差異性教學對科技大學學生閱讀理解力的研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	差異性教學對科技大學學生閱讀理解力的研究
作者：	梁玲玲
作者(外文)：	Ling-Ling Liang
校院名稱：	淡江大學
系所名稱：	英文學系博士班
指導教授：	黃月貴
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2015
主題關鍵詞：	差異化教學；閱讀理解力；分級活動；彈性分組；differentiated instruction；reading comprehension；tiered activities；flexible grouping
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:12

由於不同能力、興趣和學習方法的學生分布在現今的課堂裡，如何滿足所有學習者的需求，差異化教學被認為是可以解決這個問題的有效教學。本研究旨在探討差異化教學對科技大學大一學生英文閱讀理解力與英文學習之影響以及大一學生對差異化教學的看法。研究對象為73位非英語系的大一學生，37位為實驗組，以分級教學活動與彈性分組實施差異化教學，另外36位為控制組，實施一般傳統教學活動。實驗教學前、後施以全民英檢初級閱讀測驗，並以教師日誌、學生訪談、分級活動作品作為質性資料。資料以獨立樣本t檢定與質性分析進行。結果顯示在閱讀理解測驗上，實驗組學生表現優於控制組學生，且達顯著差異；質性分析顯示學生對差異化教學多持肯定評價，並喜歡自由選擇權，選擇適合自己的活動與夥伴，可以提升他們的學習動機進而更加努力，增強自我的信心。差異化教學也對英文學習有幫助，促使英文進步，英文單字的認識也增多了。差異化教學也增加學生社交技巧與能力。研究者根據研究結果提出教學建議，科技大學或技術學院教師教授高中低程度學生時，可採納差異化教學來幫助學生學習英文並加強學生的學習動機與英語能力，亦可作為教學者及未來研究者之參考。

以文找文

This mixed-method study aimed to explore the effect of differentiated instruction on students’ reading comprehension, their perceptions of learning English through differentiated instruction, and an individual’s English learning. This was prompted by the fact that today’s classroom was full of student diversity and differentiated instruction was regarded as an effective instructional approach to meet the needs of diverse students. The participants of this study were seventy-three non-English major students from a technological university in northern Taiwan. Thirty-seven students were in a treatment group receiving differentiated instruction through tiered activities with flexible grouping while thirty-six students were in a control group receiving the traditional instruction. Before and after the treatment, the participants took a mock elementary level GEPT reading test. Interviews with students, a teaching log, and tiered activities were collected as the qualitative data. The statistical analysis of independent-samples t test has revealed that there was a significant difference between the treatment group and control group. This means that students receiving differentiated instruction had better English reading comprehension than those receiving the traditional instruction. The results of qualitative data have reported that students showed positive attitude toward differentiated instruction. They liked to have choice of the tiered activities and grouping. They also showed more motivation, efforts, and self-confidence. Differentiated instruction also had a positive impact on their learning. They made some progress in their English such as recognizing more words. Differentiated instruction was also helpful to foster students’ social skills by working together. The pedagogical implications for teachers at technological universities or institutions in Taiwan and the limitations of this study were also provided.

以文找文

REFERENCES

Aliakbari, M., & Haghighi, J. (2014). On the effectiveness of differentiated instruction in the enhancement of Iranian learners reading comprehension in separate gender education. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(2014), 182-189.
Anderson, K. M. (2007). Tips for teaching: Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 49-53.
Bailey, P., Daley, C. E., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1999). Foreign language anxiety and learning style. Foreign languge Annals, 32 (1), 63-76.
Baumgartner, T., Lipowski, M. B., & Rush, C (2003). Increasing reading achievement of primary and middle school students through differentiated instruction. Retrieve from ERIC database. (ED479203)
Baurain, B., & Phan, L. H. (2010). Multilevel and diverse classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.
Benjamin, A. (2002). Differentiated instruction: A guide for middle and high school teachers. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Benjamin, A. (2005). Differentiated instruction using technology: A guide for middle and high school teachers. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Black, P., & Wiliam D. (2001). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. [BERA short final draft]. London, UK: King’s College London School of Education. Retrieved from http://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf
Boges, C. E. (2015). The effects of differentiated instruction on the achievement scores of struggling fourth grade readers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Burkett, J. A. (2013). Teacher perception on differentiated instruction and its influence on instructional practice (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text database. (UMI No.3588271)
Campbell, L., & Campbell, B. (1999). Multiple intelligences and student achievement: Success stories from six schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for Learner Autonomy: what do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6 (4), 505-518.
Chan, Y. C. & Chen, C. Y. (2012). The effects of balanced reading instruction with differentiated grouping on elementary students’ English word recognition, reading comprehension, and reading attitudes. English Teaching & Learning, 36 (2), 125-163.
Chen, Y. H. (2007). Exploring the assessment aspect of differentiated instruction: College EFL learners'' perspectives on tiered performance tasks (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans). New Orleans, Louisiana.
Cheng, A. C. (2006). Effects of differentiated curriculum and instruction on Taiwanese EFL students'' motivation, anxiety and interest (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Chien, C. W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in an elementary school EFL classroom. TESOL Journal 3(2), 280-291.
Chien, C. W. (2013). Implementing Choice Boards with Cooperative Learning to Serve Mixed-Level Elementary School EFL Learners. Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education, 44(1), 67-88.
Christinson, M. A. (2004). Using learning theory and research to create effective EFL instruction. Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 33-43), Taipei: Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Corley, M. A. (2005). Differentiated Instruction: Adjusting to the needs of all learners. Focus on Basics, 7(C), 13-16.
Dooley, A. P. (2009). The effects of differentiated instruction on a fourth grade science class (Unpublished master''s report). Ohio University, Athens, OH.
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (1), 67-89.
Ernst, H. R., & Ernst, T. L. (2005). The promise and pitfalls of differentiated instruction for undergraduate political science courses: Student and instructor impressions of an unconventional teaching strategy. Journal of Political Science Education, 1, 39-59.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilbert, D. L. (2011). Effects of differentiated instruction on student achievement in reading (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2013). Differentiated instruction strategies: One size doesn''t fit all (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Essex: Longman Press.
Heacox, D. (2012). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom--How to reach and teach all learners. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
Hess, N. (2001). Teaching large multilevel classes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Hoover, J., & Patton, J. (2005). Differentiating curriculum and instruction for English-language learners with special needs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(4), 231-235.
Huang, Y. L. (2014). An exploratory study of differentiated instruction of English reading in fourth graders (Unpublished master’s thesis). The National Taipei University of Education, Taipei.
Huang, Y. P. (2014). Applying modified extensive reading to college-level EFL students: A study on attitudes, reading habits, and reading performances (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tamkang University, Taipei.
Keck, S., & Kinney, S. (2005). Creating a differentiated classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 33(1), 12-15.
Lee, T. K. (2007) Using case study to investigate Taiwanese ESL teachers’ beliefs about differentiated instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Liu, G. (2005). The trend and challenge for teaching EFL at Taiwanese Universities. RELC Journal, 36(2), 211-221.
Liu, S. F. (2004). Teaching difficulty and effective teaching strategies in junior high school normal class grouping: A case study of eight effective teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Liu, Y. F. (2008). Differentiated instruction through flexible grouping in EFL classroom. Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education, 39(1), 97-122.
Lu, Y. C. (2011). Effective teaching towards large mix-ability classes: A qualitative study of EFL junior high school English teachers’ teaching beliefs and practices (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Pingtung Institute of Commerce, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Ma, Y. H. (2014). Integrated reading instructional effects on EFL college freshmen’s reading attitudes/motivation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tamkang University, Taipei.
MacGillivray, L., & Rueda, R. (2003). Listening to inner city teachers of English language learners: Differentiating literacy instruction. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED479984)
McGroarty, M. (1993). Cooperative learning and second language acquisition. In D. D. Holt (Ed.), Cooperative learning: A response to linguistic and culutral diversity (pp. 19-46). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta System.
Morgan, H. (2014). Maximizing student success with differentiated learning. The Clearing House, 87, 34-38.
Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL quarterly, 37(4), 589-613.
Nunley, K. F. (2006). Differentiating the high school classroom: Solution strategies for 18 common obstacles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bailey, P., & Daley, C. E. (2000) Cognitive, affective, personality, and demographic predictors of foreign language achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 94 (1), 3-15.
Oxford, R., & Oxford, J. (Eds.) (2009). Second Language Teaching and Learning in the Net Generation. National Foreign Language Resource Center. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.
Pasuy Pedroza, N. (2013). Exploring third graders’ reading comprehension through the implementation of tiered products for differentiated instruction (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/9294
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pierce, R. L. & Adams, C. M. (2004). Tiered lessons: One way to differentiated mathematics instruction. Gifted Child Today, 27(2), 58-65.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: A new way of look at ourselves and our kids. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
Reis, S., McCoach, D., Little, C., Muller, L., & Kaniskan, R. (2011). The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 462-501.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.) (2002). Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of current practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. (2009). The application of differentiated instruction in postsecondary environments: Benefits, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 307-323.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
Sternberg, R., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. (1998). Teaching triarchically improves student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 374-384.
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Teng, M. H. (2009). Effective teaching in large multilevel classes: A qualitative study on the beliefs and practices of experienced EFL elementary school teachers (Unpublished master''s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2000a). Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED443572)
Tomlinson, C. A. (2000b). Reconcilable differences? Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 6-11.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Eidson, C. C. (2003). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wang, R. Y. (2013). A study on teachers’ beliefs and practices in the implementation of differentiated instruction in junior high school regular English classrooms (Unpublished master’s thesis). The National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Weng, H. T. (2015). The effects of differentiated instruction on fifth graders’ English learning achievement and learning attitude (Unpublished master’s thesis). The National Taipei University of Education, Taipei.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Yatvin, J. (2004). A room with a differentiated view: How to serve all children as individual learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Yeh, H. N. (2013). Implementation of differentiated instruction in an EFL class. Journal of Education Research, 233, 37-48.
陳英輝（民99）。如何改善技職教育英語文。English Career, 32, 17-19
張武昌 (民95)。台灣的英語教育：現況與省思。教育資料與研究雙月刊，69，129-144。 new window

聯合報 (民102)。9萬國高中教師研習差異化教學。
鐘樹椽、許淑燕 (2005)。當前英語教學的迷思與因應對策－小組合作與資訊科技的應用。教師之友，46(3)，57－64。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	臺灣教育改革浪潮下，國小英師路難行：教師脆弱性
2.	Limited-English Proficiency Students' Perceived Effectiveness of Multiple Pedagogical Strategies
3.	國中英語適性分組教學實施策略與成效之個案研究
4.	公立國民中學推動雙語教育之挑戰與回應：政策到實踐
5.	專業課程全英語授課導入CLIL的實踐與成效
6.	從一所頂尖大學英文輔導班學生觀點初探英文能力分級教學之成效與影響
7.	澎湖縣九年級生背景變項對英語學習成就影響之研究：英語學習焦慮為中介變項
8.	The Effects of a Listening Comprehension Oriented Approach on Reading and Listening Performance of EFL Learners in a Technological University
9.	新北市國民小學跨校英語教師專業學習社群之個案研究
10.	英檢畢業門檻與大學生英語學習焦慮、持續學習意願之相關研究
11.	A Passion for English Learning? Comparing the English Learning Motivations and Self-Perceived English Proficiency between Two Types of College Students in Taipei, Taiwan
12.	探討人格特質與出席率中介效果對英語學習成效之影響
13.	Towards a Cross-generational Understanding of EFL Learner Agency: A Multiple Case Study on Learners from Taiwan
14.	新北市國小英語教師適性教學的觀點與實踐之調查研究
15.	國中生英語學習成就因素之研究

1.	讀者劇場應用於國中英語低成就學生之方案評鑑-----包容性評鑑取向之運用
2.	探索台灣大專學生高成就口語能力之發展歷程
3.	一位國小英語教師「不從眾的課程行動」之自我探究
4.	台灣高等技職校院實施英語文畢業門檻觀點之研究
5.	科技大學學生英語學習信念、學習氣氛、學習焦慮與學習效能關係之研究
6.	高中英文典範教師實務知識探究
7.	讀者劇場方案對南臺灣國小六年級學童之英文靜默閱讀及朗讀語調表現之效益研究
8.	結合網頁式教材和合作學習之教學模式研究─以6年級英語教學為例
9.	網路探究方案中台灣中部非英語系大學生英文讀寫表現、多元文化覺察及多元媒體素養之效益研究
10.	從職場需求檢驗台灣大學商用英語課程
11.	獎勵結構對國小不同社經地位背景學童英語合作學習成就影響之研究
12.	國中生職群性向與英語歌唱教學成效之相關研究
13.	國民小學英語教師教學施為之研究:結構與施為的觀點
14.	國小英語教師專業發展之研究－以字母拼讀法教學為例
15.	科技大學英語教育政策執行之研究

1.	弱勢學童讀寫希望工程 : 課輔現場的瞭解與改造
2.	美國一所小學差異化教學的文化回應實踐觀

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