:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣中小學教師與不同職業民眾之成就歸因
書刊名:思與言
作者:陳怡靖
作者(外文):Chen, I-ching
出版日期:2004
卷期:42:2
頁次:頁75-116
主題關鍵詞:成就歸因制控信念Attribution of successBelief of control
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:282
  • 點閱點閱:33
社會民眾把事業成就作怎樣的歸因,可以反映他對社會公平的看法。如果認為成就來自於能力、努力,顯示他認為社會是較為公平的;反之,如果認背景、關係才是成功的條件,那麼社會是較不公平的。內有學者曾以1992年「臺灣地區社會變遷基本調查」的資料作分析,結果發臺灣地區絕大多數的民資都把事業成就歸因於努力、才智等內在素,即一般民眾都相信只要肯努力就會成功。關於民眾這種認知,上述學者認為是社會上傳播著「有志者事竟成」這種社會價值觀,使得大家願意努力工作。
本研究從社會學大師派森思(Taloctt Parsons)的觀點出發,把學校系統視為傳遞該社會價值的管道,分析教科書中是否傳遞「有志者事竟成」這種價值觀。並且把負責傳遞這種信念的人—教師篩選出來,比較中小學教師與其他職業者對於事業成就的歸因,看看是否教師較其他職業者更傾向內控歸因。這除了可檢驗過學者的假設,也可以看看臺灣民眾在不岣年代裡,對於成就歸因的看法是否有所變化。
文獻皆析顯示中小學教科充斥著有志者事竟成這種價值觀。進一步使用「臺灣地區社會變遷調查資料」作量化分析的結果也顯示:儘管牛代不同,臺灣民眾仍然都傾向把事業成就作內在歸因,相信努力必會成功;而且中小學教師比其他職業者更傾向於把事業成就作內控歸因。這個結果可以說間接地反映出學校教育在傳遞這種內控信念的社會價值觀。而且在控制中小學教育年數之後,教師的這種特殊性就消失了,由可見,中小學教育是影響民眾攏成就作內控歸因的一個重要關鍵。
本研究除了以實證研究支持研究的假設以外,還更進一步釐清教育對於成就歸因的影響。亦即過研結論都強調社經地位對於內控歸因的正影響,本研究則指出:社經地位中的教育才是主要的影響因素。
The view that people attributes to success shows the viewpoints of social justice to people. If the persons deem society to be just, their views of achievement will reveal the abilities and exertions that is important. On the contrary, the folks think the backgrounds and relationships are the causes of success, then the society is not just. In Taiwan, a scholar analyses the 1992 data of the survey of social change that the results show the majority to attribute success in the exertions and intelligences. The meanings are the folks to believe that the exertions will be able to succeed. The scholar thinks the beliefs of the folks to come from the social values that the exertions will be successful.
The study comes first from the theory of Talcott Parsons, who thinks education is the route to deliver the social beliefs. The study will also analyze the textbooks if they deliver the value that the exertions will be successful. Meanwhile, it also sees if the teachers are more internal attributive than the other works. This can test the supposition of the study of the scholar, and the researcher will compare the data 1992 and 1997 to show the attributions of success in Taiwan.
The data analysis reveals textbooks to deliver the values that the exertions will be successful, besides, the 1997 data of the survey of social change also shows that Taiwanese believe the exertions being successful, and the teachers are more internal attributive than those with other jobs. The results indirectly explain educations to deliver the internal beliefs, and when the study controls the factor of educational years that teachers are no more internal attributive than those with other jobs. The educational years of primary schools and high schools are the key points to cause the attributions of success.
The actual study data supports the supposition and clears educational effect to the attributions of success. In other words, the past studies reveal the social status to effect internal attributions, the results show the educations that are one of the social status to be the main effect.
期刊論文
1.林偉人(19950600)。國小學生場地獨立性及制握信念對數學科電腦輔助教學學習成效之研究。國民教育研究集刊. 臺南師院,1,267-295。  延伸查詢new window
2.許錫珍、蘇建文、邱連煌(19790100)。兒童制握信念與父母制握信念以及社經水準的關係。測驗年刊,26,37-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張文秀、梁錦源(19860600)。團體輔導改變學生外制信念之研究。人文學報,11,61-75。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭悅琪(19990600)。國民小學組織氣氛、教師制握信念與教師溝通恐懼之關係研究。國民教育研究集刊.臺南師院,5,333-351。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bar, E. M.(1993)。Intellectual Achievement Responsibility of Junior Soccer Players。Journal of Sport Behavior,16(4),193-208。  new window
6.Lachman, M. E.(1991)。Perceived Control Over Memory Aging: Developmental and Intervention Perspectives。Journal of Social Issues,47(4),159-175。  new window
7.Maqsud, M.、Rouhani, S.(1991)。Relationships Between Socioeconomic Status, Locus of Control, Self-concept and Academic Achievement of Batswana Adolescents。Journal of Youth and Dolescence,20(1),107-114。  new window
8.洪有義(19780600)。肢體殘障學生的內外制握信念之研究。教育心理學報,11,113-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張進上(19900500)。新制師院生制握信念與生活適應之研究。臺南師院學報,23,43-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃堅厚(1979)。國小及國中學生內外控信念之研究。教育心理學報,12,1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃毅志(19931100)。臺灣地區教育對職業地位取得的影響之變遷。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,74,125-161。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉正、李錦華(20011200)。文憑主義的迷思:從勞工的薪資與雇主的徵才談起。臺灣教育社會學研究,1(2),91-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Chubb, Nancy H.、Fertman, Carl I.、Ross, Jennifer L.(1997)。Adolescent self-esteem and locus of control: A longitudinal study of gender and age differences。Adolescence,32(125),113-130。  new window
14.Goodman, S. H.、Cooley, E. L.、Sewell, D. R.、Leavitt, N.(1994)。Locus of control and self-esteem in depressed, low-income African-American women。Community Mental Health Journal,30(3),259-269。  new window
15.吳武典(19750600)。Children's sex, locus of control, and academic achievement。教育心理學報,8,107-114。new window  new window
16.郭明德(19950600)。國小教師制握信念、參與決定與工作滿意關係之研究。國民教育研究集刊. 臺南師院,1,221-236。  延伸查詢new window
17.Rotter, J. B.(1966)。Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement。Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,80(1)=609,1-28。  new window
18.孫清山、黃毅志(19940700)。社會資源、文化資本與地位取得。東海學報.社會科學學院,35,127-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.秦夢群(19920800)。高中教師管理心態、學生內外控信念與學生學習習慣與態度關係之研究。教育與心理研究,15,129-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周甘逢(1985)。不同制握大學生社團參與及其行為適應之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林靜芬(1995)。國小兒童內外控信念與其相關因素暨團體輔導效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡玉瑟(1994)。資優生的人格特質與其學習行為、生活適應之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡俊傑(1993)。山地、平地國中生場地獨立性、內外控信念與生活適應關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳宗逸(1995)。家庭背景、教師行為、制握信念與國小學童創造思考相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.林清財(1984)。青少年自我統整與心理特質關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cosin, B. R.(1972)。Education, Structure and Society。Harmondsworth:Penguin。  new window
2.丁庭宇(1987)。教育社會學理論。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧富美(1986)。國小兒童之制握信念與人格適應之關係。南投:台灣省政府教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
4.林清江(1987)。教育社會學新論。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃毅志(1999)。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識:臺灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996)。教育分流與社會經濟地位:兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Freedman, S. A.(1992)。Sex, gender and locus of control in college students(ED 359 452)。  new window
2.Hill, N. E.(1993)。Developmental Difference in Engagement Style, Locus of Control, and Parent-Adolescent Relationships in African-American Families(ED 364 331)。  new window
3.Hall, C. W.,Rouse, B. D.,Bolen, L. M.,Mitchell, C. C.(1993)。Social Emotional Factors in Students with and Without Learning Disabilities(ED 370 284)。  new window
4.Shorr, D. N.,Young, T. W.(1984)。Locus of Control: Ethnicity, SES, and Academic Achievement(ED 254 939)。  new window
5.Talbott, A. M.,Heritage, J.(1991)。Locus of Control and Religions Orientation(ED 412 439)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lefcourt, Herbert M.(1972)。Recent Developments in The Study of Locus of Control。Progress in Experimental Personality Research。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE