臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大學「藝術與設計實務導向研究」之教學個案：整合創作、理論與寫作
書刊名：藝術教育研究
作者：何文玲 引用關係／李傳房 引用關係／陳俊宏 引用關係
作者(外文)：Ho, Wen-ling／Lee, Chang-franw／Chen, Chung-hong
出版日期：2013
卷期：26
頁次：頁1-35
主題關鍵詞：FTCF模式；大學藝術與設計教育；實務導向研究；藝術與設計創作；FTCF model；Art and design education in university；Practice-led research；Art and design production
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:1297
  • 點閱點閱:95
最近歐、美，與澳洲高等教育中，藝術與設計之「實務導向研究」（practice-led research）已成為重要趨勢。為增進臺灣大學階段中藝術與設計實務導向研究之能力，對該實務導向研究的教學內容與方法進行探討實為亟要。因此，本文以大學視覺藝術系42名學生為研究對象，發展藝術與設計實務導向研究之教學內容與方法，探討教學個案之實施情形。具體而言，本文採用質性個案研究法，針對兩個研究目的：（1）分析學生在創作實務、理論與寫作，以及前述兩者整合之學習情形；以及（2）分析學生在藝術與設計實務導向研究中運用FTCF模式之學習情形。本文歸結兩方面之發現：（1）創作實務、理論與寫作，以及兩者整合之學習情形與教師改進方式；（2）實務導向研究中FTCF模式之創造性運用方式。最後，本文據此闡述對未來大學藝術與設計實務導向研究教學與研究之意涵。
Recently, practice-led research has become a major trend in higher education in Europe, the U.S.A, and Australia. To enhance the art and design research abilities of college students in Taiwan, it is crucial to study the teaching content and methods of practice-led research. Therefore, The authors explored such content and methods, examining the implementation thereof by studying 42 college students and adopting qualitative case study methods. This study had two objectives: (1) to analyze student learning in both creation practice, and theory and writing, as well as combinations thereof; and (2) to analyze student learning situations in art and design practice-led research by using the form/theme/context/function (FTCF) model. The results yielded the following: (1) problems related to learning and improvements for teaching methods that involve creation practice, and theory and writing, as well as combinations thereof; and (2) creative uses of the FTCF model for art and design practice-led research. Finally, the implications were discussed for future teaching and research of art and design practice-led research.
期刊論文
1.Sandell, R.(2006)。Form+Theme+Context: Balancing considerations for meaningful art learning。Art Education，59(1)，33-37。  new window
2.Sandell, R.(2009)。Using Form+Theme+Context (FTC) for rebalancing 21st-century art education。Studies in Art Education，50(3)，287-299。  new window
3.Flavell, J. H.(1999)。Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind。Annual Review of Psychology，50，21-45。  new window
4.Liu, Feng-Jung(2004)。An analysis of theoretical foundation for research methods of visual art production: Qualitative perspectives。Research in Arts Education，8，73-94。  new window
5.Allen, B. A.、Armour-Thomas, E.(1993)。Constructing validation of metacognition。Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied，127(2)，203-211。  new window
6.Barak, M.(2009)。Idea focusing versus idea generating: A course for teachers on inventive problem solving。Innovations in Education and Teaching International，46(4)，345-356。  new window
7.Collinson, J. A.(2005)。Artistry and analysis: Student experiences of UK practice-based doctorates in art and design。International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education，18(6)，713-728。  new window
8.Hockey, J.(2007)。United Kingdoms’ art and design practice-based PhDs: Evidence from students and their supervisors。Studies in Art Education，48(2)，155-171。  new window
9.Howard-Jones, P. A.(2002)。A dual-state model of creative cognition for supporting strategies that foster creativity in the classroom。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，12(3)，215-226。  new window
10.Kill, R.(2006)。Coming in from the cold: Imperialist legacies and tactical criticalities。International Journal of Art and Design Education，25(3)，308-312。  new window
11.Marchant, G. J.(1989)。Meta-teaching: A metaphor for reflective teaching。Education，109(4)，487-489。  new window
12.Noppe, L. D.(1996)。Progression in the service of the ego, cognitive styles, and creative thinking。Creative Research Journal，8，369-383。  new window
13.Isaksen, S. G.、Puccio, G. J.、Treffinger, D. J.(1993)。An Ecological Approach to Creativity Research: Profiling for Creative Problem Solving。Journal of Creative Behavior，27(3)，149-170。  new window
14.Brophy, D. R.(1998)。Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts。Creative Research Journal，11(2)，123-150。  new window
15.何文玲(20111200)。藝術與設計實務研究相關概念之分析。藝術研究期刊，7，27-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Sinner, A.、Leggo, C.、Irwin, R. L.、Gouzouasis, P.、Grauer, K.(2006)。Arts-based educational research dissertations: Reviewing the practices of new scholars。Canadian Journal of Education，29(4)，1223-1270。  new window
17.Yee, Joyce S. R.(2010)。Methodological innovation in practice-based design doctorates。Journal of Research Practice，6(2)。  new window
18.何文玲、嚴貞(20110500)。藝術與設計「實務研究」應用於大學藝術系學生創作發展之研究。藝術教育研究，21，85-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Isaksen, S. G.、Treffinger, D. J.(2004)。Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving。Journal of Creative Behavior，38(2)，75-101。  new window
20.劉豐榮(20041200)。視覺藝術創作研究方法之理論基礎探析：以質化研究觀點為基礎。藝術教育研究，8，73-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.de Freitas, N.(2007)。Activating a research context in art and design practice。International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning，1(2)，1-15。  new window
會議論文
1.Nimkulrat, N.(2011)。Problems of practice-based doctorates in art and design: A viewpoint from Finland。2nd International Conference on Professional Doctorates。UK Council for Graduate Education。58-61。  new window
2.劉豐榮(1996)。質的個案研究方法學在藝術教育研究之意義與應用。海峽兩岸小學教育學術研討會。嘉義市：國立嘉義師範學院。93-109。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Weinert, F. E.(1987)。Introduction and overview: Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding。Metacognition, motivation, and understanding。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。  new window
2.Allison, B.(1992)。Research index of art & design。Leicester, UK：Leicester Expertise。  new window
3.Arts and Humanities Research Council(2011)。Guide to student finding。London, UK：Arts and Humanities Research Council。  new window
4.Bogdan, A.(2000)。Minding minds: Evolving a reflexive mind by interpreting others。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
5.Cross, N.(1994)。Engineering design method: Strategies for product design。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.Elo, M.(2009)。Passages of articulation: Art and research touching。Reflections and connections: On the relationship between production and academic research。Helsinki, Finland：University of Art and Design Helsinki。  new window
7.Gray, C.(1998)。Inquiry through practice。No guru, no method?。Helsinki, Finland：University of Art and Design。  new window
8.Kluwe, R. H.(1987)。Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior。Metacognition, motivation, and understanding。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。  new window
9.Mäkelä, M.(2009)。The place and product(s) of making in practice-led research。Reflections and connections: On the relationship between production and academic research。Helsinki, Finland：University of Art and Design。  new window
10.Meichenbaum, D.(1985)。Teaching thinking: A cognitive behavioral perspective。Thinking and learning skill, vol. 2: Research and open questions。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Associates。  new window
11.Metcalfe, J.(2000)。Metamemory: Theory and data。The Oxford handbook of memory。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Nimkulrat, N.(2009)。Paperness: Expressive material in textile art from an artist’s viewpoint。Helsinki, Finland：University of Art and Design Helsinki。  new window
13.McNiff, S.(1998)。Art-Based Research。London：Jessica Kingsley Publisher。  new window
14.Merriam, S. B.(1998)。Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach。Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
15.Creswell, John W.(1994)。Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches。Sage。  new window
16.陳向明(2008)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Sullivan, Graeme(2005)。Art practice as research: inquiry in the visual arts。Sage。  new window
18.Mäkelä, M.、Routarinne, S.(2006)。Connecting different practices。The Art of Research: Practice in Research of Art and Design。Helsinki, Finland：University of Art and Design。  new window
19.Sullivan, G.(2009)。Making space: The purpose and place of practice-led research。Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts。Edinburg, UK：Edinburg University Press。  new window
20.Rust, C.、Mottram, J.、Till, J.(2007)。Practice-led research in art, design, and architecture。AHRC Research Review。Nov. UK：AHRC。  new window
單篇論文
1.Gray, C.(1996)。Inquiry through practice: Developing appropriate research strategies，http://carolegray.net/Papers%20PDFs/ngnm.pdf。  new window
其他
1.Candy, L.(2006)。Practice based research: A guide，http://www.creativeityandcognition.com/resources/RBR%20Guide-1.1-2006.pdf。  new window
2.Cools, J.(1999)。Academization and its impact on research in art colleges: An optique belge，http://www.zhdk.ch/fileadmin/data_subsites/data_zdok/Pub09_PDFs/zdok9_cools.pdf。  new window
3.Malins, J.，Gray, C.(1995)。Appropriate research methodologies for artists, designers, & crafts persons: Research as a learning process，http://carolegray.net/Papers%20PDFs/cc.pdf。  new window
4.Brown, B.，Gough, P.，Roddis, J.(2004)。Types of research in the creative arts and design，http://artsresearch.brighton.ac.uk/links/practice-led/4_research.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lycouris, S.(2011)。Practiceled research in arts, design and architecture。Professional doctorates in the UK 2011。Lichfield, Staffordshire：UK Council for Graduate Education。  new window
2.Flavell, J. H.(1976)。Metacognition Aspects of problem-solving。The nature of intelligence。Hillsdale, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
3.Haseman, B.(2007)。Rupture and recognition: Identifying the performative research paradigm。Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts inquiry。London：I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.。  new window
4.Scrivener, S.(2006)。Visual art practice reconsidered: Transformational practice and the academy。The art of research: Research practices in art and design。Helsinki：University of Art and Design。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：378（臺灣：376，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1931025 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67729397
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上