:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小經濟弱勢生學習生活與學習文化之個案研究--凌寒待暖陽
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:蕭玉佳張芬芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Yu-chiaChang, Fen-fen
出版日期:2013
卷期:16:1
頁次:頁35-67
主題關鍵詞:經濟弱勢生弱勢生學習生活學習文化文化Economically disadvantaged studentDisadvantaged studentEducational lifeEducational cultureCulture
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:704
  • 點閱點閱:293
本研究目的有二:(1)探究3名國小經濟弱勢生的學習生活特徵。(2)分析3名經濟弱勢生所習得的學習文化,亦即對學習所抱持的觀念取向。本研究採觀察、訪談、文件分析等方法,進行一年之田野資料蒐集。歸納家庭、社區、學校等田野資料,所獲結論如下:(1)在學習生活特徵方面,3名經濟弱勢生共同處有七,一在社區方面,鄰居親友往來頻繁,唯文化資源不充裕;二為家中照顧人力充裕,唯教育資源闕如;三為家長教養態度寬嚴互補,唯家中均有負面身教者;四是家長對教育之期望均表示自己強調品德,唯本身有心無力去施教;五在家人互動上,個案與照養者感情親密,唯家人為錢衝突頻繁;六在學校人際方面,3個案均能建立固定友伴,唯亦因不當行為而招致同儕非議;七在學習動機上雖了解學習係本分,唯學習態度卻被動消極。(2)在學習文化方面,3名經濟弱勢生習得之相似觀念有六,一對「教育脫貧」的看法傾向「現實主義」;二對「成績優劣」持「無足輕重」態度;三對「科目喜好」持「好逸惡勞」觀念;四對「家長期望」傾向「避罰服從」、「追求安定」;五對「師長管教」希冀「寬鬆為尚」,表現「臣服權威」態度;六在「同學相處」上傾向「尋求隸屬」、「重利輕義」。最後本研究提出對學校教師、政府單位與未來研究等方面建議。
The aims of this study are to explore the educational life of three specific economically disadvantaged students (EDS) and their acquired educational culture, namely, their values in relation to learning. In order to collect the field data, we conducted observations and carried out interviews and document analyses. The conclusions we reached are as follows: 1. The three EDS shared common life experiences in seven respects: the cultural resources of their community; the educational resources of their family; parental attitudes to nurturing; parental expectations in relation to their children's education; interactive relationships among family members; inter-personal adjustment at school and motivation to learn. 2. The EDS shared the following features in their educational lives: despite their constant interaction with relatives and neighbors, the students did not enjoy abundant cultural resources; although living in caring families, the students had few educational resources; the parents of these students tended to unconsciously display negative examples of behavior, although they usually exhibited a conscious balance between leniency and strictness in their attitudes toward the students; although morality was their top concern, the parents did not prove to be good examples for their children in this respect; students' interactions with their family members were generally intimate, but they often became involved in conflicts with one another because of money; the EDS often had difficulty establishing stable inter-personal relationships with their peers at school as a result of their misconduct; although they clearly defined learning as their top responsibility, their motivation in this respect was comparatively passive. The EDS shared common ideas in relation to the opportunity to overcome poverty through education, academic achievement, subject preference, parental expectations, teachers' discipline and instruction, and companionship with classmates. They were realistic in their views of the opportunity to overcome poverty through education; they took an indifferent attitude toward grades; they tended to prefer easy subjects; they were keen to fulfill their parents' expectations; they tended to adopt a tolerant and subservient attitude toward teachers' discipline and instruction; and they took a subordinate and practical attitude when attempting to get along with their classmates.
期刊論文
1.黃國彥、劉玉燕(1983)。教師期望與社經地位對兒童學業成就之影響。國立政治大學學報,47,61-82。  延伸查詢new window
2.Guo, G.、Harris, K. M.(2000)。The mechanisms mediation the effects of poverty on children's intellectual development。Demography,37(4),431-447。  new window
3.黃木蘭(2006)。愛心不容任意消費。師友月刊,470,17-20。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sewell, W. H.、Hauser, R. M.(1980)。The Wisconsin longitudinal study of social and psychological factors in aspirations and achievements。Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization,1,59-101。  new window
5.Crosnoe, R.、Johnson, M. K.、Elder, G. H. Jr.(2004)。Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships。Sociology of Education,77(1),60-81。  new window
6.陳建州、劉正(20010600)。重探學校教育功能--家庭背景因素影響力變化之研究。臺東師院學報,12(上),115-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳麗珠(20061100)。從公平性邁向適足性:我國國民教育資源分配政策的現況與展望。教育政策論壇,9(4),101-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.呂朝賢(19990600)。社會救助問題:政策目的、貧窮的定義與測量。人文及社會科學集刊,11(2),233-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.馬信行(19850500)。家庭文化背景與學業成績的關係。國立政治大學學報,51,139-165。  延伸查詢new window
10.White, K. R.(1982)。The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement。Psychological Bulletin,91(3),461-481。  new window
11.呂朝賢(20070100)。貧窮動態及其成因--從生命週期到生命歷程。臺大社會工作學刊,14,167+169-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林義男(19880300)。國小學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及學業成就的關係。輔導學報,11,95-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.周新富(20061200)。Coleman社會資本理論在臺灣地區的驗證--家庭、社會資本與學業成就之關係。當代教育研究,14(4),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.楊瑩(19940500)。臺灣地區不同家庭背景子女受教機會差異之研究。教育研究資訊,2(3),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.謝孟穎(20030600)。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。教育研究集刊,49(2),255-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Teachman, Jay D.(1987)。Family Background, Educational Resources, and Educational Attainment。American Sociological Review,52(4),548-557。  new window
17.陳麗珠(20080800)。弱勢學生照顧政策之檢討與改進。教育研究,172,5-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.李文益、黃毅志(20041200)。文化資本、社會資本與學生成就的關聯性之研究--以臺東師院為例。臺東大學教育學報,15(2),23-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.楊深坑(20081200)。社會公義、差異政治與教育機會均等的新視野。當代教育研究,16(4),1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.陳怡靖、鄭燿男(20000700)。臺灣地區教育階層化之變遷--檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在臺灣的適用性。國家科學委員會研究彙刊.人文及社會科學,10(3),416-434。  延伸查詢new window
21.張芳全(20061200)。社經地位、文化資本與教育期望對學業成就影響之結構方程模式檢定。測驗學刊,53(2),261-295。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.巫有鎰(19990700)。影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制--以臺北市和臺東縣作比較。教育研究集刊,43,213-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.楊振昇、林坤燦(20080800)。臺灣地區弱勢族群學生教育輔助計畫之現況與展望。教育研究月刊,172,17-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.李敦仁、余民寧(20051200)。社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結構關係模式之驗證:以TEPS資料庫資料為例。臺灣教育社會學研究,5(2),1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.林義男(19930600)。國中學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及其學業成就的關係。輔導學報,16,157-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Sewell, William H.、Haller, Archibald O.、Portes, Alejendro(1969)。The Educational and Early Occupational Attainment Process。American Sociological Review,34(1),82-92。  new window
會議論文
1.何金香(1999)。教育優先區的省思。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。201-219。  延伸查詢new window
2.國立臺灣大學師資培育中心(2009)。實施計畫。臺北:國立臺灣大學教務處師資培育中心。2。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉美慧(200906)。重新理解弱勢學生:敘事與行動取向的多元文化師資培育。弱勢學生師資專業素養學術研討會,淡江大學主辦 。新北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王秀槐(1985)。國中高、低成就學生家庭環境與學習態度之比較研究(碩士論文)。政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐慕蓮(1987)。個人及家庭因素影響國小新生學校生活適應之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳正昌(1994)。從教育機會均等觀點探討家庭、學校與國小學生學業成就之關係(博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.郭素蘭(1984)。國小資優兒童與普通兒童在家庭社經背景與父母管教態度上的差異(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭淵全(1997)。社經地位、能力、學校教育過程與國小學生學業成就之關係--功能典範與衝突典範之探究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃懷萱(2006)。父母的社經地位、管教方式及親子關係與兒童學業成就關係之探討(碩士論文)。台南女子技術學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉美慧(2008)。文化回應教學。多元文化教育。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.譚光鼎(2008)。特殊學生與多元文化。多元文化教育。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Coleman, J. S.、Hoffer, T.、Kilgore, S. B.(1966)。Equality of education opportunity。Washington, DC:U. S. Government Printing Office。  new window
4.Mayer, S. E.(1997)。What Money Can’t Buy: Family Income and Children’s Life Chances。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Lewis, Oscar、丘延亮(2004)。貧窮文化:墨西哥五個家庭一日生活的實錄。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃鴻文(2003)。國民中學學生文化之民族誌研究。臺北市:學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.許嘉猷(1992)。社會階層化與社會流動。台北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Geertz, Clifford(1973)。The interpretation of cultures。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
9.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、張芬芬(2005)。質性研究資料分析。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
10.Babbie, Earl Robert(1998)。The Practice of Social Research。International Thomson Publishing:Wadsworth。  new window
其他
1.內政部主計處(2009)。2001年臺閩地區低收入戶生活狀況調查結果摘要分,http://www.moi.gov.tw/W3/stat/Survey/lowincome90.htm, 20091220。  延伸查詢new window
2.王雲東(2007)。不要讓經濟弱勢兒童一開始就輸在起跑點上!,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/2127, 20091101。  延伸查詢new window
3.家扶基金會(2004)。臺灣兒童及少年貧窮調查報告,http://www.ccf.org.tw/index_1.php, 20091210。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2009)。教育部98 年度施政目標與重點,http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0039/98%ae%d6%a9w%a4W%b3%af%aa%a9.doc, 20091218。  new window
5.教育部(2001)。2001年教育改革之檢討與改進會議,http://www.edu.tw/content.aspx?site_content_sn=1360, 20090328。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Duncan, G. J.、Brooks-Gunn, J.(1997)。Income effects across the life span: Integration and interpretation。Consequences of growing up poor。New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE