:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺北市中小學教學輔導教師制度九十一學年度試辦實施成效評鑑研究
書刊名:臺北市立師範學院學報. 教育類
作者:張德銳 引用關係丁一顧 引用關係許雅惠陳信夫李俊達高紅瑛
作者(外文):Chang, DerrayTing, Yi-kuHsu, Ya-wheiChen, Sin-fuLee, Chin-daKao, Hung-ying
出版日期:2004
卷期:35:1
頁次:頁101-125
主題關鍵詞:教學輔導教師夥伴教師初任教師教學輔導教學專業Mentor teacherPartner teacherBeginning teacherTeaching mentoringTeaching profession
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(5) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:46
     本研究旨在進行意見調查研究,以瞭調臺北市十所中小學試辦教學輔導教師制度的成效。研究採取問卷調查,了解教學輔導教師、夥伴教師、以及相關行政人員對於教學輔導教師制度,試辦成效的看法。另進行半結構式訪談,蒐集實施成效與困難的意見,最後探討歸納出具體可行的建議,供相關實施單位與人員改進制度成效之參考。   本研究發現教學輔導教師制度有下列實施成效: 1.教學輔導教師與夥伴教師對彼此互動方式、互動頻率要互動品質皆感到滿意。 2.約有半數夥伴教師表示托受過訪視輔導小組所提供的教學錄影服務。教學錄影對於夥伴教師的教學成長有所助益。 3.教學輔導教師制度所能發揮的各項功能獲得筋定,其中尤以「協助建立學校同儕互動文化」、「協助夥伴教師進行班級經營」、「協助夥伴教師解決教學問題」、「協助夥伴教師進行教學省思」、「協助夥伴教師增強教學能力」、「協助夥伴教師持續專業成長」等功能更受認同。 4.經過一年的教學輔導推行經驗後,絕大多數的行政人員願意繼續在校內推動教學輔導教師制度;大多數教學輔導教師願意繼續承擔下一年度的校內教學輔導工作;多數夥伴教師願意繼續拉受輔導和協助。 雖然教學輔導教師制度的功能基本上受到試辦參與人員的肯定,但南參與人員表達學校在推行教學輔導教師制度過程中, 仍會遭遇到一些困難,可以日以改善,其中犖犖大者為:(1)教學輔導教師與夥伴教師的任教年級或任教科目未能配合;(2)夥伴教師職前訓練與在職成長課程仍有所不足;(3)教學輔導教師與夥伴教師缺乏足夠互動討論的時間。
     The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the second-year mentor teacher program in Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. The research methods were questionnaire survey and semi-structured interview. According to the survey and interview findings, the positive impacts of the program were: (1)mentor teachers and partner teachers (prot?g?s) were satisfied with their interaction, (2)video recordings were helpful for the instructional growth of partner teachers, (3)the functions of the program were highly recognized by mentor teachers and partner teachers, (4)mentor teachers and partner teachers were willing to continue their relationships. The problems of the program were found the be the following: (1)menter teachers were not matched with partner teachers who taught the same grade level or subject matter; (2)partner teachers were not provided with an adequate preservice and in-service training of the program; (3)mentor teachers and partner teachers did not have adequate time for informal and formal conferencing, planning, and conversation. Based on the research findings, some recommendations were proposed to improve the implementation of the program.
期刊論文
1.張德銳、張芬芬、鄭玉卿、萬家春、賴佳敏、楊益風、張清楚、高永遠、彭天健(20010400)。臺北市中小學教學導師制度規劃研究。初等教育學刊,9,23-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.American Federation of Teachers(1998)。Mentor teacher programs in the states。Educational Issues Policy Brief,5,1-13。  new window
3.Huffman, G.、Leak, S.(1986)。Beginning teachers' perceptions of mentors。Journal of Teacher Education,37(1),22-25。  new window
4.Giebelhaus, C. R.、Bowman, C. L(2002)。Teaching mentors: Is it worth the effort?。The Journal of Education Research,95(4),246-254。  new window
5.Wang, J.、Paine, L. W(2001)。Mentoring as assisted performance: A pair of Chinese teachers working together。The Elementary School Journal,102(2),157-181。  new window
6.張德銳、李俊達、高紅瑛(20030900)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教師制度第一年試辦實施成效評鑑研究。臺北市立師範學院學報.教育類,34,41-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Wagner, L. A.、Ownby, L.、Gless, Janet(1995)。The California mentor teacher program in 1980s and 1990s。Education & Urban Society,28(1),20-35。  new window
8.江雪齡(1989)。由美國良師制度探討實習教師的問題與輔導途徑。國教研究雙月刊,7,49-52。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.秦夢群(2000)。教學導師概念與設置之探討。現代教育論壇,毛連塭、吳清山 。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Commission on Teacher Credentialing(1993)。Beginning teacher support and assessment program descriptions: Year one。Sacramento:California Department of Education。  new window
2.Feiman-Nemser, S.(1992)。Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an experienced support teacher。East Lansing, MI:Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning。  new window
3.Wilder, Gita Z.(1992)。The Role of the mentor teacher: A two-phase study of teacher mentoring programs。  new window
學位論文
1.許月玫(2002)。國民小學教學輔導教師制度之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Olsen, K. D.(1996)。The master teacher role: Owner's manual。Kant, WA:Books for Educators, Inc.。  new window
2.Lowney, R. G.(1986)。Mentor Teachers: The California Model。  new window
3.張德銳、張芬芬、鄭玉卿、萬家春、楊益風、高永遠、張清楚、彭天建(2000)。臺北市中小學教學導師制度規劃研究。臺北市:臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Odell, S. J.(1990)。Mentor teacher programs。Eugene, Oregon:University of Oregon Library。  new window
5.張德銳、張芬芬、邱錦昌、張明輝、熊曣、萬家春、鄭玉卿、葉興華、張嘉育、高紅瑛、李俊達(2002)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教師九十學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市:臺北市立師範學院初等教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Social Learning Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
單篇論文
1.Blair, Susan M.,Bercik, Janet T.(1987)。Teacher induction: A survey of experienced teachers(ED 303405)。  new window
2.Stanford, R. L.,Banaszak, R. A.,McClelland, S. M.,Rountree, B. S.,Wilson, E. K.(1994)。Empowering cooperating teachers: The University of Alabama clinical master teacher (CMT) program(ED 378157)。  new window
其他
1.Sandra, N. L.(1999)。"Characteristics of a mentor" Science technology base programs,http://education.lanl.gov/resources/mentors/character.html, 2009/03/15。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gold, Y.(1997)。Beginning teacher support。Handbook of research on teacher education : a project of the Association of Teacher Educators。New York:Simon & Schuster Macmillan。  new window
2.張德銳(1998)。美國良師制度對我國實習輔導教師制度之啟示。師資培育與教育革新研究。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE