:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:校本教學輔導教師方案評鑑規準之研究
書刊名:市北教育學刊
作者:張素偵張德銳 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Su-chenChang, Derry
出版日期:2010
卷期:37
頁次:頁19-65
主題關鍵詞:教學輔導教師方案評鑑評鑑規準Mentor teacherProgram evaluationEvaluation criteria
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:103
  • 點閱點閱:54
本研究旨在建構評價學校推動教學輔導教師制度的整體計畫、歷程及成效的標準,以供評鑑者做決定或判斷的基礎,進而獎勵成功推動方案之學校。除此之外,基於方案評鑑規準具有引導方案執行之功能,希望能更進一步歸納出優質教學輔導教師方案成功實施之關鍵要素,俾供教育行政機關及學校推動教學輔導教師方案之參考。 為達成研究目的,本研究採焦點團體法及模糊德菲法進行探究。焦點團體法係由學者專家及訪視輔導委員共六人,針對文獻探討及三次整合型會議討論結果所完成之問卷初稿提供建議,藉以蒐集其在理論、訪視經驗與學校行政實務上的意見;模糊德菲法則用於正式問卷之實施,依照模糊德菲法之實施步驟,對二十位專家學者之施測結果進行統計分析及規準篩選,最後確定校本教學輔導教師方案評鑑規準。 本研究依據上述方法進行探究,獲致以下結論: 一、校本教學輔導教師方案評鑑規準架構包括「背景評鑑」、「輸入評鑑」、「過程評鑑」及「成果評鑑」等四大向度。 二、校本教學輔導教師方案評鑑規準之內涵架構根據四大向度,共涵蓋十四項目、五十二項指標。
The purpose of this study was to construct the evaluation criteria of the school-based mentor teacher programs. With these criteria hopefully those schools which implement the programs with success might be selected and encouraged in accordance. Some key elements of the program evaluation were explored in this study for the reference of the educational agencies and schools because evaluation criteria have the influence of leading the programs’ implementation. Group interview and Fuzzy Delphi technique were used as the research methods to conduct the study. As for the group interview, six specialists were invited to provide information and suggestions for the construction of the Fuzzy Delphi questionnaire. And then twenty specialists were surveyed with this questionnaire. The evaluation criteria were constructed on the basis of the results of the Fuzzy Delphi technique. The conclusions of the study were as follows: The evaluation criteria include four dimensions: context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation, and product evaluation. The evaluation criteria include fourteen items and fifty-two indicators.
期刊論文
1.王元仁(20030300)。模糊理論應用於技職學校課程評鑑模式之探討。國立臺北師範學院學報(教育類),16(1),49-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Perry, F.、Taylor, H.(1982)。Needed: A methods course in discipline for pre-service teachers。Education,102(4),416-419。  new window
3.謝金青(20040300)。跨文化的領導觀點--家長式領導的概念與回顧。教育研究,119,41-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Onafowora, L. L.(2005)。Teacher efficacy issues in the practice of novice teachers。Educational Research Quarterly,28(4),34-43。  new window
5.Veenman, Simon(1984)。Perceived Problems of Beginning Teachers。Review of Educational Research,54(2),143-178。  new window
6.張素偵、張德銳(20080800)。提升國小初任教師班級常規經營之教學輔導歷程分析。初等教育學刊,30,35-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.何佳郡、劉春榮(20080600)。教學輔導教師培訓人選遴選指標建構之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,5,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control,8(3),338-353。  new window
9.Algozzine, B.、Gretes, J.、Queen, A. J.、Cowan-Hathcock, M.(2007)。Beginning teachers’ perceptions of their induction program experience。The Clearing House,80(3),137-143。  new window
10.Normore, A. H.,、Loughry, K. S.(2006)。Avoiding the pitfalls of the rookie year: How a mentor can help。Kappa Delta Pi Record,43(1),25-29。  new window
會議論文
1.Sheeler, K. K. H.(1996)。Mentors in the classroom, not just someone who can show you to your office: A brief summary of literature。San Diego, CA。  new window
2.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2003)。The CIPP model for evaluati on。Portland, OR.。  new window
研究報告
1.Crawford, P. H.(2003)。Exploring the development of teaching expertise:Novice and expert teachers’ reflections upon professional development。Raleigh, NC:North Carolina State University。  new window
2.張德銳、林天祐、蔡先口(2007)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教師制度可行性研究。臺北市:臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.張德銳、丁一顧、楊宜領(2007)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度95學年度實施成效評鑑報告(1)--臺北市教學導師角色壓力及其因應策略之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.張德銳、張芬芬、邱錦昌、張明輝、熊曣、萬家春、鄭玉卿、葉興華、張嘉育、高紅瑛、李俊達(2002)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教師制度九十學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市:臺北市教育局。  延伸查詢new window
5.張德銳、高紅瑛、丁一顧、李俊達、簡賢昌(2005)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度九十三學年度實施成效評鑑報告之一-國民小學問卷及訪談調查。臺北:臺北市立師範學院初等教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
6.張素偵、賴宜鴻(2007)。教學輔導歷程提升國小初任教師班級常規經營之個案分析。  延伸查詢new window
7.張芬芬、王令宜(2007)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度95學年度實施成效評鑑報告(4)-教學導師試辦國小校內推動者推廣策略中的成功之道---個人智能的觀點。  延伸查詢new window
8.張德銳、丁一顧、高紅瑛(2006)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度94學年度實施成效評鑑報告(2)-國民中學問卷及訪談調查。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.張德銳、丁一顧、高紅瑛、李俊達、許雅惠、陳信夫(2003)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度九十一學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張德銳、詹蕙瑋、簡賢昌(2005)。初任教師專業成長歷程及影響因素。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.張德銳、鄭玉卿、鄭可偉(2006)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度94學年度實施成效評鑑報告(1)--教學導師試辦學校推動教學輔導教師制度策略與實施成效。  延伸查詢new window
12.張德銳、簡賢昌(2006)。臺北市教學導師與夥伴教師對教學協助系統需求性與實施程度之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Clay, J. D.(2002)。Implementation of the Georgia Mentor Teacher Program: Perceptions of principals and teacher support specialist mentors(博士論文)。Georgia Southern University,Statesboro, Georgia。  new window
2.Pak, Mira(2005)。Learning to teach in an urban school: Influences affecting a mentor teacher-student teacher relationship(博士論文)。University of California,Los Angeles, California。  new window
3.Yu, C. N. L.(2002)。Stress among Seventh day Adventist Teachers: An analysis of relationships between selected teacher characteristics and occupational stress factors,Riverside, CA。  new window
4.李順銓(2001)。國小初任教師發展教學歷程檔案經驗之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.Voth, B. L.(2002)。Expressed concerns of beginning teachers in early childhood education,Stillwater, OK。  new window
6.Dunbar, K. D. L.(2004)。A mentor teacher professional development guide for the Los Angeles Unified School District(博士論文)。University of California,Los Angeles, California。  new window
7.鄧美珠(2006)。國民小學初任教師同儕教練之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳淑珍(2004)。應用模糊綜合評判於發展網路教師評鑑系統之研究(碩士論文)。臺中健康暨管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳梅娥(2003)。模糊德菲術在國小校長評鑑指標系統建構之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.江啟昱(1993)。CIPP評鑑模式之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.白青平(2000)。臺北縣市國民小學初任教師工作困擾與解決途徑之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.徐顥恩(2004)。國民中學初任教師工作困擾與專業發展需求之研究--以花蓮縣為例(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.張宜芳(2003)。教學信念和教學困擾--二位國小初任教師的個案研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
14.許雅惠(2004)。臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師制度試辦現況與實施成效之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
15.謝旻晏(2003)。國民小學初任教師班級經營現況、困擾與改善成長策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
16.林世昌(2006)。CIPP模式學校層級課程評鑑規準建構之研究--以臺南縣國民中小學為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃慧文(1999)。以CIPP評鑑模式建構我國遠距高等教育評鑑項目之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
18.吳嘉文(2004)。營建知識管理績效評估模式建構之研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳信夫(2004)。臺北市中等學校教學輔導教師制度試辦現況與實施成效之研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃勝彥(2005)。應用模糊德菲層級分析法於汽車營業據點區位選擇之研究-以某日產汽車公司為例(未出版之碩士論文),新竹。  延伸查詢new window
21.蔡麗靜(2005)。大專校院實施「教訓輔三合一方案」CIPP評鑑模式規準建構之研究(未出版之碩士論文),屏東。  延伸查詢new window
22.賴阿福、陳靖旻(2004)。國小自然科數位教材模糊化評估工具及平台之發展研究(未出版之碩士論文),臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
23.魏韶勤(2005)。教學輔導教師教學觀察與回饋對國小初任教師教學效能影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文),臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.Andrews, B. D.(2002)。Mentoring and induction: First-year teachers’ perception of support received,NV。  new window
25.Elmore, C. J.(2003)。Using full-time mentor teacher consultants and part-time peer mentors in Wicomico County, Maryland, public schools: The impact on new teacher effectiveness and retentiont,OH。  new window
26.Epperson, A. D.(2004)。A study of new teacher efficacy and mentor teacher relationships,TX。  new window
27.Holcomb, C.(2006)。Mentor and mentee perceptions of the importance and effectiveness of mentor suppor,TX。  new window
28.Hughes, M.(2003)。Mentor teacher programs: A survey of practices and program features across Virginia(博士論文)。University of Virginia,VA。  new window
29.Launa, M. W.(1990)。Public policy implementation: The role of the local official, institutional isomorphism, and capacity building in the California Mentor Teacher Program,CA。  new window
30.Montesano, R. R.(1998)。The New Jersey beginning teacher program and the mentor/protégé relationship(博士論文)。Fordham University。  new window
31.Ruskus, J. A.(1988)。A multi-site evaluation of the California Mentor Teacher Program,CA。  new window
32.Schumann, J. K.(2005)。Passing the torch: Ten mentor teachers ’ perceptions of their role in working with first-year teachers(博士論文)。Columbia University Teachers College。  new window
33.Wilk, S. E.(1999)。The effects of a mentoring program on the socialization process of first-year teachers in a public school district,WI。  new window
圖書
1.Gordon, S. P.、Maxey, S.(2000)。How to Help Beginning Teachers Succeed。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
2.張德銳、高紅瑛(2009)。同儕輔導--專業成長故事集。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Klir, G. J.、Yuan, B.(1995)。Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic Theory。Boston, MA:New Jersey:Kluwer Academic Publishers:Prentice Hall PTR。  new window
4.Chen, S. J. J.、Hwang, C. L.(1992)。Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications。Springer-Verlag。  new window
5.王進德、蕭大全(1994)。類神經網路與模糊控制理論入門。全華科技圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.曾淑惠(20040000)。教育評鑑模式。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Gee, J. B.(2001)。What graduates in education fear most about their first year of teaching。Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED454161)。  new window
8.Neufeldt, v.、Guralnik, D. B.(1994)。Webster’s New World Dictionary (3rd ed.)。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE