:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:倫理的歸返、實踐與債務:黃錦樹的中文現代主義
書刊名:中山人文學報
作者:劉淑貞 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Shu-jhen
出版日期:2013
卷期:35
頁次:頁69-99
主題關鍵詞:現代主義離散倫理美學ModernismEthicsAestheticsDiaspora
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:128
  • 點閱點閱:147
本文試圖以黃錦樹所提出的「中文現代主義」作為起點,旁觸他所建構的抒情傳統、現代中國性、以及馬華文學等體系,試圖指出:在這些看似個別的研究個案之中,黃錦樹所試圖召喚的,正是那「不在」的中文幽靈。而這個既是缺席、卻又時時現身、干擾黃錦樹的論述及其研究對象的幽靈,將為我們指出黃錦樹本人的現代主義者身份,和他所列舉出的一整列「中文現代主義者」之間,其實正共享著同一個「離散華人-現代主義」的對等結構。這個結構體現在被二十世紀初的那場現代性驚爆所震散於各地的中文作家書寫當中,在行動的意義上,乃是呈現為對「中國」這一形上學意義的「父親」死亡後的反覆重寫。「中文現代主義」因此是一段戀父者歷經亡父後的彌留狀態:以父的屍身導向書寫的唯物論。而黃錦樹本人也在自身的小說場景裡,不斷重複實踐這一重寫式的唯物場景。本文試圖指出,現代主義之於黃錦樹,形式就是身份,而美學等同於倫理。黃錦樹作為一個離散華人作家,現代主義的形式姿態,將是他永恆的遙祭。而他所抗拒的國家文學認同,也將在在逼使他的書寫離開了「國土」概念的本質,以現代主義之「火」(形式),燎燒出一整片現代主義的「土」(倫理)。而這一向倫理回歸的實踐之道,也必然使他欠下之於美學的債務。
By taking the core concept that Huang Jinshu [Ng Kim Chew] has recently proposed ”Chinese Modernism: an Incomplete Project?” as a point of departure, this essay argues that a symmetric structure of diasporic Chinese Modernism is co-constituted between Huang the modernist writer and the group of Taiwanese writers whom he calls the Chinese Modernists. Such a structure has scattered in the works of Chinese modernist writers in all directions by the implosion of modernity in the early 20th century. In practice, their repetitive writings represented an image of China as a deceased metaphysical Father. Chinese Modernism thus manifests an Electra complex with prolonged mourning for the death of the Father, and consequently by his corpse a Materialism of writing is produced. Huang himself also repetitively applies the material scenes to his narratives. However, as a diasporic Chinese writer, will the gesture of Modernism be his eternal pyre? The national identity of literature that Huang objects is in fact a repression to forcefully distance his writing from the essence of the ”fatherland,” igniting an entire Earth (ethics) of Modernism by the Fire (form) of Modernism. This essay attempts to point out that what Modernism meant to Huang is form as identity and aesthetic as ethics. It is in this context that the evolution from Modernism to Postmodernism in the 1980s and 90s is endowed with a new ethical meaning--it is an extremity of form and simultaneously it is evident that identity shifts from a dispersed subject to language. Hence the return of a new ethics.
期刊論文
1.言叔夏(2005)。我的哭牆與我的罪:訪/評駱以軍。幼獅文藝,605,42-49。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃錦樹(2004)。沒有家園。印刻文學生活誌,12,161。  延伸查詢new window
3.林建國(20000900)。方修論。中外文學,29(4)=340,65-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張錦忠(20041200)。文化回歸、離散臺灣與旅行跨國性:「在臺馬華文學」的案例。中外文學,33(7)=391,153-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林建國(20020300)。蓋一座房子。中外文學,30(10)=358,42-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃錦樹(1998)。華文/中文:「失語的南方」與語言再造。黃錦樹。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃錦樹(2003)。中文現代主義:一個未了的計劃?。黃錦樹。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃錦樹(2003)。從大觀圜到咖啡館:閱讀/書寫朱天心。黃錦樹。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃錦樹(2003)。隔壁房間的裂縫:論駱以軍的抒情轉折。黃錦樹。  延伸查詢new window
5.林建國(1998)。現代主義者黃錦樹。黃錦樹。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃錦樹(1998)。緒論:馬華文學與在臺灣的中國經驗。馬華文學與中國性。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃錦樹(2005)。土與火--與駱以軍對談。臺北:麥田出版。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃錦樹(2007)。焚燒。麥田出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃錦樹(1994)。夢與豬與黎明。九歌出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Foucault, Michel、洪維信(2003)。外邊思維。臺北:行人出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃錦樹(1997)。烏暗暝。臺北:九歌。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃錦樹(1998)。詞的流亡:張貴興和他的寫作道路。黃錦樹。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃錦樹(1998)。馬華文學與中國性。臺北:遠流:元尊。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃錦樹、王德威(200605)。文與魂與體:論現代中國性。臺北:麥田出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃錦樹(2003)。謊言或真理的技藝:當代中文小說論集。臺北:麥田。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃錦樹(2001)。刻背。臺北:麥田出版。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.黃錦樹(20041114)。出走,還是回歸?:關於國家文學問題的一個悖論。  延伸查詢new window
2.駱以軍(20070902)。野火燒不盡的,聯合報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林建國(2001)。反居所浪遊:讀黃錦樹的《夢與豬與黎明》。刻背。臺北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
2.張誦聖(2007)。文學史對話:從「場域論」和「文學體制觀」談起。重寫臺灣文學史。臺北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE