:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:紀錄片作為國族寓言:我們的另一堂地理課
書刊名:新聞學研究
作者:陳品君 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Pen-juin
出版日期:2016
卷期:129
頁次:頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:柯金源生態環保紀錄片國族寓言國族想像Ke Chin-yuanEnvironmental documentaryNational allegoryNational imagination
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:200
  • 點閱點閱:36
環境議題以土地之名,傳達生態人權和倫理之普世價值。然意識形態根據其所需將土地轉化成各種符號。土地作為符號承載各種意識形態間的相互傾軋。土地既已受各種力量所滲透,而以護土為名的環保紀錄片會僅止於客觀記錄嗎?它可被解讀為國族寓言嗎?美國學者Frederic Jameson認為第三世界文學皆是國族寓言。柯金源長期關注台灣公害與環境議題,結合個人對土地的情感與台灣集體的政治經驗讓他的紀錄片具有一種國族寓言的特質。本文旨將柯金源所拍攝的生態環保紀錄片在台灣內部認同分歧脈絡下,對照台灣本土化運動史進行寓言式閱讀,探討其生態環保紀錄片背後的台灣國族想像和生命共同體意識。
American scholar Frederic Jameson regards all third-world literature as a national allegory. Jameson considers that the characteristics of third world literatures combine personal stories and collective experiences into the form of an allegory. Environmental issues in the name of protecting the land convey universal values such as ecological rights and ethics. However, the land can be transformed into various sings according to the needs of those interests and ideologies involved. Could environmental documentaries produce and record the issues in an objective way? Will environmental documentaries be interpreted as a national allegory? In this paper, I will attempt to explore the national imagination and the consciousness of the community that both surfaced in Ke, Chin-yuan’s environmental documentary. As a Taiwanese documentary producer Ke has long paid close attention to issues related to contamination and the environment on this island. He incorporates into the documentary his personal affections for the land as well as Taiwan's collective memory, bequeathing it an element of allegory. In recognition of the division among Taiwanese over their national identities, an allegorical way of reading will be used to discuss Ke’s documentary in the way of looking into politics geography, contaminated land, and Taiwan’s uniqueness.
期刊論文
1.蔡慶同(20111200)。「社區影像」作為文化政策:一個批判性的回顧。思與言,49(4),57-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Jameson, Fredric(1986)。Third World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capital。Social Text,15,65-88。  new window
3.邱貴芬(2012)。新紀錄片的誕生:機器複製時代開啟的革命能源。臺灣人文通訊,3。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭阿勤(20001000)。民族主義與臺灣一九七○年代的「鄉土文學」:一個文化(集體)記憶變遷的探討。臺灣史研究,6(2),77-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.沈松僑(20060600)。江山如此多嬌--1930年代的西北旅行書寫與國族想像。臺大歷史學報,37,145-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Tsai, Tsung-lung、Yu, Li-ping、Ke, Chin-yuan(20130300)。A Glimpse at the Development of the Environmental Documentary in Taiwan。Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies,39(1),161-176。new window  new window
學位論文
1.鄭明德(2004)。民進黨派系政治之研究(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Nogue, Joan、徐鶴林、朱倫(2009)。民族主義與領土。北京:中央民族大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Darby, Wendy Joy、張箭飛、趙紅英(2011)。風景與認同:英國民族與階級地理。南京:譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Storey, David(2001)。Territory: The Claiming of Space。Harlow:Pearson Education Limited。  new window
4.Cresswell, Tim、徐苔玲、王志弘(2006)。地方。臺北:群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Austin, John Langshaw、楊玉成、趙京超(2012)。如何以言行事。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.柯金源(2002)。環境紀錄工作者的視野。台北:公共電視新聞部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Trawny, P. M.、張振華、楊小剛(2012)。海德格爾導論。上海:同濟大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kohn, H.(1946)。The idea of nationalism: A studies its origin and background。New York, NY:The Macmillan Company。  new window
9.Smith, A. D.(1991)。Myths and memories of the nation。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Smith, Anthony D.(1986)。The Ethnic Origins of Nations。Basil Blackwell Ltd.。  new window
11.蕭阿勤(20120000)。重構臺灣:當代民族主義的文化政治。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.教育部教育年鑑編纂委員會(1974)。第四次中華民國教育年鑑。正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.李又如(2014)。以鏡頭記錄經濟與環境的衝突--柯金源與洪淳修見證土地與政治的角力,http://www.tidf.org.tw/zh-hant/reportsandarticle/902。  延伸查詢new window
2.林媽利(2001)。從DNA的研究看台灣原住民的來源,http://www.ling.sinica.edu.tw/files/publication/j2001_1_11_7600.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
3.何明修(2015)。台灣環境運動與政治轉型,http://www.21ccom.net/articles/tgzc/20150126119557_all.html。  延伸查詢new window
4.馬祥佑(2010)。環保運動與台灣本土意識的互動,http://www.21bcrcom/a/zhuan_ti/taiwan-zuishuxidemoshegren/2010/018/1793。  延伸查詢new window
5.段文宏(2009)。珊瑚礁生態系概述,http://www.sea.e.infor.org.tw/handout3.doc。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐國明(2014)。台灣新記錄片脈絡下的社區影像研究,http://www.hakka.gov.tw.dl.aspo.fileName:511417214571.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
7.張瑞昌(20010129)。掌握時代潮汐,認識新潮流,http://forums.chinatimes.com/special/DPP_new/main.htm。  延伸查詢new window
8.賴以博,蔡崇隆(2008)。深度訪談環境紀錄片導演柯金源,http//docworker.blogspot.om/2008/07/blog-post_10html。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kuo, Li-hsin(2012)。Sentimentalism and the Phenomenon of Collective ‘Looking Inward': A Critical Analysis of Mainstream Taiwanese Documentary。Documenting Taiwan on Film: Issues and Methods in New Documentaries。Routledge。  new window
2.Renov, Michael(1993)。Toward a Poetics of Documentary。Theorizing Documentary。Routledge。  new window
3.Relph, Edward、饒祖耀、陳厚逸(1992)。場所的本質。建築現象學導論。台北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.王炎(2007)。主權。文化研究關鍵詞。南京:江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.馬克思(1995)。關於費爾巴哈的提綱。馬克思恩格斯選集。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳品君(2004)。社會再現:鄉愁地理學在台北。課程改革:反省與前瞻。台北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
7.Garcia-Ramon, M. D.、Nogu-Font, J.(1994)。Nationalism and Geography in Catalonia。Geography and national identity。Oxford:Blackwell Press。  new window
8.Deppman, H.-C.(2012)。The politics and aesthetics of seeing in Jump! Boys。Documenting Taiwan on Film: Issues and methods in new documentaries。London:Routledge。  new window
9.Ahmad, A.(1994)。Jameson's rhetoric of otherness and the "national allegory"。Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures。New York, NY:Verso。  new window
10.Renov, M.(2004)。Surveying the subject: an introduction。The Subject of documentary。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
11.Taylor, Charles(1994)。The Politics of Recognition。Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition。Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE