勸諫辭令是中國經典裡常見的內容，在傳統封建社會體系下，處在卑位的臣子，如何以言語勸諫君主，既能保全自己，又能達到目的？這不僅是種技巧，更是一門高深的學問。歷來，勸諫辭令的賞析多半著眼於修辭學的角度，本文針對「語言」部分，援引語用學（Pragmatics）的概念：語境、「會話合作原則」（cooperative principle, CP）、「禮貌原則」（politeness principle, PP）等，作為論述根源，選擇《戰國策．趙策四》「觸龍說趙太后」、《史記．滑稽列傳》「淳于髡」為語料，探究兩段勸諫過程的語用現象及效果，提供賞析文章的另一條詮釋路徑。

Remonstrative rhetoric is the content commonly seen in Chinese classics. In the traditional feudal society, how do courtiers in humble status remonstrate their lord, protecting themselves and achieving the goal? This is not only a skill for convincing but also one that requires profound wisdom. From the past until now, most analyses of the remonstrative rhetoric focus on the perspective of rhetoric. This paper focuses on the “linguistic” part of remonstrative rhetoric, applying the concepts of Pragmatics such as context, cooperative principle (CP), politeness principle (PP), etc. as the origin of description. This paper chooses Chulong shui Zhaotaihou ‘Chulong canvasses Zhaotaihou in the fourth volume of Zhao in Zhanguo Ce‘ the Books of the Warring States’ and Chunyukun in Huaji liezhuan of Shiji as data base. It discusses the pragmatic phenomenon and effect in these two processes and provides another interpreting path for analyzing the articles.