:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:通識課程霧峰學對社工專業教育的影響:社工系畢業生修課經驗之回饋分析
書刊名:社會發展研究學刊
作者:廖淑娟 引用關係蕭至邦 引用關係簡宏哲林裕峰
出版日期:2013
卷期:13
頁次:頁47-71
主題關鍵詞:通識課程霧峰學社工教育社區社會工作學生學習成效General educationWu-feng StudiesSocial work educationCommunity social workStudents' learning effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1320
  • 點閱點閱:15
本文想探究曾經修習霧峰學的社工系畢業生,在職場上是否獲益於霧峰學課程的學習,藉以了解學生的學習成效。同時期望這門通識課程不僅能夠持續下去,也希望為它能夠奠定社工專業的知識基礎,為社區工作的教學與實務,提供改進與創新的機會。本研究以通識理念與社區社會工作為分析架構,採用質性研究來分析社工系畢業生的週誌、期末報告、學習心得與反思等文本。接著,分析經電話和電子信件所獲得的回饋意見。根據研究分析結果,研究團隊確認可以從三個面向來總結及反思霧峰學對社工系畢業生的影響,分別是1.個人基本學習的面向,2.社工專業的面向,3.課程的反思與改善建議。個人基本學習面向有三個部分:a.深入霧峰,更加認識霧峰的土地與人事物,b.透過分工合作,發揮團隊精神,完成所交付之任務,c.培養正向的學習態度,奠定成功的基礎。社工專業的面向:a.直接幫助社區社會工作實務,b.溝通協調、團隊合作,c.資源連結與整合運用。課程的反思與改善建議:a.交通問題,b.團體動力,c.行銷霧峰。從社工畢業生回饋分析的結果,可以看出通識課程霧峰學對社工專業有正面的影響,一方面為學生訓練個人的認知、情意與技巧,為學生未來的職場生涯做準備;另一方面,為社會工作專業打下深厚的基礎。再者,學生提出批判式反思,在課程以及大環境面向,都有深入積極的看法,尤其是他們展現出對所生存的土地心存感恩,敬天敬地,建立人與自然最和諧的相處方式,彰顯出霧峰學課程的終極目標。
The purpose of this study is to explore students' effectiveness of learning and career benefits from the Wu-feng Studies, who were graduated from the Social Work Department. We hope to continue the course as well as lay the knowledge base of the social work profession. Furthermore, we expect to provide opportunities of improvement and innovation for teaching and practice of community work.This study applied both general education and community social work as theoretical underpinning, utilized qualitative research to analyze the weekly journals, term papers, and learning reflections of the social work graduates when they took the Wu-feng Studies. And then, we analyze the feedbacks obtained through telephone and electronic mails from the graduates.The results show in three dimensions on the impact of the Wu-feng Studies on social work graduates. These are individual basic learning, social work profession, as well as reflections and recommendations for course improvement.Conclusion from the feedback analysis shows that the Wu-feng Studies as a course of generation education has a positive impact on the social work profession. On the one hand, it educates students with cognitive, affective and skills training for their future career; on the other hand, it lays a solid foundation for the social work profession. Furthermore, students are able to critically reflect in the curriculum as well as the environment in which they live. They demonstrate their thankfulness and love to land and show the harmony between man and nature, which highlights the ultimate goal of the Wu-feng Studies.
期刊論文
1.吳肇銘(20090600)。「服務學習」課程在通識教育實施之研究--以中原大學為例。通識教育學刊,3,97-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.廖淑娟、蕭至邦、陳竹上、簡宏哲(20111200)。服務學習取向的社區工作--以亞洲大學霧峰學為例。Asian Journal of Arts and Sciences,2(2),185-204。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bartlett, H.(1958)。Working definition of social work practice。Social Work,3(2),5-9。  new window
4.Gordon, W. E.(1965)。Knowledge and value: Their distinction and relationship in clarifying social work practice。Social Work,10(3),32-39。  new window
5.Curry, R. M.、Cunningham, P.(2000)。Co-learning in the community。New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,87,73-82。  new window
6.謝青龍(19961200)。通識教育的整體哲學觀。通識教育,3(4),97-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.江宜樺(20050900)。從博雅到通識:大學教育理念的發展與現況。政治與社會哲學評論,14,37-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李金連、蔡行濤、駱劍秋(2000)。大學通識教育課程規劃之實例研究。通識教育季刊,7(1),67-92。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Das Bundesminster für Bildung und Wissenschaft(198504)。Humbold und die Universität heute。Symposium des Bundesminsters für Bildung und Wissenschaft am 17。Bonn。  new window
2.Thornton, J. W.(1958)。General education: Establishing the program。The National Committee on General Education。  new window
圖書
1.林勝義(2011)。社會工作概論。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃玉(2009)。從服務中學習:跨領域服務學習理論與實務。臺北市:洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kretzmann, J.、McKnight, I(1993)。Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets。Chicago, USA:Northwestern University。  new window
4.Callixiicos, Alex、簡守邦(2004)。社會理論思想史導論。台北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃俊傑(2004)。全球化時代大學通識教育的新挑戰。台北:中華民國通識教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
6.李增祿(1997)。社會工作概論。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
7.Habermas, Jürgen、McCarthy, Thomas A.(1987)。Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason。Beacon Press。  new window
8.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃俊傑(1999)。大學通識教育的理念與實踐。中華民國通識教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
10.Habermas, Jürgen、McCarthy, Thomas(1979)。Communication and the Evolution of Society。Beacon Press。  new window
11.陳向明(20020000)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.蘇景輝(2009)。社區工作:理論與實務。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
13.林勝義(2011)。社區工作。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
14.Butrym, Z.(1976)。The Nature of Social Work。London:Macmillan。  new window
15.Howard, Craig C.(1992)。Theories of General Education: A Critical Approach。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
其他
1.(2013)。亞洲大學通識教育中心霧峰學,http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/socialwork1930/post/1321932847, 2013/06/10。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖淑娟,蕭至邦,簡宏哲(2011)。服務學習取向的都市原住民社區工作之初探:以台中市霧峰區花東新村學童課後輔導為例,屏東:大仁科技大學。,http://ir.tajen.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/310904200/656。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE