:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:王龍溪的儒佛會通策略之探討
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:蔡家和 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsai, Chia-he
出版日期:2012
卷期:39:5=456
頁次:頁67-89
主題關鍵詞:良知範圍三教不二虛無Conscience to bound the three teachingsUnityUnderstandingEphemeralEmptinessSunyata
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:591
  • 點閱點閱:44
本文對於王龍溪合會儒佛的方式,做一說明,而於最後做出一反省與判斷,看其合會之詮釋是否成功。龍溪的合會方式,主要是以良知統三教而合會儒、佛,然而良知是實事實理,有本質之善時,就難以與佛學互相融合,於是龍溪改以良知虛寂性,而與佛學做融攝。而良知是無善又是至善,此是龍溪的合會方式,只說良知如孟子所言至善乃不足,又要說到無善。然無善又如何是至善呢?其內容是,良知依於性善,但卻不執著於善,故能與佛學相通。除了以良知之虛寂統攝佛學外,有時亦是學了佛學的優點,如空、如處,如無、不二等等概念,在此一方面,表面看似龍溪站在儒家的立場,以良知合會儒、佛,然而其良知的定義,其實已經加入了佛學的元素,故吾人認為,龍溪的學術工作,便是以儒學的觀點,吸收佛學的好處,進而合會通之。然這合會是一種策略方法,若以先秦儒學原意視之,龍溪以虛無等言良知,非先秦儒家之本意。
This paper explains how Wang Longxi harmonizes Confucianism and Buddhism, and finally makes a reflection and determination about whether the interpretation in harmonization was successful. Wang's harmonization method uses the conscience to integrate the three teachings to harmonize Confucianism and Buddhism However, conscience is based on real issues and principles, and when there is good nature, it would be difficult to blend with Buddhism. Then, Wang uses the emptiness of conscience to blend with Buddhism Conscience has no goodness, but it is also the ultimate goodness, and this is the harmonization method of Wang, saying that conscience is the utmost good according to Mencius but is still insufficient, but saying that it is necessary to be no goodness. However, but how is no goodness also the utmost goodness The content of this is, conscience is based on the goodness of nature, but it does not emphasize goodness, so it can be connected to Buddhism. Other than using the emptiness of conscience to integrate Buddhism, sometimes it also learns from the advantages of Buddhism, such as concepts in empty, ephemeral, negation, and unity. In this respect, it seems that Wang is taking a Confucian stance to use conscience to integrate Confucianism and Buddhism, but the definition of conscience already includes Buddhist elements. Thus, this paper argues that Wang's academic work uses the Confucian perspective to absorb the good points of Buddhism, and in turn, harmonizing them. However, this type of harmonization is a strategic method. Seen from the original meanings in pre-Qin Confucianism, Wang's discuss ion of conscience as empty violates the original intent of pre-Qin Confucianism.
期刊論文
1.彭國翔(1996)。明刊《龍溪會語》,及王龍溪文集佚文。鵝湖月刊,24(10)=287,37。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡家和(2010)。陽明後學王龍溪的圓教說。陽明學,25,329-343。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃泊凱(2008)。良知統三教的研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市中壢區。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鳩摩羅什、陳引馳、林曉光(2007)。新譯維摩詰經。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.裴宗鎬(1980)。韓國儒學資料集成(上)。韓國儒學資料集成(上)。漢城。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱熹(1972)。周易本義。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.程樹德(1970)。論語集釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳震、王龍溪(2007)。王畿集。南京:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.牟宗三(1997)。佛性與般若。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.牟宗三(1993)。從陸象山到劉蕺山。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.王守仁、陳榮捷(1998)。王陽明傳習錄詳註集評。臺北:學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王夫之(1996)。船山全書。長沙:岳麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃宗羲、沈善洪、吳光(2005)。黃宗羲全集。浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳榮捷(1984)。王陽明與禪。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.勞思光(1990)。新編中國哲學史。臺北:三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.周汝登(1970)。東越證學錄。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.彭國翔(2005)。良知學的展開:王龍溪與中晚明的陽明學。生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.唐君毅(1991)。中國哲學原論.原教篇。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.朱熹、鵝湖月刊社(1984)。四書章句集註。鵝湖出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.曾陽晴(19920000)。無善無惡的理想道德主義。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陸九淵(2010)。陸九淵集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.楊簡(1964)。楊氏易傳。四明叢書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.惠能、李中華(1997)。新譯六祖壇經•疑問品第三。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.釋如碩(2011)。王畿闢佛論之根源性考究。「儒道佛三家的哲學論辯」硏究生論文發表會論文集。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE