:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:風險社會下的大眾媒體:公共新聞學作為重構策略
書刊名:國家發展研究
作者:黃浩榮
作者(外文):Huang, Hao-rong
出版日期:2003
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁99-147
主題關鍵詞:風險風險社會媒體社會學公共新聞學RiskRisk societyPublic journalismMedia sociology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:394
  • 點閱點閱:102
德國社會學家Ulrich Beck提出著名的風險社會理論觀點,適時地為當代社會的現狀與未來提出一組慧眼獨具的詮釋與規劃。在Beck的著作中,他屢次強調大眾媒體在風險社會中扮演著相當重要的一環,但遺憾的是,他卻未有系統地論述大眾媒體的角色與職能為何。 職是,在本文中,筆者試圖從Beck的著作中耙梳出風險社會下大眾媒體的角色;此外,Beck始終強調,風險社會的未來需要一個更為民主化的風險治理模式,而大眾媒體是否能對孕育這個更民主的風險治理模式有所貢獻?筆者選擇引入美國的公共新聞學理念,試圖進一步勾勒出更為適切的風險媒體角色以及更為合理、民主的風險治理模式。
Ulrich Beck has declared with emphatic arguments that we are now in "world/global risk society," in which the logic of risk distribution has replaced that of wealth distribution and become the primary agent of social change. In risk society, among Beck's most works, mass media play a significant role and exert decisive influence in both the process of "individualization" and of definition of risks. Beck has depicted in his macro-theory the social role and functions of mass media-just in a rough manner, however. The lack of systematic analysis upon mass media in risk society has been criticized by some scholars (like Simon Cottle). Hence, in this paper, I would like to systematically clarify and position the media roles, their primary social functions as well as how they operate fittingly in risk society, mainly focusing on Beck's theoretical framework; I would then critique the inequality and anti-democratic quality of risk-governing model we are now used to, no matter in the life experience or academic discourse; last, consequently would I, basing on Beck's ultimate ideal for a reasonably fair risk-distribution, try to explore a feasible way leading to a more democratic risk-governing model by adopting the idea of public journalism, in which (news) media would shoulder key responsibility and exert certain social power to help citizens gain their say as equally as the experts or politicians in the risk-definition process and make the civil rights well-manifested in the political realm.
期刊論文
1.周桂田(20000900)。高科技風險:科學與社會之多元與共識問題。思與言,38(3),75-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Dzur, Albert W.(2002)。Public Journalism and Deliberative Democracy。Polity,34(3),313-336。  new window
3.張錦華、黃浩榮、洪佩民(20030700)。從多元文化觀點檢視新聞採寫教科書--以原住民族群相關報導為例。新聞學研究,76,129-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.顧忠華(20031000)。風險社會中的風險治理--SARS事件的啟示。當代,76=194,54-61。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hansson, S. O.(20020300)。Uncertainties in the Knowledge Society。International Social Science Journal,54(171),39-46。  new window
6.周桂田(19980600)。「風險社會」中結構與行動的轉轍。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,26,99+101-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.周桂田(20020300)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究,45,69-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.朱元鴻(19950600)。風險知識與風險媒介的政治社會學分析。臺灣社會研究季刊,19,195-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.周桂田(19981000)。現代性與風險社會。臺灣社會學刊,21,89-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林國明、陳東升(20031200)。公民會議與審議民主:全民健保的公民參與經驗。臺灣社會學,6,61-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Schaffer, Jan(2000)。Civic journalism。National Civic Review,89(3),267-269。  new window
圖書
1.Beck, Ulrich、Weisz, Amos(1995)。Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk。Oxford。  new window
2.羅文輝(1993)。新聞理論與實證。臺北市:黎明文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Beck, Ulrich(1999)。World Risk Society。Polity Press。  new window
4.Fallows, James、林添貴(1998)。解讀媒體迷思。臺北市:正中。  延伸查詢new window
5.Beck, Ulrich、Ritter, Mark A.(1997)。The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order。Cambridge, Mass:Polity Press。  new window
6.Merritt, D. B.(1998)。Public journalism and public life: Why telling the news is not enough?。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
7.Iggers, Jeremy(1999)。Good news, bad, news: Journalism ethics and the public interest。Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
8.Giddens, Anthony(1991)。Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age。Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers。  new window
9.Glasser, T. L.(1999)。The idea of public journalism。Guilford。  new window
10.顧忠華(20010000)。第二現代:風險社會的出路?。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Beck, Ulrich、孫治本(1999)。全球化危機:全球化的形成、風險與機會。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.林東泰(1999)。大眾傳播理論。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Barber, Benjamin R.(1984)。Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age。University of California Press。  new window
14.Giddens, Anthony(1990)。The Consequences of Modernity。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
15.Beck, Ulrich、Giddens, Anthony、Lash, Scott(1994)。Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order。Stanford University Press。  new window
16.Beck, Ulrich、Ritter, Mark(1992)。Risk Society。London:Sage。  new window
17.Thurow, Lester C.、齊思賢(2000)。知識經濟時代。臺北:大將書行:時報出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.Charity, Arthur(1995)。Doing Public Journalism。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
19.Singer, Eleanor、Endreny, Phyllis M.(1993)。Reporting on Risk。New York, NY:Russel Sage Foundation。  new window
其他
1.「SARS媒體觀察」網站(2003)。媒體新聞處理失當案例。  延伸查詢new window
2.方念萱(2003)。SARS新聞報導的幾個分析點。  延伸查詢new window
3.尹宏毅譯(2001)。風險社會的政治。  延伸查詢new window
4.周桂田(2003)。全球在地化下之風險溝通與風險評估--以SARS為Case 分析。  延伸查詢new window
5.周桂田(2000)。風險社會之政治實踐。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡幼偉(2003)。防疫大戰中的媒體角色。  延伸查詢new window
7.南方朔(2003)。儘速召開全國防疫會議。  延伸查詢new window
8.南方朔(2003)。愛在痕疫蔓延時。  延伸查詢new window
9.高銛、王宏周、魏章玲譯(1989)。後工業社會的來臨--對社會預測的—項探索,台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
10.孫治本(2001)。個人主義化與第二現代。  延伸查詢new window
11.孫治本(2001)。附錄:學習型理性--與貝克談第二現代。  延伸查詢new window
12.張錦華(2003)。SARS蔓延時--媒體角色傳播驚悚?傳遞勇氣、關懷與鼓勵。  延伸查詢new window
13.彭明輝(2003)。顯微鏡下飛沫穿透N95?根本就是合成照片!--防範SARS,更要防範流言。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉維公(2001)。第二現代理論:介紹貝克與紀登斯的現代性分析。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉靜怡(2003)。抗疫看不到公民理性與專業倫理。  延伸查詢new window
16.羅志明(2003)。從SARS風暴看台灣的風險管理。  延伸查詢new window
17.顧忠華、王惠珀、陳明琪、郭正亮、陳宜君、李端端(2003)。「從SARS事件反思臺灣公民意識」座談會記錄。  延伸查詢new window
18.Adams, William C(1993)。The role of media relations in risk communication。  new window
19.Allan, Stuart(2002)。Media, Risk and Science,Buckingham:Open University Press。  new window
20.Batten, James K.(1993)。Newspapers and communities。  new window
21.Beck, Ulrich(1991)。Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society。  new window
22.Bogart, Leo(1991)。Preserving the Press: How Daily Newspapers Mobilized to Keep Their Readers,New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
23.Broder, David(1990)。Democracy and the press。  new window
24.Cohn, Victor(1989)。Reporters as gatekeepers。  new window
25.Cottle, Simon(1998)。Ulrich Beck, "risk society" and the media。  new window
26.Douglas, May(1992)。Risk and danger。  new window
27.Frewer, Lynn(2004)。The public and effective risk communication。  new window
28.Friedland, Lewis A.(1996)。Bringing the news back home: Public journalism and rebuilding local communities。  new window
29.Gordon, Judy A(1991)。Meeting the challenge of risk commxmication。  new window
30.Leone, Richard C.(1996)。Foreword。  new window
31.Luhmann, Niklas(1993)。Riske: A Sociological Theory。  new window
32.Merritt, Davis(1996)。Beyond telling the news。  new window
33.Merritt, Davis(1995)。Public journalism and public life。  new window
34.Miller, Edward D.(1994)。The Charlotte Project: Helping citizens take back democracy。  new window
35.National Conference of Editorial Writer (NCEW)(1996)。Public journalism。  new window
36.Pew Center for Civic Journalism (n.d).(2004)。Doing civic journalism。  new window
37.Rosen, Jay(1996)。Getting Connections Right,New York:The Twentieth Century Foundation。  new window
38.Rosen, Jay(1994)。Making things more public: On the political responsibility of media intellectuals。  new window
39.Rosen, Jay(1992)。Community Connectedness。  new window
40.RTNDF (Radio-Television News Directors Association & Foundation)(2003)。Community journalism project。  new window
41.U.S. Census Bureau(2003)。USA Statistics in Brief。  new window
圖書論文
1.孫治本(2001)。風險抉擇與形而上倫理學。第二現代:風險社會的出路?。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.周桂田(2001)。科學風險 : 多元共識之風險建構。第二現代 : 風險社會的出路?。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE