:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:四位西洋思想家的教育改革論點--教育視野之擴展
書刊名:師大學報. 教育類
作者:葉坤靈 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Kuen-ling
出版日期:1998
卷期:43:2
頁次:頁1-19
主題關鍵詞:坤體良教育改革康德斯賓塞懷海德Marcus Fabius QuintilianEducational reformImmanuel KantHerbert SpencerAlfred North Whitehead
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:13
     美國教育哲學家赫欽斯(R.M. Hutchins)認為偉著(great books)的價值之一是開 啟視野,因為這些書保存下來的原因是每個時代的人們,因受這些榜樣的鼓舞而得到提昇。 值此臺灣大肆推動教育改革之際,從傳統中採擷偉大思想家對教育改革相關問題的識見,應 能得到若干啟示並避免嘗試錯誤。 本文針對臺灣目前棘手的教育問題,如 1.對教育改革缺乏較正確的認識; 2.「教育目的」不明確; 3.學科本位主義太濃; 4.「在家自行教育」的想法否定學校教育的功能等四項。 擇取康德的「開明專家主導致教育實驗」教育改革觀點;懷海德的「博雅的專才」教育目的 論;斯賓塞論述「何種知識有最有價值」時,以完全生活的五種活動做為課程內容;及坤體 良論「家庭教育與學校教育的優劣」中,肯定學校教育有家庭教育無法達到的教育效果等主 題,探討思想家這些問題的看法及教育改革的措施,做為臺灣進行教育改革的參考。
     R. M. Hutchins (1899-1977), a contemporary American philosopher, argued that 「 great books have endured because men in every era have been lifted beyond themselves by the inspiration of their examples. 」 At this moment, our government is putting enormous efforts in ameliorating the educational environment. Moreover, educational reform, which should be founded on the basis of sound theories, is essentially a piece-meal process and therefore takes time. Under such circumstances, one of the best ways to make the educational reform mors efficient is to adopt the insights of educational philoso- phies from the great thinkers. These insights are embodied in their great books. This paper aims at discussing how to cope with some of the urgent educational problems in Taiwan in the light of the philosophies proposed by four great thinkers concerning educational reform: 1. Kant's doctrines of educational reform; 2. Whitehead's emphasis of 「 the general specialist 」 as the aim of education; 3. Spencer's discussion on 「 What knowledge is of most worth? 」 ; Quintillian's proposal on 「 the comparative merits of private and public instruction 」.
期刊論文
1.Hutchins, R. M.(1941)。Ethics, Politics and Education。School and Society,54(1379),257。  new window
2.Schilling, Marie(1986)。Education and Liberal Education: A Critique of Paul Hirst。Curricutum Studies,18,1-16。  new window
3.俞懿嫻(19970700)。懷海德[A. N. White-Head]的教育思想。東海哲學研究集刊,4,115-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃嘉雄(1995)。轉化社會結構的課程理論(博士論文)。國立師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kazamias, A. M.(1966)。Herbert Spencer on education。New York, NY:Teachers College Press, Columbia University。  new window
2.Gibson, R.(1984)。Structuralism and education。London:Hodder and Stoughton。  new window
3.Kant, Immanuel、Churton, Annette(1960)。Education。University of Michigan Press。  new window
4.林玉体(1995)。西洋教育思想史。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bernstein, B.(1990)。The structuring of pedagogic Discourse: Class, Codes and Control。London:New York:Routledge。  new window
6.Quintilian, Marcus Fabius、Smail, William M.(1938)。Quintilian on Education。N.T.:Teachers College Press, Columbia University。  new window
7.Whitehea, Alfred North(1983)。The Aims of Education and other Essays。台北:雙葉書局。  new window
8.Brubacher, J. S.、林玉体(1978)。西洋教育史。臺北:教育文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Dewey, John(1966)。Democracy and education。The Free Press。  new window
10.Brubacher, John S.(1966)。A history of the problems of education。New York:Mcgraw-Hill。  new window
11.張春興(1994)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hirst, P. H.(1975)。Liberal education and the Nature of Knowledge。Knowledge and the Curriculum。London:R. K. P.。  new window
2.楊深坑(1997)。理性的冒險、生命的行動與主體性的失落與拯救。溝通理性、生命情懷與教育過程--哈伯瑪斯的溝通理性與教育。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE