:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣南部水利糾紛的歷史考察
書刊名:興大歷史學報
作者:陳鴻圖 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Hung-tu
出版日期:2008
卷期:20
頁次:頁109-134
主題關鍵詞:臺灣南部水利糾紛分水輪灌水利規約官府角色嘉南大圳分水協定Southern TaiwanDisputes over water conservancyRotating of water irrigationRules of water conservancyRoles of the governmentChia-nan irrigationAgreement of water dividing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:139
  • 點閱點閱:129
水利糾紛是臺灣農村社會最常見到的紛爭,嚴重的水利糾紛不但引發械鬥,甚至造成社會的動亂。臺灣南部由於氣溫高、河川短促、水源缺乏,漢人大量來臺開墾後,水利灌溉一直是農業急待解決的問題,除了「開源」的水利開發外,「節流」 的分水輪灌是農民間存在已久的默契。水源充足的時候,水利糾紛較少,但遇缺水時節,爭水糾紛頗多。 清代臺灣南部最常發生的水利糾紛是爭水源、爭水份及埠圳興築為害墳墓等三種。時官府對於水利糾紛的處理,大都採取息事寧人的態度,如危及莊社、田園、墳廬,則會採取較嚴厲的立場。由於官府的態度被動,民間社會乃有規約來維持水利秩序。日治時期臺灣總督府強力介入水利運作,將舊有埠圳公共化,透過水利組織管理水利設施。然農民由於負擔較過去為重,且分水輪灌受制於米、糖競爭的制約,再加上水利紛爭掺入臺、日間複雜的民族問題,水利糾紛相形複雜,嘉南大圳被譏為「咬人大圳」。戰後,由於經過日治時期水利公共化及水利組織的確立,水利糾紛的產生大多圍繞在水費的抗爭和盜水兩個問題上,兩個問題水利單位都可以直接訴諸司法解決,但在權衡農民生計問題下,常以協調或寫悔過書來解決水利糾紛。
Disputes over water conservancy were prevalent in Taiwan’s agriculture society. Serious disputes over water conservancy not only resulted in fights with weapons but also caused social upheaval. There were several reasons he1ped to explain such disputes in southern Taiwan: high temperature, short and rapid rivers, lack of water sources. After the Han people came to Taiwan for rec1amation, the disposition of water - either for developing water sources, or rotating the water irrigation - was always a crucial issue that needed to be solved. Particularly when it came to the dry season, such kind of disputes were more frequent. There were three most common disputes over water conservancy in southern Taiwan under the rule of Qing dynasty: disputes over sources of water; disputes over shares of water; disputes over the damage of tombs due to the constructions of irrigations or channels. The local government was more passive than the civil society in dealing with the disputes; mostly the government tended to reconcile the disputes unless the disputes involved the danger of the village, the farmland, or the burial ground. The order of water conservancy was therefore maintained by the agreements made by the civil society. During the period of Japanese rule, the Government-general intervened water operations vigorously. It publicized the old channels or irrigations, and managed the water facilities through the organizations of water conservancy. However, the heavier pressures of farmers, the restriction of rotating irritation by the competition of rice and sugar, and the racial issue between Taiwanese and Japanese, all resulted in the complicated disputes over water conservancy. That was why Chia-nan Irrigation was mocked as “the Biting Irrigation.” After the Sino-Japanese War, disputes over water conservancy were mostly about the fights for water charges and the stealing of water due to the establishment of the publicization and organization of water conservancy. These two issues can be settled down by appealing to law, but usually they were solved either by conciliation or writing statements of penitence, since the economy of the farmers were not all affordable for them to go to court.
期刊論文
1.French, S. A.、Jaffery, R. W.、Murray, D.(1999)。Is dieting good for you? Prevalence, duration and associated weight and behaviour changes for specific weight loss strategies over four yours in US adults。International Journal of Obesity,23(3),320-327。  new window
2.二宮對富(1931)。公共埤圳の概念。台灣の水利,1(3),10-19。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳鴻圖(20010600)。日治時期臺灣水利事業的建立與運作--以嘉南大圳為例。輔仁歷史學報,12,117-119+121-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.永山止米郎(1931)。嘉南大圳組合事業の現況。台湾時報,1931(1月号),23-28。  延伸查詢new window
5.有安龍太郎(1937)。臺灣に於ける小作慣行。臺灣の水利,7(2),110-111。  延伸查詢new window
6.降矢壽(1937)。農耕地の各作物區への分布狀況と是れが改善事業(嘉南大圳組合區域)。臺灣の水利,7(1),114-119。  延伸查詢new window
7.藤黑總左衛門(1932)。水利組合の經營。台灣の水利,2(5),1-5。  延伸查詢new window
8.增田福太郎(1932)。水利組合の本質について-法理學の觀點より-。台灣の水利,2(1),4。  延伸查詢new window
9.花岡伊之作(1911)。曹公圳起源。臺灣慣習記事,1(8),25-32。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1925)。嘉南大圳的灌溉問題。臺灣民報。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1926)。嘉南大圳三年輪作又是官僚辦法。臺灣民報。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1927)。三年輪作的罪惡 犧牲農民的生命。臺灣民報。  延伸查詢new window
13.李次珊(1953)。濁水溪的分水調節問題。臺灣水利,1(3),13。  延伸查詢new window
14.何見旺、陳麗美(1999)。濁水溪水量調節之分水、配水。農田水利,45(12),33-34。  延伸查詢new window
15.藤黑總左衛門(1936)。臺灣南部の產業使命と嘉南大圳。臺灣の水利,6(2),18-23。  延伸查詢new window
16.木原圓次(1932)。水利と自治。台灣の水利,2(3),4-6。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉素芬(1999)。清代臺灣農田水利研究—政府介入的契機。臺北。1-32。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳鴻圖(2004)。嘉南大圳史料調查及蒐集計畫期末報告。臺東。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周天生。由基層地方官的幾項量化分析及職責看清代地方吏治(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇坤輝(1998)。十 九世紀以前岡山地區的土地利用(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾國棟。清代台灣示禁碑之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭雲萍(1994)。國家與社會之間的嘉南大圳--以日據時期為中心(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.顧雅文(2000)。八堡圳與彰化平原人文、自然環境變遷之互動歷程(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.臺北米榖事務所(1936)。嘉南大圳。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣總督府殖產局(1921)。臺灣農業年報。臺北:臺灣總督府殖產局。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺灣總督府內務局土木課(1942)。臺灣水利關係法令類纂。臺北:臺灣水利協會。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺灣省文獻委員會(1961)。臺灣文獻輯覽(一):經濟部門林業‧水利。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺灣總督府內務局土木課(1944)。半世紀間臺灣農業水利大觀。半世紀間臺灣農業水利大觀。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.井出季和太、郭輝(1977)。日據下之臺政。臺中市:南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.何培夫(1994)。臺灣地區現存碑碣圖誌‧臺南縣篇。臺北市:國立中央圖書館臺灣分館。  延伸查詢new window
8.丁曰健、臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1958)。治臺必告錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.公共埤圳嘉南大圳組合(1930)。嘉南大圳新設事業概要。臺北:臺灣日日新報社。  延伸查詢new window
10.矢內原忠雄、周憲文(1985)。日本帝國主義下的臺灣。臺北市:帕米爾書店。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃典權(1966)。臺灣南部碑文集成。臺北市:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
12.馮桂芬(1970)。(光緒)蘇州府志。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.王世慶(19940000)。清代臺灣社會經濟。臺北市:聯經出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1963)。臺灣私法物權篇。臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳鴻圖(19960000)。水利開發與清代嘉南平原的發展。臺北:國史館。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃雯娟(1998)。宜蘭縣水利發展史。宜蘭縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
17.戴炎輝(1997)。清代臺灣的鄉治。清代臺灣的鄉治。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.森田明(1974)。清代水利組織の構造と性格。清代水利史研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
19.古川勝三(1989)。台灣を愛した日本人:嘉南大圳の父八田與一の生涯。台灣を愛した日本人:嘉南大圳の父八田與一の生涯。日本松山。  延伸查詢new window
20.臺灣省斗六農田水利會(1963)。建圳十七年。建圳十七年。斗六。  延伸查詢new window
21.臺灣省嘉南農田水利會(1951)。嘉南農田水利會統計要覽。嘉南農田水利會統計要覽。臺南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1911)。臺灣公共埤圳規則。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1913)。爭水殺人,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1916)。爭水致命,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1930)。嘉南大圳的水利租業主將要求三年延期。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1930)。愛妹を賣つて嘉南大圳の水租納入。  延伸查詢new window
6.(19300927)。嘉南大圳沒有給水也要徵收水租/地主們大起抗議/「咬人」大圳的正體暴露/請看當局將如何處置。  延伸查詢new window
7.(19310117)。水害組合?!全收入が水組に充たぬ桃園嘉南大圳の慘狀。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1930)。不堪嘉南大圳的強迫 善化庄業佃組織協和會 將來的活動大可注目。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1930)。嘉南大圳強迫編入土地 派警察強開小水路 業主農民交涉決裂。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1931)。地主會向大圳理事者提交要求的決議文。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1931)。大圳管理者は愈愈萬策盡きたか。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1931)。嘉南大圳水租雖有減輕一半依然負擔困難。  延伸查詢new window
13.(1931)。嘉南大圳評議員籌設大圳問題研究會。  延伸查詢new window
14.(1902)。八堡圳圳頭破壞事件一恬。  延伸查詢new window
15.中央社(2008)。曹公圳整治工程受阻,楊秋興盼化解僵局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Pasternak, Burton(1972)。The Sociology of Irrigation: Two Taiwanese Villages。Economic Organization in Chinese Society。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE