:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生態系統取向班級輔導活動設計實施與成效:以建立班級友善氣氛為例
書刊名:中華輔導與諮商學報
作者:林淑君
作者(外文):Lin, Shu-chun
出版日期:2018
卷期:52
頁次:頁81-112
主題關鍵詞:反霸凌生態系統取向行動研究班級友善氣氛班級輔導活動Action researchAnti-bullyClass guidance activitiesClass positive/friendly atmosphereEcological system approach
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:126
  • 點閱點閱:13
本研究採取行動研究探討專業輔導人員運用生態系統取向班級輔導以解決學生欺凌問題。「生態系統取向班級輔導活動」是指針對班級的特別需求或問題「量身打造」可以滿足其需求、或解決其問題的輔導活動;強調評估與理解系統動力對該問題的影響,採取生態系統角度,將導師納入合作團隊,以提升輔導成效。介入前需評估班級動力,擬定介入策略,最後評鑑實施成效。反霸凌對班級欺凌問題恐怕只是治標,更重要的是重建學校或班級的正向氛圍與團體凝聚力。本研究分為五階段,(1)評估學生特別需求;(2)發展行動方案─獎勵學生利社會行為;(3)評鑑省思與回饋─對獎勵制度的反思與行動修正;(4)發展行動方案─運用繪本建立班級友善氛圍;(5)評鑑省思與回饋。研究結果發現,這二種策略都能改善班級正向互動,然而獎勵學生利社會行為雖然能夠得到成效,但卻有隱憂:學生是為了得到獎賞才表現出好行為。為了解決此隱憂,第二次介入從情意到認知,最後到行為層面,是較為完整的輔導活動歷程,不僅可收成效,亦可避免第一次行動的隱憂。這個介入方式符合以生態系統觀為核心的WISER模式之精神,亦即初級發展性輔導不僅預防問題發生,也可以運用班級層級的輔導活動來解決學生已經發生的問題。最後研究者提出對本方案的省思與未來研究與實務上的建議。
The study adopted action research to treat bully problems in junior high school classes. The purpose of this study was to explore a school counselor or counseling psychologist how to deal with students' bully problems, by ecological system approach guidance activities. "Ecological approach guidance activities" meant to evaluate and understand students' needs and problems before intervention, then design guidance activities to meet students' needs and solve their problems. The ecological system approach guidance activities emphasized evaluating and understanding the class and students' interaction dynamic, instead of treating one or few of the students as a "problem student" or "trouble maker". After understanding the class dynamic, the next step was adopting ecological system approach intervention strategies, and facilitating the teacher/mentor to collaborate with the school counselor. In simple terms, the school counselor had to evaluate class dynamic at first, then drew up intervention strategies, carried out the intervention, and assessed the outcome after implementing. There were three data resources evaluating class dynamic: (1) discussed with the teacher or mentor, (2) observed the group interaction, and (3) interviewed students. To resolve bully problems in class, anti-bully activities could only treat the symptoms but not the root cause. The most important was rebuilding school or class positive and friendly atmosphere, and enhancing group cohesion. The action research process had five stages: (1) Before action: evaluated students' and group's specific needs and problems. This was a 7th grade class, in the beginning of the first semester, the students often treated others in a mean way, for example: to irritate each other, describe others in a negative way, supplant some disadvantaged students, threaten, rumor, and physical aggression, etc. In this situation, if the school counselor discussed anti-bully directly, the adolescents may feel be blamed, and arouse their defense. The students needed to learn how to treat others friendly, not only be requested to stop improper behavior, and the class had to rebuild positive and friendly atmosphere, and support students' proper interpersonal behavior. (2) The first action: adopted encouraging altruistic behavior strategy to solve students' and group's problems. In this stage, the researcher invited the class mentor as a partner to carry out the guidance activities together, and applied encouraging system to inspire students' altruistic behavior. The strategy transferred the negative focus (students' improper behavior) to positive focus (altruistic behavior). (3) After the first action: evaluation and feedback - to think back over the encouraging system, and revise the action. Encouraging students' altruistic behavior was effective. But it seemed to occur together with a secret concern: students' altruistic behavior was from internal? Or just for reward? If we take the reward away, the students would continue their altruistic behavior? To solve the concern, the researcher developed the next action. (4) The second action: applying a picture book and series activities to rebuild class positive and friendly atmosphere, and enhance their cohesion. The action implemented in another year, a new 7th grade class which also had bully behavior. The researcher invited the class mentor for cooperation to resolve the problem. There were series guidance activities, including: (a) Line game: helped students finding their common ground, (b) read the picture book "The Original Warm Fuzzy Tale", (c) discussed and created class "warm fuzzy" environment. (5) After the second action: evaluation and feedback. The action research found the strategy improving group's positive and friendly interaction effectively. This intervention matched WISER model which based on ecological system approach: primary and developmental guidance activities not only prevent problems, but also resolve the occurred problems.
期刊論文
1.Clark, M. A.、Breman, J. C.(2009)。School counselor inclusion: A collaborative model to provide academic and social-emotional support in the classroom setting。Journal of Counseling and Development,87(1),6-11。  new window
2.Olweus, D.、Limber, S. P.(2010)。Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying prevention program。American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,80(1),124-134。  new window
3.邱珍琬、張麗麗(20120600)。中小學教師之校園霸凌行為辨識、嚴重性與介入評估之研究。應用心理研究,54,203-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.洪福源、邱素玲、丘金蘭、郭毓珊(20120300)。國中小學生、教師對校園欺凌行為之認知與態度研究。臺北海洋技術學院學報,5(1),158-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳昆壽(20040900)。資優障礙學生學校生態系統研究。特殊教育與復健學報,12,81-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.雷新俊(2008)。校園霸凌事件的防治與輔導。國教之友,60(4),33-41。  延伸查詢new window
7.林淑君、王麗斐(20130900)。君子不器:諮商心理師與校長合作推動初級發展性輔導工作的經驗分享。輔導季刊,49(3),19-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Fallon, L. M.、McCarthy, S. R.、Sanetti, L. M. H.(2014)。School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) in the classroom: Assessing perceived challenges to consistent implementation in Connecticut schools。Education & Treatment of Children,37(1),1-24。  new window
9.魏美惠(20091000)。新臺灣之子的能力較差嗎?從多元能力與生態系統理論剖析。臺灣圖書館管理季刊,5(4),47-57。  延伸查詢new window
10.Nansel, T. R.、Overpeck, M. D.、Pilla, R. S.、Ruan, W. J.、Simons-Morton, B.、Scheidt, P.(2001)。Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment。Journal of the American Medical Association,285(16),2094-2100。  new window
11.粘絢雯、程景琳(20100600)。國中班級經營與班級氣氛相關因素之探討:關係攻擊與關係受害。教育實踐與研究,23(1),57-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.楊馥如(20161200)。大學影片鑑賞教學模式之發展與效果--以女性主義及生命教育為影片議題。教育實踐與研究,29(2),173-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.杜淑芬(20150600)。國小導師成功處理兒童欺凌行為的輔導策略分析。教育實踐與研究,28(1),99-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.蔡清田(2015)。行動研究的功能限制與關鍵條件。T&D飛訊,209,1-19。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃宛婕(20120900)。扭曲的正義--談校園「關係霸凌」之輔導策略。中等教育,63(3),163-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.羅丰苓(20120300)。談有效改善校園霸凌的策略。學生事務,51(1),41-54。  延伸查詢new window
17.Calvery, S. V.、Hyun, J. H.(2013)。Sustaining education through enhanced collaboration between teachers and school counselors。Educational Research Journal,28(1/2),125-144。  new window
18.Garandeau, C. F.、Poskiparta, E.、Salmivalli, C.(2014)。Tackling acute cases of school bullying in the KiVa anti-bullying program: A comparison of two approaches。Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,42(6),981-991。  new window
19.Garandeau, C. F.、Vartio, A.、Poskiparta, E.、Salmivalli, C.(2016)。School bullies' intention to change behavior following teacher interventions: Effects of empathy arousal, condemning of bullying, and blaming of the Perpetrator。Prevention Science,17(8),1034-1043。  new window
20.Låftman, S. B.、Östberg, V.、Modin, B.(2017)。School climate and exposure to bullying: A multilevel study。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,28(1),153-164。  new window
21.Greene, M. B.(2003)。Counseling and climate change as treatment modalities for bullying in school。International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling,25(4),293-302。  new window
22.Marlow, D. L.、Bloss, D. K.、Bloss, D. D.(2000)。Promoting social and emotional competence through teacher/counselor collaboration。Education,120,668-674。  new window
23.McIntosh, K.、Predy, L. K.、Upreti, G.、Hume, A. E.、Turri, M. G.、Mathews, S.(2014)。Perceptions of contextual features related to implementation and sustainability of school-wide positive behavior support。Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,16(1),31-43。  new window
24.Nocera, E. J.、Whitbread, K. M.、Nocera, G. P.(2014)。Impact of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports on student behavior in the middle grades。RMLE Online: Research in Middle Level Education,37(8),1-14。  new window
25.Salmivalli, C.、Poskiparta, E.(2012)。KiVa antibullying program: Overview of evaluation studies based on a randomized controlled trial and national rollout in Finland。International Journal of Conflict and Violence,6(2),294-302。  new window
26.Worthman, C. M.(2010)。The Ecology of Human Development: Evolving Models for Cultural Psychology。Research Article,41(4),546-562。  new window
27.陶蕃瀛(20040900)。行動研究:一種增強權能的助人工作方法。應用心理研究,23,33-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.王麗斐、杜淑芬、羅明華、楊國如、卓瑛、謝曜任(20130600)。生態合作取向的學校三級輔導體制:WISER模式介紹。輔導季刊,49(2),4-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.王麗斐、李旻陽、羅明華(20130900)。WISER生態系統合作觀的雙師合作策略。輔導季刊,49(3),2-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.謝智玲、許惠芳(2009)。一位國小教師以繪本進行反欺凌方案之個案研究。臺灣教育學術研討會。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.鄭英耀、黃正鵠、陳利銘、薛靜雯、劉昆夏、黃國彰(2010)。教育部校園霸凌現況調查與改進策略研究計畫研究報告。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李淑惠(2010)。全校性正向行為支持方案對國小學生學業適應行為的影響之研究--以嘉義縣梅山國小為例(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉宜佩(2014)。新北市國中導師班級經營策略與校園霸凌行為關係之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Yalom, Irvin D.、Leszcz, M.、方紫薇、馬宗潔(2003)。團體心理治療的理論與實務。台北市:桂冠出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Slavin, Robert E.、張文哲(2013)。教育心理學:理論與實際。學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.王乙徹(2003)。暖毛球與冰刺球。台中:晨星出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.王麗斐、杜淑芬(2013)。國民中學學校輔導工作參考手冊。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education(2010)。School-wide positive behavior support team workbook。Jefferson City, MO:Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education。  new window
6.The Freedom Writers Foundation(2007)。The Freedom Writers' Diary Teachers' Guide。New York, NY:Broadway Books。  new window
7.Bronfenbrenner, Urie(1979)。The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2014)。2014年臺灣校園霸凌狀況調查報告,http://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/1174, 。  延伸查詢new window
2.Department for Eucation(2017)。Preventing and tackling bullying advice for headteachers, staff and governing bodies,https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/623895/Preventing_and_tackling_bullying_advice.pdf。  new window
3.Cecil, H.,Molnar-Main, S.(2011)。Olweus bullying prevention program in high schools: A review of literature,http://www.safeschools.info/images/stories/CSC_Research_Brief_5_Aug_2011.pdf。  new window
4.Midgett, A.(2016)。Bullying: How counselors can intervene,http://ct.counseling.org/2016/06/bullying-counselors-can-intervene/。  new window
5.Rigby, K.(2010)。Bullying in schools: six methods of intervention,http://www.loggerheadfilms.co.uk/productspage/?category=1&product_i d=4。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bronfenbrenner, U.(1994)。Ecological models of human development。The International encyclopedia of education。Elsevier Science/Pergamon。  new window
2.蔡清田(2000)。行動研究及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。高雄:麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.林淑惠、陳薏安、張玲瑜、吳紋如、蔡育穗、陳細珍(2006)。探究受霸凌國小學童之處理策略。104期候用主任專題研究集。新北市:國家教育研究院。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳玉芳(2015)。三級預防的輔導模式。輔導原理與實務。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE