:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以「雙重詮釋」概念,理解質性研究之多元面貌
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:賴文恩李秉學
作者(外文):Lai, Wen-anLee, Ping-hsueh
出版日期:2016
卷期:35:4
頁次:頁351-358
主題關鍵詞:質性研究雙重詮釋測不準定理Qualitative researchDouble hermeneuticsUncertainty principle
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1250
  • 點閱點閱:47
目前,公共衛生領域,有愈來愈多學者,採質性研究探索實務與理論問題,然而,國內較少討論質性研究科學哲學理論背景的文章。質性研究是引自社會學界之研究方法,自二十世紀初期以來,就以多元面貌出現:其理論基礎,包括後實證主義、扎根理論、建構詮釋學、批判主義、女性主義、後現代主義等;資料收集方式包括深度訪談、觀察法、民族誌法、行動研究、文獻實物分析等;不同學術背景,也有包羅萬象的研究內容。因此,對於何謂質性研究,並沒有一個明確的定義,對於背後的科學哲學理念,也沒有一致的共識,以致於不同背景的初學者,對於不同取向與方法之異同、對錯及應用時機,常常有所混淆,對於如何整合質性研究與量性研究,也不易了解。本文作者以一個寓言故事開始,嘗試以紀登斯「雙重詮釋」的概念,描繪創意、多元、互為主體的社會現象,理解質性研究的內涵、多元的面貌與共通的特徵,並說明在科學哲學的層次上,如何可能整合質性研究與量性研究的理論基礎。
Nowadays, many researchers adopt qualitative methods to investigate practical or theoretical issues in public health; however, few articles introduced the philosophical and methodological considerations when applying qualitative approaches. Since the beginning of the 20^(th) century, qualitative research originated within the community of sociology and other related academic disciplines with multifaceted perspectives and methods. Different qualitative researchers investigate diverse sociological phenomenon or issues with various study designs in accordance with their academic backgrounds. Their studies are based on different theoretical perspectives such as post-positivism, grounded theory, constructive hermeneutics, critical theory, feminism, or postmodernism. They collect data with different methods including in-depth interviews, participant observation, ethnography, or action research. Because of the diversity of their philosophical backgrounds, there is still no clear definition of qualitative research. Novice researchers frequently lose their way in the terminology jungle of different schools of qualitative research. They also encounter difficulty in understanding how to integrate qualitative and quantitative research methods. In this article, which begins with a fable, the authors try to clarify the philosophical essence of qualitative research using the concept of "double hermeneutics" and explore the possibility of integrating qualitative and quantitative research methodologies.
圖書
1.Giddens, A.(1993)。New Rules of Sociological Method。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。  new window
2.王雅各(2004)。質性研究導論。質性研究。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王榮德(1996)。流行病學方法論--猜測與否證的研究。台北:健康文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Creswell, J. W.(2014)。A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research (Sage Mixed Methods Research)。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
5.Merriam, Sharan B.(2009)。Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation。Jossey-Bass。  new window
6.Creswell, John W.(2003)。Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
7.Patton, Michael Quinn(2014)。Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice。Sage。  new window
8.陳向明(20020000)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Drislane, R.,Parkinson, G.(2016)。Qualitative research,http://bitbucket.icaap.org/dict.pl, 2016/07/15。  new window
圖書論文
1.何信全(1991)。從古典到現代自由主義的過渡--穆勒。當代西方思想先河:十九世紀的思想家。台北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Denzin, N. K.、Lincoln, Y. S.(2005)。Introduction: the principle and practice of qualitative research。The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Morse, J. M.(1992)。The characteristics of qualitative research。Qualitative Health Research。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
4.劉仲冬(1996)。量與質社會研究的爭議與社會研究未來的走向及出路。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
5.Miller, W. L.、Crabtree, B. F.(1992)。Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map。Doing qualitative research。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
6.胡幼慧(1996)。轉型中的質性研究:演變、批判和女性主義研究觀點。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.畢恆達(1996)。詮釋學與質性研究。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE