This article aims to examine the causes and goals of Kahabu culture reviving movement in the interest of eliciting its social meanings. It argues that the movement not only brings out a culture revival of Kahabu but also constructs a newly born indigenous people simultaneously. The success of “reviving” the cultural heritages, on one hand, serves the people’s spiritual needs; on the other hand, draws an ethical boundary between “us” and “the other.” From a socio-political perspective, this paper argues that “the other,” as opposed to the Kahabu, seems to be the current government of Taiwan. It is the general lack of recognition and validation of the Kahabu people from the central government causing the endeavor to pursue acknowledgement of Kahabu as an indigenous people. Therefore, the significance of Kahabu culture reviving movement is as a matter of fact a ‘construction’ of a newly born indigenous people rather than a ‘representation’ of an existing one.