:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區成人教育組織績效評估CVIPP模型與指標之建構
書刊名:成人及終身教育學刊
作者:胡夢鯨 引用關係嚴嘉明詹浚煌
作者(外文):Hu, Meng-chingYen, Chia-mingChan, Chun-huang
出版日期:2015
卷期:24
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:成人教育組織績效評估模型CVIPP模型Adult educational organisationsPerformance evaluationCVIPP model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:300
  • 點閱點閱:146
成人教育專業組織不僅是實務推動的關鍵,也是專業化的必備條件之一。臺灣地區近年來成人及終身教育組織雖然多元發展,但是其具體實施成效究竟如何卻不得而知。放眼國內、外成人教育及終生學習的發展,績效評估已是不可避免的趨勢。無論營利組織或非營利組織都已有一些適當的指標可資評估其成效。 本研究的主要目的,是從成人教育組織專業化的觀點,探討臺灣地區成人教育組織經營績效現況,進而發展並建構一套完整、系統化,並適合臺灣地區成人教育組織的績效評估模型與指標。研究方法主要為焦點座談及德懷術,根據焦點座談結果,具體研擬成人教育組織績效評估指標的問卷作為研究工具,並透過德懷術的方法,建構成人教育組織績效評估指標。 研究結論顯示,本研究所建構的「成人教育組織CVIPP績效評估模型」,共有5個構面、19個評估項目,以及59項評估指標,指標的信、效度頗高,可以適用於評估臺灣地區成人教育組織經營績效。因此,本研究建議,後續研究可依據本研究所建構之模型進行問卷調查,或進行半結構訪談,也可以針對不同類型之成人教育組織,做各類型組織之間的比較。本研究亦建議政府在本研究基礎上,逐步發展我國各類型成人教育組織共同認可之績效評估工具,並以此作為起點,逐步建立起成人教育的專業化與證照化。
It is recognized that adult educational organizations deliver educational services which is one of the crucial elements to promote adult education professionalism. Recent years adult and lifelong educational organizations in Taiwan have been developed diversely; however, the outcomes of organizational performances are not confirmed. Performance evaluation of adult and lifelong educational organizations is becoming a trend worldwide as well as in Taiwan. Both profit and non-profit organizations have adopted various indicators in terms of performance evaluation. The purpose of this research is to build up a set of comprehensive and systematic evaluation models and indicators with which are suitable for Taiwanese adult educational organizations in particular. Focus group interviews and Delphi technique are adopted as research methods. The responses of focus group interviews are further developed as base for Delphi questionnaire and which helps to construct a set of CVIPP performance indicators. The findings of the research reveal that the CVIPP Performance Evaluation Model of adult educational organizations include 5 dimensions, 19 program evaluation items and 59 evaluation indicators. The reliability and validity are good which indicate that the model is appropriate to assess the performance of adult educational organizations in Taiwan. It is suggested that to use the CVIPP model established by the research to develop questionnaire survey or semistructured interviews for follow-up studies. Different types of adult and lifelong educational organizations could use the model to do evaluation and comparison. The results of this research results could provide an evaluation foundation for government to develop evaluation tools to assess different types of adult educational organizations, thus, in term, to help generate ideas of certification and professionalism of adult education in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Colleen, A. W.、Leila, G. S.(2007)。New learning: Constructing knowledge in leadership training programs。Community College Review,35(2),88-112。  new window
2.Herman, Robert D.、Renz, David O.(1999)。These on Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness。Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,28(2),107-126。  new window
3.Khan, M. E.、Manderson, L.(1992)。Focus groups in tropical diseases research。Health Policy and Planning,7(1),56-66。  new window
4.McClure, R. H.、Wells, C. E.(1984)。A mathematical programming model for faculty course assignments。Decision Science,15(3),409-420。  new window
5.Shults, C.(2008)。Making the case for a positive approach to improving organizational performance in Higher Education institutions: The community college abundance model。Raleigh: Community College Review,36(2),133-159。  new window
6.呂育一、徐木蘭(19940200)。非營利組織績效指標之研究--以文教基金會為例。臺大管理論叢,5(1),165-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林案倱(2001)。社會教育館所屬社會教育工作站經營策略及其影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林淑華(2014)。我國公立博物館績效評估指標與權重體系之建構(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李維真(2001)。我國社區大學經營及其發展之研究--以南部地區為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳婉如(1992)。臺灣地區長青學苑教師教學型態與學員學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳澤義、陳啟斌(2006)。企業診斷與績效評估:平衡計分卡之應用。臺北市:華泰。  延伸查詢new window
2.Neil, C.、Klein, R.、Patricia, D.(1995)。How organizations measure success: The use of performance indicators in government。London, UK:Routledge。  new window
3.司徒達賢(1999)。非營利組織的經營與管理。臺北:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2002)。終身學習法。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.Knowles, M. S.(1980)。The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
6.Fitzpatrick, J. L.、Sanders, J. R.、Worthen, B. R.(2004)。Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines。Pearson Education, Inc。  new window
7.謝文全(1989)。教育行政--理論與實務。臺北市:文景書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.孫本初(2005)。公共管理。台北:智勝。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部(2006)。邁向高齡社會:老人教育政策白皮書。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
10.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action。Boston:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
11.張錫惠(1997)。績效管理--非營利組織經營管理研修精要。台北市:洪建全基金會。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.胡夢鯨(2008)。樂齡學習資源中心的經營成效評估指標。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.鄒篪生(2010)。科技計畫績效評估及指標設計(PPT講稿發表於政府科技發展計畫研擬及績效指標訂定及實作研習會),臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2000)。The CIPP model for evaluation。Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation。Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE