:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:家庭--幼兒園中間系統量表建構之研究
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:王美方廖鳳瑞 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Mei-fangLiaw, Fong-ruey
出版日期:2006
卷期:29:4
頁次:頁745-769
主題關鍵詞:生態系統中間系統家園互動親師互動因素分析Ecological systems theoryMesosystemFamily-kindergarten interactionParent-teacher interactionFactor analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:60
  • 點閱點閱:96
本研究根據Bronfenbrenner生態理論中間系統的層面與特質,編擬一套測量我國家庭與幼兒園中間系統的測量工具,經過二次專家效度檢驗與預試,再進行正式施測與探索性因素分析。研究發現:1.幼兒家長與幼兒教師的分析結果類似,家長版出現「同盟」、「間接溝通」及「直接溝通」三個因素,而教師版出現「同盟」及「直接溝通」二個因素;且二個版本的因素問項雷同。2.由這三個因素所構成的家長版及二個因素構成的教師版「家庭—幼兒園中間系統量表」具有可接受的內部一致性信度與建構效度。3.除了「權力的平衡」層面的問項完全消失外,中間系統所表述的其他概念(正向情感、目標有共識、多重場所的參與、間接連結、場所間知識的溝通)大部分都適用於我國的家園互動;但國內幼兒家長與幼兒園的互動不像中間系統所述有許多不同的層面與特質,而是由幾個組合的因素來解釋。
The purpose of this study was to construct a Family-Kindergarten Mesosystem Questionnaire based on Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory for Chinese parents and kindergarten teachers. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the family-kindergarten interaction could mostly be explained by three factors (affiliation, direct interaction, and indirect interaction), and the factor items for the parent sample and the teacher sample were similar. Except for the “indirect interaction” factor of the Teacher Questionnaire, all the factors extracted had acceptable reliability and validity. The results were discussed from three perspectives: 1. Its consistency with the complicated dimensions and principles of the mesosystem as Bronfenbrenner proposed. 2. Its similarities and dissimilarities with literature findings. 3. the implication for the appropriateness of direct application of western theories in Taiwan. Suggestions for future research directions and questionnaire constructions were discussed.
期刊論文
1.Peet, S. H.、Powell, D. R.、O'Donnel, B. K.(1997)。Mother-Teacher Congruence in Perceptions of the Child's Competence and School Engagement: Links to Academic Achievement。Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,18,373-393。  new window
2.Powell, D. R.(1998)。Reweaving Parents into the Fabric of Early Childhood Programs. Research in Review。Young Children,53(5),60-67。  new window
3.林清山(19880100)。驗證性因素分析的理論及應用:修訂魏氏兒童智力量表之驗證性因素分析。測驗年刊,35,117-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.歐陽誾、柯華葳、梁雲霞(19900800)。我國國民小學學生家長參與子女學習活動之研究。教育與心理研究,13,265-304。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Caruso, G. A. L.(1992)。The Development of Three Scales to Measure the Supportiveness of Relationships between Parents and Child Care Providers。Educational and Psychological Measurement,52(1),149-160。  new window
6.Elicker, J.、Noppe, I. C.、Noppe, L. D.、Fortner-Wood, C.(1997)。The Parentcaregiver Relationship Scale: Rounding Out the Relationship System in Infant Child Care。Early Education and Development,8(1),83-100。  new window
7.Reay, D.(1999)。Linguistic Capital and Homeschool Relationships: Mothers' Interactions with Their Children's Primary School Teachers。Acta Sociologica,42,159-168。  new window
研究報告
1.劉慈惠(2002)。落實學前親職教育的一個觸角:幼稚園教師和家長對彼此合作關係及幼兒發展之期望的連續性研究。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林雯瑤(1995)。臺灣地區公共圖書館的社會角色與功能之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.賴秀英(2001)。國民小學親師生互動之個案研究---以一個小班教學班級為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳承珊(2000)。母親與教師的管教方式對幼兒社會行為影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.曾俊凱(2001)。臺北縣國民小學親師合作之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
5.鍾美英(2002)。國小學生家長參與班級親師合作之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
6.王泰茂(1999)。原住民學校的親師互動--以玫瑰小學為例(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝鴻隆(2003)。國民小學親師互動之個案研究--以彰化縣一所國民小學為例(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.朱珊妮(2002)。一個幼稚園班級中親師溝通的探討(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡曉玲(1999)。幼兒園中親師互動之探討研究--多元文化下的思考(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.林珍宇(2002)。國民小學親師溝通互動歷程之探究,0。  延伸查詢new window
11.趙聖秋(1998)。國民小學家長與教師親師溝通及相關因素之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.DeVellis, R. F.、吳齊殷(1999)。量表的發展:理論與應用。台北:弘智文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kellaghan, Thomas、Sloane, K.、Alvarez, B.、Bloom, B. S.、吳國淳(1996)。家庭環境與學校學習。五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kline, R. B.(1998)。Principle and practice of structural equation modeling。New York, NY:Guilford Press。  new window
4.Bronfenbrenner, Urie(1979)。The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design。Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Kontos, S.(1987)。The Attitudinal Context of Family Day Care Relationships。Applied Developmental Psychology。Norwood, NJ。  new window
其他
1.Weiss, H.,Dirks, J.,Friedman, K.,Hanley, G.,Kreider, H.,Levine, E.(1998)。A Mixed Method Approach to Understanding Family-school Communication,Cambridge, MA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bronfenbrenner, U.(1989)。Ecological systems theory。Annals of child development, Vol. 6: Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues。Greenwich, CT:JAI Press。  new window
2.Bronfenbrenner, U.、Morris, P. A.(1998)。The Ecology of Development Process。Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Models of Human Development。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
3.Kagan, S. L.(1991)。Moving from Here to There: Rethinking Continuity and Transitions in Early Care and Education。Issues in Early Childhood Curriculum。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
4.Long, F.、Garduque, L.(1987)。Continuity between Home and Family Day Care: Caregivers' Perceptions and Children's Social Experiences。Applied Developmental Psychology。Norwood, NJ:Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE