:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:課程統整之理論性研究及其對九年一貫社會領域課程綱要(草案)之啟示
作者:陳新轉
作者(外文):Shin-tsuang Chen
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:黃炳煌
詹志禹
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2000
主題關鍵詞:課程統整分科課程學科科目curriculum integrationsubject curriculumdisciplinessubject s
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:58
摘 要
論文題目:課程統整之理論性研究及其對九年一貫社會領域課程綱要
(草案)之啟示。
研 究 者:陳新轉
指導教授:黃炳煌教授‧詹志禹教授
所屬學校:國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文
畢業年度:民國89年8月
本研究以國民中小學課程統整為範圍,旨在探討「課程統整」概念之涵義、理論基礎、課程統整的理由、統整模式、實施原則,以及與課程統整相屬的觀念,並根據理論探討的結果,評析「九年一貫社會領域課程綱要草案」。經過文獻分析及概念分析,最後得到的發現如下:
第一,課程統整的涵義。從歷史的角度探討課程統整的演變,本文發現近代課程統整概念源於十九世紀之「學問的統整」、「社會的統整」、「學習者(人格)的統整」及「學習的統整」的思想。到了進步主義教育思想盛行的時代,課程統整已經發展成為統合學習者、知識及社會三者的課程理論,其形式與內涵都相當完備,二次大戰後迄今,由於課程科學化、概念重建、人本主義以及後現代思潮的影響,課程統整的內涵從知識的統整逐漸擴展為統整知識、學習者(自我意義、認知結構、社會文化、生活經驗)、社會(社會所期望之價值、能力與公民素質)的課程設計方法或理論。
第二,課程統整與「科際整合」的概念有關,但不宜視之為「一而二,二而一」的關係。
第三,教育人員對課程統整的認識,除了「找出課程組織核心」、「打破學科界限」、「組織有意義、統整的學習內容」之外,更要有課程統整乃促成知識與學習者之自我意義、認知結構、生活經驗及社會文化相聯結的思考,因為課程統整最後乃是統整在學習者身上。
第四、了解課程統整的涵義之後,必須掌握課程統整的特性及正確觀念,才能架接從「認識」到「實踐」的一致性。
第五、當代課程統整的理論依據,從課程統整概念的演進過程來看,至少包括杜威教育哲學、認知學習理論、建構論、人本主義心理學、腦相容學習理論、多元智力理論及後現代課程思潮。
第六,從課程改革的立場而論,實施課程統整需要「好理由」,但是從「功能」層面出發,往往遭到反對者質疑沒有充分的證據、並不比傳統分科課程優越、或者與課程無關而是教師專業能力的問題。因此論課程統整的理由應從「學理」與「理想」層面著手,找出當今教育上必須努力或值得努力,而課程統整在實踐上要比分科課程具「優越性」的目標,做為實施課程統整的理由,本文將這些理由分成教育方面、學習方面、社會統整及適應社會變遷方面、反應時代特性方面等四個範疇。
第七,課程統整設計必須能帶給學生獲得以主題為核心的完整的學習,以及提高思考層次,從這種標準而論,有些統整型課程其實只是分科課程的變形,但並不表示統整性越高越有價值,這必須視課程主題及學習目標而定,因此設計統整型課程必同時考慮課程主題的性質與統整模式的功能,本研究探討主題之選擇與課程組織原則,並結合主題的學術性強弱及學科界限之濃淡這兩個向度,將統整型課程的設計模式分成:概念性多科並列統整、概念性學科互動統整、主題性多科並列統整、主題性學科互動統整、主題性超學科統整等五種類型,各舉實例說明。
第八,推行課程統整應遵循某些必要的原則,也需要配合措施。原則方面本研究指出主題處理的原則、課程組織原則;配合措施則從建立全校性課程藍圖;「教」、「學」與「評量」的一致性措施;統整的校園文化;充分的行政支援;以及與課程統整相屬的觀念等方面討論之。
第九,關於「九年一貫社會領域課程綱要(草案)」之評析,本研究根據研究結果,採取「支持統整而求其完美」的立場,針對課程綱要與「課程統整」有關的陳述加以評析。發現其統整取向是正確的,但仍有若干待補強的地方:
(一)缺少對於「追求統整」從「認知」到「實踐」所需的觀念、原則與要件之陳述。
(二)缺少社會領域課程非統整不可的基本理由。
(三)社會領域目標仍有進一步統整的可能。
(四)九大主題軸僅顧及社會領域知識統整,導致經過轉化的「分段能力指標」過於向知識學習,因而出現能力指標在各學習階段分配不均,甚至從缺的現象。
(五)「實施要點」內容不敷所需,也需要調整其定位。
最後本研究依據前述之發現,針對「如何實踐課程統整」、「九年一貫社會領域課程綱要(草案)」之修訂,以及後續研究三方面提出建議。
關鍵字:課程統整、分科課程、學科、科目
A Theoretical Research of Curriculum Integration and The Analysis of The 1-9 Social Studies Curriculum Programs from The Perspective of Curriculum Integration
Shin-tsuang Chen
Abstract
The purposes of this study are: (1)to explore the meanings, theoretical foundations, rationales , models, principles, character and relevant ideas of curriculum integration; and (2)to analyze what the “1-9 Social Study Curriculum Program “involves in curriculum integration. Through the methods of literature review and concept analysis , the researcher has had the following main findings :
1. Tracing the changing of the concept of curriculum integration(CI), we know the original thinkings of CI were discipline-integration, society-integration, personal-integration and learning integration in the nineteen century. During the progressivism era, curriculum integration had fully developed both in pattern and content. After World War II, the concept of CI affected by Curriculum-Scientific movement, Reconceptualists movement, Humanistic Psychology and Post-modern Curriculum Thinking, the concept of CI has grown into a curriculum design theory and method which bring knowledge, society and learner(cognitive schema, social —culture, self-signification )together.
2. It is not true to think “interdisciplinary” is equal to “curriculum integration”.
3. If teachers want to know CI completely, they will recognize the CI not only to find out “core”, to break the discipline barriers, and to organize whole experience, etc. but also to facilitate the integrated knowledge, society and the learner.
4. According to CI concept evolution, the theory foundations of CI included John Dewey educational thinking, Cognitive Learning Theory, Constructivism Humanistic Psychology, Brain-Compatible Learning Theory, Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory and Post-modern curriculum thinking at least.
5. The rationales for CI to be practiced , including four major aspects: the reasons of education, the reasons of learning, the reasons of social integration and social changing, as well as the reasons of time-changing necessity .
6. Although most of experts believe that there is a continuum along which progressively more and more connections are made, but the growth toward a more progressive state may not be better; it may be just complexities. So, design an integrated curriculum must consider both curriculum theme and model. In this study, provided five curriculum integration models: conceptual multidisciplinary approach, conceptual interdisciplinary approach, thematic multidisciplinary approach, thematic multidisciplinary approach, and thematic transdisciplinary approach.
7. To carry out curriculum integration idea ,we need to hold some disciplines and create supportive conditions which are to build curriculum mapping, to make teaching, learning and assessment in alignment, to grow up an integrative culture in a school and integrative idea in staff development.
8. The “1-9 Social Studies curriculum Program” is a progressive curriculum plan , but something with curriculum integration have to supply:
(1) to add some explanation to practice.
(2) to add some rationale to implement.
(3) to integrate the social curriculum objects more.
(4) to expand the curriculum theme content to include both knowledge and abilities elements which have to be learned for the students in compulsory education level .
(5) to adjust and supply some “ implement guidelines ”.
At last, this study draws some suggestions about how the curriculum integration idea to be practiced, the curriculum program to be adjusted and what the next study step is in the future.
