:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:劉宗周 (1578-1645) 對於「主靜」與「靜坐」的反省--一個思想史的探討
書刊名:新史學
作者:潘振泰
作者(外文):Pan, Jen-tai
出版日期:2007
卷期:18:1
頁次:頁43-85
主題關鍵詞:主靜靜坐陳獻章湛若水王陽明聶豹歐陽德王畿羅洪先高攀龍陳龍正劉宗周Emphasizing tranquilityChu chingSitting in meditationChing-tsoCh'en Hsien-changChan Jo-shuiWang Yang-mingNei PaoOu-yang TeWang ChiLo Hung-hsienKao P'an-lungCh'en Lung-chengLiu Tsung-chou
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:468
  • 點閱點閱:85
「靜坐」是宋明理學的一大課題。「靜坐」又與「主靜」之說相連,自周敦頤倡「主靜」說,程顥、程頤倡導「靜坐」以來即構成宋明理傳統中的一大課題,在明代理學出現「心學」轉向後,由於陳獻章開創了特殊的「靜坐」之教,此一課題更為引人注目。明代諸多學者,除了陳獻章之外,還有湛若水、王陽明、聶豹、歐陽德、王畿、羅洪先、高攀龍、陳龍正、劉宗周等人無不或積極投入、或起而攻之。本文乃以劉宗周對於「主靜」、「靜坐」的反省為例,作一思想史的探討,從中討論「主靜」、「靜坐」說在明代理學中所遭到的四大質疑:(一)「主靜」、「靜坐」有違程朱「主敬」之教;(二)「主靜」、「靜坐」近似佛家的「主靜」、「坐禪入定」之教;(三)「主靜」、「靜坐」之說背後隱藏一種「體 / 靜」與「用 / 動」相對的二元論;(四)「主靜」、「靜坐」容易使人流於喜靜厭動之弊。並說明劉宗周對於這類質疑的回應。藉此探索「主靜」、「靜坐」之說在明代思想史上的理論脈動。
"Sitting in Meditation" (ching-tso) is a central issue in Neo-Confucianism. The practice of sitting in meditation is usually related to the doctrine of "emphasizing tranquility" (chu ching). The doctrines of "emphasizing tranquility" and "sitting in meditation" became an important issue in the Neo-Confucian tradition after Chou Tun-i propounded the doctrine of "emphasizing tranquility" and Chi'eng Hao and Ch'eng I promoted the practice of "sitting in meditation" Ch'en Hsien-chang's creation of a special way of sitting in meditation inspired a new intellectual orientation toward the study of the Learning of the Mind, and the issue aqttracted increasing scholarly attention. Besides Ch'en Hsien-chang, many other Ming scholars, including Chan Jo-shui, Wang Yang-ming, Nei Pao, Ou-yang Te, wang Chi, Lo Hung-hsien, Kao P'an-lung, Ch'en Lung-cheng and Liu Tsung-chou, involved themselves in discussion of the issue. This study uses Liu Tsung-chou's reconsideration of the doctrine of "emphasizing tranquility" and "sitting in meditation" as a case-study to reveal four main kinds of doubts on the doctrine of "emphasizing tranquility" and the practice of "sitting in meditation" in the history of Ming Neo-Confucianism. First, there was doubt about the compatibility between these doctrines and the doctrine of "emphasizing reverence" that was emphasized in the Ch'eng-Chu paradigm of Neo-Confucianism. Second, there was doubt about their closeness to Ch'an Buddhism. Third, there was doubt about the "substance/tranquility" and "function/activity" dualism on which they were based. Last, there was doubt about their lapsing into a preference for tranquility over activity. From this study we can investigate how the doctrines of "emphasizing tranquility" and "sitting in meditation" developed in Ming intellectual history.
圖書
1.歐陽德(1990)。歐陽南野先生文集。歐陽南野先生文集。日本,東京:高橋情報。  延伸查詢new window
2.高攀龍(1987)。高子遺書。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃宗羲(1993)。黃宗羲全集。杭州:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃宗羲、沈芝盈(1987)。明儒學案。華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉宗周、戴璉璋、吳光(1997)。劉宗周全集。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
6.黎靖德、王星賢(1987)。新校標點朱子語類。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉蕺山(1996)。人譜。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.王守仁、陳榮捷(1983)。王陽明傳習錄詳注集評。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳榮捷(1988)。朱子新探索。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.周敦頤(1975)。周子全書。廣學。  延伸查詢new window
11.錢穆(1971)。朱子新學案。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳獻章、孫通海(1987)。陳獻章集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.Graham, A. C.(1991)。Two Chinese Philosophers: The Metaphysics of the Brothers Ch'eng。Two Chinese Philosophers: The Metaphysics of the Brothers Ch'eng。La Salle。  new window
14.錢穆(1978)。中國學術思想史論叢(7)。中國學術思想史論叢(7)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(明)湛若水(1997)。湛甘泉先生文集,濟南。  延伸查詢new window
2.(明)王龍溪(1970)。王龍溪全集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(明)聶雙江。雙江聶先生文集。  延伸查詢new window
4.(唐)孔穎達(2001)。周易正義,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)王陽明(1992)。王陽明全書,上海。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)陳龍正。幾亭全集。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)劉汋(1997)。劉宗周年譜,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.(隋)釋智顗(1983)。法華三昧懺儀,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳榮捷(1969)。A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy。A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy。Princeton。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE