:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究
作者:蔡吉郎
作者(外文):Tsai, Chi-Lang
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:工業教育與技術學系
指導教授:陳繁興
梁滄郎
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:學習領導專業學習社群教學效能技術型高中Leadership for LearningProfessional Learning CommunitiesTeaching EffectivenessSkill-Based Senior Secondary Schools
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:77
本研究旨在探討技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群與教師教學效能之關係。研究對象為技術型高中教師,使用自編之「校長學習領導量表」、「教師參與專業學習社群量表」與「教師教學效能量表」為研究工具,從直轄市與非直轄市抽取技術型高中40校共1,000名受試者進行問卷調查,有效問卷727份,有效回收率72.700%。所得資料以SPSS與AMOS統計軟體進行分析,並使用平均數、標準差、獨立樣本t檢定、ANOVA、皮爾森積差相關、多元逐步迴歸、結構方程模式及中介效果檢定等,做為本研究主要的統計方法。本研究之具體結論如下:
一、技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群與教師教學效能
之現況良好。
二、技術型高中教師知覺校長學習領導之差異方面,以大型學校(61班
以上)、私立學校、校齡50年以下、兼行政主任及定期參與專業學
習社群之教師,對校長學習領導知覺較高;另以中小型學校(25-
36班)、公立學校、校齡71年以上、專任教師及偶爾(或曾經)參
與專業學習社群之教師,對校長學習領導知覺較弱。
三、技術型高中教師知覺專業學習社群之差異方面,以大型學校(61班
以上)、私立學校、校齡50年以下、兼行政主任及定期參與專業學
習社群之教師,對專業學習社群知覺較高;另以中型學校(37-48
班)與中大型學校(49-60班)、公立學校、校齡71年以上、教師
兼組長及偶爾(或曾經)參與專業學習社群之教師,對專業學習社
群知覺較弱。
四、技術型高中教師知覺教學效能之差異方面,以私立學校、校齡50年
以下及定期參與專業學習社群之教師,對教學效能知覺較高;而以
公立學校、校齡51-70年及偶爾(或曾經)參與專業學習社群之教
師,對教學效能知覺較弱。
五、技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群與教師教學效能
之間具有中度正相關。
六、技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群對教師教學效能
具有高預測力。
七、技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群與教師教學效能
之結構方程模式呈現良好適配度的正向結構關係。
八、技術型高中教師參與專業學習社群具有校長學習領導影響教師教學
效能之部份中介效果。
最後,依據研究結論,提出對教育主管機關、技術型高中校長與教師,以及後續相關研究之建議。
關鍵詞:學習領導、專業學習社群、教學效能、技術型高中
This study investigated the relationships among principals’ leadership for learning, teachers’ participation in professional learning communities (PLC), and teachers’ teaching effectiveness in skill-based senior secondary schools. Three self-developed questionnaires, namely, “Questionnaire of Principals’ Leadership for Learning”, “Questionnaire of Teachers’ Participation in PLC”, and “Questionnaire of Teachers’ Teaching Effectiveness,” were distributed to 1,000 teachers in 40 skill-based senior secondary schools located in the municipalities and non-municipalities cities of Taiwan. A total of 727 valid samples were returned, with a valid return rate of 72.700%. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS through methods including mean and standard deviation, independent-sample t tests, analysis of variance, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, multivariate stepwise regression, structural equation modeling, and mediation analysis. Accordingly, the study results were as follows:
1.Overall, principals attained excellent performance in
their leadership for learning, and teachers performed
favorably in their PLC participation and teaching
effectiveness.
2.Regarding teachers’ perceived principals’ leadership
for learning, those teaching in large schools (with ≥61
classes), private schools, and schools aged ≤50 years,
and those who serve as the school administration
director and regularly participate in PLC, reported
higher perceptions. By contrast, teachers teaching in
small-to-medium schools (with 25–36 classes), public
schools, and schools aged ≥71 years, tenured teachers,
and teachers who occasionally participate (or have
participated) in PLC, reported lower perceptions.
3.Concerning teachers’ perceived participation in PLC,
those teaching in large schools (with ≥61 classes),
private schools, and schools aged ≤50 years, and those
who serve as the school administration director, and
regularly participate in PLC, reported higher
perceptions. By contrast, teachers teaching in medium
(37–48 classes) and medium-to-large (49–60 classes)
schools, public schools, and schools aged ≥71 years,
and those who serve as a section chief, and
occasionally participate (or have participated) in PLC,
reported lower perceptions.
4.Regarding teachers’ perceived teaching effectiveness,
those teaching in private schools and schools aged ≤50
years, and those who regularly participate in PLC,
reported higher perceptions. Conversely, teachers
teaching in public schools and schools aged 51–70
years, and those who occasionally participate (or have
participated) in PLC, reported lower perceptions.
5.Moderately positive correlations existed among
principals’ leadership for learning, teachers’
participation in PLC, and teachers’ teaching
effectiveness.
6.Principals’ leadership for learning and teachers’
participation in PLC exhibited a high prediction power
for teachers’ teaching effectiveness.
7.The SEM model constructed for principals’ leadership
for learning, teachers’ participation in PLC, and
teachers’ teaching effectiveness attained excellent
goodness of fit.
8.Teachers’ participation in PLC exerted a partial
mediation effect on the relationship between
principals’ leadership for learning and teachers’
teaching effectiveness.
According to the aforementioned results, suggestions were proposed for relevant education authorities, principals and teachers of skill-based senior secondary schools, and future related studies.
Keywords: Leadership for Learning, Professional Learning Communities, Teaching Effectiveness, Skill-Based Senior Secondary Schools
壹、中文部份
丁一顧(2011)。教師專業學習社群與教師集體效能感關係模式驗證之研究。屏東教育大學學報,37,1-26。
丁一顧(2012)。教師專業學習社群運作的核心:以學生學習為本。教育研究月刊,215,5-16。
丁一顧(2014)。國小教練式領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。教育政策論壇,17(3),117-151。
丁文祺(2008)。國民中學校長教學領導、教師社群互動、教師專業實踐與學校校能關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
王文科(2007)。課程與教學論(七版一刷)。臺北:五南。
王政彥、吳正榮(2011)。從專業社群發展論析教師工會的組成與功能。教育研究月刊,203,57-75。
江嘉杰(2014)。偏鄉小學教師專業學習社群組成、運作及影響之探究。學校行政,89,142-163。
何佳瑞(譯)(2011)。學習導向之領導:40年來經驗研究的教導(上)(原作者:P. Hallinger)。教育研究月刊,212,95-105。(原著出版年:2011)
何佳瑞(譯)(2012)。學習導向之領導:40年來經驗研究的教導(下)(原作者:P. Hallinger)。教育研究月刊,213,97-102。(原著出版年:2011)
吳百祿(2010)。教師領導研究。高雄:復文。
吳明隆(2013)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用(二版三刷)。臺北:五南。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2008)。SPSS與統計應用分析(二版九刷)。臺北:五南。
吳俊憲(2012)。推動高中職學校優質化-「學習領導」之觀點分析。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(10),39-42。
吳俊憲、林怡君(2014)。從學習領導觀點談學校行政人員未來的培力方向。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(4),1-3。
吳堂鐘(2016)。國民中學學習領導、學習環境與學習成效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究。臺北:五南。
吳清山(2012)。教師專業學習社群與學生學習。教育人力與專業發展,29(1),1-4。
吳清山(2013)。教育發展議題研究。臺北市:高等教育。
吳清山、王令宜(2012)。校長學習領導理念與實踐策略。教育行政研究,2(2),1-21。
吳清山、林天祐(2011)。教育小辭書(初版十二刷)。臺北:高等教育。
吳清山、林天祐(2012)。學習領導。教育研究月刊,217,139-140。
吳清山、林天祐(2014)。教育U辭書。臺北:高等教育。
吳慧蘭(2016)。新北市國民中學校長教學領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
林劭仁(2006)。專業學習社群運用於師資培育自我評鑑之探究。中正教育研究,5(2),79-111。
林君屏(2015)。一所推動理念學校校長學習領導敘說之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東縣。
林明地(2013)。學習領導:理念與實際初探。教育研究月刊,229,18-31。
林思伶、蔡進雄(2005)。論凝聚教師學習社群的有效途徑。教育研究月刊,132,99-109。
林清山(1988)。驗證性因素分析的理論及應用:修訂魏氏兒童智力量表之驗證性因素分析。測驗年刊,35,117-136。
林進材(1999)。教師教學信念與決定:談教師教學實施與效能。中等教育,50(3),9-21。
林進材(2000)。有效教學─理論與策略。臺北:五南。
林進材(2002)。教學效能的研究發展及其在教學與研究上的意義。教育研究月刊,104,32-43。
林新發、黃秋鑾(2014)。推動校長教學領導以提升教師專業學習社群互動之策略。臺灣教育評論,3(1),43-62。
林繼生(2013)。十二年國民基本教育下學習領導的實施與挑戰:高中階段。教育研究月刊,229,32-49。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析SPSS(PASW):資料分析範例(第五版)。臺北:五南。
邱皓政(2014)。結構方程模式:LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用(二版修訂)。臺北:雙葉。
施政宏(2014)。高中科展指導教師正向心理特質、壓力來源與教學效能之相關研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
柯份(2014)。國民小學校長優質領導、學校環境營造與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係:實徵取向的分析。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,109-140。
孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報,34(2),139-156。
孫志麟(2010)。專業學習社群:促進教師專業發展的平台。學校行政,69,138-158。
孫國華(2014)。國小教師心理資本、情緒勞務、實用智能與教學效能徑路模式之建構及驗證(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
徐善德(1997)。高職教師工作價值觀、組織承諾與教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
徐碧君(2010)。臺灣地區教學卓越幼稚園創新經營、組織承諾、教師專業社群及教學效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群、吳勁甫(2011)。國中校長教學領導、學校知識管理與教師教學效能之多層次分析。教育與心理研究,34(2),1-31。
秦夢群、張伯瑲(2013)。國小校長領導行為、學校組織文化與教學效能之中介效果分析:競值架構之應用。教育政策論壇,16(3),31-64。
馬秀蘭、吳德邦(2008)。統計學:以SPSS for Windows為例(三版二刷)。臺北:新文京開發。
張素花(2014)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師情緒勞務對教師教學效能影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
張素貞、吳俊憲(2013)。縣市輔導團教師的學習領導:領導踐行與能力發展。教育研究月刊,229,71-85。
張偉豪(2011)。SEM論文寫作不求人。高雄:三星統計。
張淑宜、辛俊德(2011)。學習社群與教師專業表現關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報(教育類),25(1),83-103。
張媛甯、岳美秀(2012)。臺南市公立幼兒園教師覺知專業成長與教學效能之研究。學校行政,82,70-89。
張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅、陳美丞、林淑華(2009)。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊(再版)。臺北:教育部。
張新仁、馮莉雅、潘道仁、王瓊珠(2011)。臺灣教師專業學習社群的啟動。教育研究月刊,201,5-27。
張裕弘(2009)。行銷,請先從內部做起:淺談以內部行銷策略提升教師教學效能。學校行政,64,66-77。
張碧娟(1999)。國民中學校長教學領導、學校教學氣氛與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
張德銳(2002)。以教學檔案提升教師教學效能。教育研究月刊,104,25-31。
張德銳(2015)。學習領導在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。市北教育學刊,52,1-20。
張德銳、王淑珍(2010)。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報,41(1),61-90。
張德銳、張素偵(2012)。臺北市中小學校長轉型領導、教師領導與教學效能之研究。市北教育學刊,41,59-97。
教育部(2011)。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2016a)。補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000567
教育部(2016b)。精緻教師專業發展評鑑網。取自http://atepd.moe.gov.tw/relatedlink?type=3
教育部(2016c)。高職優質化資訊網。取自http://203.71.198.29/iQuality/FILESDOWNLOAD.aspx
教育部(2016d)。高級中等學校第三期程學校評鑑實施計畫(技術型高中)。取自http://qoi.nknu.edu.tw/TeachingEva/User/NewsData.aspx?newno=0f3a508d-7919-43d1-aae4-7896e637b56a
教育部(2016e)。高級中等學校概況統計(104學年度)。取自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s
教育部(2016f)。高級中等教育法(105年6月1日修正)。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=GL001143&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=1
教育部(2016g)。數位學習服務平台。取自http://ups.moe.edu.tw/index.php
許世葦(2016)。企業組織於環境不確性、訓練品質系統與組織績效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
許德便(2012)。國民中學校長服務領導、教師教學創新、社群互動與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
郭小蘋、吳勁甫(2011)。臺灣地區近年來校長教學領導與教師教學效能學位論文研究走向之分析。嘉大教育研究學刊,27,1-27。
郭生玉(1987)。心理與教育測驗。臺北市:精華書局。
郭福豫(2015)。高職校長課程領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
陳文彥(2016)。跨越教室的力量:教師學習領導之領導實踐分析。當代教育研究季刊,23(1),65-98。
陳木金(1997)。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2011)。多變量分析方法統計軟體應用(六版一刷)。臺北市:五南。
陳佩英(2009)。一起學習、一起領導:專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育,60(3),68-88。
陳佩英、潘慧玲(2013)。校長的學習領導:領導踐行與能力發展的初探。教育研究月刊,229,50-70。
陳玫良(2009)。國中自然與生活科技教師課程領導、組織承諾和教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
陳逸敬、陳世佳(2010)。臺中市國民小學參與「教師專業發展評鑑」教師教學效能之研究。東海教育評論,4,147-188。
陳慕能(2011)。高職校長課程領導、教師改革支持與教師教學效能之關係(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
單文經(2013)。試釋學習領導的意義。教育研究月刊,229,5-17。
曾信榮(2010)。高中職工業類科學校教師教學效能、教育專業承諾與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
曾信榮(2012)。高職(中)工業類科學生知覺教學效能之探討。學校行政,79,58-72。
湯誌龍、楊麗香(2005)。高職餐飲管理科教師工作壓力、因應策略與教學效能之研究。弘光人文社會學報,3,250-280。
馮莉雅、張新仁、吳裕益(2001)。國中教師教學效能評鑑工具之分析。中國測驗年會測驗學刊,48(2),17-23。
黃文三(2012)。中等教育。臺北:高等教育。
黃文三、沈碩彬(2012)。工作價值觀、工作投入與教學效能關係之研究:以高雄市國中教師為例。課程與教學季刊,15(4),161-188。
黃玉鳳(2013)。縣市國教輔導團領域召集人知識領導、學習社群與創新教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
黃秀霞(2013)。公立高中校長教學領導、教師社群互動、學校創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃建翔、吳清山(2013)。國民中學教師專業發展、專業承諾與教學效能關係之研究:以TEPS資料庫為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,6(2),117-140。
黃秋鑾(2009)。臺灣地區國民中學校長知識領導、學習社群與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
楊振富(譯)(2002)。(原作者:P. M. Senge, N. Cambron-McCabe, T. Lucas, B. Smith, J. Dutton, & A. Kleiner)。學習型學校:第五項修練教育篇(下)。臺北:天下遠見。
楊素綾(2011)。技職校院教師教學信念、課程與教學決定和教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
楊豪森(2008)。綜合高中校長課程領導、教師專業承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
葉佳文(2007)。臺灣地區公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
榮泰生(2011)。AMOS與研究方法(第四版)。臺北市:五南。
劉宗明、黃德祥(2008)。國中教師人格特質與教學效能之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報,39(2),1-34。
潘慧玲、李麗君、黃淑馨、余霖、薛雅慈(2013)。學習領導下的學習共同體手冊1.0版。新北:學習領導與學習共同體計畫辦公室。
潘慧玲、李麗君、黃淑馨、余霖、薛雅慈(2014)。學習領導下的學習共同體1.1版。新北:學習領導與學習共同體計畫辦公室。
潘慧玲、陳佩英、張素貞、鄭淑惠、陳文彥(2014)。從學習領導論析學習共同體的概念與實踐。市北教育學刊,45,1-27。
蔡吉郎、李敏蕙、余月美、陳繁興、梁滄郎(2015年4月)。高職教師參與專業學習社群與教學效能關係之研究。「2015第十六屆提升技職學校經營品質研討會」發表之論文,國立彰化師範大學。
蔡吉郎、林浩明、石家玲、陳繁興、梁滄郎、陳德發(2015年4月)。高職校長學習領導與教師參與專業學習社群關係之研究。「2015第十六屆提升技職學校經營品質研討會」發表之論文,國立彰化師範大學。
蔡吉郎、黃耀寬、劉麗勉、陳繁興、梁滄郎(2015年4月)。高職校長學習領導與教師教學效能關係之研究。「2015第十六屆提升技職學校經營品質研討會」發表之論文,國立彰化師範大學。
蔡清田、雲大維(2011)。透過課程領導經營教師專業學習社群之研究。教育資料與研究,101,107-134。
蔡進雄(2009)。學校經營的新典範:論教師學習社群的建立與發展。教育研究月刊,188,48-59。
鄭友超、曾信榮(2010)。高職(中)工業類科學校教師自評與學生評鑑之教學效能比較。課程與教學季刊,13(3),163-192。
鄭淑惠(2017)。校長學習領導與學習願景落實。教育研究月刊,274,69-84。
鄭淑惠、陳文彥(2013)。教師的學習領導:領導踐行與能力發展的初探。教育研究月刊,229,86-99。
賴志峰(2010)。學校領導新議題──理論與實踐。臺北:高等教育。
駱奕穎(2011)。國民小學校長知識領導、教師學習社群與創新教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
謝百亮(2006)。後現代脈絡下國民中學校長課程領導與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
謝豐宇、賴志峰(2012)。國民中學校長服務領導、教師組織公民行為與教師教學效能關係之研究。學校行政,82,47-69。
簡杏娟、賴志峰(2014)。國民小學教師教師領導促進專業學習社群建構之個案研究。學校行政,90,172-193。
羅仁駿、蔡慧敏、許惠英、黃寶月(2010)。臺北市國小體育教師專業社群互動、教學輔導創新與教學效能之關聯性。99年度大專體育學術專刊,233-239。
羅巧玲、魏美惠(2013)。中部地幼兒教師創造力人格特質與教學效能之相關研究。教育科學期刊,12(1),149-178。  
貳、英文部份
American Institute for Research. (2012). Measuring principal performance: How rigorous are commonly used principal performance assessment instruments? Naperville, IL: Christopher Condon & Matthew Clifford.
American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the american psychological association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
Anderson, G. L. (2009). Advocacy leadership: Toward a post-reform agenda in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teacher’s sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Ongman.
Ashton, P., Webb, R., & Doda, C. (1983). A study of teachers’ sense of efficacy. Final report, Executive summary. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED231833)
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bolster, S. J., & Henley, M. D. (2005, April). Transform classrooms with learning communities. NCA CASI e-news, 3, 5.
Borich, G. D. (1988). Effective teaching methods. New York, NY: Merrill.
Borich, G. D. (2007). Effective teaching methods: Research-based practice. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Brazeau, G. A. (2008). Leadership and learning. American Journal of Pharmarceutical Education, 72(3), 56.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Bunker, V. J. (2008). Professional learning communities, teacher collaboration, and student achievement in an era of standards based reform (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lewis and Clark College, Oregon.
Cheliotes, L. G., & Reilly, M. F. (2010). Coaching conversations: Transforming your school one conversation at a time. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Cheng, H. (2004). Teacher learning about and with technology: Sharing, support, and stretching through a professional learning community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought process. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 225-296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754-761.
Croasmun, J. (2007). The impact of a professional learning community on student achievement gains: A case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Carolina.
Daresh, J. C. (2010). Improving leadership by building community: A principal’s guide to action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Dembo, M. H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teacher’s sense of efficacy: A definition of the construct and a model for further research. Educational Research Quarterty, 5, 39-63.
Dempster, N., Robson, G., & Gaffney, M. (2011). Leadership for learning: Research findings and frontiers from down under. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 143-163). London, England: Springer.
Devlin, M., & Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 111-124.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillon-Peterson, B. (1986). Trusting teachers to know what is good for them. In K. Zumwalt (Ed.), Improving teachers (pp. 24-36). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R. B., & Eaker, R. (2008). Revisiting professional learning communities at work: New insights for improving schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R. B., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Eradio, M. R. (2003). Tips to improve teaching effectiveness. Retrieved from http://hyper. vcsun.org/HyperNews/djordan/get/itaeffective.html
Erwin, S., Winn, P., & Erwin, J. (2011). A comparison of urban, suburban, and rural principal leadership skills by campus student achievement level. Administrative Issues Journal, 1(2), 3-17.
Fielding, G., & Schalock, H. (1985). Promoting the professional development of teachers and administrators. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Glatthorn, A. A., & Jailall, J. M. (2009). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Glickman, C. D. (1985). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Glickman, C. D. (2002). Leadership for learning: How to help teachers succeed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Goldring, E. (2010). The next generation principal professional development: Feedback and coaching as a tool for leadership development. Paper presented at the Conference on Challenges and Prospects of School Improvement in the New Era, Taipei, Taiwan.
Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices, Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1-36.
Gordon, H. R. D. (2003). Selected factors of teaching effectiveness: Perceptions of apprenticeship trainers. Journal of Technology Studies, 29, 56-59.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 3(2), 95-110.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Leadership and student learning outcomes. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and Learning (pp. 56-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-248.
Harris, A. (2005, April). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel good factor? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Association, Canada.
Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hayward, P. A. (2001). Students’ initial impressions of teaching effectiveness: Analysis of structured response items. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED465979)
Hipp, K. K., Huffman, J. B., & Pankake, A. M. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9(2), 173-195.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Hord, S. M. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In S. M. Hord (Ed.), Learning together, leading together: Changing school through professional learning communities (pp. 5-14). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hord, S. M., Roussin, J. L., & Sommers, W. A. (2010). Professional learning communities: Inspiration, challenge, surprise, and meaning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Huffman, J. B. (2000). One school’s experience as a professional learning community. Planning and Changing, 31(1&2), 84-94.
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
James, H. (2010). A study of social cognitive theory: The relationship between professional learning communities and collective teacher efficacy in international school settings (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minnesota.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111-117.
Karimvand, P. N. (2011). The nexus between Iranian ELF teachers’ self-efficacy, teaching experience and gender. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 171-183.
Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 21-43.
Klein, S., Medrich, E., & Perez-Ferreiro, V. (1996). Fitting the pieces: Education reform that works. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2011). Effectiveness of refutational teaching for high and low achieving students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 79-90.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis & S. D. Kruse (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Kyriacou, C. (1986). Effective teaching in schools. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Kyriakides, L. (2005). Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(2), 103-152.
Lancer, J. R. (2015). The meaning of quality professional learning for school improvement articulating a coherent vision rooted in a theoretical perspective on learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 639-667.
Leclerc, M., Moreau, A., Dumouchel, C., & Sallafranque-St-Louis, F. (2012). Factors that promote progression in schools functioning as professional learning community. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 7(7), 1-14.
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (2012). Preface. In K. Leithwood & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Linking leadership to student learning (pp. xxiii-xxviii). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What do we already know about educational leadership? In W. A. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 12-27). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham, England: National College of School Leadership.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom. K. (2004). Review of research how leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: The Wallance Foundation.
Leithwood, K., Patten, K. S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671-706.
Little, J. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teacher’s professional relations. Teacher’s College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S.E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Pages/Investigating-the-Links-to-Improved-Student-Learning.aspx.
Lunenburg, F., & Ornstein, A. (2004). Educational administration: Concepts & practices. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
MacBeath, J. (2004). The leadership file: Twenty-five definitions of leadership with activities to help you recognise their relevance to school practice. Melbourne, Australia: Hawker Brownlow.
MacBeath, J., & Cheng, Y. C. (2008). Leadership for learning: International perspectives. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
MacBeath, J., & Dempster, N. (Eds.). (2009). Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. London, UK: Routledge.
MacBeath, J., & Townsend, T. (Eds.). (2011). International handbook of leadership for learning. New York, NY: Springer.
Manthey, G. (2006). Collective efficacy: Explaining school achievement. Leadership, 35(3), 23.
Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organizational learning and improved student outcomes - What do we know? Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 175-195.
Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. Journal of School Leadership and Management, 27(2), 179-201.
Murphy, J., Goldring, E. B., Cravens, X. C., Elliott, S. N., & Porter, A. C. (2007). The Vanderbilt assessment of leadership in education: Measuring learning-centered leadership. East China Normal University Journal, 1(1), 1-38.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychomertric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Peltier, J., Drago, W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2004). The effects of class size on effectiveness of online courses. Management Research News, 27(10), 27-41.
Polk, J. A. (2006). Traits of effective teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), 23-29.
Ramont, P. R. (2006). Educational leadership: Examination of the effects of professional development on student evaluation of nursing faculty (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Alliant International University, San Diego.
Reynolds, D., Muijs, D., & Treharne, D. (2003). Teacher evaluation and teacher effectiveness in the United Kingdom. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 83-100.
Ribeiro, J. J., & DeMagistris, D. (2011). Does a co-learner delivery model in a mathematics methods course affect pre-service teacher candidates’ self-efficacy in teaching mathematics? Retrieved from http://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/teacher_ed/5
Richmond, G., & Manokore, V. (2011). Identifying elements critical for functional and sustainable professional learning communities. Science Education, 95(3), 543-570.
Rigdon, E. (2005). SEM FAQ. Retrieved from http://www.gsu.edu/~mkteer/sem.html.
Roberts, M. S., & Pruitt, Z. E. (2003). School as professional learning communities: Collaborative & activities and strategies for professional development. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press Inc.
Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
Rockoff, J. E., & Speroni, C. (2011). Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness: Evidence from New York city. Labour Economics, 18, 687-696.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: New York.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2005). Strengthening the heartbeat: Leading and learning together in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T. J., & Green, R. L. (2015). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structional equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Southworth, G. (2005). Learning-centred leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 75-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Spillane, J. P., & Orlina, E. C. (2005, April). Investigating leadership practices: Exploring the entailments of taking a distributed perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Association, Montreal, Canada.
Strike, K. A. (1999). Can school be communities? The tension between shared values and inclusion. Educational Administration Quaterly, 35(1), 46-70.
Stronge, J., & Hindman, J. (2003). Hiring the best teachers. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 48-52.
Swaffield, S., & MacBeath, J. (2009). Leadership for learning. In J. MacBeath, & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning (pp. 32-52). New York, NY: Routledge.
Taylor, M. (1982). Community, anarchy and liberty. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Theall, M., & Franklin, J. (Eds.). (1991). Effective practices for improving teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Theoharis, G. (2009). The school leaders our children deserve: Seven keys to equality, social justice and school reform. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Timperly, H. S. (2015). Continuing professional development. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2, 796-802.
Tinsley, H. E. A., & Tinsley, D. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414-424.
Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., & Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263-275.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk, H. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2016). Relating school leadership to perceived professional learning community characteristics: A multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 26-38.
Walker, D., & Downey, P. (2012). Leadership for learning. The Educational Forum, 76, 13-24.
Waters, C. D. (2009). Case study: Teacher perceptions of professional learning communities in an elementary school setting (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Wildman T., & Niles, J. (1987). Essentials of professional growth. Educational Leadership, 44(5), 4-10.
Willson, M. S. (2006). Examining professional learning community factors related to educators receptivity to professional development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 81-89.
Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about management students. Teaching & Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-148.
Wray, D., Medwell, J., Fox, R., & Poulson, L. (2000). The teaching practices of effective teachers of literacy. Educational Review, 52(1), 75-84.
Wu, Robert T. Y. (2005). Relationship between teachers’ teaching effectiveness and school effectiveness in comprehensive high schools in Taiwan, Republic of China. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED490759)
York-Barr, J., Sommers, A. W., Ghere, G. S., & Montie, J. (2001). Reflective practice to improve schools: An action guide for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE