:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:文化的反思.典範的重建
書刊名:思與言
作者:黃光國
作者(外文):Hwang, Kwang-kuo
出版日期:2001
卷期:39:4
頁次:頁1-29
主題關鍵詞:儒家文化學術典範社會科學學術生涯視域Confucian cultureAcademic paradigmsSocial scienceAcademic careerHorizon
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:2530
  • 點閱點閱:24
     作者認為:臺灣社會科學研究水準低落的根本原因,在於學術研葡昜署既不瞭解近代西方文明主要學術研究典範的發展,又對自身的文化傳統缺乏相應的理解,而袛盲目移植套用西方各門不同學科的研究方法,造成學術實踐主體性的喪失。 在這篇論文中,作者回顧他在過去將近二十年中所作研究的心得,主張:要在儒家社會中發展社會科學,必須整合兩條不同的研究路線:第一,是瞭解近代西方文明中發展出來的主要學術典範;第二,是以西方的學術典範作為基礎,回過頭研究儒家文化傳統在現代社會中的體現。 要達到這樣的目標,必須從研究生的養成教育著手,讓他們瞭解近代西方科學哲學及主要學術典範的演變,能夠以之作為個人展開學術生涯的視域,在學術研究工作上有所創發。
It is argued that the reason for poor performance of research in various domains of social science in Taiwan is caused by the fact most that researchers understand neither the progress and development of major academic paradigms in contemporary Western civilization, nor their own cultural tradition. They imported popular research methods from the West and followed the approaches in such a similar way that they lost their own academic identities eventually. The article reviewed my previous works of research in the passed two decades, advocated that it is necessary to integrate two types of study for the development of social science in Confucian society: First, to comprehend the major academic paradigms developed in Western civilization; Second, to study the manifestations of Confucian cultural traditions in the contemporary societies by academic paradigms from the West. In order to achieve this goal, it is recommended that the philosophy of science and the progress of major academic paradigms should be included in the training program for graduate students, so that they are able to use it as horizon for conducting innovative research works and developing their academic careers.
期刊論文
1.黃光國(1998)。Two moralities: Reinterpreting the findings of empirical research on moral reasoning in Taiwan。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,1(3),211-238。  new window
2.May, R. M.(1997)。The Scientific Wealth of Nations。Science,275,793-796。  new window
3.Hwang, Kwang-kuo(19990900)。Chinese Corporate Culture and Productivity。中山管理評論,7(特刊),621-647。  new window
4.陳獨秀(1919)。本誌罪案之答辨書。新青年,6(1)。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hwang, K. K.(1997)。Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society。Intercultural Communication Studies,7(1),17-42。  new window
6.黃光國(19990300)。多元典範的研究取向:論社會心理學的本土化。社會理論學報,2(1),1-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(2000)。Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations。Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,30(2),155-178。  new window
8.黃光國(20001200)。現代性的不連續假說與建構實在論--論本土心理學的哲學基礎。香港社會科學學報,18,1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.傅偉勳(19961200)。佛學、西學與當代新儒家--宏觀的哲學考察。明報月刊,31(12)=372,49-56。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃光國(1987)。Face and favor: the Chinese power game。American Journal of Sociology,92(4),944-974。  new window
11.陳獨秀(1918)。答佩劍青年。新青年,3(1)。  延伸查詢new window
12.曾孝明(1998)。我們科學研究的水準低落與改進之道。科技報導,3-8。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉廣定(2001)。當前科學發展政策之盲點─不知己不知彼。科技報導,236。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Schutz, Alfred(1992)。舒茲論文集(第一冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.瞿本瑞(1996)。新儒家論述形成的一個社會現象學考察。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林毓生(1979)。The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness: Radical Antitraditionalism in the May Fourth Era(-),Madison。  new window
圖書
1.牟宗三(1959)。道德的理想主義。道德的理想主義。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lin, Yu-sheng(1972)。Radical Iconoclasm in the May Fourth Period and the Future of Chinese Liberalism。Reflections on the May Fourth Movement: A Symposium。Cambridge, MA:East Asian Research Center, Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Hwan, K. K.(2001)。Morality: East and West。International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences。Oxford:Pergamon。  new window
4.Schutz, Alfred(1962)。Collected Papers(1): The Problem of Social Reality。Hague。  new window
5.黃光國(1991)。王者之道。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lévi-Strauss, Claude(1963)。Structural Anthropology。New York:Basic Books。  new window
7.Fukuyama, Francis(1992)。The End of History and the Last Man。London:New York:Hamish Hamilton:Free Press。  new window
8.曾孝明(20010000)。臺灣的知識經濟:困境與迷思。臺北市:群學。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.周策縱(1960)。The May Fourth Movement: Intellectual Revolution in Modern China。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
10.牟宗三(1978)。歷史哲學。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃光國(2001)。社會科學的理路。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.牟宗三(1979)。從陸象山到劉蕺山。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.牟宗三(1968)。心體與性體。台北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1996)。The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order。Simon & Schuster Company, Inc.。  new window
15.黃光國(19980000)。知識與行動:中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.牟宗三(1977)。佛性與般若。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.牟宗三(1975)。現象與物自身。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.牟宗三(1963)。才性與玄理。人生出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.黃光國(19880000)。儒家思想與東亞現代化。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.牟宗三(1961)。論中國之治統。政道與治道。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.牟宗三(1961)。理性的運用表現與架構表現。政道與治道。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
22.Henry, P.(1986)。Indigeneous Religious and the Transformation of Peripheral Societies。Prophetic Religious and Politics。New York。  new window
23.Leventhal, G. S.(1976)。Fairness in Social Relationships。Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology。Morristown, N. J.。  new window
24.Henry, Paget(1993)。本土宗教與邊陲社會的轉型。宗教與社會變遷。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.黃光國(2001)。Constructive Realism and Confucian Relationalism: The Philosophical Foundation, Theoretical Construction, and Empirical Research of Indigenous Psychology。  new window
圖書論文
1.林毓生(1983)。五四時代的激烈反傳統思想與中國自由主義的前途。思想與人物。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃俊傑(1993)。戰後台灣關於儒家思想的研究。戰後台灣的教育與思想。台北:東大圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉述先(1996)。毛澤東對中國傳統文化繼承之分析。當代中國哲學論(第一冊)。美國新澤西州。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃光國(19880000)。中國人的權力遊戲。中國人的心理。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Leventhal, Gerald S.(1980)。What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships。Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research。Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE