:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:師培生對特殊需求學生的融合教育與社會正義期許之初探研究
書刊名:特殊教育發展期刊
作者:黃秋霞 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chiu-hsia
出版日期:2016
卷期:61
頁次:頁24-48
主題關鍵詞:融合教育融合教育全量表Inclusive educationInclusive education scale
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:164
  • 點閱點閱:24
本研究根據 Torres-Harding、Siers與 Olson (2012)、McHatton與 McCray (2007)等理論基礎,編製 49題的「融合教育全量表」 (Inclusion Education Scale)含三個分量表各為: 28題的「融合教育概念量表」 (Concepts of Inclusive Education Scale)、11題的「社會正義期許量表」 (Expectations of Social Justice Scale)、10題的「各障礙類型覺知量表」 (Perceptions of Disability Groups Scale);旨在翻譯「融合教育全量表」的檢驗與分析。其次,旨在以「融合教育全量表」考驗 62名大二與大四職前師培生對特殊需求學生的融合教育概念、社會正義期許與各障礙類型覺知等贊成程度是否有所差異。問卷資料處理採項目分析、項目相關、內在一致性效標等;資料分析呈現以描述統計檢驗(如:平均數、標準差、偏斜度、峰度)、極端組比較、 p<.05顯著性、鑑別度、α係數、各試題之獨立樣本 t檢定等。 研究結果顯示:(1)「融合教育概念量表」的α係數為 .70,信度尚可,「社會正義期許量表」與「各障礙類型覺知量表」的α係數各為 .91與.88,屬於高信度。(2)大四師培生對特殊需求學生的融合教育概念、社會正義期許與各障礙類型覺知之贊成程度比大二師培生為高。能即早提供大一與大二師培生更多元的實務觀摩、志工或義工制度等,(融合教育領域的師資培育課程規劃),並提供師培生能即早有機會接觸與了解特殊需求學生。 總而言之,社會福利較進步的國家,對於特殊需求學生與融合的重視不亞於其他公共議題,早已挹注於各階段國民義務教育,甚至於成人或社區教育的公民素教育裡,如此,融合的概念即能很自然地融入個體生活中,並真正具備了充權賦能與自我決定的權利、社會正義期許等養成教育。
This investigation mainly aimed to testify and analyze in translating the Inclusive Education Scale (INS) divided into three subscales, Concepts of Inclusive Education (INC) , Expectations of Social Justice (SJ) and Perceptions of Disability Groups Scale (PER), based on Torres-Harding, Siers and Olson (2012); McHatton and McCray’s (2007) theories. Firstly, it aimed to investigate 62 sophomore and senior pre-service teachers’ supportive attitudes toward inclusive education for children with special needs. Secondly, all items of INS were analyzing and descriptive by the frequency, percentile, mean, SD, p<.05, Skewness, Kurtosis, Cronbach’s α and item analysis. Overall, the α of the Concepts of Inclusive Education Scale, Expectations of Social Justice Scale and Perceptions of Disability Groups Scale separately were .70, .91 and .88, which indicated that this entire set with three subscales was a very stable and reliable questionnaire. In addition, the senior pre-service teachers were more willing to support children with special needs than sophomore pre-services teachers did. The investigator will advise all teacher training institutions providing all pre-service teachers more volunteering experiences to contact with children with special needs. Taiwan government may emerge the inclusion issues into K-12 even continuing education programs in order to educate all Taiwan’s citizens civil with more supportive attitudes toward children with special needs in their daily lives.
期刊論文
1.鄭雅莉、何東墀(20101200)。特殊幼兒融合教育的社會互動、教師課程及教學之研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報,12,25-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.唐榮昌(20071100)。改革中的省思--談融合教育的困境與突破。雲嘉特教期刊,6,4-7。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.傅秀媚(20020900)。發展遲緩兒童社會互動研究。幼兒教育年刊,14,125-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉明松(20091200)。臺東地區國中小融合教育實施成效及問題之研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報,11,31-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王天苗(20020900)。發展遲緩幼兒在融合教育環境裡的學習。特殊教育研究學刊,23,1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.何東墀(20010600)。融合教育理念的流變與困境。特教園丁,16(4),56-60。  延伸查詢new window
7.McHatton, P. A.、McCray, E. D.(2007)。Inclination toward Inclusion: Perceptions of elementary and secondary education teacher candidates。Action in Teacher Education,29(3),25-32。  new window
8.Torres-Harding, S.、Siers, B.、Olson, B.(2012)。Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Justice Scale (SJS)。American Journal of Community Psychology,50(1/2),77-88。  new window
9.吳淑美(19951200)。完全包含(full inclusion)模式可行嗎?。特教新知通訊,3(3),1-2。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳淑美(20031000)。融合班常用的教學策略。國教世紀,207,57-70。  延伸查詢new window
11.King-Sears, M. E.(1997)。Best academic practices for inclusive classroom。Focus on Exceptional Children,29(7),1-24。  new window
12.王天苗(20030900)。學前融合教育實施的問題和對策--以臺北市國小附幼為例。特殊教育研究學刊,25,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳淑美(19991200)。融合教育的實施與困境。國教世紀,188,6-11。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳昆壽(19980500)。融合教育的省思。特教新知通訊,5(7),1-4。  延伸查詢new window
15.鄭麗月(19990300)。從特殊兒童的融合教育談學校行政的配合。特教新知通訊,6(1),1-4。  延伸查詢new window
16.賴翠媛(20031200)。實施融合教育的困難與普通班教師的因應策略。教師之友,44(5),2-7。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳武典(20050800)。融合教育的迴響與檢討。教育研究月刊,136,28-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.鈕文英(20060600)。國小融合班教師班級經營策略之研究。特殊教育學報,23,147-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳淑美(2004)。融合班的理念與實務。心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.Walther-Thomas, C. S.、Korinek, L.、McLaughlin, V. L.、Williams, B.(2000)。Collaboration for effective inclusive education: Developing successful programs。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
3.鈕文英(2015)。擁抱個別差異的新典範:融合教育。心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡昆瀛(2002)。從現況與需求析論北市學前融合教育的發展方向。花蓮市:中華民國發展遲緩兒童早期療育協會。  延伸查詢new window
5.盧明(2011)。學前融合教育:理論與實務。臺北市:華都文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Cohen, J.(1996)。Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
7.Anastasi, Anne、Urbina, Susana(1997)。Psychological Testing。Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Prentice Hall。  new window
8.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.(2009)。Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective。Prentice-Hall。  new window
其他
1.Asante, S.(1996)。What is inclusion?,http://goo.gl/yBkaj7。  new window
圖書論文
1.邱上真(1999)。融合教育問與答。特殊教育年刊--迎千禧談特教。臺北市:中華民國特殊教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.傅秀媚(2002)。融合班級中教學策略之應用--同儕教學法與示範教學法。特殊教育論文集。臺中市:國立臺中教育大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fried, R. L.、Jorgensen, C. M.(1998)。Equity and excellence: Finding common ground between inclusive education and school reform。Restructuring high schools for all students: Taking inclusion to the next level。Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE