:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:談權力關係下及人際互動中--教師異化現象
書刊名:區域與社會發展研究
作者:柯佳伶李麗日 引用關係
作者(外文):Ko, Chia-lingLee, Li-jih
出版日期:2011
卷期:2
頁次:頁129-160
主題關鍵詞:異化教師異化權力關係人際互動AlienationTeachers' alienationPower relationsPersonal interaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:78
  • 點閱點閱:3
本研究採用質性研究法,以半結構深度訪談方式,訪談十六位國小教師,希望透過受訪者詳盡的敘說,完整且清楚呈現教師於權力關係下及人際互動中的異化現象。本研究結果如下: 一、權力關係下的教師異化現象 教師在權力關係下職務選擇受限,影響因素有:資深教師往往優先挑選中年級導師職務及某些組長職位由固定的人員擔任。另外,因行政業務過於繁重,使得組長、教師推託及敷衍完成行政業務。而代表制、忽略教師意見及必須謹慎發言的校務會議,沒有成立教師會及運作有限的教師會,教師會理事長受職務角色的影響立場有所偏頗及教師會成員中的行政人員權益未獲重視,教師於課程發展委員會中因減課問題有所衝突,都顯示教師參與校務情形未達理想。 二、人際互動中的教師異化現象 對於學習動機不高及不服管教的高年級學生,教師無能為力,而家長未能配合,使得教師不能發揮專業能力協助學生。再來,教師較無法互助追求高品質教學,也缺乏行政人員的支援,甚至彼此有所衝突。最後,菜鳥教師除了職務的選擇有限外,也承擔較多的工作,在各項會議上,更是不敢發言。
Qualitative research method was adopted and semi-structured in-depth interviews were used to interview sixteen primary school teachers in this study. The research result was as follows. 1. Teacher’s alienation phenomena beneath the power relationship: Positions that teachers could choose were limited because senior teachers often chosen to be primary homeroom teachers of medium grade. Besides, section chiefs who stayed in fixed positions. Busy and tedious educational administrative works made section chiefs dodge the works and teachers accomplished those works perfunctorily. Many phenomena reported as follows indicate that teachers didn’t participate in school business freely. For example, population and time were limited in the school council. Teachers had to speak cautiously in the school council to avoid losing their work . Teachers’ opinions were ignored in the school council. Teachers’ associations were operated with limitations or were not established at all. The standpoint of the president of teachers’ council was affected by his or her position. Rights and interests of administrative staffs were not respected in the Teachers’ associations. In the curriculum development committee, conflicts occurred between teachers because of class reduction problems. 2. Teacher’s alienation phenomena within personal interaction: Teachers couldn’t do anything to help senior students who learned passively or who didn’t obey disciplines. Parents couldn’t cooperate with teachers, and teachers couldn’t practice their professional teaching skills to help their students. Teachers couldn’t help each other to pursue better teaching quality. Teachers lacked for administrative staffs’ back-up; moreover, they conflicted with each other. Novice teachers not only had limited positions to choose but also took on more works; besides, they dared not speak out in any kind of councils.
期刊論文
1.周崇儒(20001000)。促進教師專業成長策略之分析。中等教育,51(5),74-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鍾任琴(19940600)。教師專業之探討。教師之友,35(3),29-35。  延伸查詢new window
3.姜添輝(20020600)。九年一貫課程政策影響教師專業自主權之研究。教育研究集刊,48(2),157-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.文麗萍(2008)。教師發展生態危機的成因透析--一種生態學視角。教育發展研究,29(5),192-194。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂艷紅(2009)。盧卡奇與馬克思主體異化思想差異辨析。經濟與社會發展,7(1),6-8。  延伸查詢new window
6.李志興(2007)。教育異化淺論。當代教育論壇,2007(5),21-22。  延伸查詢new window
7.Grace, M. D.(1997)。Organizational climate and teacher autonomy: Implications for educational reform。The International Journal of Educational Management,11(5),218-219。  new window
學位論文
1.許育榮(2003)。國民小學教師文化之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張其高(1999)。高雄縣國中小學教師職業疏離與人際衝突的相關性(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳麗容(1999)。高雄縣國民中小學教育人員的職業疏離(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳志強(2004)。文化再製過程中教師教育信念的成因與影響之分析(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭景澤(2007)。一路走來,何必如一--教師異化之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.葉淑花(1998)。國民小學教師文化之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.范信賢(1995)。文化霸權的運作機制:對國小教師學校生活世界的探討(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃裕婧(2002)。學校場域、教師習性與教師對台灣當前課程改革回應之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.王渝華(2005)。國小教師工作的異化現象與成因(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.朱輝南(2005)。組織精簡、裁撤與異化的關係:以空軍飛機修護人員為例(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉怡君(2006)。國民中學課程革新過程中教師文化之研究--以語文領域國文科為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭文鵬(2005)。山中猶有讀書聲--國民中學教師文化之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rosenholtz, S. J.(1991)。Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
2.Marx, Karl、伊海宇(1990)。1844年經濟學哲學手稿。時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.宋國誠(1990)。馬克思的人文主義。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭丁熒(20040000)。教師圖像:教師社會學研究。臺北:高雄復文圖書出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳奎憙(1993)。教育社會學研究。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾任琴(1999)。中小學教師專業自主權之研究。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bourdieu, P.、Passeron, J. C.、Richard, N.、Bottomore, T.(1990)。Reproduction in education, society and culture。London:Sage。  new window
8.Marx, K.、Engels, F.、Strunk, P. J.(1963)。The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844。New York:International Publisher。  new window
9.Marx, K.、Wood, A. W.(1988)。Marx selections。London:Collier Macmillan。  new window
10.Ollman, B.(1976)。Alienation: Marx's conception of man in capitalist society。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.陳向明(2002)。教師如何作質的研究。洪葉文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃政傑(1996)。質化研究的原理與方法。質的教育研究:方法與實例。台北:漢文。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hargreaves, A.(1992)。Cultures of Teaching: A Focus For Change。Understanding Teacher Development。New York:Teachers College Press, Columbia University。  new window
3.郭諭陵(2005)。中小學教師專業化之探討。教師的教育信念與專業標準。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sharon, F. N.、Robert, E. F.(1986)。The cultures of teaching。Handbook of research on teaching。New York:Macmillan。  new window
5.何福田、羅瑞玉(1996)。教育改革與教師專業化。教育專業。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE