:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科學民主化下科技議題的風險治理:探討國光石化廠開發案的科技官僚風險溝通、公眾風險感知與公眾動員
書刊名:思與言
作者:李明穎 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Ming-ying
出版日期:2014
卷期:52:4
頁次:頁111-159
主題關鍵詞:公眾動員風險溝通風險治理風險感知科學民主化Democratization of sciencePublic mobilizationRisk communicationRisk governanceRisk perception
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:330
  • 點閱點閱:131
科技發展如同雙面刃,一方面是經濟發展的主要動力,另一方面也為環境生態帶來許多風險。科技議題不只涉及不同行動者之間的風險溝通,還考驗著國家在風險治理的能耐。從科學民主化的三波浪潮來看,「公眾參與科學」漸成趨勢。公眾參與可以擴大科技議題的公眾動員效果。近年來國內最受爭議的科技議題以國光石化開發案最受矚目,本研究以此個案為例,探討不同行動者如何就科技議題生產論述進行風險溝通。研究發現,科技官僚對在地公眾進行風險溝通時,刻意淡化個人切身相關的風險。在地公眾並非對風險無知,只是被迫自行發展與風險共存的心理調適。研究也發現,異議行動者利用媒體與多層次的發聲行動,由外向內、全國到地方、專家到公眾,進行公眾動員,不只重新建構公眾的風險感知,還不斷捲入更多的行動者,激盪出「風險的社會強化」的漣漪效應。
Technology development is like a knife with two-sided edges. On the one side, technology drives economic development; one the other side, technology brings about a lot of risks at the expense of ecology. In the process of decision-making on techno-science issues, risk communication can endure capability of risk governance of the states. In three waves of democratization of science, 'public engagement in science' is an emerging tendency. Public engagement will result in effects of public mobilization. In Taiwan, one of controversial techno-science issues in recent years is whether Kuokuang petrochemical projects should develop. This study draws such a case to discuss the ways of different actors dealing with risk communication on techno-science issues. This study argued that technocrat deliberately attenuated risks related to local people. However, local people were forced to adopt themselves coexisting with risks. Moreover, this study argued that dissidents made a good use of media and took multilevel actions for public mobilization. Hence, public perception on risk was reconstructed. Ripple effect on social amplification of risk was shown.
期刊論文
1.范玫芳(20071000)。風險論述、公民行動與灰渣掩埋場設置爭議。科技、醫療與社會,5,43-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳平軒(20111200)。從網路到街頭:反國光石化的動員經驗、成效與反省。臺灣社會研究,85,437-450。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Frankenfeld, Philip J.(1992)。Technological Citizenship: A Normative Framework for Risk Studies。Science, Technology and Human Values,17(4),459-484。  new window
4.Jasanoff, Sheila(1993)。Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis。Risk Analysis,13(2),123-129。  new window
5.杜文苓、李翰林(20110600)。環境資訊公開的民主實踐課題--以霄裡溪光電廢水汙染爭議為例。臺灣民主,8(2),59-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.杜文苓、施麗雯、黃廷宜(20071000)。風險溝通與民主參與:以竹科宜蘭基地之設置為例。科技、醫療與社會,5,71-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.丘昌泰(20040600)。公共設施中鄰避情結的成因與因應:以民營電廠為例。政治學報,37,37-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.杜文苓(20070600)。審議民主與社會運動:民間團體籌辦新竹科學園區宜蘭基地公民會議的啟發。公共行政學報,23,67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.丘昌泰(19980800)。公害社區風險溝通之問題與對策。法商學報,34,17-58。  延伸查詢new window
10.何明修(20120100)。反國光石化運動的「公民」展演。傳播研究與實踐,2(1),45-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林倖妃、陳一姍(2010)。政府花錢「買新聞」臺灣民主的大騙局。天下雜誌,463,320-324。  延伸查詢new window
12.邱大昕、羅淑霞(20110600)。鄰避與被鄰避:身心障礙機構與設施抗爭處理經驗之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊,15(1),167-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.胡慕情(20120100)。媒體的民主練習曲。傳播研究與實踐,2(1),9-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳順孝(20120100)。網路社會動員的繼往開來:反國光石化運動的社會科技基礎和行動策略演化。傳播研究與實踐,2(1),19-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.齊偉先(2009)。風險、媒體與常民科學溝通。教育社會學通訊,76,6-19。  延伸查詢new window
16.齊偉先(20130300)。媒體災難敘事的社會意義建構:日本福島核災的戲劇分析。思與言,51(1),103-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.蔡嘉陽(20120100)。反國光石化的社會實踐:談環境保護的公民。傳播研究與實踐,2(1),1-8。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Zooey(2011)。反國光石化,青年學生站出來。新新聞,1260,12-16。  延伸查詢new window
19.Alsop, Steve(1999)。Understanding Understanding: A Model for the Public Learning of Radioactivity。Public Understanding of Science,8(4),267-284。  new window
20.Baxter, James、Lee, Daniel(2004)。Understanding Expressed Low Concern and Latent Concern near a Hazardous Waste Treatment Facility。Journal of Risk Research,7(7/8),705-729。  new window
21.Carson, Lyn、Martin, Brian(2002)。Random Selection of Citizens for Technology Decision Making。Science and Public Policy,29(2),105-113。  new window
22.Comby, Emeline、Le Lay, Yves-François、Piégay, Hervé(2014)。How Chemical Pollution becomes a Social Problem. Risk Communication and Assessment through Regional Newspapers during the Management of PCB Pollutions of the Rhône River。Science of the Total Environment,482/483,100-115。  new window
23.Gross, Alan G.(1994)。The Roles of Rhetoric in the Public Understanding of Science。Public Understanding of Science,3,3-23。  new window
24.Johnson, Branden、Chess, Caron(2003)。Communication Worst-Case Scenarios: Neighbor’s View of Industrial Accident Management。Risk Analysis,23(4),829-840。  new window
25.Luloff, Albert E.、Albrecht, Stan L.、Bourke, Lisa(1998)。NIMBY and the Hazardous and Toxic Waste Siting Dilemma: the Need for Concept Clarification。Society and Natural Resources,11(1),81-90。  new window
26.Mausda, Jeffrey、Garvin, Theresa(2006)。Place, Culture, and the Social Amplification of Risk。Risk Analysis,26(2),437-454。  new window
27.Ockwell, David、Rydin, Yvonne(2006)。Conflicting Discourses of Knowledge: Understating the Policy Adoption of Pro-burning Knowledge Claims in Cape York Peninsula。Australia Environmental Politics,15(3),379-398。  new window
28.Renn, Ortwin(2010)。The Contribution of Different Types of Knowledge Towards Understanding, Sharing and Communication Risk Concepts。Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies,2(2),177-195。  new window
29.Renn, Ortwin、Benighaus, Christina(2013)。Perception of Technological Risk: Insights from Research and Lessons for Risk Communication and Management。Journal of Risk Research,16(3/4),293-313。  new window
30.Rickard, Laura、McComas, Katherine、Clarke, Christopher、Stedman, Richard、Decker, Daniel(2013)。Exploring Risk Attenuation and Crisis Communication after a Plague Death in Grand Canyon。Journal of Risk Research,16(2),145-167。  new window
31.Signorino, Guido(2012)。Proximity and Risk Perception. Comparing Risk Perception 'Profiles' in Two Petrochemical Areas of Sicily (Augusta and Milazzo)。Journal of Risk Research,15(10),1223-1243。  new window
32.Thurman, Neil(2008)。Forums for Citizen Journalists? Adoption of User Generated Content Initiatives by Online News Media。New Media & Society,110(1),139-157。  new window
33.Wettergren, Asa(2009)。Fun and Laughter: Culture Jamming and the Emotional Regime of Late Capitalism。Social Movement Studies,8(1),1-15。  new window
34.Xue, Wen、Hine, Donald W.、Loi, Natasha M.、Thorsteinsson, Einar B.、Phillips, Wendy J.(2014)。Cultural Worldviews and Environmental Risk Perceptions: A Meta-analysis。Journal of Environmental Psychology,40,249-258。  new window
35.Carolan, M. S.(2006)。Ecological Representation in Deliberation: The Contribution of Tactile Spaces。Environmental Politics,15(3),345-361。  new window
36.Mathes, Rainer、Pfetsch, Barbara(1991)。The Role of Alternative Press in the Agenda- Building Process: Spill- Over Effects and Media Opinion Leadership。European Journal of communication,6,33-62。  new window
37.黃懿慧(19940400)。科技風險的認知與溝通問題。民意研究季刊,188,95-129。  延伸查詢new window
38.Collins, Harry M.、Evans, Robert(2002)。The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience。Social Studies of Science,32(2),235-296。  new window
39.周桂田(20020300)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究,45,69-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.湯京平(19990600)。鄰避性環境衝突管理的制度與策略--以理性選擇與交易成本理論分析六輕建廠及拜耳投資案。政治科學論叢,10,355-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Kasperson, R. E.、Kasperson, J. X.(1996)。The Social amplification and attenuation of risk。The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,545(1),95-105。  new window
42.Kasperson, Roger E.、Renn, Ortwin、Slovic, Paul、Brown, Halina S.、Goble, Robert、Emel, Jacque、Ratick, Samuel、Kasperson, J. X.(1988)。The Social Amplification of Risk: a Conceptual Framework。Risk Analysis,8(2),177-187。  new window
43.徐世榮、許紹峰(20010500)。以民眾觀點探討環境影響評估制度。臺灣土地研究,2,101-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.范玫芳(20080600)。科技、民主與公民身份:安坑灰渣掩埋場設置爭議之個案研究。臺灣政治學刊,12(1),185-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.楊國斌(20090701)。悲情與戲謔:網絡事件中的情感動員。傳播與社會學刊,9,39-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.周桂田(20041200)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」--在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊,56,1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.Renn, Ortwin、Burns, William J.、Kasperson, Jeanne X.、Kasperson, Roger E.、Slovic, Paul(1992)。The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications。Journal of Social Issues,48(4),137-160。  new window
48.林國明、陳東升(20050900)。審議民主、科技決策與公共討論。科技、醫療與社會,3,1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.杜文苓(20100600)。環評決策中公民參與的省思:以中科三期開發爭議為例。公共行政學報,35,29-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.蔡培慧(20100900)。真實是一場社會行動:反思臺灣農村陣線的行動與組織。臺灣社會研究季刊,79,319-339。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.杜文苓(20110600)。環境風險與科技決策:檢視中科四期環評爭議。東吳政治學報,29(2),57-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.周桂田(20070900)。新興風險治理典範之芻議。政治與社會哲學評論,22,179-233。new window  延伸查詢new window
53.Callon, M.(1999)。The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge。Science, Technology & Society,4(1),81-94。  new window
圖書
1.吳晟、吳明益(2011)。溼地.石化.島嶼想像。台北:有鹿文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Donk, Wim Van De、Loader, Brian D.、Nixon, Paul G.、Rucht, Dieter(2004)。Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements。London:Routledge。  new window
3.Melucci, Alberto(1996)。Challenging Codes: Collective Actions in the Information Age。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.謝志誠、何明修(2011)。八輕遊臺灣:國光石化的故事。左岸文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Zald, M. N.、McCarthy, J. D.(1987)。Social movements in an organizational society。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Books。  new window
6.丘昌泰(2007)。鄰避情結與社區治理:臺灣環保抗爭的困局與社區治理。臺北:韋伯。  延伸查詢new window
7.Lundgren, Regina E.、McMakin, Andrea H.(2013)。A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks。Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
8.柯金源(2011)。退潮。臺北:財團法人公共電視文化事業基金會。  延伸查詢new window
9.Irwin, Alan(1995)。Citizen Science。London:Routledge。  new window
10.Krimsky, Sheldon、Plough, Alonzo(1988)。Environmental Hazards: Communicating Risks as a Social Process。Dover, MA:Auburn House Publishing Company。  new window
11.Renn, O.、Graham, P.(2005)。Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach。Geneva, CH:International Risk Governance Council。  new window
12.Irwin, Alan、Wynne, Brian(1996)。Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Douglas, Mary、Wildavsky, Aaron(1982)。Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers。University of California Press。  new window
14.丘昌泰(19960000)。建構利害關係人取向的環境風險政策:以石化專業區為分析焦點。臺北:時英。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Fischer, Frank(2000)。Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
16.何明修(20060000)。綠色民主:臺灣環境運動的研究。臺北:群學。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Latour, Bruno(2005)。Reassembling the Social: an Introduction to Actor-Network Theory。The MIT Press:Oxford University Press。  new window
18.Nelkin, Dorothy(1992)。Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
其他
1.謝文華,陳永吉,高嘉和(20110111)。粉飾國光石化 政府置入行銷 伸進部落格,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/jan/11/today-p4.htm, 2012/01/14。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱淑娟(20101017)。這是一場價值之戰,http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2010/10/blog-post_17.html, 2013/03/05。  new window
3.朱淑娟(20101217)。還全民一場高品質的國光石化聽證會,http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2010/12/blog-post_17.html, 2013/03/05。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱淑娟(20110424)。國光石化停建公民力量的最大展現,http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2011/04/blog-post_23.html, 2013/03/05。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱淑娟(20110425)。國光石化600天還沒回答的問題(5)這是我們世代生存的價值,http://shuchuan7.blogspot.tw/2011/04/60010-510-4-2011421600-600-2009.html, 2013/03/05。  延伸查詢new window
6.林靜梅,胡慕情,莊志成(20100908)。民代動員挺國光在地居民被朦騙,http://pnn.pts.org.tw/, 2013/11/12。  延伸查詢new window
7.胡思聰(20090317)。環評審查絕非延宕重大投資建設案的因素,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/5603, 2013/11/12。  延伸查詢new window
8.胡慕情(20100823)。訓練白海豚轉彎?專家:不可能的事,http://pnn.pts.org.tw/, 2013/11/12。  延伸查詢new window
9.胡慕情(2010)。學界籲辦聽證會論辯國光石化未來,http://pnn.pts.org.tw/, 2013/11/12。  延伸查詢new window
10.經濟部(20100721)。兼顧產業發展、環境保護及全民利益-推動國光石化之政策說明,http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/news/News.aspx7kind:1&menu_id=40&news_id=19188, 2014/10/12。  延伸查詢new window
11.經濟部(20100726)。「800學者連署反對國光石化設廠李遠哲:國光石化絕對走錯路」之澄清稿,http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=19223, 2014/10/12。  延伸查詢new window
12.經濟部(20100803)。有關反對國光石化在彰化設廠連署聲明書之澄清,http://www.cpc.com.tw/big5/content/index01.asp?sno=2893&pno=365, 2014/10/12。  延伸查詢new window
13.經濟部(20101028)。有關立法院經濟委員會委員及與會學者專家對國光石化投資案所提用水供應、溼地、健康風險及外部成本等疑慮之澄清說明,http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/external/ctlr?PRO=news.NewsView&id=10321, 2014/10/12。  延伸查詢new window
14.經濟部(20110110)。關於綠黨發布不實新聞「替國光石化護航?政府砸十萬買部落客美言」澄清稿,http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/external/ctlr?PRO=news.NewsView&id=10603, 2014/10/12。  延伸查詢new window
15.經濟部(20110126)。關於民進黨第14屆第20次中常會新聞稿對國光石化案聲明本部之回覆,http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/extemal/ctlr?PRO=news.NewsView&id=10663, 2014/10/12。  延伸查詢new window
16.經濟部(20110308)。部分學者對我國石化產業及國光石化案論述引用錯誤之澄清,https://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/extemal/ctlr?PRO=filepath.DownloadFile&f=news&t=f&id=2293, 2014/10/12。  延伸查詢new window
17.環保署(20100718)。環保署回應「學者研究模擬結論國光石化運轉國人壽命少23天」,http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?InputTime=0990718180322, 2014/10/12。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Leach, Melissa、Scoones, Ian(2005)。Science and Citizenship in a Global Context。Science and Citizens。London:Zed Books。  new window
2.Wynne, Brain(1996)。Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science。Misunderstanding science?。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hess, David、Breyman, Steve、Campbell, Nancy、Martin, Brian(2008)。Science, Technology and Social Movement。The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
4.Bucchi, Massimiano、Neresini, Federico(2008)。Science and public participation。The handbook of science and technology studies。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
5.邱文聰(2010)。科學研究自由與第三波科學民主化的挑戰--對「知識憲法」與「政治憲法」二分的一個批判考察。2009科技發展與法律規範雙年刊:科學管制、學術研究自由與多元民主價值。臺北:中研院法律研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.Slovic, P.(1992)。Perception of Risks: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm。Social Theories of Risk。New York, NY:Praeger。  new window
7.何思瑩(2013)。反國光石化運動。公民不冷血:新世紀公民行動事件簿。臺北:紅桌。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳吉仲(2011)。八輕在彰化設廠的經濟分析。溼地.石化.島嶼想像。臺北:有鹿。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳昭倫(2011)。白海豚為什麼該轉彎?。溼地.石化.島嶼想像。臺北:有鹿。  延伸查詢new window
10.Irwin, Alan(2007)。STS Perspectives on Scientific Governance。The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
11.Kahan, Dan(2012)。Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk。Handbook of Risk Theory。Dordrecht, Netherlands:Springer。  new window
12.Renn, Ortwin、Rohrmann, Bernd(2000)。Cross-Cultural Risk Perception Research: State and Challenges。Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies。Dordrecht, Netherlands:Springer。  new window
13.Gerrard, Simon、Petts, Judith(1998)。Isolation or integration? The relationship between risk assessment and risk management。Risk Assessment and Risk Management。Royal Society of Chemistry。  new window
14.Evans, Peter(2000)。Introduction: Looking for Agents of Urban Livability in a Globalized Political Economy。Livable Cities? Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
15.Shapin, Steve(1990)。Science and the public。Companion to the history of modern science。Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE