:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:複數選區下的棄保效應:民調與選區資料的觀察比較
書刊名:理論與政策
作者:王鼎銘 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Ding-ming
出版日期:2003
卷期:17:1=65
頁次:頁87-106
主題關鍵詞:棄保效應策略投票選區資料民意調查Strategic votingDistrict dataSurvey data
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:209
  • 點閱點閱:81
     臺灣歷年來的選舉,常發生所謂的政黨配票或選民棄保的選舉型態。本文根據 「杜佛傑法則」(Duverger's Law)及Gary Cox的「M + l法則」理論為基礎,針對這種策略性投票的情況,以 2001年第五屆立委選舉時,民調資料及選區總體資料兩方面來觀察。本文的研究發現,無論是從民調的分析或是選舉的結果所示,選民在複數選區的立委選舉中,並未明顯的將選票集中在實力堅強的候選人身上,也就是棄保的情況並不顯著。但更重要的是,兩種資料在解釋影響棄保的原因上並無共識,特別是在選區大小影響力的解釋上,二者有截然不同的看法。
     The influence of strategic voting has become overwhelmingly in recent Taiwan elections. According to Duverger's Law and M+l rule proposed by Gary Cox, this paper focusing on 2001 legislative election, explores this particular electoral phenomenon. More importantly, comparing to previous literature, this empirical study tries to combine and compare the information received from the individual survey data and aggregate district data. The results from both data show the votes did not cluster to the top two candidates in the legislative election. That is, the evidence of strategic voting is not sufficient enough in multimember districts. However, as for the impacts of strategic voting, no consensus between both data is found.
期刊論文
1.Galbraith, John W.、Rae, Nicol C.(1989)。A test of the importance of tactical voting: Great Britain, 1987。British Journal of Political Science,19(1),126-136。  new window
2.Blais, Andre、Carty, R. K.(1991)。The Psychological Impact of Electoral Laws: Measuring Duverger's Elusive Factor。British Journal of Political Science,21(1),79-93。  new window
3.謝復生、Niemi, Richard G.(1999)。Can Duverger's Law Be Extended to SNTV? The Case of Taiwan's Legislative Yuan Elections。Electoral Studies,18(1),101-116。  new window
4.Wright, G. C.、Wright, Gerald C.(1989)。Level-of-Analysis Effects on Explanations of Voting: The Case of the 1982 US Senate Elections。British Journal of Political Science,19,381-398。  new window
5.Cox, Gary W.(1994)。Strategic Voting Equilibria under the Single Nontransferable Vote。American Political Science Review,88(3),608-621。  new window
6.Robinson, William S.(1950)。Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals。American Sociological Review,15(3),351-357。  new window
7.王鼎銘(20030300)。策略投票及其影響之檢測:二○○一年縣市長及立委選舉結果的探討。東吳政治學報,16,95-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王業立(19960500)。相對多數vs.絕對多數:各國總統直選方式的比較研究。選舉研究,3(1),49-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王業立(19950500)。單記非讓渡投票制的政治影響:我國民意代表選舉制度的探討。選舉研究,2(1),147-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃秀端(20010900)。單一選區與複數選區相對多數制下的選民策略投票。東吳政治學報,13,37-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Jesse, N. G.(1999)。Candidate Success in Multi-Member Districts: An Investigation of Duverger and Cox。Electoral Studies,18(3),323-340。  new window
12.徐永明(2001)。民調在競選中的角色:以二000年臺灣總統大選中「未表態選民」為例。問題與研究,40(5),105-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Key, V. O.(1960)。The Politically Relevant in Surveys。Public Opinion Quarterly,24,54-61。  new window
14.Shively, W. P.(1969)。Ecological Inference: The Use of Aggregate Data to Study Individuals。American Political Science Review,63,1183-1196。  new window
圖書
1.Cox, Gary W.(1997)。Making Votes Count。Cambridge。  new window
2.Duverger, Maurice、North, Barbara、North, Robert(1954)。Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State。London:University Paperbacks, Methuen。  new window
3.王業立(1998)。比較選舉制度。台北:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝復生(1992)。政黨比例代表制。臺北市:理論與政策雜誌社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林水波(2002)。棄保政治學。棄保政治學。臺北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Cox, G. W.,Shugart, M. S.(1995)。Strategic Voting under Proportional Representation,San Diego:University of California。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ranney, Austin(1962)。The Utility and Limitations of Aggregate Data in the Study of Electoral Behavior。Essays on the Behavioral study of Politics。Urbana, Illinois:University of Illinois Press。  new window
2.Riker, William H.(1986)。Duverger's Law Revisited。Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences。New York:Agathon Press, Inc.。  new window
3.Duverger, Maurice(1986)。Duverger's Law: Forty Years Later。Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences。New York:Agathon Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE