:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智旭《周易禪解》之「四悉檀」及其釋義
書刊名:興大中文學報
作者:林文彬 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Wen-ping
出版日期:2013
卷期:34
頁次:頁69-100
主題關鍵詞:智旭蕅益周易禪解四悉檀以佛解易Zhi-xuOu-yiZen Interpretation of ZhouyiZhou-yi-chan-jieFour SiddhantaBuddhist interpretation of Yijing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:340
  • 點閱點閱:58
本文是探討智旭《周易禪解》解經的體例,即所謂的「四悉檀」及其釋義。智旭是把《周易》的經傳結構,卦形、卦辭、爻辭、《十翼》分別配置於「四悉檀」,再用「眾生法」、「佛法」,「觀心法」來加以闡述。本篇先藉由「四悉檀」上溯其淵源,由龍樹《中論》「四句」的兩型之思想分析,我們可以看到中土佛教對法性空義的吸收和轉化,而天臺宗就是用「心」去攝納了因緣所生法的法性空義,天臺宗也依此而建立了「中道佛性」之思想,並藉著詮釋自宗的根本經典《妙法蓮華經》,創立了釋經的模式。由南岳慧思之「眾生法」、「佛法」、「心法」到智顗的「因緣」(四悉檀)、「約教」、「本跡」、「觀心」之「天臺四釋」,最稱完備。私淑天臺的智旭綜合了南岳三法與智顗四釋,形成了自己的解經模式。智旭除了用來解佛典外,更以之解外典《周易》。智旭撰《周易禪解》之意,本為誘儒入佛,但其實智旭判教的思想很濃。儒佛雖然可以同源於真如本體,但儒雖具性德卻無修德,這亦就是智旭《周易禪解》會通《易》佛的用意,要以此開決儒典,指出向上一路。
This paper probes into the style of exegesis of Buddhist scriptures in Zhi-xu's Zen "Interpretation of Zhouyi": i.e., the so-called "four Siddhanta" and their definitions. Zhi-xu allotted Zhouyi's structure (body of hexagram, explanation of hexagram, explanation of horizontal line and Ten Wings) to each of four Siddhanta, and further, used dharma of all living beings, Buddha-dharma and dharma of observing mind to expound it. First, this paper traces back to its source by four Siddhanta and then analyses thoughts by two types of "catuskoti" in Nagarjuna's The Fundamentals of the Middle Way (Mulamadhyamaka-Karika). From that, we can realize Chinese Buddhism absorbed and transformed emptiness of dharma nature and the Tiantai School used "mind" to adopt emptiness of dharma nature issued from causes and conditions. According to this, the Tiantai School also produced the thought of "Buddha-nature of Middle Way", and established a model for exegesis of Buddhist scriptures by interpreting "Lotus Sutra", their own school's fundamental scripture. It is the most comprehensive from Nanyue Hui-si's dharma of all living beings, Buddha-dharma and dharma of mind to Zhi-yi's four exegeses of Tiantai: i.e., causes and conditions(four Siddhanta), according to the teachings, original and traces and observing the mind. Zhi-xu, a disciple who never took lessons directly under Tiantai, integrated three Nanyue dharmas with Zhi-yi's four exegeses to form his own model of exegesis of Buddhist scriptures. He interpreted not only Buddhist scriptures but also "Zhouyi" with it. His original intent in writing "Zen Interpretation of Zhouyi" was to lead Confucianism into Buddhism, but in fact, his thinking on classification of Buddha's teaching is very strong. Confucianism and Buddhism have a common origin of Tathatā (true thusness or suchness). While Confucianism has virtue but no cultivating virtue, this is also a motive for integrating "Yijing" and Buddhism in Zhi-xu's "Zen Interpretation of Zhouyi": to carry out Confucian classics with it, and pointed out a way to get upgraded.
期刊論文
1.陳堅(2003)。《妙法蓮華經文句》的釋經方法--兼與《周易禪解》釋經方法的比較。閩南佛學學報。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭朝順(20030700)。智顗「四意消文」的解經方法論。華梵人文學報,1,243-269。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.釋聖嚴(20010900)。「教觀綱宗」緒論。中華佛學學報,14,353-359。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳汝鈞(19920700)。印度中觀學的四句邏輯。中華佛學學報,5,149-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳英善(19940201)。蕅益智旭大師修學心路歷程之探索。獅子吼,33(2),14-20。  延伸查詢new window
6.林文彬(20060600)。《易經》與佛學的交會--智旭《周易禪解》試析。興大中文學報,19,217-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳英善(19920700)。「觀音玄義」性惡問題之探討。中華佛學學報,5,173-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.楊惠南(19830700)。「中論」裡的「四句」之研究。華岡佛學學報,6,277-310。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳英善(19960300)。蕅益智旭思想的特質及其定位問題。中國文哲研究集刊,8,227-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林文彬(20020600)。試論智旭《周易禪解》天臺學之特色。興大人文學報,32(上),147-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳彥戎(2007)。蕅益智旭《周易禪解》儒佛會通思想研究(博士論文)。輔仁大學,台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃鴻文(2009)。蕅益智旭「現前一念心」研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃馨儀(2003)。釋智旭援佛解易思想研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳進益(2004)。澫益智旭「《易》佛會通」研究(博士論文)。東吳大學,台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝金良(2006)。《周易襌解》研究。四川:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張曼濤(1979)。天臺思想論集。臺北:大乘文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王弼、孔穎達(1986)。周易正義。臺北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱熹(1983)。易本義。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.智旭。楞嚴經玄義。  延伸查詢new window
6.智顗。法華文句,智者大師。  延伸查詢new window
7.澄觀。大方廣佛華嚴經隨書演義鈔。  延伸查詢new window
8.親光。佛地經論。  延伸查詢new window
9.龍樹。中論。  延伸查詢new window
10.龍樹。大智度論。  延伸查詢new window
11.灌頂。法華文句記。  延伸查詢new window
12.王仲堯(2001)。易學與佛學。北京:中國書店。  延伸查詢new window
13.賴永海(2000)。中國佛教百科全書(肆)宗派卷。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.蕅益智旭(1996)。周易禪解。臺北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.智旭、釋成時。靈峰蕅益大師宗論。  延伸查詢new window
16.牟宗三(1997)。佛性與般若。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳汝鈞(2002)。法華玄義的哲學與綱領。台北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.釋恆清(1997)。佛性思想。臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.董平(2002)。天台宗研究:普陀山佛教文化研究所研究課題。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳英善(1997)。天臺性具思想。臺北:東大出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.吳汝鈞(199904)。天台智顗的心靈哲學。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
22.智顗。妙法蓮華經玄義。  延伸查詢new window
23.慧思。大乘止觀法門。  延伸查詢new window
24.智顗。維摩經玄疏。  延伸查詢new window
25.潘桂明、吳忠偉(2001)。中國天台宗通史。南京:江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.吳汝鈞(19970000)。龍樹中論的哲學解讀。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.尤惠貞(19930000)。天臺宗性具圓教之研究。臺北:文津。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.吳汝鈞(19950000)。中國佛學的現代詮釋。臺北:文津。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.呂澂(1985)。中國佛學源流略講。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
30.釋聖嚴、關世謙(1988)。明末中國佛教之研究。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.夏金華(19970000)。佛學與易學。臺北:新文豐。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.朱伯崑(1990)。易學哲學史。藍燈文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.智顗(1983)。摩訶止觀,臺北:新文豐出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE