:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣高等教育公平議題之民意調查研究
書刊名:高等教育
作者:劉秀曦黃家凱
作者(外文):Liu, Hsiu-hsiHuang, Chia-kai
出版日期:2012
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁1-38
主題關鍵詞:民意調查多元入學高等教育教育公平學雜費Telephone interviewing surveySystem of diversified university admissionsHigher educationEducational equityTuition fee
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:89
  • 點閱點閱:43
1980年代以後,各先進國家高等教育多由菁英型轉向大眾化甚至普及化發展,我國亦然。高等教育擴張雖提供國人更多接受高等教育的機會,但高等教育公平程度是否伴隨著數量擴充而提升,成為各界關注的新議題。本研究旨在瞭解社會大眾對於高等教育公平與相關教育政策方案執行成效的看法,以做為政府未來相關政策規劃與改進的參考。為達研究目的,本研究以高等教育公平議題進行民意調查。首先根據文獻探討、文件分析、專家諮詢座談會議發展出包含大學彈性學雜費方案與大學多元入學方案等議題之民意調查問卷,其次透過電話訪問調查,以居住台閩地區(包括台灣本島及離島澎湖、連江、金門三縣)且年滿20歲之受訪民眾為對象進行抽樣調查。最後根據研究發現提出兩項建議供主管機關參考,其一,就大學彈性學費政策而言,政府應建置更為整全的助學系統;其二,就大學多元入學方案而言,政府應規劃更為具體的扶弱措施。
Higher education have been expanded rapidly in many advanced countries, and transformed from the traditional pattern of the "elite" , to a "mass", or even an "universal" pattern since 1980s. This expansion has provided the public with more opportunities to enter higher education in Taiwan, but whether such expansion has promoted the equity of higher education remains questionable with great concern. The main goal of this study is to offer valuable empirical findings for higher education decision-making in Taiwan. The methods of this study include literature review, document analysis, experts' consultative meeting. The questionnaire has modified primarily according to the consultative suggestions from the experts. Besides, representative samples of adult population were surveyed regarding their views and attitudes toward equity issues of higher education. One thousand and seventy one interviewees who are 20 years old or above were randomly sampled by CATI (computer-assisted telephone interviewing) according to the population percentage of counties. The results of this study show that the government still needs to face the challenge of achieving equity in higher education and there is still plenty of room for improvement in the future policy-making of higher education. Therefore, it is necessary to re-examine financial aid programs and the mechanism of educational selection for disadvantaged students.
期刊論文
1.田芳華、傅祖壇(20090300)。大學多元入學制度:學生家庭社經背景與學業成就之比較。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),209-233。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.DiMaggio, Paul、Mohr, John(1985)。Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection。American Journal of Sociology,90(6),1231-1261。  new window
3.秦夢群(20040800)。大學多元入學制度實施與改革之研究。教育政策論壇,7(2),59-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.彭森明(20050900)。臺灣高等教育應如何進一步落實公平化的理念?。教育研究月刊,137,5-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jonathan, R.(1997)。Illusory freedoms: liberalism, education and the market。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
2.張鈿富(2006)。大學多元入學機會與壓力。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2007)。97學年度大學多入學方案家長手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.大學入學考試中心(2001)。大學多元入學新方案,台北:大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.大學招生委員會聯合會(2010)。入學管道,http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/left-32.htm。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院主計處(2011)。普查應用名詞解釋(二),http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=550&ctNode=547。  延伸查詢new window
4.林思宇(2011)。大學學雜費確定不漲,http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/11053l/5/2si6p.html。  new window
5.教育部(2008)。教育施政藍圖(98-101年),http://www.edu.tw/content.aspx?site_content_sn=87。  new window
6.教育部統計處(2010)。近16年我國教育發展統計分析(83-98學年度),http://www.edtw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=24755。  延伸查詢new window
7.教育部統計處(2011)。各級教育學齡人口在學率:淨在學率,http://www.edu.tw/files/publication/B0013/99mdicators.xls。  延伸查詢new window
8.教育部統計處(2011)。學雜費歷年調幅及占平均每人國內生產毛額之比率:一般大學,http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0013/overviewl8.xls。  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部統計處(2011)。高、低所得家庭受高等教育比率,http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8956。  延伸查詢new window
10.Eurydice(2008)。Higher education governance in Europe: Policies, structures, funding and academic staff,http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/ressources/eurydice/pdf/0_integral/091EN.pdf。  new window
11.Harrison, A.(2011)。University fees: Half opting for top fees, survey says,http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education13004196。  new window
圖書論文
1.Trow, Martin(1974)。Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education。Policies for Higher Education: General Report。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE