:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:闢妄醒迷:明清之際的天主教與「迷信」之建構
書刊名:中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊
作者:祝平一 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Ping-yi
出版日期:2013
卷期:84:4
頁次:頁695-752
主題關鍵詞:迷信理性宗教風俗耶穌會MixinSuperstitionReasonReligionCustomThe society of Jesus
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:129
  • 點閱點閱:441
本文分析十七世紀中文世界中「迷信」一詞的形成與意涵,以覘迷信(superstition)、理性(reason)與宗教(religion)三詞在近世中國的變遷。以「迷信」對譯superstition的出現於二十世紀,指涉「非理性的信仰」。在此之前,「迷信」一詞只在唐代出現兩次,但卻多次出現在十七世紀的天主教文獻中。十七世紀的「迷信」一詞,不能算是superstition的對譯。二十世紀前的「迷信」一詞作動詞用,指的是「沈溺」的行為,而非特定的範疇。而「迷信」的賓語則為不合教規的「偶像崇拜」、「占卜」與娶妾等中國習俗。傳教士與中國信徒以辯駁這些異俗,彰顯十誡中「上帝為最高無上之存在」和「不可淫亂」的誡條。不過,因為天主教的傳入,歐洲superstition的概念也悄然進到中國。在天主教神學中religion指的是人因信從而與神之間所構成的倫理關係,而superstition作為名詞,相對於religion,指不當的神聖崇拜(對象不對),或以不當的方式崇拜神聖(方式不對)。Superstition因而指的是「過信」的範疇,而非行為;但這些範疇和中文「迷信」行為的內容亦有重疊之處。為了駁正中國人「迷信」的行為,明、清之際的天主教社群訴諸「理推」(reasoning),以辯駁中國崇拜與風俗的合理性。康熙八年以後,南懷仁針對楊光先的指控,對中國的占測提出系統性的批評。南懷仁仍沿用「理」辯之術,希望藉開啟讀者靈魂中的明悟,一舉摧毀中國的卜算之術。不久,利類思在《超性學要目錄》中,以「尊奉」恰當地翻譯religion,卻用「左道」翻譯superstition,將中國合於此概念下的各種行為皆指為不合法的「師巫邪中術」。在天主教的論述裡,reason不但不是religion的對立,反而是religion必要的助力。十七世紀來華的耶穌會士猶確定上帝予人的明悟能燭照俗迷,但在是啟蒙運動後的歐洲,宗教與理性的齟齬日深,終至將之推向理性的對立面,成了必須被理性照亮的闇淵。「迷信」一詞在中國的誕生與轉化,恰恰折射出這一歷史過程,並深刻地影響了中國人如何認知信仰的世界。
This paper investigates the usage of the term mixin (迷信) which now denotes the Chinese rendering of the Western concept of ”superstition.” Mixin was rarely used in the Chinese language before the twentieth century but appeared several times in Christian documents during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It was used as a verb meaning ”to indulge in” pagan customs which did not fit Christian expectations, particularly behaviors violating the commandments to honor the Lord and against adultery. When the Jesuits arrived in China, they dealt with local beliefs with caution. They recorded these strange customs and advised their followers not to follow them, but they did not make a concerted effort to dispute them. It was probably Iiterati converts like Zhu Zhongyuan (朱宗元) who initiated the protest against mixin behaviors. The Chinese Christian community invoked the concept of classical reason in theology and natural philosophy in order to awaken the Chinese who had gone astray. In their discourses, religion went hand in hand with reason. Later Qing criticism of mixin (superstition) reIies on a concept of reason formulated during the Enlightenment when religion no longer played an important role in human affairs. Thus, Buddhism, Daoism, the cults of deities, mantic practices, and even Christianity could not be exempt from the accusation of mixin in light of reason. The history of the term mixin thus reflects the complicated relationship among religion, reason, and superstition and the transformation of these concepts in China and Europe.
期刊論文
1.黃一農(19901200)。楊光先家世與生平考。國立編譯館館刊,19(2),15-28。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋紅娟(2008)。“ 逃信"概念在中國現代早期的發生學研究。北京大學研究生學志,4,65-75。  延伸查詢new window
3.沈潔(2006)。“反遮信"話語及其現代起源。史林,2,30-42。  延伸查詢new window
4.路遙(2010)。中國傳統社會民間信仰之考察。文史哲,4,82-95。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bailey, Michael D.(2009)。A Late-Medieval Crisis of Superstition?。Speculum,84,633-661。  new window
6.Charng, Ku-ming(2004)。From Oral Disputation to Written Text: The Transformation of the Dissertation in Early Modern Europe。History of Universities,19,129-187。  new window
7.Bastid, Marianne(1997)。中國近代國家觀念溯源--關於伯倫知理國家論的翻譯。近代史研究,1997(4),221-232。  延伸查詢new window
8.安雙成(1992)。湯若望案始末。歷史檔案,3,79-87。  延伸查詢new window
9.祝平一(1997)。Scientific Dispute in the Imperial Court: The 1664 Calendar Case。Chinese Science,14,7-34。  new window
10.黃一農(19930200)。清初天主教與回教天文家間的爭鬥。九州學刊,5(3)=19,47-69。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃一農(19911000)。耶蘇會士對中國傳統星占術數的態度。九州學刊,4(3)=15,5-23。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳熙遠(20021200)。「宗教」--一個中國近代文化史上的關鍵詞。新史學,13(4),37-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃一農(19911200)。擇日之爭與「康熙曆獄」。清華學報,21(2),247-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.黃一農(19920600)。湯若望「新曆曉或」與「民曆鋪註解惑」二書略記。國立中央圖書館館刊,25(1),151-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.祝平一(19960600)。身體、靈魂與天主:明末清初西學中的人體生理知識。新史學,7(2),47-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Duara, Prasenjit(1991)。Knowledge and Power in the Discourse of Modernity: The Campaigns against Popular Religion in Early Twentieth Century China。The Journal of Asian Studies,50(1),67-83。  new window
17.祝平一(20061200)。天學與歷史意識的變遷--王宏翰的《古今醫史》。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,77(4),591-626。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.祝平一(20040600)。金石盟--〈御製天主堂碑記〉與清初的天主教。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,75(2),389-421。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Goossaert, Vincent(2006)。1898: The Beginning of the End for Chinese Religion?。Journal of Asian Studies,65(2),307-336。  new window
20.黃一農(19910600)。清初欽天監中各民族天文家的權力起伏。新史學,2(2),75-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.張先清(200201)。試論艾儒略對福建民間信仰的態度及其影響。世界宗教研究,2002(1),123-136。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林東陽(1992)。楊光先及其反教事件。歷史與宗教:紀念湯若望四百週年誕辰暨天主教傳華史學國際研討會。新北市新莊區:輔仁大學出版社。179-212。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張振國(2008)。拒斥與吸納:天主教對中國民間信仰的應對──以明末至鴉片戰爭為限(博士論文)。山東大學,濟南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.伏爾泰、伏燕生(1991)。哲學辭典。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gay, Peter(1966)。The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, The Rise of Modern Paganism。New York:Alfred A. Knodf。  new window
3.朱宗元(1697)。答客問。  延伸查詢new window
4.艾儒略。口鐸日抄。  延伸查詢new window
5.Blunts chli Johann Caspar(1986)。國家論。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.伯倫知理、吾妻兵治(1899)。國家學。東京:善隣譯書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.Lodovico Buglio。超性學要目錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.沙守信。真道自證。  延伸查詢new window
9.南懷仁。不得已辨。  延伸查詢new window
10.南懷仁(2009)。妄占辯。臺北:利氏學社。  延伸查詢new window
11.南懷仁。妄擇辯。  延伸查詢new window
12.南懷仁。窮理學。  延伸查詢new window
13.徐光毆(1965)。闢妄。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.(2002)。醒迷篇。臺北:利氏學社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Aleni, Giulio。西方答問。梵蒂岡圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.利類思(1965)。不得已辯。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.李之藻(1965)。天學初函:天主實義。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.張能信。敘。答客問。梵蒂岡圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
19.畢方濟、徐光歐(1965)。靈吉蠡勺。天學初函。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.劉凝(編)。天學集解。  延伸查詢new window
21.潘國光。未來辯論。  延伸查詢new window
22.藍鼎元(1977)。鹿洲初集。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.Ricci, Matteo(1942)。Storia dell 'Introduzione del Cristianesimo in Cina。Fonti Ricciane。Roma:Libreria dello Stato。  new window
24.吳相湘(1965)。天主教東傳文獻。臺北:台灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.吳相湘(1972)。天主教東傳文獻三編。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.沈雲龍(1977)。近代中國史料叢刊二輯。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.徐宗澤(1958)。明清間耶穌會士著作提要。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
28.黃一農(1998)。中西文化在清初的衝突與妥協.以湯若望所編民厝為個案研究。Western Learning and Christianity in China: The Contribution and Impact of Johann Adam Schall von Bell, S. J (1592-1666)。China-Zentrum:Monumenta Serica Institute:Nettetal, Germany:Steyler Verlag。  延伸查詢new window
29.岡本主丈(2000)。近世中國の比較思想:異文化との邂逅。東京:東京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.Dudink, Ad.、Nicolas Standaert(1999)。Ferdinand Verbiest's Qionglixue 窮理學(1683)。The Christian Mission in China in the Verbiest Era: Some Aspects of the Missionary Approach。Leuven:Leuven University Press。  new window
31.Grafton, Anthony(1999)。Cardano 's Cosmos: The Worlds and Works of a Renaissance Astrologer。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
32.Grant, Edward(2004)。God and Reason in the Middle Ages。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
33.Hsia, Florence C(2009)。Sojourners in a Strange Land: Jesuits and Their Scientific Missions in Late Jmperial China。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
34.Kurtz, Joachim(2011)。The Discovery of Chinese Logic。Leiden:Brill。  new window
35.Sachsenmaier, Dominic(2003)。The Jesus of Zhu Zongyuan (1616-1660): A Complex Pattern of Inculturation。The Chinese Face of Jesus Christ。Nettetal:Steyler Ver1ag。  new window
36.Zürcher, Erik(1997)。Aleni in Fujian, 1630-1640: The Medium and the Message。Scholar Irom the West: Giulio Aleni S 1. (1582-1649) and the Dialogue between Christianity and China。Sankt Augustin:Institut monumenta serica。  new window
37.Zürcher, Erik(2007)。'Kou duo ri chao ': Li Jiubiao 's Diary of Oral Admonitions: A Late Ming Christian Journal。Sankt Augustin:lnstitut monumenta serica。  new window
38.富察敦崇(2001)。燕京歲時記。北京:北京古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
39.楊光先(1966)。不得已。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
40.吳相湘(1965)。天主教東傳文獻續編。台北:台灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
41.王冶心(2004)。中國基督教史綱。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
42.Nedostup, Rebecca(2010)。Superstitious Regimes: Religion and the Politics of Chinese Modernity。Harvard University Asia Center。  new window
43.黃彰建(1979)。明代律例彙編。中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
44.Aquinas, St. Thomas、Fathers of the English Dominican Province(1947)。Summa Theologica。New York:Boston:Benzinger Brothers。  new window
45.周紹良、趙超(2001)。唐代墓誌彙編。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
46.新民社(1986)。清議報全編。文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
47.鐘鳴旦、杜鼎克(2002)。耶穌會羅馬檔案館明清天主教文獻。臺北:臺北利氏學社。  延伸查詢new window
48.Aleni, Giulio(1972)。滌罪正規略。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
49.Liu, L. H.(1995)。Translingualpractice: literature, national culture, and translated modernity。Standford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
50.Pfister, Louis Aloys、馮承鈞(1995)。在華耶穌會士列傳及書目。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
51.黃伯祿(1894)。正教奉褒。上海:慈母堂。  延伸查詢new window
52.Standaert, Nicolas、Dudink, Adrian、Monnet, Nathalie(2009)。法國國家圖書館明清天主教文獻。利氏學社。  延伸查詢new window
53.Thomas, Keith Vivian(1971)。Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century England。New York:Charles Scribner's Sons。  new window
54.無著、波羅頗蜜多羅。大乘莊嚴經論。  延伸查詢new window
55.蔡彥仁(20010000)。天啟與救贖:西洋上古的末世思想。臺北:立緖文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
56.St. Thomas Aquinas、周克勤、陳家華(2008)。神學大全。碧岳學社。  延伸查詢new window
57.黃進興(20130000)。從理學到倫理學:清末民初道德意識的轉化。臺北:允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
58.郭納爵。燭俗迷篇。  延伸查詢new window
59.湯若望、南懷仁。民曆鋪註解惑。  延伸查詢new window
60.南懷仁。妄推吉凶辯。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.禮記‧王制。  延伸查詢new window
2.CatholicCulture。vain observance,http://www.catholiccu Iture.org/cu1ture/l ibrary/dictionary /index.cfm?id=37027, 2013/01/04。  new window
3.CatholicCulture。Astrology,http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02018e.htm, 2013/01/03。  new window
4.Catholic Encyclopedia。Grace,http: //www.newadvent.org/cathen/06689x.htm, 2013/01/05。  new window
5.Catholic Encyclopedia。Superstition,http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14339a.htm, 2013/05/04。  new window
6.Wikipedia。Religion,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion#Etymology, 2012/12/22。  new window
7.Wikipedia。Reason,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason, 2013/01/20。  new window
圖書論文
1.張先清(2007)。刊書傳教:清代禁教期天主教經卷在民間社會的流傳。史料與視界:中文文獻與中國基督教史研究。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊廷筠(1966)。天釋明辨。天主教東傳文獻續編。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.梅奕紹(1934)。職官志。普寧縣志。汕頭:華僑印刷公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE