:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:認識的困境與結構:傳播學門之自我認同的病理學還原探索
書刊名:新聞學研究
作者:趙雅麗 引用關係
作者(外文):Chao, Yaly
出版日期:2005
卷期:84
頁次:頁119-161
主題關鍵詞:自我認同病理學還原形式知識內容知識意義系譜Self-identityPathological reductionForm knowledgeContent knowledgeSpectrum of meaning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:154
  • 點閱點閱:89
自我在「本體」與「認識」上所形成的矛盾,往往引發其對「存有」的質疑和緊張,而這種結構上的困境,似乎也正指向傳播領域在「自我認同」(self-identity)上所面臨的危機。本文首先說明傳播學門因知識本質的混淆所形成之主體性危機,並探討此一問題在「本體論」與「認識論」兩者間所形成的結構困境;接著闡述「病理學還原」(pathological reduction)方法論上的哲學預設與學理基礎,並透過「病理學還原」的進路,探討「形式知識」與「內容知識」的分屬定位;最後則闡述傳播作為形式學門的知識本質,並試圖勾勒出其所應具備之獨特的學門樣態。
The paradox between “ontology” and “epistemology” of the self often leads to query and tension toward its “being”. This difficulty in structure seemingly points to the self-identity crisis that confronts the communication field.This study first introduces the identity crisis in the communication field due to the disorder of its knowledge base and simultaneously discusses its difficulty from a structural entanglement between ontology and epistemology. The study then follows up by stating the philosophical assumptions and theoretical methodology of pathological reduction. The study further aims to explore respectively the position of form knowledge as well as content knowledge. Finally, it elaborates upon the nature of communication knowledge for being a form field and sketches the unique perspective that the communication field should possess.
期刊論文
1.張文強(20040600)。學術工作合法性的反思:從超越「理論與實務」的分類開始談起。中華傳播學刊,5,105-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Swanson, David L.(1993)。Fragmentation, the Field, and the Future。Journal of Communication,43(4),163-172。  new window
3.Craig, R. T.(1993)。Why are there so "many" communication theories?。Journal of Communication,43(3),26-33。  new window
4.Craig, R.(199905)。Communication theory as a field。Communication Theory,9(2),119-161。  new window
5.Chaffee, Steven H.、Rogers, Everett M.(1993)。The Past and the Future of Communication Study: Convergence or Divergence?。Journal of Communication,43(4),125-131。  new window
6.Shepherd, Gregory J.(1993)。Building a Discipline of Communication。Journal of Communication,43(3),83-91。  new window
7.翁秀琪(20011000)。臺灣傳播教育的回顧與願景。新聞學研究,69,29-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.潘家慶、羅文輝、臧國仁(19960700)。傳播教育核心課程規劃。新聞學研究,53,85-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.翁秀琪(19970100)。對臺灣「傳播學正當性危機」的一些想法。新聞學研究,54,1-2。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳世敏(20001000)。傳播學入門科目的現實與理想。新聞學研究,65,1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.鍾蔚文、臧國仁、陳百齡(19960700)。傳播教育應該教些什麼?--幾個極端的想法。新聞學研究,53,107-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.(19960700)。「新」傳播教育:傳播學的正當性危機 (主題導言)。新聞學研究,53,5-7。  延伸查詢new window
13.Putnam, Linda L.(2001)。Shifting Voices, Oppositional Discourse, and New Visions for Communication Study。Journal of Communication,51(1),38-51。  new window
14.Beniger, James R.(1990)。Who Are the Most Important Theories of Communication?。Communication Research,17(5),698-715。  new window
15.Beniger, James R.(1993)。Communication - Embrace the Subject, not the Field。Journal of Communication,43(3),18-25。  new window
圖書
1.沈清松(2002)。哲學概論。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Anderson, James A.(1996)。Communication Theory: Epistemological Foundations。New York, NY:Guilford。  new window
3.文德爾班(1998)。西洋哲學史。西洋哲學史。臺北市:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
4.李幼蒸(1994)。結構與意義,現代西方哲學論集。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Littlejohn, Stephen W.(2002)。Theories of Human Communication。Wadsworth Thomson Learning。  new window
6.龔卓軍(1997)。臺灣現象學:性.身體.現象學。臺北:梅洛龐蒂讀書會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice、Smith, Colin(1962)。Phenomenology of Perception。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
8.張春興(1998)。現代心理學。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.王臣瑞(2000)。知識論。臺北:台灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.林信華(1999)。符號與社會。臺北:唐山出版社:東方出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
11.Sokolowski, Robert、李維倫(2004)。現象學十四講。臺北:心靈工坊出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃光國(2001)。社會科學的理路。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Koffka, Kurt、黎煒(2000)。格式塔心理學原理。昭明出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.洪漢鼎(19920000)。語言學的轉向:當代分析哲學的發展。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡錚雲(20010000)。從現象學到後現代。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.路易斯.波伊曼(1995)。What Can We Know? An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge。What Can We Know? An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge。0。  new window
17.陳世敏(2004)。跋:傳播學知識歷史可以正什麼?。臺灣傳播學的想像,下。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.Schmidt, James(1992)。梅洛龐帝:現象學與結構主義之間。梅洛龐帝:現象學與結構主義之間。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.Wood, Julia T.(2001)。Communication Mosaics: An Introduction to the Field of Communication。Communication Mosaics: An Introduction to the Field of Communication。Belmont, CA。  new window
20.鄔昆如(1998)。哲學概論。哲學概論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE