:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:吐故納新--大學如何因應「特殊選才」學生之學習、適應與支援
書刊名:清華教育學報
作者:林佩錡
作者(外文):Lin, Pei-chih
出版日期:2018
卷期:35:2
頁次:頁35-69
主題關鍵詞:未來大學拾穗計畫特殊選才實驗教育學習適應Future universityGleaner's projectEarly admission without GSAT programExperimental educationLearning adjustment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:180
  • 點閱點閱:13
教育部於2015年開始試辦「特殊選才」至今已招收五屆學生,許多高等教育行政與教學人員都在關注這些「特殊選才」學生的學習需求是否能在入學後對應到學校的體制與系統。本研究以國立清華大學2015至2017年入學之54名「特殊選才」學生為例,透過9個月的參與觀察和訪談蒐集資料,分析出學生在課業、活動參與、專才提升上的表現,並整理出因制度延伸出對群體和自我感到混淆的「認同感」困難、因現存學習與評量方式的局限所產生之「學習適應」困難、因校內行政資源與支援制度未能跟上需求所導致之「專才提升」困難,提供臺灣高等教育未來發展之參考。
The Ministry of Education in Taiwan ran a pilot project named "Early Admission without GSAT" program at the National Tsing Hua University in 2015 and tried to break the myth that academic performance is the only criterion for admission to higher education. This program has been considered one of channels for formal university admission in 2018. Since the program is novel and innovative, not only in Taiwan but also in Asia, there has been constant curiosity evinced by education officers, university administrators, and professors about such students' learning, adjustment, and support systems. National Tsing Hua University as a case study has been examined from the perspective of Grounded Theory. The research methods of participant observation and interview were applied, and 54 students who joined National Tsing Hua University through the Early Admission without GSAT program from 2015 to 2017 were the participants in the study. According to the data, four kinds of students with different strengths (academic, skill, passion and perseverance, and leadership) were identified and their performance in coursework, extracurricular activity, and skill/profession were analyzed. Overall, these students experienced three major difficulties in (a) identification, due to the design of the enrollment, (b) learning adjustment, due to the assessment method employed, and (c) advancement in skill/profession, owing to the administration system structure. The research concluded with three suggestions to build a friendly environment, raise the visibility of the program, and integrate the support systems to relieve the burden on the students of the Early Admission without GSAT program.
期刊論文
1.Pittman, L. D.、Richmond, A.(2008)。University belonging, friendship quality, and psychological adjustment during the transition to college。The Journal of Experimental Education,76(4),343-362。  new window
2.楊朝祥(20091200)。臺灣高等教育的挑戰、超越與卓越。教育資料集刊,44,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王守玉、Windsor, Carol、Yates, Patsy(20120200)。簡介紮根理論研究法。護理雜誌,59(1),91-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李慶生(19941200)。中國醫藥學院運動績優生的問題與建議。國民體育季刊,23(4)=103,48-51。  延伸查詢new window
5.張宏亮(19950600)。大學運動績優保送生之學校適應探討。國民體育季刊,24(2)=105,77-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.簡茂發、洪冬桂(20090600)。大學入學考試中心的回顧與前瞻。臺灣教育,657,2-7。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉源俊(19980300)。臺灣大學入學制度的改革。教育資料文摘,41(3)=242,105-114。  延伸查詢new window
8.張殷榮(2000)。高中數學及自然科學資賦優異學生大學畢業後之追蹤調查研究結果報導。科學教育月刊,230,64-70。  延伸查詢new window
9.湯堯、蘇建洲(20130900)。臺灣家長對高等教育服務品質特性歸類與評價之研究。教育研究集刊,59(3),65-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.潘瑛如(20130900)。高等教育學生事務與輔導的新發展方向。臺灣教育評論月刊,2(9),71-75。  延伸查詢new window
11.Alshenqeeti, H.(2014)。Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review。English Linguistics Research,3(1),39-45。  new window
12.Chen, A.(2017)。Addressing Diversity on College Campuses: Changing Expectations and Practices in Instructional Leadership。Higher Education Studies,7(2),17-22。  new window
13.Ferreira, C.、Vidal, J.、Vieira, M. J.(2014)。Student Guidance and Attention to Diversity in the Processes of Quality Assurance in Higher Education。European Journal of Education,49(4),575-589。  new window
14.Qu, S. Q.、Dumay, J. C.(2011)。The Qualitative Research Interview。Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management,8(3),238-264。  new window
15.王文科、王智弘(20100600)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.駱明慶(20180300)。誰是臺大學生?(2001-2014)--多元入學的影響。經濟論文叢刊,46(1),47-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蘇錦麗(201006)。高等教育學生學習成果評估面面觀:重要利害關係人的作為。評鑑與教育品質保證:利害關係人,您關心什麼?研討會,財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會 。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李大偉、李建興、胡茹萍、黃嘉莉(2012)。我國大學多元入學制度之評估研究 (計畫編號:RDEC-RES-100-022)。臺北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉正、紀金山(2006)。多元入學,誰的多元?。  延伸查詢new window
3.Clarke, M.、Shore, A.(2001)。The role of testing and diversity in college admissions。  new window
學位論文
1.曾逸誠(2005)。大學體保生其生活適應與生涯發展關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊翠玉(1997)。運動績優生就讀大專院校一般科系之學校適應情況研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃楗翔(2003)。運動績優生與一般生適應情形之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.丘愛鈴(1998)。我國大學聯招政策變遷之研究(1954-1997)(博士論文)。國立師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇鈺茵(2014)。我國大學繁星計畫執行情形及其學生入學適應問題之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝佳男(2001)。運動之路的起伏與調適--八位體育保送生的經驗(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.詹偉新(2015)。高職工業類科技優保送科技大學學生學習適應問題與因應方式個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bogdan, R. C.、Biklen, S. K.(2007)。Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.Dey, Ian(1993)。Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-friendly guide for social scientists。Routledge。  new window
3.Schmuck, Richard A.(1997)。Practical action research for change。Arlington Heights, Illinois:IRI/SkyLight Training and Publishing, Inc.。  new window
4.Marshall, Catherine、Rossman, Gretchen B.(1995)。Designing qualitative research。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
5.American Council on Education、American Association of University Professors(2000)。Does Diversity Make a Difference? Three Research Studies on Diversity in College Classrooms。Washington, DC:American Council on Education:American Association of University Professors。  new window
6.Schensul, S. L.、Schensul, J. J.、LeCompte, M. D.(1999)。Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires。AltaMira Press。  new window
7.Glaser, Barney G.、Strauss, Anselm L.(1967)。The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research。Aldine。  new window
8.Kvale, Steinar(1996)。Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing。Sage。  new window
單篇論文
1.國立清華大學招生策略中心(2018)。全方位審查。  延伸查詢new window
2.國立清華大學學習評鑑中心(2018)。特殊選才學習成效之探究。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.大學招生委員會聯合會(2019)。多元入學方案(107學年度適用),http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/multi1.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.大學招生委員會聯合會(2019)。特殊選才(單獨招生),http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/srecruit.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.李建興(20180223)。未來大學 跟你想的不一樣,https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=42801。  延伸查詢new window
4.國立清華大學秘書處(2019)。清華首辦大學實驗教育課程、老師自由選,https://www.nthu.edu.tw/hotNews/content/868。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(2019)。大學多元入學方案的理念,http://nsdua.moe.edu.tw/index.php/about。  延伸查詢new window
6.教育部高等教育司(20171027)。107學年度特殊選才招生正式上路 提供不同才能學生升學便利通,https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&sms=169B8E91BB75571F&s=BBC8CF8B9991946A。  延伸查詢new window
7.許稚維(20181105)。大學特殊選才招生 108學年度名額近倍增,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/201811050180.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
8.馮靖惠(20180919)。清華首辦大學實驗教育 學生自己訂課程、選老師,https://udn.com/news/story/7266/3375469。  延伸查詢new window
9.盧諭緯(20160910)。清華大學--控掘分數以外的含光珍珠,http://www.news.high.edu.tw/feature_story/content.php?cid=136&did=290。  延伸查詢new window
10.Fine, E.,Handelsman, J.(2010)。Benefits and challenges of diversity in academic settings,https://wiseli.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/662/2018/11/Benefits_Challenges.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brittain, J. C.、Landy, B.(2014)。Reducing reliance on testing to promote diversity。The future of affirmative action: New paths to higher education diversity after Fisher v. University of Texas。New York, NY:Century Foundation Press。  new window
2.Eccles, J. S.、Roeser, R. W.(2003)。Schools as developmental contexts。Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology: Blackwell handbook of adolescence。Malden, MA:Blackwell。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE