| 期刊論文1. | 翁榮銅(2006)。中央、地方與學校在執行教育優先區計畫成效之探討與批判。現代教育論壇,15,322-338。 延伸查詢 | 2. | Belfield, C. R.、d'Entremont, C.(2005)。Privatization after school: Will disadvantaged students benefit from a free market in supplemental education services?。American School Board Journal,192(5),28-31。 | 3. | DeBray, E. H.(2005)。Partisanship and ideology in the ESEA reauthorization in the 106th and 107th Congresses: Foundations for the new political landscape of federal education policy。Review of Research in Education,29,29-50。 | 4. | Peterson, P. E.(2005)。Making up the rules as you play the game: A conflict of interest at the very heart of NCLB。Education Next,2005(4),42-48。 | 5. | Ascher, C.(2006)。NCLB's supplemental educational services: Is this what our students need ?。Phi Delta Kappan,88(2),136-141。 | 6. | McDonnell, L. M.(2005)。No child left behind and the federal role in education: Evolution or revolution?。Peabody Journal of Education,80(2),19-38。 | 7. | 楊巧玲(20071200)。美國教育政策的發展及其啟示:沒有任何孩子落後。教育資料集刊,36,153-170。 延伸查詢 | 8. | 陳仕宗(20000600)。美國特許學校的發展狀況及其對我國教育改革的啟示。花蓮師院學報,10,127-144。 延伸查詢 | 9. | 林文蘭(20060600)。優惠或污名?--臺灣教育補助政策的社會分類效應。教育與社會研究,11,107-152。 延伸查詢 | 10. | Thomas, J. Y.、Brady, K. P.(2005)。The Elementary and Secondary Education Act at 40: Equity, accountability, and the evolving federal role in public education。Review of Research in Education,29(1),51-67。 | 11. | 張德銳(19980200)。學校選擇政策的實施經驗與啟示--以美國為例。教育政策論壇,1(1),86-101。 延伸查詢 | 12. | 吳清山、賴協志(20070300)。臺灣初等教育改革的省思:1994-2007。教育資料集刊,33,1-27。 延伸查詢 | 13. | 張鈿富、葉兆祺、林友文(20070300)。美國初等教育改革動向分析。教育資料集刊,33,125-150。 延伸查詢 | 圖書1. | Government Accountability Office(1994)。No Child Left Behind Act: Education actions needed to improve implementation and evaluation of supplemental educational services。Washington, D. C.。 | 2. | Sunderman, G. L.、Kim, J.(2004)。Increasing bureaucracy or increasing opportunities? School district experience with supplemental educational services。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University。 | 3. | Henig, J. R.(1994)。Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。 | 4. | 行政院教育改革審議委員會、江文雄、徐昊果(1996)。行政院教育改革審議委員會總諮議報告書。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。 延伸查詢 | 單篇論文1. | Burch, P.(2007)。Supplemental education services under NCLB: Emerging evidence and policy issues,http://epsl.asu.edu/ epru/documents/EPSL-0705-232-EPRU.pdf, 2008/01/05。 | 圖書論文1. | Gorman, S.(2004)。The invisible hand of NCLB。Leaving no child behind? Options for kids in failing schools。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。 | 2. | Hess, F. M.、Finn, C. E. Jr.(2004)。Introduction。Leaving no child behind? Options for kids in failing schools。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。 | |