:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會福利政策該關注所得貧窮或消費貧窮?
書刊名:臺灣社會福利學刊
作者:洪明皇 引用關係
作者(外文):Hong, Ming-hwang
出版日期:2011
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁97-165
主題關鍵詞:貧窮消費所得收入支出條件式PovertyIncomeConsumptionConditional analysis of income and expenditure
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:145
本研究使用臺灣 1988-2008年家庭收支調查,透過對照家戶所得與消費的排序特徵、比較所得貧窮及消費貧窮群體的重疊與差異、及各類家庭收支餘絀狀況,來探討社會福利政策該關注所得貧窮或消費貧窮。主要發現為︰1.雖然就所得與消費的排序特徵來看,用消費資料測量貧窮下,所得與消費的高低排序較一致。但以生命循環假說為立論基礎的消費貧窮測量,在臺灣的適用性仍須商榷。2.單親家庭是「僅消費低」這個群體中,較值得關心的經濟弱勢。3.老人夫妻兩人家庭陷入「僅所得低且入不敷出」的比率相當高。主要建議為︰扶貧政策分析應兼採所得與消費指標,並引入類似本研究收入支出條件式的的分析方法,如此才能更細緻區別不同類型的經濟弱勢。
This study uses the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan from 1988 to 2008 to investigate the income poverty and consumption poverty groups requiring concern from social welfare policies by comparing the ranking of features such as income and expenditure among households, the overlaps and differences between income and consumption poverty groups, and the surplus and deficit of various family incomes. The primary results of this study are as follows: (1) Regarding the feature ranking of income and expenditures, we observed a consistent ranking of income and expenditure when using consumption data to evaluate poverty. However, using a life-cycle hypothesis in supporting the feasibility of consumption poverty evaluation in Taiwan requires further confirmation. (2)Among households with expenditure below the set expenditure threshold but income above the set income threshold, single parent households deserve particular attention. (3)Elderly two-member households have a relatively high rate of being “households with income below the set income threshold but expenditure above the set expenditure threshold” and “households with income less than expenditure.” This study suggests that poverty reduction policy analysis should consider both income and expenditure indices, and employ a conditional analysis of income and expenditure similar to the method used in this study, to enable a more thorough classification of the various economically disadvantaged groups.
期刊論文
1.Pendakur, Krishna(1993)。Changes in Canadian Family Income and Family Consumption Inequality between 1978 and 1992。Review of Income and Wealth,44(2),259-283。  new window
2.Slesnick, Daniel(1993)。Gaining Ground: Poverty in the Postwar United States。Journal of Political Economy,101(1),1-38。  new window
3.Dhawan-Biswal, U.(2002)。Consumption and Income Inequality: The Case of Atlantic Canada from 1969-1996。Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques,28(4),513-537。  new window
4.王永慈(19951200)。我國直接稅的所得再分配效果--兼論等值量表的敏感性。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,24,211-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.洪明皇、鄭文輝(2007)。所得定義與均等值設定對經濟福利不均的測量影響。經濟研究,45(1),11-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.詹維玲(20090300)。臺灣生命循環消費與退休。臺灣經濟預測與政策,39(2),129-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Orshansky, Mollie(1965)。Counting the poor: Another look at the poverty profile。Social Security Bulletin,28(7),3-29。  new window
8.薛承泰、黃碧霞、李璧如(20110600)。重修「貧窮線」的意義。社區發展季刊,134,381-399。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王永慈(20050100)。臺灣的貧窮問題:相關研究的檢視。臺大社會工作學刊,10,1+3-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王德睦、呂朝賢、何華欽(20031200)。臺灣貧窮門檻與測量的建立:FCSU的應用。臺大社會工作學刊,8,1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王德睦、何華欽、呂朝賢(20030400)。兒童與成人基本生活費用的差異。調查研究,13,5-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Zaidi, Asghar、Burchardt, Tania(2005)。Comparing Incomes when Needs Differ: Equivalization for the Extra Costs of Disability in the U.K.。The Review of Income and Wealth,51(1),89-114。  new window
13.Smeeding, T. M.、Weinberg, D. H.(2001)。Toward a Uniform Definition of Household Income。Journal of Income and Wealth,47(1),1-24。  new window
14.Cutler, David M.、Katz, Lawrence F.(1992)。Rising Inequality? Changes in the Distribution of Income and Consumption in the 1980's。American Economic Review,82(2),546-551。  new window
15.Barreti, Garry、Crossley, Thomas、Worswick, Christopher(2000)。Consumption and Income Inequality in Australia。Economic Record,76(33),116-138。  new window
16.McGregor, Patrick、Borooah, Vani.(1992)。Is Low Spending or Low Income a Better Indicator of Whether or Not a Household is Poor: Some Results from the 1985 Family Expenditure Survey。Journal of Social Policy,21(1),53-69。  new window
17.主計處(2011)。國民經濟統計季報134。  延伸查詢new window
18.Blacklow, P.、Ray, R.(2000)。A Comparison of Income and Expenditure Inequality Estimates: The Australian Evidence, 1975-76 to 1993-94。The Australian Economic Review,33(4),317-329。  new window
19.Fisher, G. M.(1992)。The Development and History of the Poverty Thresholds。Social Security Bulletin,55(4),3-14。  new window
20.Gradín, C.、Cantó, O.、Río, C. D.(2008)。Inequality, Poverty and Mobility: Choosing Income or Consumption as Welfare Indicators。Investigaciones Económicas,32(2),169-200。  new window
21.Johnson, D. S.、Smeeding, T. M.、Torrey, B. B.(2005)。Economic Inequality through the Prims of Income and Consumption。Monthly Labor Review,128(4),11-24。  new window
22.Meyer, B. D.、Sullivan, J. X.(2003)。Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption。The Journal of Human Resources,38,1180-1220。  new window
23.Muellbauer, J.(1974)。Inequality Measure, Prices and Household Composition。Review of Economic Studies,41,483-504。  new window
24.Pendakur, K.(2001)。Consumption Poverty in Canada, 1969 to 1998。Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques,28(2),125-149。  new window
25.Robert, K. W. S.(1980)。Price Independent Wealfare Prescriptions。Journal of Public Economics,13,277-298。  new window
26.Saunders, P.、Bradshaw, J.、Hirst, M.(2002)。Using Household Expenditure to Develop an Income Poverty Line。Social Policy and Administration,36(3),217-234。  new window
研究報告
1.王永慈、陳昭榮(2007)。我國所得分配變動及因應對策之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.王永慈、陳昭榮、鄭清霞(2008)。探討新貧問題及其因應對策研究研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.湯淺誠、蕭秋梅(2010)。反貧困--逃出溜滑梯的社會。台北:早安財經文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Citro, Constance F.、Michael, Robert T.(1995)。Measuring Poverty: A New Approach。Washington, D.C.:National Academies Press。  new window
3.內政部(2009)。九十七年低收入戶生活狀況調查報告。臺北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
4.主計處(2008)。九十六年家庭收支調查報告。臺北:主計處。  延伸查詢new window
5.主計處(2009)。九十七年家庭收支調查報告。臺北:主計處。  延伸查詢new window
6.主計處(2010)。九十八年家庭收支調查報告。臺北:主計處。  延伸查詢new window
7.主計處(2011)。九十九年家庭收支調查報告。臺北:主計處。  延伸查詢new window
8.Brewer, M.、Goodman, A.、Leicester, A.(2006)。Household spending in Brita: What Can It Teach Us about Poverty?。Bristol:The Policy Press。  new window
9.Fiegehen, G. C.、Lansley, P. S.、Smith, A. D.(1977)。Poverty and Progress in Britain, 1953-1973: A Statistical Study of Low Income Households: Their Numbers, Types and Expenditure Patterns。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Friedman, M.(1957)。A Theory of Consumption Function。Princton:Princeton University Press。  new window
11.277-298(1901)。Poverty: A Study of Town Life。London:Macmillan。  new window
其他
1.中華民國統計資訊網(2011)。社會指標--65歲以上人口占總人口比率,http://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4, 2011/03/27。  延伸查詢new window
2.主計處(2011)。主計處統計專區:物價指數,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=2825, 2011/03/27。  延伸查詢new window
3.Abel-Smith, B., & Townsend, P.(1966)。The Poor and the Poorest: A New Analysis of the Ministry of Labour's Family Expenditure Surveys of 1953-54 and 1960,London:Bell。  new window
4.Crossley, T. F.,Pendakur, K.(2002)。Consumption Inequality,http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/rsrch/papers/archive/2002-09.pdf., 2008/11/12。  new window
5.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(2006)。Equivalence Scale: Subjective Methods,http://www.fao.org/tc/easypol/output/search_by_topics.asp., 2007/09/03。  new window
6.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(2006)。Impact of Policies on Poverty: Definition of Poverty,http://www.fao.org/tc/easypol/output/search_by_topics.asp, 2007/09/03。  new window
7.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(2006)。Impact of Policies on Poverty: Relative Poverty Li,http://www.fao.org/tc/easypol/output/search_by_topics.asp, 2007/09/03。  new window
8.Luxembourg Income Study(2009)。Lis Key Figures,http://www.lisproject.org/key-figures/kf-workbook.xls., 2009/02/01。  new window
9.Niemelä, M.(2005)。Trends on the Relationship between Low Income and Low Expenditure in Finland 1966-2001,http://vanha.soc.utu.fi/sospol/julkaisut/C%2016%20B5%20PS%2030%20kpl.pdf., 2009/02/16。  new window
圖書論文
1.Modigliani, Franco、Brumberg, R.(1954)。Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-section Data。Post Keynesian Economics。New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press。  new window
2.Atkinson, A. B.(1989)。How Should We Measure Poverty? Some Conceptual Issues。Poverty and Social Security。London:Harvester Wheatsheaf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE