:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「一綱一本教科書事件」平議
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:歐用生
作者(外文):Ou, Yung-sheng
出版日期:2008
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:一綱一本教科書政策One-guideline-one-versionTextbook policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:183
臺北市政府於2006 年底,宣布推動「北北基一綱一本、共辦基 測」,引起了一綱一本與一綱多本的爭議,至今尚在延燒。本文從臺 灣的社會歷史脈絡,及近十餘年教育改革的政治環境,探討其爭議焦 點後發現,一本和多本的爭論成為政治的議題,國民黨藉此爭取選 票,向民進黨政府爭奪教育、課程決策權,最後演變為「中國化教育」 與「臺灣主體性教育」間的對決,甚至成為民進黨和國民黨間的政權 保衛戰。本文主要在分析這些論點,並申述其在課程政策上的意涵。
Toward the end of 2006 the Taipei City Government Department of Education announced its stance of “one-guideline-one-version policy for Taipei City, Taipei County, and Keelung” and joint sponsorship of basic skills achievement tests for junior high school students. The issue has become a source of contention between the one-guideline-one-version group in one camp versus the one-guideline-multiple-versions group in the other. By way of analysis of Taiwan’s social and historical developments and the political environments of educational reforms in the last ten-plus years, this paper has attempted to analyze the bone of this textbook policy contention. It was found that the so-called one-version vs. multiple-versions textbook policy is best analyzed from a political perspective. The Democratic Progressive Party (DDP) and the Kuomingtang Party (KMT) have vied intensively for control of constituent votes, especially in regard to education and curriculum policy. Specifically, the rivalry between the two political parties lies in “Chinese-ized education” versus “Taiwan subjectivity-oriented education.” In essence, the contention manifests a fierce struggle for power between the two political parties. This paper has served to analyze the intricate complexities entailed in this textbook version contention. It has also explicated the implications of the contention for curriculum policy making.
期刊論文
1.歐用生(20060600)。臺灣教科書政策的批判論述分析。當代教育研究季刊,14(2),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Apple, M. W.(2003)。The state and the politics of knowledge。New York:Routledge Falmer。  new window
2.Miller, J. L.(2005)。Sounds of Silence Breaking: Woman, Autobiography, Curriculum。New York, NY:Peter Lang。  new window
3.Giroux, H. A.(1988)。Teachers as intellectual: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning。Westport, CT:Bergin & Garvery。  new window
4.Grumet, M. R.(1988)。Bitter Milk: Women and Teaching。Amherst, MA:The University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
5.Olssen, M.、Codd, J. A.、O'Neill, A.(2004)。Education policy: Globalization, citizenship and democracy。SAGE。  new window
6.Apple, M. W.(1993)。Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age。New York, NY:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
7.Ball, Stephen J.(1994)。Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach。Open University Press。  new window
8.Eisner, E. W.(2002)。The arts and the creation of mind。Yale University Press。  new window
9.Greene, Maxine(1995)。Releasing the imagination: essays on education, the arts, and social change。Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
10.Henderson, James George、Hawthorne, Richard D.(2000)。Transformative curriculum leadership。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
11.Pinar, W. F.(2004)。What is curriculum theory?。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
12.歐用生(1996)。教科書事件平議。新世紀的課程改革。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.歐用生(1999)。教科書的評鑑與選用——政治、經濟的分析。課程改革。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.Apple, M. W.(1986)。Teachers and texts。New York:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
15.Ball, S. J.(2000)。What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxs。Soci-ology of education: Major themes. Volume IV-Politics and policies。London。  new window
16.Ball, S. J.(2006)。Performativities and fabrication in the education: Towards the perfor-mative society。Education, globalization and social change。Oxford。  new window
17.Berson, K. M.(2006)。Conversation of curriculum reform-Teachers and students interpred through autobiographical and phenomenological texts。New York。  new window
18.Donmoyer, R.(2005)。He must not know that the war is over and the other side won, because he just keeps fighting-E。Intricate palette: Working the ideas of Elliot Eisner。New Jersey。  new window
19.Duncan, G. A.(2005)。Race and change in education-Toward a semiotics of curricu-lum。The politics of curriculum change: Race, he-gemony and power in education。New York。  new window
20.Larsen, M.(2004)。Making the twenty-first century quality teacher: A postfoundational comparative approach。Re-imaging comparative educa-tion-postfoundational ideas and applications for critical times。New York。  new window
21.Maguire, M.(2004)。The modern teacher: A te xtual analysis of educational restructura-tion。Educational restructuring: International perspectives on traveling policies。Connecticut。  new window
22.Rasheed, S.(2007)。An existentialist curriculum of action-Creating a language of freedom and possibility。New York。  new window
23.Rogers, R.(2004)。An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education。An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education。New Jersey。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gee, J. P.(2004)。Discourse analysis: What make it critical?。An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education。Mahwah, New Jersey:LEA。  new window
2.Popkewitz, T. S.(2000)。Curriculum as a problem of knowledge, governing, and the social administration of the soul。Curriculum & consequence: Herbert M. Kliebard and the promise of schooling。Teachers College Press。  new window
3.歐用生(2007)。一綱一本教科書政策論述的批判。教科書制度與影響。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE