:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:青年毛澤東的思想與現代中國極權主義的誕生
書刊名:國立政治大學歷史學報
作者:劉季倫
作者(外文):Liu, Chi-lun
出版日期:2001
卷期:18
頁次:頁63-130
主題關鍵詞:毛澤東極權主義中華人民共和國儒家自然人性論存有的連續性Mao ZedongTotalitarianismPeople's Republic of ChinaConfucianismNatural view of human natureThe continuity of being
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:434
  • 點閱點閱:56
青年毛澤東的思想承接了中國傳統的「存有的連續性」--「天命」下貫而為人的「天性」,人則應該秉持著此一「天性」,盡「性」以知「天」,上契於「天」:「人」與「天」是相連續的。與中國傳統的觀念不同的是:毛把傳統中「天」對「人」的優位性,轉換成了「人」對「天」的優位性。
但青年毛澤東卻把人的情欲等「自然衝動」視為人性之根本,故與孟子以來對人性的看法大異其趣。毛的這種「自然人性論」,造成的結果是:在毛身上完全看不到基於道德上的考慮,而對於自己的欲望加以克制的努力。
由於在毛的思想中,人的「自然衝動」本來源自於「自然」或曰「天」;既然「天」與「人」是相連續的,順著「自然衝動」而行,就等於是「天」在人的�堶悼N理「人」來行動。毛相信:順著「自然衝動」而動,才是順「天」而行,如果遭遇了任何「外界之抵抗」,都應該加以克服,以期能實現「天」的意志(其實也就是他自己的意志)。在毛身上,一切內在的衝突,都被轉化為他自己與「外界」的對峙了。
然而,毛的「自然人性論」,卻並沒有發展成自私自利之學;毛反而發展出了「精神之利己」,「精神之個人主義」。毛作為「精神之個人主義」者,以「我」為中心,以「大我」為目標。「我」可以--或更恰當地說:必須--吞併萬有•包羅萬有,從「人類」,「生類」一直到「宇宙」,然後才能成其為「大我」。毛的「我」如同一個阿米巴(amoeba)一般,不斷吞噬、同化外在的一切,以自我擴大而成「大我」。毛的革命,其實就是這個「我」擴大為「大我」的過程。由於是以「我」為主,被包羅進來的則是歸順於「我」的從,由此而形成的一切關係--包括人際關係、人與自然的關係等等,都不會是一種「對等」的關係,而是一種以「我」為主的「隸屬」的關係。
毛所進行的共產革命,正是為了體現這樣一個「大我」的必經之途。所有阻礙「我」發展而為「大我」的「外界之抵抗」,都必須掃蕩淨盡。為了實現「大我」這一個理想,毛必須開始關注現實中與他對敵的一切--那些反抗、拒絕被他的「大我」所吞噬的一切:毛的一生,就是克服並吞噬這一切的過程。而中華人民共和國的建立,則是毛的「大我」之階段性的完成;是「己即神也」的實現,是「神」的誕生。在中華人民共和國的毛澤東時代,在那極權主義的階段所發生的種種事故,也都是以毛澤東這一尊「神」為主軸而發生的。
Young man Mao Zedong's thought inherited the "continuity of Being" in Chinese tradition: What Heaven imparts to man is called human nature, and man should follow and fully develop this nature in order to assist in the transforming and nourishing process of Heaven. Man is continuous with Heaven. What makes Mao different from Chinese tradition is: in traditional Chinese thinking, Heaven is superior to man, but in Mao's view, man is superior to Heaven.
Moreover, Mao regarded human desires or natural impulses as the very roots of human nature, much different from Mencious' theory of human nature. Mao's natural view of human nature makes himself a "natural man," who has shown no restraint on his own desires or impulses.
In Mao's theory, "natural impulses" were originated from "nature" or "heaven;" this is what we called the "continuity of Being." With the concept of "continuity of Being," men's following such "human impulses" made them agents of "heaven." Mao believed following "natural impulses" is actually carrying out the will of "Heaven." And he should overcome whatever resist from the outside world, in his term, "external world resists," in order to fulfill will of "Heaven," precisely, his own will. As a result, no internal conflict is found in Mao; he has transformed all the internal conflicts into external conflicts.
However, Mao's natural view of human nature didn't develop into egoism, which is selfish in nature; Mao transformed such view into a "spiritual egoism." As a "spiritual egoist," Mao started from "Wo"('T') and aimed at the fulfillment of "Dawo"("Big I"). "Wo" can, or more correctly, must devour everything, including human beings, living things, and the whole universe, in order to grow into "Dawo." Like an amoeba, Mao's "Wo" engulfed and assimilated everything in order to become "Dawo." As a matter of fact, Mao's revolution is the growing process of his "Wo" into "Dawo." "Wo" was the principal, and the devoured ones, the subordinates. They formed a subordinational relation, not a coordinational relation.
Mao's revolution is the destined way of the fulfillment of his "Wo"/"Dawo." Mao confronted and destroyed all "external world resists" for the purpose of the fulfillment of his "Dawo." His whole life is a course of overcoming, devouring and assimilating. And the founding of People's Republic of China is an achievement of Mao's "Dawo;" it is the realization of his "I am God" doctrine, and the birth of"God." Everything happening during Mao's period, the totalitarian phase of People's Republic of China, was caused by Mao's "Dawo," the living God.
Other
1.胡嘯(1991)。譚嗣同融合佛儒的心性論,上海。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.張光直(1986)。連續與破裂:一個文明起源心說的草稿。九州學刊,1(1),1-8。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張元(1975)。宋代理學家的歷史觀(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stein(1913)。Die Zivilprozessordnung für das Deutsche Reich。Erster Band:Tübingen。  new window
2.熊忠武(1992)。當代中國流行語辭典。長春:吉林文史出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.中共中央文獻研究室國外研究毛澤東思想資料選輯編輯組(1992)。毛澤東的政治哲學。北京:中央文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.趙無眠(1996)。真假毛澤東。香港:明鏡出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Snow, Edgar(1992)。紅星照耀中國。紅星照耀中國。石家莊。  延伸查詢new window
6.牟宗三(1979)。政道與治道。臺北市:廣文書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Russell, Bertrand Arthur William(1988)。西洋哲學史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich(1980)。歷史哲學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊伯峻(1971)。論語譯注。明倫出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich、范揚、張企泰(1995)。法哲學原理。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.Hobbes, Thomas、黎思復、黎廷弼(1995)。利維坦。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.Brugger, Walter、項退結(1976)。西洋哲學辭典。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
13.Moore, George Edward、蔡坤鴻(1978)。倫理學原理。臺北:聯經出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.牟宗三(1978)。中國哲學的特質。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.沈從文(1987)。沈從文自傳。臺北:聯合文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.牟宗三(1985)。圓善論。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.Schwartz, Benjamin I.(1967)。Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
18.孫春在(19850000)。清末的公羊思想。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.林毓生(1979)。The Crisis of Chinese Conciousness: Radical Antitraditionalism in the May Fourth Era。The Crisis of Chinese Conciousness: Radical Antitraditionalism in the May Fourth Era。Madison。  new window
20.MacFarquhar, Roderick(1974)。The Origins of the Cultural Revolution (1)。The Origins of the Cultural Revolution (1)。New York。  new window
21.毛澤東。致黎錦熙信‧一九一七年八月二十三日。毛澤東早期文稿。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
22.王汎森(1985)。『群』與倫理結構的破壞。章太炎的思想。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.Shakespeare, William(1991)。哈姆萊特。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.(2000)。道‧學‧政─論儒家知識份子。道‧學‧政─論儒家知識份子。上海。  延伸查詢new window
25.楊伯峻(1980)。孟子譯註。孟子譯註。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.余英時(1995)。打天下的光棍。歷史人物與文化危機。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
27.李澤厚(1987)。青年毛澤東。中國現代思想史論。北京。  延伸查詢new window
28.James, William(1994)。實用主義。實用主義。北京。  延伸查詢new window
29.Schwartz, Benjamin I.(1993)。毛澤東思想的形成。西方學者論毛澤東思想。北京。  延伸查詢new window
30.新島淳良(1991)。毛澤東思想的形成與發展。日本學者視野中的毛澤東思想。北京。  延伸查詢new window
31.Wakeman, Frederic, Jr.(1975)。History and Will:Philosophical Perspectives of Mao Tse-yung's Thought。History and Will:Philosophical Perspectives of Mao Tse-yung's Thought。Berkeley。  new window
32.毛澤東(1995)。《倫理學原理》批注。毛澤東早期文稿。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
33.野村浩一(1993)。毛澤東。毛澤東。長春。  延伸查詢new window
34.汪澍白(1996)。傳統下的毛澤東。北京:中國青年出版社。  延伸查詢new window
35.Schwarcz, Vera(1985)。The Chinese Englishment: Intellectuals and the Legacy of the May Fourth Movement of 1919。The Chinese Englishment: Intellectuals and the Legacy of the May Fourth Movement of 1919。Berkeley University of California Press。  new window
36.龔育之(1996)。毛澤東與自然科學。毛澤東的讀書生活。北京。  延伸查詢new window
37.毛澤東(1992)。體育之研究。體育之研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
38.Taylor, Charles(1996)。Hegel and Moedon Society。Hegel and Moedon Society。Cambridge。  new window
39.魏海敏。毛澤東倫理思想新論。毛澤東倫理思想新論。  延伸查詢new window
40.Babbitt, Irving(1968)。Rouueau and Romanticism。Rouueau and Romanticism。Cleveland and New York。  new window
41.Kant, Immanuel(1982)。Critique of Practical Reason。康得的道德哲學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
42.李鋭(1995)。廬山會議實錄。廬山會議實錄。鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
43.勞思光(1996)。試論當代反儒學思潮。思辯錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
44.章炳麟(1958)。檢論‧議王。章世叢書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
45.Babbitt, Irving。浪漫的道德之現實面。實秋文存。  延伸查詢new window
46.毛澤東(1991)。實踐論。毛澤東選集(第2卷)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
47.王健民(1974)。陜北之行。中國共產黨史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
48.毛澤東(1996)。七律二首─送瘟神。毛澤東詩詞箋析。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(南宋)朱熹(1984)。周易本義,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(明)李贄,劉東星(1983)。明燈道古錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.劉述先(1996)。毛澤東對中國傳統文化繼承之分析。當代中國哲學論(第一冊)。美國新澤西州。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE