:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小高年級學童偏差行為、依附鍵、信仰鍵之關聯性與徑路分析
書刊名:青少年犯罪防治研究期刊
作者:許春金 引用關係羅玉珠
作者(外文):Sheu, Chuen-jimLo, Yu-chu
出版日期:2012
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁117-137
主題關鍵詞:依附信仰兒童偏差行為AttachmentBeliefChildrenDelinquent behaviors
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:102
  • 點閱點閱:20
相當多的文獻顯示,兒童時期的偏差行為可以是未來的犯罪行為重要預測指標。兒童時期的偏差行為對未來成人生活的許多不同層面亦有不良的負面影響。因此,探討兒童早期偏差行為之影響因素是非常重要的。過去的偏差行為研究,大多是以國、高中的青少年或受保護管束、感化教育的犯罪少年為主要的研究對象,較少探討國小兒童的觸法行為。其次,偏差行為的研究也鮮少關注學童的信仰鍵,故本研究使用國小五、六年級學童共513名之問卷資料做分析,探討依附鍵及法律信仰鍵對兒童偏差行為的影響。本研究發現,法律信仰鍵及依附鍵具有關聯性且確實均會影響兒童的偏差行為。研究亦發現:學童有較高程度的法律信仰,僅有較低程度的中立化信仰。研究結果同時顯示:國小高年級學童內在的是非信仰判斷已然形成,且有相當的一致性(consensus)。徑路分析亦發現:偏差同儕依附是偏差行為最大的影響因素,而學童個人內在法律信仰較家庭依附及學校依附更能直接影響偏差行為。研究結論指出,個人法律信仰與道德判斷應早於國小高年級之前形成,對偏差行為才有抑制效果。
Previous studies reveal that misbehavior during the childhood could be an important indicator to predict the future delinquent behavior. Misbehavior in the childhood could continue to adult life in different manifestations and life domains. That is why it is very important to do research on the factors which influence the early misbehaviors in childhood. In the past time, most of investigations are focussing on junior high school and senior high school students or those who are in custody of protective or correctional reformatories and not on elementary school children. This current research intends to use a sample of 513 fifth and sixth grade elementary school children to study the correlational relationship among attachment, beliefs and delinquency. Our analysis shows that there is a significant correlation between beliefs and attachment and both influence children's delinquent behaviors. This investigation also discovered: in general, children have a higher degree of anti-crime belief, and a lower degree of pro-crime belief. It also found that sampled children had already formed their legal value judgment system with high degree of consensus. According to the path analysis we also discovered that compare to family and school attachment bond, the belief system is more influential and directly to cause delinquency .The belief system interacts with delinquent peers to cause more delinquent behaviors. The implication of this study shows that individual legal belief and moral judgment should be formed before fifth or sixth grades, so that it can inhibit delinquent behaviors.
期刊論文
1.譚子文(20090900)。社會控制理論依附和參與要素之關聯性研究。犯罪與刑事司法研究,13,51-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Caspi, A.(1987)。Personality in the life course。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53,1203-1213。  new window
3.Glueck, S.(1960)。Ten Years of Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency:An Examination of Criticisms。Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science,51,283-308。  new window
4.Loeber, Rolf(1982)。The Stability of Antisocial Child Behavior: A Review。Child Development,53,1431-1446。  new window
5.Olweus, D.(1979)。Stability of Aggressive Reaction Patterns in Males: A Review。Psychological Bulletin,86,852-875。  new window
6.Huesmann, L. R.、Eron, L. D.、Lefkowitz, M. M.、Walder, L. O.(1984)。Stability of Aggression Over Time and Generations。Developmental Psychology,20(6),1120-1134。  new window
7.周愫嫻(19950700)。正式與非正式社會控制對青少年偏差行為的嚇阻效果。犯罪學期刊,1,31-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.譚子文、范書菁(20100500)。依附關係、參與傳統活動、社會緊張因素與臺灣地區青少年外向性偏差行為及內向性偏差行為關聯性之研究。輔導與諮商學報,32(1),17-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.董旭英、王文玲(20071200)。國高中生依附父母、接觸偏差同儕、傳統價值觀念與偏差行為的關聯性之差異性研究。犯罪學期刊,10(2),33-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.侯崇文(20010900)。家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年偏差行為探討。應用心理研究,11,25-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.許春金、侯崇文、黃富源、謝文彥、周文勇、孟維德(1996)。兒童、少年觸法成因及處遇方式之比較研究。臺北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周美智(2001)。家庭因素、子女道德觀與青少年偏差行為之關係研究--以雲嘉地區為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇英玫(2007)。國小高年級學童同儕關係與校園偏差行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張玲榕(2009)。家庭結構、家長社經地位與國中生偏差行為之研究--以新莊市某國中為例(碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.張恕(2010)。社會連結、親子價值觀一致性對偏差行為的影響:以縱貫性研究驗證社會控制理論(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭慧敏(2005)。從家庭結構、社會控制理論、社會學習理論探討青少年不良行為(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.溫淑盈(2004)。家庭結構、功能、自我控制與兒童問題行為之縱貫性研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.內政部警政署刑事警察局(2009)。中華民國刑案統計。臺北:內政部警政署刑事警察局。  延伸查詢new window
2.lessor, R.、Costa, F. M.、Donovan, J. E.(1991)。Beyond adolescence: Problem behavior and young adult development。Cambridge。  new window
3.Sampson, R. J.、Laub, J. H.(1993)。Crime in the making: Pathways and turning point through life。Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Bowlby, J.(1979)。The making and breaking of affectional bonds。London:Routledge。  new window
5.法務部(2009)。少年兒童犯罪狀況及其分析。臺北:法務部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Adler, Freda、Mueller, Gerhard O. W.、Laufer, William S.(1995)。Criminology。McGraw Hill Inc.。  new window
7.Hirschi, Travis(2002)。Causes of Delinquency。Transaction Publishers。  new window
8.Robins, Lee N.(1966)。Deviant Children Grown Up。Baltimore:Williams and Wilkins。  new window
9.Sutherland, E. H.、Cressey, D. R.(1978)。Principles of Criminology。Philadelphia:J. B. Lippincott。  new window
10.Matza, David(1964)。Delinquency and Drift。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
11.Hirschi, T.(1969)。Causes of delinquency。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
12.Laub, John H.、Sampson, Robert J.(2003)。Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70。Harvard University Press。  new window
13.Gottfredson, Michael R.、Hirschi, Travis(1990)。A General Theory of Crime。Stanford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Caspi, A.、Bem, D. J.(1990)。Personality Continuity and Change across the Life Course。Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research。NY:Guilford。  new window
2.Farrington, D. P.(1979)。Longitudinal Research on Crime。Crime and Justice。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE