:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺北市國民中小學實施「公辦民營」之可行性分析
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:吳清山 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Ching-shan
出版日期:1999
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁157-179
主題關鍵詞:國民中小學公辦民營管理合約民間承包特許學校Elementary and junior high schoolsPrivate management of public schoolManagement contractContract outBOTCharter school
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(9) 專書(4) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:135
     本文旨在分析臺北市國民中小學實施「公辦民營」之可行性。首先就臺北市國民 中小學環境背景進行分析;其次說明「公辦民營」學校經營理念產生背景及其利弊;復次探 究當前「公辦民營」之主要模式 -- 管理合約、民間承包、BOT、特許學校; 接著剖析臺北 市國民中小學實施「公辦民營」之可行模式,其中以特許學校較為可行;最後就臺北市國民 中小學實施「公辦民營」之實際作為提出建議。
     The purpose of this article is to analyze the feasibility on the implementing private management of public school strategies in Taipei elementary and junior high schools. Firstly, it explores the internal and external environments of Taipei's public elementary and junior high school. Secondly, it discusses the advantages and disadvantages concerning the private management of public school. Next, it presents four models of the private management of public school--management contract, contract out, BOT, and charter school. Then, it assesses the feasibility of the four models to be implemented to Taipei's elementary and junior high schools. Finally, it provides suggestions to the Education Bureau of Taipei Municipality for the reform purpose.
期刊論文
1.Bennett, D. A.(1991)。The centennial essay。American School Board Journal,178(10),34-37。  new window
2.Bixby, M.(1998)。Charter schools: More than we ever expected。Education Week,17(21),47+54-55。  new window
3.Doyle, D. P.(1994)。Private management and school reform。The American Enterprise,5(3),13-15。  new window
4.Smith, F. L.(1994)。The outside option。The American School Board Journal,181(40),40-42。  new window
5.Gonzalez, G.、Wessely, M.(1995)。Private management of the schools : Solution for failing schools?。School Board Policies,26(1),3-6。  new window
6.McLaughlin, J. M.(1994)。The private management of public schools。Principal,73(4),16-17+19。  new window
7.吳清山(19950400)。美國學校經營型態的新實驗:談「公設私營」的革新方式。中華民國比較教育學會比較教育通訊,36,23-27。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Doughty, S.(1997)。The private management of public schools: The Baltimore, Maryland, experience。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research。Chicago, IL。  new window
2.Doughty, S.(1997)。The private management of public schools: Lessons learned from the experience of four school districts。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research。Chicago, IL。  new window
3.Edwarws, D. L.(1997)。The private management of public schools: The Dade County, Florida, experience。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research。  new window
4.Jackson, L.(1997)。The private management of public schools: The Minneapolis, Minnesota, experience。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research。Chicago, IL。  new window
研究報告
1.台北市政府教育局(1997)。台北市教育統計。台北市政府教育局。  延伸查詢new window
2.馬信行、于倬民、歐進士、周志宏、戴玉綺、林珈夙(1996)。國民教育公辦民營之可行性研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王俊民(1997)。台北市中小學教育民營化之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃榮村、胡家祥(1996)。民間興學與辦學的政策環境:以中小學為例。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.McNergney, R.、Herbert, J. M.(1995)。Foundations of education。Boston:Allan and Bacon。  new window
3.Spring, J.(1994)。American education。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.NCREL(1998)。Charter in our midst: An overview,http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/pbriefs/97/97-loover.htm。  new window
2.NCREL(1993)。Charter schools: A new breed of public schools,http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/pbriefs/ 93/93-2frstt.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.朱敬一、戴華(19960000)。教育鬆綁的哲學探討。教育鬆綁。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE