臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：建構式學習活動應用於建築設計課程教學成效之探討
書刊名：建築學報
作者：翁國華 引用關係／吳韻吾 引用關係／孫啟榕 引用關係
作者(外文)：Weng, Guo-hua／Wu, Yun-wu／Sun, Ci-rong
出版日期：2013
卷期：83
頁次：頁1-18
主題關鍵詞：行動研究；建構理論；建築設計；創造力；教學成效；Action research；Constructivism；Architectural design；Creativity；Teaching effectiveness
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:188
  • 點閱點閱:31
本研究主要目的為以創造性問題解決理論融入建構理論教學模式，進行實驗教學，以探討學生創造力的提 升與教學成效。本研究透過行動研究、成對樣本t 檢定、教學成效問卷進行評量，以探討教學模式對學生建築 設計學習的影響。研究對象為北部私立科技大學建築系一年級學生共114 名（男=71 人，62.3%；女=43 人，37.7%， 平均年齡18 歲），及參與課程的8 位老師。研究結果顯示，學生於實施建構式教學後，流暢力顯著下降（t=2.63, p<.05），變通力則有顯著提升（t=-2.85, p<.01）。教學成效問卷結果顯示學生接受此教學模式，信度分析為可信 （N=51，Cronbach’s α= .90）。
The purpose of this study was to explore the teaching effects and the rising of students' creativity based on constructivist learning environment with creative-problem-solving theory. One hundred and fourteen China University of Technology students (male=71, 62.3%; female=43, 37.7%, average age=18) participated in the experiment. Action research, paired-t test and teaching effectiveness questionnaire were conducted in analyzing the students' response and the collected data. The results showed that constructivism learning were effective in flexibility (t=-2.85, p＜.01) but ineffective in fluency (t=2.63, p＜.05). In General, participants showed positive attitudes in constructivism learning environment.
期刊論文
1.唐玄輝(20061100)。設計過程中創意產出的可能性--以PSEP比例為測量標準。工業設計，34(2)=115，155-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.傅朝卿(2010)。建築新鮮人的建議。台灣建築，180，52。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chiu, S. H.(2010)。Students' knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio-an exploratory study。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，20(1)，27-42。  new window
4.Ensor, J.、Cottam, A.、Band, C.(2001)。Fostering knowledge management through the creative work environment: a portable model from the advertising industry。Journal of Information Science，27(3)，147-155。  new window
5.Feist, G. J.、Gorman, M. E.(1998)。The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline。Review of General Psychology，2(1)，3-47。  new window
6.Firestien, R. L.、Treffinger, D. J.(1983)。Ownership and converging: Essential ingredients of creative problem solving。The Journal of Creative Behavior，17(1)，32-38。  new window
7.Hocevar, D.(1979)。Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality。Journal of Educational Psychology，71(2)，191-196。  new window
8.王紀鯤(19980700)。建築教育中的設計工作室--以淡江大學建築系為例。淡江理工學刊，1(1)，39-48。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hocevar, D.(1981)。Measurement of creativity: A review and critique。Journal of Personality Assessment，45(5)，450-464。  new window
10.涂志銘、林秀玉、張賴妙理、鄭湧涇(20080200)。符合建構論理念的教學策略對植物的養分與能量概念學習的成效。科學教育學刊，16(1)，75-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王本壯、周芳怡(20061200)。以行動研究探討契約學習教學模式應用大學建築設計教學之可行性。建築學報，58，63-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王紀鯤(19990900)。建築教育中的評圖制度。建築學報，30，93-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Gardner, H.(1988)。Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective。Creativity Research Journal，1(1)，8-26。  new window
14.Scott, G. M.、Leritz, L. E.、Mumford, M. D.(2004)。The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review。Creativity Research Journal，16(4)，361-388。  new window
15.Amabile, T. M.(1997)。Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy。Journal of Creative Behavior，31(1)，18-26。  new window
16.Posner, G. J.、Strike, K. A.、Hewson, P. W.、Gertzog, W. A.(1982)。Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change。Science Education，66(2)，211-227。  new window
17.McGourty, J.、Tarshis, L. A.、Dominick, P.(1996)。Managing innovation: Lessons from world class organizations。International Journal of Technology Management，11(3/4)，354-368。  new window
18.Shiffler, Ronald E.(1988)。Maximum Z Scores and Outliers。The American Statistician，42(1)，79-80。  new window
19.徐雍智、蔡今中、陳明璋(20020400)。數學創意類比與同儕評量及其網路案例設計之初探。師大學報. 科學教育類，47(1)，1-13。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Warr, A.、O'Neill, E.(2006)。The effect of group composition on divergent thinking in an interaction design activity。The 6th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems。NY, USA：ACM。122-131。  new window
圖書
1.張世彗(2005)。創造力理論、技法與教學。台北市：心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張新仁(2010)。學習與教學新趨勢。台北市：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Burton, J. B.(1976)。The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and Development of Higher Education in America。NY, USA：W. W. Norton。  new window
4.Lawson, B.(2005)。How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified。Oxford, UK：Architectural Press。  new window
5.Perkins, D. N.(1988)。Creativity and the quest for mechanism。The Psychology of Human Thought。NY, USA：Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Driver, R.(1988)。Theory into practice II: A constructivist approach to curriculum development。Development and Dilemmas in Science Education。London, UK：Falmer Press。  new window
7.教育部(2003)。創造力教育政策白皮書--打造創造力國度。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
8.Guilford, Joy Paul(1986)。Creative Talents: Their Nature, Uses and Development。Bearly Limited。  new window
9.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995)。Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning。London：The Falmer Press。  new window
10.Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996)。Creativity: Flow and Psychology of Discovery and Invention。New York：Harper Collins Publishers。  new window
11.Gallagher, J. J.、Gallagher, S. A.(1994)。Teaching the Gifted Child。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
12.Sternberg, Robert J.、Lubart, Todd I.、洪蘭(1999)。不同凡想：教育界、產業界的創造力開發。臺北：遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Guilford, J. P.(1967)。The nature of human intelligence。McGraw-Hill。  new window
14.毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(20000000)。創造力研究。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Sternberg, Robert J.、Lubart, Todd I.(1995)。Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity。Free Press。  new window
16.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Simonton, Dean Keith(1990)。History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: An intellectual autobiography of historiometry。Theories of creativity。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
2.Runco, M. A.(1990)。Implicit theories and ideational creativity。Theories of Creativity。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
3.Hocevar, D.、Bachelor, P. A.(1989)。A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity。Handbook of creativity。New York, NY：Plenum Press。  new window
4.Cropley, A. J.(1997)。Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles。Creativity research handbook。Cresskill, NJ：Hampton Press。  new window
5.Glynn, S. M.、Duit, R.(1995)。Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models。Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Brown, R. T.(1989)。Creativity: What are we to measure?。Handbook of Creativity。New York, NY：Plenum Press。  new window
7.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1989)。Constructivism in education。The International Encyclopedia of Education: Research and Studies。Oxford。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：864（臺灣：845，外國：19） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2344557 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68148148
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上