臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：市場機制或社會正義--教育券政策走向之分析研究
書刊名：教育政策論壇
作者：秦夢群 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chin, Joseph M.
出版日期：2002
卷期：5:2
頁次：頁25-42
主題關鍵詞：父母學校選擇權；教育券；Parental choices；Voucher plan
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:34
在父母教育選擇權的爭執中，教育券是最富爭議的主張。市場經濟與社會正義之間的拉址，使得歷來教育券計畫之實施均有不同偏向。本文即從歷史的觀點，分析與哦國在各時期所產生的教育券主張與其實施。研究發現美國傳統以自由市場導向的教育券計畫，於1990年代已轉而擁有社會正義的色彩，我國則仍停留在教育代金的制度，與傳統教育券的精神並不相符。此外，研究也指出未來我國全面實施教育券的困難極高，解決之道，可採取在小規模地區針對弱勢的學生的作法，以平息自由市場導向所造成的不公平現象。
The modern development of the voucher plan is generally credited to Milton Friedman and has received support form individuals holding divergent educational beliefs since the 1960s. opponents of the voucher system contend that parents are not sufficiently in formed of educational matters and may not choose a school on the basis of quality of educational program. A number of different voucher proposals such as Milwaukee Voucher Plan and Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program have been reexamined and implemented in the United States since the 1980s. This paper focuses on the historical developments and debates of different voucher plans advocated both in Taiwan and United States followed by an examination of the feasibility of the voucher plans that are currently implemented.
期刊論文
1.Jencks, C.(1988)。Whom must we treat equally for educational opportunity to be equal?。Ethics，98，518-533。  new window
2.Rouse, C. E.(1998)。Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program。Quarterly Journal of Economics，113，553-602。  new window
3.McMurtry, J.(1991)。Education and the market model。Journal of Philosophy of Education，25(2)，209-217。  new window
4.Gintis, H.(1995)。The Political Economy of School Choice。Teachers College Record，96(3)，492-511。  new window
5.鄭新輝(19970600)。家長教育選擇權的可行性分析。初等教育學報，10，389-415。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.符碧真(19990100)。從美國教育券之實施論我國教育券政策。教育研究集刊，42，203-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳麗珠(19980500)。教育券制度可行模式之研究。教育研究資訊，6(3)，129-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳漢強(2000)。幼教券與幼教政策。成長幼教季刊，11(4)，6-10。  延伸查詢new window
9.賴志峰(19950400)。教育券之基本概念分析。教育資料文摘，35(4)=207，26-34。  延伸查詢new window
10.蕭芳華(19991200)。幼兒教育券政策分析之研究。中國行政評論，9(1)，135-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Hargreaves, D.(1995)。Diversity and choice in school education: A modified libertarian approach。Oxford Review of Education，22，131-141。  new window
會議論文
1.Witte, J. F.(1997)。Achievement effects of the Milwaukee voucher program。New Orleans, LA。  new window
學位論文
1.王小芬(1996)。教育券制度可行性之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Moe, T. M.(1995)。Private vouchers。Stanford, CA：Hoover Institution Press。  new window
2.蓋浙生(1989)。教育財政學。臺北：東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Friedman, Milton、Friedman, R.(1962)。Capitalism and Freedom。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Chubb, J. E.、Moe, T.(1990)。Politics, Market, and America's Schools。Washington D.C.：Brookings institution。  new window
5.Coons, J. E.、Sugarman, S. D.(1978)。Education by Choice: The Case for Family Control。University of California Press。  new window
6.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Jencks, C.(1970)。Educational vouchers。Educational vouchers。Cambridge, MA。  new window
8.Metcalf, K.(1999)。Evaluation of the Cleveland scholarship and tutoring grant program 1996-1999。Evaluation of the Cleveland scholarship and tutoring grant program 1996-1999。Bloomington, IN。  new window
9.Shokrail, N. H.、Yousef, S. E.(1998)。School choice Program: What is happening in the states。School choice Program: What is happening in the states。Washington, DC。  new window
10.Weiler, D.(1974)。A public school voucher demonstration: The first year at Alum Rock。A public school voucher demonstration: The first year at Alum Rock。Santa Monica。  new window
11.Witte, J. F.(1996)。School choice and student performance。Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education。Washington, DC。  new window
12.Witte, J. F.、Sterr, T. D.、Thorn, C. A.(1995)。Fifth year report: Milwaukee parental choice program。Madison：University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Political Science, and the Robert M. La Follette Institute of Public Affairs。  new window
其他
1.Peterson, P. E.(1995)。A critique of the Witte evaluation of Milwaukee's school choice program，Cambridge, MA。  new window
2.Greene, J. P.，Howell, W. G.，Peterson, P. E.(1997)。An evaluation of the Cleveland scholarship program，Cambridge, MA。  new window
3.Carnoy, M.(1998)。National Voucher Plans in Chile and Sweden: Did Privatization Reforms Make for Better Education?，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Peterson, P. E.(1998)。School choice: A report card。Learning from school choice。Washington, DC：Brookings Institution Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：448（臺灣：445，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67580922
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上