Key word: curriculum integration, subject curriculum, subject , disciplines
中文部分
王仲孚(民80)。對於國一公民、歷史、地理合併為「社會科」的質疑。人文及
社會學科教學通訊,2(1),212~214。
王岳川(民81)。後現代主義文化研究。台北:淑馨。
王秀雲(民88)。向社區學習─以鄉土教育為切入點的「社會科課程整合機制」
營造歷程。發表於國立台北師範學院主辦:1999亞太地區整合型社會科課
程國際研討會。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(民85)。教育改革總諮議報告書。
光復書局編(民81)。大美白科全書(25)。台北:光復。
臼井嘉一著、楊思偉譯(1998)。社會科理論與融合課程之研究。商鼎。
吳家瑩、郭守芬(民88)。「國民教育階段九年一貫課程綱要」訂定之源起與過
程。台灣教育,581,48~57。
何縕琪(民89)。國小教師主題統整教學歷程之分析暨合作省思專業成長之建
構。國立台灣師大學教育心理與輔導研究研究所博士論文。
余安邦(民88)。夢中情人─九年一貫課程。教育資料與研究,26,19-21。new window
李坤崇、歐慧敏(民89)。統整課程理念與實務。台北:心理。
李聰超 (民88)。整合性鄉土教學活動設計探討─以陽明山為例。發表於國立
台北師範學院主辦:1999亞太地區整合型社會科課程國際研討會。
李稚勇(1998)。關於開設中學綜合社會科課程的思考與構想。課程、教材、教
法,(1998)9, 19~24。
沈清松(民80)。談科際整合。教師天地,民80/6,頁34~37。
杜威原著(1992)。經驗與教育。台北:五南。
松本元(1995)。人類的腦是受感情支配的學習型電腦。牛頓雜誌,151,頁
74~75。
林生傳(民88a)。九年一貫課程與教學創新。收錄中華民國教材研究發展學會
主編(民88)。邁向課程新紀元。台北:康軒。
林生傳(民88b)。九年一貫課程的社會學評析。收錄於中華民國課程與教學學
會主編(民88)。九年一貫課程之展望。台北:揚智。
林怡秀(民88)。國民小學課程統整模式之究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究
所碩士論文。未出版。
林清江、蔡清田(民86)。國民中小學課程發展共同原則。嘉義國立中正大學。
教育部國教司委託專案。
林清江(民88)。國民教育九年一貫課程規劃簡報。教育部。
林達森(民88)。論析統整性課程及其對一貫課程的啟示。教育研究資訊,1999,new window
7(4),97~116。
林寶山譯(民78)。民主主義與教育。台北:五南。
林寶山、康春枝譯(民79)。學校與社會‧兒童與課程。台北:五南。
邵瑞珍譯(民84)。教育的歷程:布魯納教育論著選之一。台北:五南。
施添福(民80)。國中社會科分科與合科的論述。人文與社會學科教學通訊,2(1),
215~226。
周佩儀(民86a )。後現代思潮衝擊下的教育研究。教育研究集刊,頁48-74。
周佩儀(民86b)。後現代課程的理論基礎。教育資料與研究,17,58~62。new window
周淑卿(民88)。論九年一貫課程的「統整」問題。收錄於中華民國課程與教學
學會主編(民88)。九年一貫課程之展望。台北:揚智。
姜 來(1996)。綜合課程建設的幾個基本問題。課程、教材、教法,(1996)10,
1~5。
柯華葳(民88)。教育的心理學。收錄於教育科學國際化或本土化。台北:揚智,
頁563-583。
高建新(民87)。我國實施社會科課程統整的若干經驗與實驗。教育研究雙月刊,
62,12~17。
徐宗林(民77)。西洋教育思想史。台北:文景
黃永和(民88)。課程統整的理論與方式之探討。新竹師院學報,12,231~260。new window
黃光雄(民85)。課程與教學。台北:師大書苑。
黃宏偉(1995)。整合概念及其哲學意蘊。學術月刊,(1995)9,12-17。
黃甫全(1996)。整合課程與課程整合論。課程、教材、教法,(1996)10,6~11。
黃炳煌(民85)。試為我國建立一適切可行的課程發展模式。收於黃炳煌著。教
育改革─理念、策略與措施。台北:心理。
黃炳煌等(民86)。九年一貫社會科課程綱要之研究。教育部研究專案。國立政
治大學教育系。
黃炳煌(民88a)。邁向二十一世紀的臺灣社會科課程改革。收錄中華民國教材
研究發展學會主編。邁向課程新紀元。台北:康軒。
黃炳煌(民88b)。談「課程統整」--以國民教育九一貫為例。本文發表於國立中
正大學主辦(民88)。「新世紀的教育展望」學術研討會。
黃炳煌、詹志禹(民88)。九年一貫社會領域課程綱要(草案)。教育部。
黃政傑(民80a)。以科際整合促進課程統。教師天地, 80年6, 頁38~43。
黃政傑(民81)。課程設計。台北:東華。
黃 葳(1997)。論當代課程結構的整合化。課程、教材、教法,(1997)6,!~4。
黃訓慶譯(民85)。後現代主義。台北;立緒。
黃譯瑩(民87)。課程統整之意義探究與模式建構。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:
人文及社會科學,8(4),616~633。
黃譯瑩(民88)。課程統整相關問題探究及社會領域統整課程示例。本文發表於
國立台北師範學院主辦:1999亞太地區整合型社會科課程統整國際研討
會。
教育部(民87)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。教育部。
許信雄(民88)。課程統整的基本認識。教師天地,100,58~65。
張文軍(1998)。後現代教育。台北:揚智。
張春興(民83)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
陸正威(民88)。臺北縣永和國小教師進行整合型社會科課程設計與教學之行動
研究。發表於國立台北師範學院主辦:1999亞太地區整合型社會科課程國
際研討會。
陳伯璋(民82)。「國民小學社會科課程統整架構研究」。教 育部研究專案。
陳伯璋(民88a)。九年一貫課程的理念與理論分析。收錄於中華民國教材研究new window
發 學會主編(民88):邁向課程新紀元(上)。台北:康軒。
陳伯璋(民88b)。九年一貫新課程綱要修訂的背景及內涵。教育研究資訊,7(1),new window
1~13。
陳國川(民87)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要評析。地友,41,4~6。
陳新轉(民88)。腦相容之社會科課程設計理念究。發表於國立台北師範學院主
辦:1999亞太地區整合型社會科課程國際研究會。
陳曉萍、施憶(1998)。初中設置綜合理科探析。課程、教材、教法,(1998),6,
26-30。
郭重吉(民85)。建構論--科學哲學的省思。教育研究雙月刊,49,16~24。new window
單文經(民79)。統整教育─美國中小學課程的新猷。收錄於中華民國比較教育
學會主編。各國中小學課程比較研究。台北:師大書苑。
彭明輝(民88)。社會領域的課程規劃與內容。邁向課程新紀元。台北:康軒。
游家政(民87)。建構主義取向課程設計的評析。課程與教學季刊,1(3),頁31-new window
46。
游家政(民88a)。再造「國民教育九年一貫課程」的圖像─課程綱要的規劃構
想與可能問題。教育資料與研究,26,4~18。
游家政(民88b)。九年一貫課程─學校課程銜接與統整的推動與落實。台灣教new window
育,581,37~42。
葉煬彬(民83)。國民中學社會科課程架構研究。台灣省中等教師研習會。
葉學志(民74)。教育哲學。台北:三民。
葉興華(民89)。我國國小推行課程統整之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究博new window
士論文。未出版。
詹志禹(民85):認識與知識:建構論VS. 接受觀。教育研究雙月刊,49, 25~38。
詹志禹(民88)。九年一貫社會科課程綱要草案背後的哲學觀。教育研究,54,new window
54~60。
新陸書局編(民57)。牛津英英‧英漢雙解辭典。台北:新陸書局。
歐用生(民87)。後現代社會的課程改革。收錄於歐用生、楊文慧著。新世紀的new window
改革。台北:五南。
歐用生(民88a)。從課程統整的概念評九年一貫課程。教育研究資訊,7(1),頁new window
22~33。
歐用生(民88b)。九年一貫課程之「潛在課程」評析。收錄中華民國教材研究
發展學會主編。邁向課程新紀元。台北:康軒。
楊坤原(民85)。統整科學課程之論題與趨勢。科學教育月刊,190,13-22。
楊洲松(民87)。李歐塔後現代知識論述及其教育意義。國立台灣師範大學教育new window
研究所博士論文。未出版。
楊洲松(民88)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要之哲學分析─後現代的觀點。收new window
錄於中華民國課程與教學學會主編(民88)。九年一貫課程之展望。台北:
揚智。
楊家興(民84)。情境教學理論與超媒體學習環境。教學科技與媒體,22,40~48。new window
楊國賜(民66)。現代教育思潮。台北:黎明。
楊深坑(民76)。從科學理論的發展論教育研究之科學整合趨勢。收錄於國立台new window
灣師範大學主編:中華民國七十六年科際整合研討會論文集第三冊,頁
85~102。
楊愛程(1998)。論課程的綜合化。收錄於中國人文社會科學博碩士文集‧教育
學卷,1998。浙江教育出版社。
鄭晉昌(民83)。學徒制式教學軟體發展研究。行政院國家科學委員會轉題研
究計劃成果報告。NSC82-0111-S-032-002。
劉德勝(民76)。小學社會科課程結構與內涵。高雄:復文。
蔡清田(民88)。九年一貫課程─改革之行動探究。台灣教育,581, 9~21。
韓復智(民80)。當前歷史教育的危機。中央日報,80年2月7~9日,文教新聞
版。
韓復智(民82)。對當前中國歷史教育平議。菁莪,5(1),3~10。
簡馨瑩(民88)。上學途中的便利商店─以社會科為主軸之統整學習活動。發表
於國立台北師範學院主辦:1999亞太地區整合型社會科課程國際研討會。
鍾啟泉(民80)。現代課程論。台北:五南。
薜梨真(民87)。統整課程活動設計。高雄:復文。
英文部分
Ackerman, D. (1989). Intellectual and Practical for Successful Curriculum
Integration. In Jacbs, H. H. (Ed). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and
Implementation. ASCD: Alexandria.
Ahier, J. (1995). Hidden Controversies in Two Cross-Curricular Themes. In J. Ahier
& A. Ross(Eds.), The Social Subjects Within The Curriculum: Children’s
Social Learning in The National Curriculum(pp.139-156). London: The
Falmers Press.
Aikin, W. (1942). The Story of The Eight Year Study. New York: Harper & Row.
Anderson, R. (1984). Some reflections on the acquisition of Knowledge.
Educational Researcfer, 13, pp.5-10.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and Curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Armbruster, B. & Andersons, T.(1984).Structures of explanation in history
textbools or so what if Governor Stanford missed the spike and hit the
rail. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16, pp.181-194.
Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. ASCD. (李平譯
(1997):經營多元智慧─展開以學生為中心的教學。台北:遠流。)
Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational Psychology: A cognizative view. New York:
Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
Barab, S. A & Landa, A. (1997). Designing Effective Interdisciplinary Anchors.
Educational Leadership, March 1997, pp.52~55.
Beane, J. A. (1990). A Middle School Curriculum: From Rhetoric to Reality.
Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
Beane, J.A. (1991). The Middle School: The Natural Home of Integrated
Curriculum. Educational Leadership Oct 1991, 9~13.
Beane, J. (1992). Creating an Integrative Curriculum: Making the Connections
NASSP Bulletin, Nov, 1992, p.46-54.
Beane, J. A. (1995a). Toward a Coherent Curriculum. ASCD, Alexandria,
Virginia.
Beane, J. (1995b). CurriculumIntegration and The Disciplines of Knowledge. Phi
Delta Kappan, April, pp.616~22.
Beane, J. (1995c).How Fares the Currciulum Integration Movement. Presentation at
the National Middle School Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum Integration─Designing the Core of Democratic
Education. N.Y.: Teacher College Press.
Bergstrom, K. L. (1998). Are We Missing the Point about Curriculum Integration?
Middle School Journal, March 1998, pp. 28~37.
Boomer, G. (1992). Negotiating the Curriculum. In G. Boomer, N. Lester, C. Onore.,
& J. Cook(Eds.), Negotiating the Curriculum(pp. 4-14). London: Falmer.
Brady, L. (1992). Curriculum Development (4th ed.), New York, Prentice Hall.
Brandt, R. (1997). On Using Knowledge about Our Brain: A Conversation with Bob
Sylwester. Educational Leadership, Mar/ 1997. Pp.16~19.
Bransford, J. & Vye, N. (1989). A perspective on cognitive research and its
implications for instruction. In L. Resnick, & L. Klopfer(Eds.), Toward the
thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Washington, D.C.: ASCD.
Bridges, P. D(1999). Curriculum Integration: Reflections on the English
Experience. 本文發表於國立中正大學主辦(民88)「新世紀的教育展望」學
術研討會。
Brophy, J. (1990). Teaching Social Studies for Understanding and Higher Order
Thinking Applications. Elementary School Journal, 90, pp.351-417.
Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). A Caveat: Curriculum Integration isn’t Always a
Good Idea. Educational Leadership, 49, 66-67.
Brown, J. S., Colluns, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and The Culture of
Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32~42.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1993). Stolen Knowledge. Educational Technology,
33(3), 10~15.
Bruner, J. S.(1960). The Process of Education. New York: Vintage Books.(邵瑞珍譯
(民84):教育的歷程。台北:五南。)
Bruner, J. S. (1964). The Course of Cognitive Thought. American Psychologist. 19,
1~5.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. New York: Norton.
Bruner, J. S. (1971).The Process of Education Reconsidered. In Robert R.
Leeper(Ed.), Dare to Care/Dare to Act: Racism and Education(pp.19-30).
Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1994)Making Connections─Teaching and the Human
Brain. New York:Anddison-Wesley.
Caine, R., Caine, G. (1997). Education on the Edge of Possibility. ERIC ED408654
Caine, R., Caine, G., & Crowell, S. (1994). Midshifts. A Brain-Based Process for
Restructuring Schools and Renewing Education. Tucson, Arizona: Zephyr.
Calvin, W. (1996a). The Cerebral Code: Think a Thought in the Mosaics of the
Mind. MA: Bradford Book.
Calvin, W. (1996b). How Brains Think: Evolving Intelligence Then and Now. New
York: Basic Books.(黃敏偉‧陳雅茜譯(1997):大腦如何思考。台北;天下)
Capron, B. J. (1972).University of Minnesota Project Social Studies. Social
Education, 36, 758-759.
Charbonneau, M., & Reider, B. (1995). The Integrated Elementary Classroom: A
Developmental Model of Education for the 21st Century. Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
Checkley, K. (1997). The First Seven…and The Eight. Educational Leadership, Sep
1997. Pp.8-13.
Chi, M, T. H., Hutchinson, J. & Robin, A. (1989). How Inferences about novel
Domain-related Concepts Can be Constrained by Structured Knowledge.
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, pp.27-62.
Colliar, S. & Nolan, K. (1997). Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions of Integration.
ERIC ED 405328.
Combs, A.W. (1981). Humanistic Education: Too Tender For a Tough World ? Phi
Delta Kappan, 62,446~449.
Connole, R. R. (1937). A Study of the Concept of Integration in Present-day
Curriculum Making. Washington, DC.: The Catholic University of America.
Cook, G. E., & Martinello, M, L.(1994). Topics and Themes in Interdisciplinary
Curriculum. Middle School Jounral, January 1994, pp.40~44.
Cross, B.E. (1995).The Case for a Culturally Coherent Curriculum. In James M.
Beane. (Ed). Toward a Coherent Curriculum. Alexandria, ASCD.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press.
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
Dewey, J. (1971). The School and the Society and The Child and the Curriculum.
(林寶山、康春枝譯(民79)。學校與社會‧兒童與課程。台北:五南。)
Doll, W.E. (1986). Prigogine: A New Sense of Order, A New Curriculum. Theory
into Practice, 25(1), 10-16.
Doll, W. E. Jr. (1989). Foundations for A Post-Modern Curriculum. Journal of
Curriculum Studies, 21(3), 243-253.
Doll, W. E.Jr.(1993a). Curriculum Possibilities in a Post-Future. Journal of
Curriculum and Supervision, 8(4), 277-292.
Doll, W. E, Jr. (1993b). A Post-modern Perspective on Curriculum. New York.:
Teachers College Press.(王紅宇譯(民88):後現代課程觀。台北:桂冠。)
Drake, S. M.(1993). Planning Integrated Curriculum: The Call to Adventure.
Alexandria, VA.: ASCD.
Drake, S. M.(1998). Creating Integrated Curriculum: Proven Ways to Increase
Student Learning. California Corwin Press.
Drake, S. M., Bebbington, J., Laksman, S., Mackie, P., Maynes, N., & Wayne, L.
(1992). Developing an Integrated Curriculum Using the Story Model. Toronto:
University of Toronto Press.
Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group
Selection. New York: Basic Books.
Edelman, G. H. (1989). The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of
Consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
Edelman, G. H. (1992). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New
York: Basic Books.
Erickson, H. L.(1995). Strring the head, heart, and soul: Redefining
curriculum and instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Espinoza, Pizarro, Rafeal, A. (1993). Exploring Integrative Curriculum for More
Effective Learning by Primary Students in Costa Rica. ERIC ED363420.
Fogarty, R. (1991). The Mindful School How to Integrate The Curricula. IL.:
IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.
Fogarty, R., & Stoehr, J. (1995). Integrating Curricula With Multiple
Intelligences─Teams, Themes, and Threads. IRI/Skylight.
Fredericks, A.(1992). The Integrated Curriculum. Englewood, Colo.: Teacher Ideas
Press.
Freeman, C. C., & Sokoloff, H. J. (1994). Toward a Theory of Thematic Curricula:
Constructing New Learning Environments for Theachers and Learners. ERIC
Ed376929.
Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New
York: Basic Books.(莊安祺/譯(民87):7種IQ。台北:時報。)
Gardner, H. (1991). The Unschooled Mind. How Children Think and How Schools
Should Teach. New York: Basic Books.(陳瓊森‧汪益/譯(民87):超越教化的
心靈。台北:遠流。)
Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on Multiple Intelligences: Myths and Messages. Phi
Delta Kappan, 77, 3. 200-203, 206-209.
George, P. S. (1996). The Integrated Curriculum: A Reality Check. Middle School
Journal, Sep, 1996, pp.12~19.
Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social Construction and the Educational Process. In L. P.
Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education( Pp.17-37).
Glatthorn, A. A. & Foshay. (1991). Integrated Curriculum. In Lewy, A. (Ed).
The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
Gleitman, H. (1991). Psychology(3rd). (洪蘭譯(民88):心理學。台北:遠流。)
Glover, J., Ronning, R. & Bruning, R. (1990). Cognitive Psychology for Teachers.
New York: Macmillan.
Goleman, D.(1995). Emotional Intelligence. (張美惠譯(民85):EQ。台北:時報)
Harris, D. E., & Carr, J. F. (1996). How to Use Standards in The Classroom.
Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hart, L. (1983). Human Brain, Human Learning. New York: Longman.
Hirst, P. H. (1974). Knowledge and Curriculum. London: R. K. P.
Hopkins, L. & Armentrout, W. D. (1931). Principles of Integration. In Five Unifying
Factors in American Education, Ninth Yearbook of the Department of
Superintendence of the National Education Association(pp. 367-378).
Washinghton, Dc: National Education Association.
Hopkins, L. T. (1937). Integration: Its Meaning and Application. New York, NY:
D. Appleton-Century.
Hopkins, L. T. (1941). Interaction: The Democratic Process. Boston: D.C. Heath.
Huang , Y.Y. (1995). Teacher’s Experience and Reflecting on Curriculum
Integration as An Approach to Teacher Change. The Ohio State University.
Unpress.
Isaacson, R. L.(1982). The Limbic System( 2ed). New York: Plenum Press.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation.
VA.: ASCD.
Jacobs, H. H. (1997). Mapping the Big Picture: Integrating Curriuclum &
Assessment K-12. Alexandria, VI.: ASCD
Janzen, R. (1995). The Social Studies Conceptual Dilenma: Six Contemporary
Approaches. The .Social Studies, May/June 1995, 134~140.
John-Steiner, V. & Mahnn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and
development: A Vygotskian Framework, Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4),
pp. 191-206.
Joyce , W. W., and Others, (1991). Scope and Sequence, Goals and Objectives:
Effects on Social Studies. In J. M. Shaver(Ed.), Handbook of Research on
Social Studies Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan.
Kliebard, H. M. (1986). The Struggle for The American Curriculum: 1893-1958.
Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kline, p. (1988). The Everyday Genius: Restoring Children's Natural Joy of
Learning, and Your's Too. VA: Great Ocean. (吳運如譯(民86):天天‧天才。
台北:世茂。)
Kovalik, S., & Olsen, K. (1997). ITI: The Model. Integrated Thematic
Instruction(3rd). Kent, WA: Book for Educator, Inc.
Lauritzen, C., & Jaeger, M. (1997). Integrating Learning through Story : The
Narrative Curriculum. Albany, NY: Delmar.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral
Participation. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lewy, A. (1991). The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, Oxford,
Pergamon Press.
Liston, D. (1995). Basic Guidelines for Brain-Compatible Classrooms: Theory to
Praxis. ERIC ED385201
Lloyd, D.(1995). Education's New Poke-Sitter: Brain-Compatible Theory and
Integrated Thematic Instruction. ERIC Ed383148
Lopach, J. J. & Luckowski, J. A.(1989). The Rediscovery of Memory in
Teaching Democratic Values. Social Education, 52(6),1989. 18-23.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodernism Condition: A Report on Knowledge.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
MacLean, P. D. (1978). A Mind of Three Minds: Educating the Triune Brain. In
Education and the Brain, Jeanne Chall and Allan Mirsky(Ed.) , pp. 308~342.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
*Mason, T. C. (1996). Integtated Curricular: Potential and Problems. Journal of
Teacher Education, September-October, 47(4), pp.263-270.
McLellan, H. (1993a). Situated Learning in Focus: Introduction to Special Issue.
Educational Technology, 33(3), 5~9.
McLellan, H. (1993b). Evaluation in a Situated Learning Environment.
Educational Technology, 33(3), 39~45.
Means , B., & Knapp, M.S. (1997). Cognitive approaches to teaching advance skills
to educationlly disadvantaged students. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 282-289.
Meeth, L. R. (1978). Interdisciplinary Studies: Integration of Knowledge and
Experience. Change 10, 6~9.
Meinbach, A., Rothlein, L., & Fredericks, A. (1995). The Complete Guide to
Thematic units: Creating the Integrated Curriculum. Norwood, Mass.:
Christopher-Gordon.
Nagel, N.G. (1996). Learning Through Real-World Problems Solving: The Power of
Integrative Teaching. ERIC ED394948
National Council for the Social Studies(NCSS). (1994). Curriculum Standards for
Social Studies: Expectation of Excellence. Washington, DC: National Council
for the Social Studies. (陳麗華、王鳳敏譯(民85) 。美國社會科課程標準。
教育部編印。)
National Science Teachers Association(NSTA). (1993a).The Science, Technology,
Society Movement .
National Science Teachers Association(NSTA). (1993b). Scope, Sequence,
Coordination of Scondary School Science(Vol. 1) The Content Core: A Guide
for Curriculum Designs.
North Carolina State Department of Public Instruction. (1987). Integrated Learning:
What─Why─How. ERIC ED 290759.
Ohlhausen, M. & Roller, C. (1988). The Operation of Text Structure and
Content Schemata in Isolation and in Interaction. Reading Research
Quarterly, 23, 70-88.
Palmer, J. (1991). Planning Wheels: Turn Curriculum Around. Educational
Leadership, Oct, 1991,60.
Pate, P. E., McGinnis, K., and Homestead, E.(1995). Creating Coherence Through
Curriculum Integration. In James M. Beane(1995. Ed.).Toward a Coherent
Curriculum. Alexandria, VA.: ASCD.
Pinar, W. (1975). Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA:
McCutchan.
Prigogine, I. (1980). From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical
Sciences. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Oder Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with
Nature. New York: Bantam Books.(曾慶宏等譯(1987)。從混沌到有序:人
與自然的新對話。上海:譯文。)
Relan, A., & Kimpston, R. (1991). Curriculum Integration: A Critical Analysis
of Practical and Conceptual Issues, ERIC ED 334677.
Ross, A., & Olsen, K. (1993). The Way We Were …The Way We Can Be: A Vision
for the Middle School through Integrated Thematic. ERIC ED 371906.
Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. In R.
Spiro, B. Bruce & W. Brewer(Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading
comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rust, V. D. (1991). Postmodernism and Its Comparative Education Implications.
Comparative Education Review, 35(4), PP. 610-626.
Ryan, C. D. (1994). Authentic Assessment. Westminister, Calif.: Teacher Created
Materials.
Schubert, W. H. (1995). Toward Lives Worth Living and Sharing: Historical
Perspective on Curriculum Coherence . In Beane, J. A.(ed. ). Toward a
Coherent Curriculum. ASCD, Alexandria, Virginia.
Shaffer, J. B.(1978). Humanistic Psychology. NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
Slavin, R. E. (1988). Educational Psychology: Theory into Practice. Englewood
Cliffs. N.J: Prentice Hall.
Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. N.Y.: Garland.
Sylwester, R. (1995). A Celebration of Neurons: An Educator’s Guide to human
Brain. ASCD,Alexandria, Virginia.
Taba, H. (1966). Teaching Strageies and Cognitive Functioning in Elementary
School Children(Cooperative research Project). Washington,DC: Office of
Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare; San Francisco:
San Francisco State College.
Taba, H., Durkin, M. C., Fraenkel, J. R., & McNaughton, A. H. (1971). A Teacher's
Handbook to Elementary Social Studies Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Tanner, D, (1989). A brief Historical Perspective of the Struggle for an
Integrative Curriculum. Educational Horizons, Fall 1989, 7~11.
Tchudi, S.(1991). Travels Across the Curriculum: Models for Interdisciplinary
Learning. Richmond Hill, Ont.: Scholastic.
Tchudi, S. & Lafer, S. (1996). The Interdisciplinary Teacher’s Handbook: A Guide
to Integrated Teaching Across the Curriculum. Portsmouth, NH:
Boynton/Cook.
Torney-Purta, J. (1989). Political Cognition and Its Restructuring in
Young people. Human Development, 32,14~23.
Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Vars, G. F. (1991). Integration Curriculum in Historical Perspective. Education
Leadership, 49(1), 14~15.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Camgridge: Harvard University Press.
Ward, J. M., Suttle, J. E., & Otto, H. J. (1960). The Curriculum Integration Concept
Applied in the Elementary School. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Wiggins, G. (1994). Seminar on “Integrated Curriculum and Performance
Assessment”. At The Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development's Professional Development Conference, Boston, Mass.
Williams, G. (1995). Curricular Coherence and Assessment: Making Sure That the
Effect Matches the Intent. In J. A. Beane (Ed.) Toward a Coherent Curriculum.
ASCD, Alexandria, Virginia.
Wolfinger, D. M., Stockard, J. W. Jr. (1997). Elementary Methods: An Integrated
Curriculum. Longman.
Wraga, W. G. (1997). Pattarns of Interdisciplinary Curriculum Organization and
Professional Knowledge of The Curriculum Field. Journal of Curriculum and
Supervision, Winter 1997, 12( 2), 98~117.
Yager, R. E. (1988). A New Focus for School Science: STS. School Scinece and
Mathematics, 88, 181-190.
Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional Design for Situated Learning. ETR&D, 41(1), 43-
58.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE