The statement "Confucius spoke of no freaks of nature, feats of powers, disorders, or spirits" in The Analects, having been frequently quoted over the centuries, has become unfittingly an anti-religious trademark of the Master. Lu Xun, for one, believes that Confucius had done a severe damage in the development of Chinese mythology by this remark. On the surface, this statement does not seem to deny any such accusations. Yet on a closer examination, especially when placed in a historical and cultural context, one sees the possibilities of different readings. One annotator of the sixth century, Li Chong, possibly under the influence of Zheng Xuan, suggested an alternative exegesis. He combined and reduced the four items which Confucius spoke not of into two: freakish powers and disorderly spirits, which made a better sense in Zhou society whose political and religious demands called for a more rigorous discipline against shamanism and superstition left over from the previous Shang dynasty. In making this statement, Confucius seemed to have a stronger cultural intention than a mere personal predilection.