臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國中小學學校選擇政策新趨勢：以聯邦法案與最高法院判決為例
書刊名：教育政策論壇
作者：賴志峰 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lai, Chih-feng
出版日期：2004
卷期：7:2
頁次：頁29-57
主題關鍵詞：學校選擇；聯邦最高法院判決；帶好每位孩子法案；No Child Left Behind Act；School choice；Zelman v. Simmons-Harris decision
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:60
　　　　　學校選擇是美國當前重要的教育改革措施之一，2001年「帶好每位孩子法案」（The No Child Left Behind Act）規定，若學校連續二年未有足夠進步，應提供家長為子女選擇學區內之其他公立學校就讀，學區必須支村或提供選擇轉學學生的交通，此為公立學校選擇的實施；2002年，聯邦最高法院發布Zelman v. Simmons-Harris判決，宣告「克里夫蘭獎助金計畫」並不違反憲法，支政政府經費透過獎助金或教育券的方式補助給個人，經由個人的教育選擇結果，政府經費間接到達教會學校，貧窮的都市學童可就讀私立學校或教會學校，有助於教育機會均等之實踐，可說是自1954年聯邦最高法院Brown v. Board of Education判決，廢止黑白學生分校政策以來，最具宣示性質的突破判決，此為私立學校選擇重大的里程碑。首先，本文探討學校選擇的內涵、類型、爭議首現況等基本概念，其次，系針對上述聯邦法案及最高法院判決，探討美國中小學學校選擇的新趨勢，最後，提出對我國學校選擇政策的啟示。
　　　　　School choice is one of the most important education policies in the USA currently. According the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, if a school that fail to make adequate yearly progress for two consecutive years must provide parents to choose other public school. School districts have to pay for or provide transportation to another public school in the district. This measure is called public school choice. In 2002, Supreme Court of the United States has issued Zelman v. Simmons-Harris decision that upholding the constitutionality of the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program and not violating the separation of church and state. It supports publicly funded scholarship or voucher for parents. According the result of individual choices, the money flow to religious schools indirectly. The decision which has made equal educational opportunities more readily attainable to poor inner-city children that may attend private or religious schools is a significant breakthrough since the court's 1954 decision in Brown v. board of Education that ended schools segregation. This ruling also is the tremendous milestone of private school choice. Firstly, this paper discusses the concepts of school choice including content, typology, controversies and situation. Then, it reviews the aforementioned federal legislation and Supreme Court decision and analysis the new trends of school choice of elementary and secondary education in American. At last, the implications for implementation of school choice in Taiwan are offered.
期刊論文
1.Linn, R. L.、Baker, E. L.、Betebenner, D. W.(2002)。Accountability System: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001。Educational Researcher，31(6)，3-16。  new window
2.賴志峰(20030400)。美國2001年No Child Left Behind Act之測驗本位績效責任制度。初等教育學刊，14，135-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.秦夢群(20020800)。市場機制或社會正義--教育券政策走向之分析研究。教育政策論壇，5(2)，25-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Robelen, Erik W.(2002)。ESEA to boost federal role in education。Education Week，21(16)，28-31。  new window
5.張德銳(19980200)。學校選擇政策的實施經驗與啟示--以美國為例。教育政策論壇，1(1)，86-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.賴志峰(20020800)。美國中小學教育改革新趨勢之評析及啟示--2001年No Child Left Behind Act。國民教育研究學報，9，273-297。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張民杰(1999)。由最高法院判例看美國公立中學的宗教活動。教育研究集刊，43，163-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bloom, I.(2003)。The New Parental Rights Challenge to School Control: Has the Supreme Court Mandated School Choice?。Journal of Law and Education，32(2)，139-183。  new window
9.(2002)。Does the Establishment Clause Allow States to Provide Parents with Money for Religious School Tuition?。Supreme Court Debates，5(4)，106-126。  new window
10.Dowling-Sendor, B.(2002)。The Voucher Decision。American School Board Journal，189(10)，52-54。  new window
11.Gryphon, M.(2003)。True Private Choice: A Practical Guide to School Choice after Zelman v. Simmons-Harris。Policy Analysis，466，1-15。  new window
12.Hendrie, C.(2002)。Applications for Cleveland Vouchers Soar after High Court Ruling。Education Week，22(1)。  new window
13.Omand, H. L.(2003)。The Struggle for School Choice Policy after Zelman: Regulation v. the Free Market。Policy Analysis，495，1-23。  new window
14.Peterson, P. E.(2002)。Victory for Vouchers?。Commentary，114(2)，46-50。  new window
15.Rose, L. C.、Gallup, A. M.(2003)。The 35th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/ Gallup Poll of the Publics's Attitudes toward the Public Schools。Phi Delta Kappan，85(1)，41-57。  new window
16.(2002)。Text of U. S. Supreme Court Decision: Zelman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Ohio, et al, v. Simmons-Harris et al.。Journal of Church and State，44(3)，618-643。  new window
17.Viteritti, J. P.(2002)。Will the U. S. Supreme Court's Decision in Zelman End the Voucher Debate?。Education Next，2(2)，24-33。  new window
圖書
1.林玉体(2003)。美國教育史。臺北市：三民。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kafer, K.(2003)。School Choice 2003: How States are Providing Greater Opportunity in Education。Washington, DC：The Heritage Foundation。  new window
3.Guthrie, J. W.(2003)。Encyclopedia of Education。New York, NY：Macmillan。  new window
4.司法院(2003)。美國聯邦最高法院憲法判決選譯。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bierlein, Louann A.(1993)。Controversial Issues in Educational Policy。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
6.秦夢群(1997)。教育行政：理論部分。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Brownstein, R.(2003)。Implementing No Child Left Behind。The Future of School Choice。Stanford, CA。  new window
8.Cooper, B. S.、Fusarelli, L. D.、Randall, E. V.(2004)。Better Policies, Better Schools: Theories and Applications。Boston, MA：Pearson。  new window
9.Hamilton, L. S.、Koretz, D. M.(2002)。Tests and Their Use in Test-Based Accountability Systems。Making Sense of Test-Based Accountability in Education。Santa Monica, CA。  new window
10.Henig, J. R.(1999)。School Choice Outcomes。School Choice and Social Controversy。Washington, DC。  new window
11.Hill, P. T.、Guin, K.(2002)。Baselines for Assessment of Choice Programs。Choice with Equity。Stanford, CA。  new window
12.Howell, W. G.、Peterson, P. F.、Wolf, P. J.、Campbell, D. E.(2002)。The Education Gap: Vouchers and Urban Schools。The Education Gap: Vouchers and Urban Schools。Washington, DC。  new window
13.Koret Task Force on K-12 Education(2003)。Findings and Recommendation。Our Schools and Our Future...Are We Still at Risk?。Stanford, CA。  new window
14.Peterson, P. E.(2003)。Preface。The Future of School Choice。Stanford, CA。  new window
15.Peterson, P. E.(2003)。Introduction: After Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, What Next?。The Future of School Choice。Stanford, CA。  new window
16.Rudalevige, A.(2003)。No Child Left Behind: Forging a Congressional Compromise。No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability。Washington, DC。  new window
17.Stecher, B.、Hamilton, L.、Gonzalez, G.(2003)。Working Smarter to Leave No Child Behind。Working Smarter to Leave No Child Behind。Santa Monica, CA。  new window
18.Walberg, H. J.、Bast, J. L.(2003)。Education and Capitalism: How Overcoming Our Fear of Market and Economics can Improve America's Schools。Education and Capitalism: How Overcoming Our Fear of Market and Economics can Improve America's Schools。Stanford, CA。  new window
19.Young, T. W.、Clinchy, E.(1992)。Choice in Public Education。Choice in Public Education。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.Alliance for the Separation of school and State。Politics and Education don't Mix，0。  new window
2.Belfield, C. R.，Levin, H. M.(2002)。Does the Supreme Court Ruling on Vouchers in Cleveland Really Matter for Education Reform?，沒有紀錄。  new window
3.Bielick, S.，Chapman, C.(2003)。Trends in the Use of School Choice 1993 to 1999: Statistical Analysis Report，沒有紀錄。  new window
4.Holland, R.(2002)。Still No Choice for Poor and Minority students，沒有紀錄。  new window
5.Learning First Alliance(2002)。Major Changes to ESEA in the No Child Left Behind Act，沒有紀錄。  new window
6.Metcalf, K. K.(2003)。Evaluation of the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program，沒有紀錄。  new window
7.Smole, D. P.(2003)。School Choice: Current Legislation，沒有紀錄。  new window
8.The National Working Commission on Choice in K-12 Education(2003)。School Choice: Doing it the Right Way Makes a Different，沒有紀錄。  new window
9.U. S. Department of Education(2002)。Zelman v. Simmons-Harris: The Cleveland School Choice Case，沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kahlenberg, R. D.(2003)。The Problem of Taking Private School Voucher Programs to Scale。Public School Choice v. Private School Vouchers。New York, NY：The Century Foundation。  new window
2.Peterson, P. E.(2001)。Choice in American Education。A Primer on America's Schools。Stanford, CA：The Hoover Institution。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：674（臺灣：658，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67543813
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上