:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學用合一:「職涯高手--Boss要的表達力」實作課程之學習成效探究
書刊名:運動與遊憩研究
作者:林玉惠
作者(外文):Lin, Yu-hui
出版日期:2019
卷期:14:1
頁次:頁58-68
主題關鍵詞:口語表達力書寫溝通力實作課程學用合一學習成效Oral expressionCommunication ability in writingPractical courseEducation-job integrationLearning effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:5
本研究係教育部「106年教學創新試辦計畫」補助課程,實踐場域為某國立大學,實施期間為106-1學期,修讀學生分布七大學院、25個系所,採立意抽樣法,進行教學實踐研究並探討學習成效。研究以參與「專案管理」提案實作的學生,在期末完成Likert scale五點量表與半結構式問卷為有效樣本作為資料分析,總結研究成果並提出建議。本研究顯示四大面向:(一)實作成果面:學習者認為有用的、對自己有幫助的,更能強化學習動機。(二)課程設計面:課程主軸與學習者當下切身相關者最獲青睞。(三)學生學習面:學習者偏愛獨力學習,不習慣與不熟識的同學合作、共組團隊。(四)師生互動面:學習者喜愛歡樂的課堂氛圍,及課餘的「一對一職涯諮詢」,蓋因其符合立即性學習需求。本研究發現:與未來就業或就學相關的實作課程,裨益學生學習亦享有更高學習成就;教師講述搭配學生實作之「學用合一」課程型態有助學習成效。
This research is a subsidy program of the Ministry of Education's "Teaching Innovation Pilot Program of year 2017". It is implemented in a national university of its first semester, and it covers students from seven major colleges and 25 departments. This research also implements "purposive sampling method" in the practical course to explore learning outcomes. Students who participated in the implementation of the "Project Management" proposal and completed the Likert scale five-point scale and semi-structured questionnaire as valid samples at the end of the period as data analysis, summed up the research results and made recommendations. This study shows four major aspects: (1) the results of the implementation: learners who think useful, help themselves, can strengthen learning motivation. (2) Course design: the course is the most popular among students if its axis is relevant to students current needs. (3) Student learning surface: Learners prefer to study alone, and are not accustomed to working with unfamiliar classmates to form a team. (4) Teacher-student interaction: learners love the joyful classroom atmosphere, and the "one-on-one job counseling" after school, because it meets the needs of immediate learning. The study found that the practical courses related to future employment or schooling also benefited students' learning and higher learning achievements. The teacher's description of the "education-job integration" curriculum style with student implementation helped the learning outcomes.
期刊論文
1.吳錦勳(2007)。越寫越聰明。商業週刊,1012,84-104。  延伸查詢new window
2.張敏雪(19980100)。教室內的實作評量。教育資料與研究,20,24-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.莊明貞(19980100)。真實性評量在教育改革中的相關論題--一個多元文化教育觀點的思考。教育資料與研究,20,19-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳韜文(19990400)。傳播教育的知識結構問題:思考分析與實務技術訓練之間的張力。新聞學研究,59,137-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.單文經(19981100)。評介二種多元評量:真實評量與實作評量。北縣教育,25,46-52。  延伸查詢new window
6.盧雪梅(19980100)。實作評量的應許、難題和挑戰。教育資料與研究,20,1-5。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李坤崇(2000)。實作評量的編制步驟及實例。教育研究月刊,214,92-109。  延伸查詢new window
8.林志忠(20001200)。實作評量與真實評量的運用與反省。國教輔導,40(2)=340,30-35。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bloom, B. S.(1956)。Taxonomy of educational objectives--Handbook I: The cognitive domain。New York:David McKay Co. Inc.。  new window
2.張高評(2010)。實用中文講義。臺北市:東大圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.李飛彤(2012)。說話,其實也能套公式:一開口就能說到重點,百分百提升好感、達成目標。臺北市:如何。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dewey, John、吳毓瑩、呂金燮(2018)。明日學校:杜威論學校教育。商周文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊如雪(2016)。國文語法教學的理論與實務。萬卷樓。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘麗珠(2013)。非問不可:提升口語表達能力的課文提問教學。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.Dewey, J.(1944)。Democracy and education。New York:Free Press。  new window
8.Piaget, J.(1978)。Success and understanding。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.洪素卿,胡清暉(20000719)。企業最愛新鮮人。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE