臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：高職資源班學生參與個別化教育計畫之行動研究
作者：黃柏華
作者(外文)：Po-Hua Huang
校院名稱：國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱：特殊教育學系
指導教授：林幸台
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2015
主題關鍵詞：高職資源班學生；學校適應；自我決策；學生參與IEP；支持系統；vocational high school resource-room students；school adjustment；self-determination；student-involved IEP；support system
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
本研究旨在探討高職資源班學生學校適應的能力現況、特殊教育服務需求與服務成效，以發展高職資源班學生參與個別化教育計劃(Individualized Education Programs,以下簡稱IEP)的可行方案。本研究採用協同行動研究法，六位高職資源班學生、學生家長與普通班級教師為研究參與者；兩位資源班行政教師為研究協同者，經由互動、對話、溝通和反思的歷程，共同建構高職資源班學生參與IEP的可行模式。本研究的主要發現和具體成效如下:
一、研究主要發現
資源班學生能遵守團體規範，但缺乏學習策略、處理人際困擾與擬定生涯目標和執行計畫的能力。學生依據獲得的特教服務項目與環境支持程度調整個人需求的優先順序，導師則從問題解決的觀點，認為學生主要的需求為學業學習與人際關係，家長考量子女整體學習適應狀況、獲得資源與服務的現況、以及子女未來生涯目標，從不同角度評估特教服務的需求。整體而言，特殊教育服務需求的多寡，會因學生個人能力現況、興趣和喜好與就讀科系相符程度而有所差異。本研究經由特教服務需求與成效的評估結果顯示，學生、家長和教師期望特教服務能增進學生改變現況的動機，提升學生進入下一階段所需具備的基礎能力。
為增進參與本研究的學生發展自己IEP會議內容和參與IEP會議的能力，本研究設計「學生參與IEP課程方案」做為研究介入的主要方案，教學過程依據學生的學習反應，調整教學方式和學習目標設定。另依據學生的需求和設定的IEP目標，研究者和研究參與者在不同階段整合不同資源，建立「學生參與IEP的支持系統」，透過IEP團隊成員達成共識和團隊合作的過程共同面對學生參與IEP歷程中特殊狀況，擬定適切的解決方案。
二、本研究的具體成效
「學生參與IEP課程方案」有效提升學生設定IEP目標的自主權，6位資源班學生參與會議的角色從單純的傾聽者和被動的說明者轉換成主動的說明者和會議協同主持者，平均發言率從介入前6%提升為15%。學生參與IEP的歷程，能有效促進6位資源班學生適應學校學習與人際關係，提升個人正向行為表現；增進學生自我決策的行為動機和自我瞭解的程度，但自我調整和獨立自主能力尚待加強。對家長和教師而言，學生參與IEP的歷程能提升家長對於子女能力現況和特殊教育需求的瞭解，提升普通班教師普通教育課程與評量調整的能力。學生參與IEP有賴以學生為中心的校本支持模式，依據個別學生的需求與設定之目標，在不同階段整合不同資源，提供必要的協助。
本研究就未盡完善之處說明本研究限制，謹提供教育現場的教師以及有意願投入此領域研究者具體的研究建議。
This study aimed to investigate the school adjustment level of vocational high school resource-room students, as well as their demands for special education services and the yielded results. My findings could benefit in developing feasible Individualized Education Programs (IEP) for students with disabilities. This study adopted the collaborative-action approach, recruiting six resource-room students, their parents, and six regular-class teachers as my target subjects, with another two administrative teachers in collaboration. My pivotal findings and what had been achieved were as follows:
I. My pivotal findings
Resource-room students were able to abide by group norms, but they lacked learning tactics and the abilities of dealing with interpersonal relationship and planning for their future career. The six students adjusted their personal demand priorities mainly on the basis of the special education services they received and the environmental support they received. From a problem-solving perspective, their homeroom teachers assumed that the resource-room students have two primary demands in their academic learning and interpersonal relationship respectively. Their parents’ main concerns include the academic adjustment level of their children, the extent to which they have access to special education services and other related resources, and their future career goal-setting. I found that the students, parents and teachers in this study, from the perspective of career development, had expected the special education services to magnify the students' motivation to change their current situation and to enhance their basic abilities required for the next phase.
In order to the students’ ability of developing contents for IEP meetings and improve their participation, I designed a “student-involved IEP curriculum.” I adjusted my instruction approaches and teaching goals in response to their feedbacks. Based on student's needs and abilities, I integrated different resources at different phases to create "Student- involved IEP support system." In general, the consensus reached by the IEP team members and their cooperation had shaped the core of the student-involved IEP support system. They figured out appropriate solutions via cooperation and teamwork to the special problems occurring during the students’ participation in IEP.
II. The specific results achieved
“The student-involved IEP curriculum” had proved efficient in enhancing the students’ autonomous power in setting their IEP goals. In the IEP meetings, the six students were no longer passive listeners. Instead, they became active speaker and even helped host the meetings. Their average speaking-rate obviously increased from 6% to 15% after our intervention.
The student-involved IEP proved to effectively promote the school adjustment and interpersonal relationship of the six resource-room students, boosting their positive behavioral performance and strengthening their self-determination motives and self-understanding. However, the students still needed to improve their self-adjustment and autonomous capabilities. As far as the parents and teachers are concerned, the student-involved IEP can not only enhance the parental understanding of their children’s actual capabilities and their demands for special education, but it also can beef up the regular-class teachers’ capabilities in general education. The student-involved IEP had greatly relied on the school-based support model centering around students, which integrates diverse resources at different phases and provides necessary assistance in accordance with individual student’s needs and his/her set goals.
一、中文部份
方永泉譯（2003）。Paulo Freire著。受壓迫者教育學。臺北：巨流。
王明泉（2001）。高職階段智能障礙學生自我決策能力相關影響因素及教學方案成效之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。new window
朱錦鳳（2008)。大學生身心適應調查表-第二版。臺北：心理。
李坤崇（1996）。學習適應量表-增訂版。臺北：心理。
李宜倫（2005）。高中職特殊教育教師自我決策教學態度之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立屏東師範學院，屏東市。
李俊甫、邱妤芳、張瓊文、林千惠（2009）。自我決策訓練對提升高職綜合職能科學生IEP參與效果之研究。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊，　2009期，107－137。
李翠玲（2007）。個別化教育計畫（IEP）理念與實施。臺北：心理。
吳新華（1996）。國小學童生活適應量表。臺北：心理。new window
余禮娟（2000）。身心障礙社會福利機構智能障礙就業青年自我決策之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
林育毅、王明泉、李永昌（2011）。大專視障學生自我決策量表之編製研究。東台灣特殊教育學報，13，1-42。new window
林宏熾（2000）。身心障礙者轉銜服務與教育。載於林寶貴（主編），特殊教育理論與實務（781-832頁）。臺北：心理。new window
林宏熾、丘思平、江佩珊、吳季樺、林佩蓁（2003）。高職輕度智能障礙學生自我決策狀況之分析。東台灣特殊教育學報，5，25-46。new window
林幸台（2007）。身心障礙者生涯輔導與轉銜服務。臺北：心理。new window
林怡杏（2007）。臺北市高中職肢體障礙腦性麻痺身體病弱學生自我概念與學校適應之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
林怡慧（2006）。高中職普通班身心障礙學生學校生活適應調查研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
林佩璇（2002）。教學知識之研究：從研究典範的轉移到整合理解。課程與教學季刊，5(3)，17-33。new window
林清江（1978）。教育社會學。臺北：國立編譯館。
林素貞（2009）。資源教室方案與經營。高雄：五南。
林莉琪（2010）。國中資源班教師自我決策教學的態度與實施現況之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
林淑女（2010）。臺北市教師行動研究之批判論述分析（未出版博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北。new window
周麗華（2012）。教師專業發展評鑑推動模式與策略之行動研究（未出版博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。new window
施清嵐（2003）。臺北市高職特教班自閉症學生學校適應之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
紀憲燕、林幸台、金樹人（2003）。生涯信念檢核表。臺北：測驗出版社。
洪儷瑜、張郁雯、邱彥男、蔡明富（2000）。青少年社會行為評量表(ASBS) 。臺北：心理。
高級中等以下學校特殊教育推行委員會設置辦法（2012）。中華民國一0二年十二月四日教育部臺教授國部字第1020107715B號令修正發布。
特殊教育法（1997，2009，2013）。中華民國八十六年五月十四日總統華總一義字第8600112820號令公布。中華民國九十八年十一月十八日總統華總一義字第09800289381號令修正公布。中華民國一0二年一月二十三日總統華總一義字第10200012441號令修正公布。
特殊教育法施行細則（1999，2012，2013）。中華民國八十七年五月二十九日教育部臺參字第87057266號令。中華民國一0一年十一月二十六日教育部臺參字第1010214785C號令修正發布。中華民國一0二年七月十二日教育部臺教學(四)字第 1020097264B號令修正。
特殊教育課程教材教法及評量方式實施辦法（2010）。中華民國九十九年十二月三十一日教育部臺參字第0990218743C號令修正發布。
教育部特殊教育通報網（2014）。一般學校身心障礙類高中階段特教班型學生安置概況【歷史統計查詢】。取自http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/ contact/102學年度統計概況/10305_3_5.htm.
教育部優質特教發展網絡系統暨教學資源平台（2013）。特殊需求領域課程大綱【新課綱教學資源】。取自http://sencir.spc.ntnu.edu.tw/
site/c_principle_003/index/process_t_key/212/mode_t_key/-1/data_t_ key/-1/code/005/kind_code/001
郭生玉（2004）。心理與教育測驗(修訂版)。臺北：精華。
陳李綢、蔡順良（2009）。中學生人際關係量表。臺北：心理。
陳韻婷、趙本強（2011）。國中智能障礙學生自我決策能力現況暨影響因素及支持情形之調查研究。特殊教育與復健學報，24，81-106。new window
許銘容（2004）。高職特教班教師對學生學習自我決策態度與實施現況之調查（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
張如杏（2007）。嚴重情緒障礙學生自我決策及其家庭參與在轉銜服務歷程之探討—以又一村情障班個案為例（未出版博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。new window
張照明（2002）。普通高中職視覺障礙學生學校生活適應及學校支持系new window
統之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
張劍、郭俊德（2003）。內部動機與外部動機的關係。心理科學進展，11（5），545-550。
張德榮、李咏吟、林本喬、賀孝銘、洪寶蓮（1995）。高中職學生學習及讀書策略量表。臺北市：中國行為科學社。new window
張聖莉（2008）。臺東縣高中職接受融合教育身心障礙學生學校適應之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
鈕文英（2008）。擁抱個別差異的新典範：融合教育。臺北：心理。new window
鈕文英（2010）。自我決策在個別化教育計畫中之實踐。中華民國特殊教 育學會年刊，2010期，95-120。
鈕文英（2014）。質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北：雙葉。
莊璧阡（2011）。十二年就學安置高中職綜合職能科學生學校適應之研
究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
黃柏華（2012）。高中職資源服務的現況與運作模式。特殊教育季刊，124，55-64。new window
黃春枝（1999）。政大學生學校生活適應及其相關因素之研究。訓育研究，3（4），56-70。
黃淑婷（2013）。以學生導向方案改善國小智能障礙學生參與個別化教育計畫之程度（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
黃瑞珍、許秀英、楊惠敏、劉娟芳、周以蕙、郭景倫、葉書宏、林麗惠（2000）：臺北市公私立高中職特殊需求學生學校適應之研究。臺北市政府教育局，臺北。
黃韻如（2004）。高雄市高中職學習障礙學生學習適應與學校支持系統之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
詹文宏（2005）。高中職學習障礙學生自我概念.因應策略.學校適應及其因果模式之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。new window
趙本強（2009）。自我決策課程對國小高年級資源班學生教學成效之研究。特殊教育學報，29，111-136。new window
趙本強 (2011) 。學齡階段身心障礙學生自我決策量表之編製。特殊教育學報，34，101-134。new window
潘世尊（2005)。教育行動研究：理論、實務與反省。臺北：心理。new window
臺北市身心障礙學生就讀高級中等以下學校普通班教學原則及輔導辦法（2013）。中華民國一OO年八月十日府法三字第10032619700號令。
劉佩嘉、林宏熾（2004)）。高中職特教班智能障礙學生自我決策之研究。特殊教育學報，19，123-156。new window
蔡瑞美（2000）。普通高中職提供身心障礙學生資源服務之現況調查研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
鄭麗蘭（2011）。十二年就學安置之高中職學習障礙學生學校適應研究以新北市為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學：臺北。
盧台華、鄭雪珠、史習樂、林燕玲（2003）。社會適應表現檢核表。臺北：心理。
盧台華主編（2011）。高級中等以下學校特殊需求領域課程大綱手冊。教育部：臺北。
謝佳男（2001）。臺北市國民中學肢體障礙及身體病弱學生升學高中職後之學校適應追蹤報告。特殊教育，79，20-25。new window

二、英文部分
Abery, B. (1994). A conceptual framework for enhancing self-determination.In M. F. Hayden &; B. H. Abery (Eds.), Challenges for a service system in transition (pp. 345-380). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.
Abery, B., &; Stancliffe, R. (1996). The ecology of self-determination. In D. J. Sands &; M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp.111-145). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Agran, M., Snow, K., &; Swaner, J. (1999). Teacher perceptions of self-determination: Benefits, characteristics, strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34 (3), 293-301.
Allen, S., Smith, A., Test, D. W., Flowers, C., &; Wood, W. M. (2001). The effects of Self-Directed IEP on student participation in IEP meetings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 107-120.
Alogzzine, B., Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test, D. W., &; Wood, W. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219-277.
Altrichter, H., Posch, P., &; Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introducation to the methods of action research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Arkoff, A. (1968). Adjustment and mental health. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.
Bambara, L. M., &; Kern, L. (2005). Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Barnard-Brak, L., Lechtenberger, D., &; Lan, W. Y. (2010). Accommodation strategies of college students with disabilities. The Qualitative Report,15(2), 411-429.
Bronfenbrenner, U., &; Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon &; R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley &; Sons.
Bullis, M., &; Egelston-Dodd, J. (1990). Priorities in the school-to-community transition of adolescents who are deaf. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 13(1), 71-82.
Calhoun, E. F. (1993). Action research: three approaches. Education Leadership, 51(2), 62- 65.
Cairns, R. B., &; Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Carr, W., &; Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical:Education, knowledge and action research. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Carr, W., &; Kemmis, S. (2005). Staying critical. Educational Action Research, 13(3), 347- 357.
Chafoules, S., Riley-Tillman, T. C., &; Sugai, G. M. (2007). School-based behavioral assessment: Informing intervention and instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill Prentice Hall.
Christenson, S. L., &; Thurlow, M. L. (2004). School dropouts: Prevention considerations, interventions, and challenges. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 36-39.
Deci, E. L. &; Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternatives. Exceptional Children, 52, 219- 232.
Dunn, C., Chambers, D., &; Rabren, K. (2004). Variables affecting students’decisions to drop out of school.Remedial and Special Education, 25, 314-323.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes,England: Open University Press.
Farmer, E. M. Z. (1995). Extremity of externalizing behavior and young adult outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 617-632.
Farmer, T. W., Hall, C. M., Weiss, M. P., Petrin, R. A., Meece, J. L., &; Moohr, M. (2011). The school adjustment of rural adolescents with and without disabilities: Variable and person-center approaches. Journal of Children &; Family Studies, 20, 78-88.
Farrell, A. D., Sullivan, T. N., Kliewer, W., Allison, K. W., Erwin, E. H., Meyer, A. L., et al. (2006). Peer and school problems in the lives of urban adolescents: Frequency, difficulty, and relation to adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 169-190.
Field, S. &; Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17(2), pp. 159-169.
Field, S., &; Hoffman, A. (1996). Steps to self-determination: A curriculum to help adolescents learn to achieve their goals. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Field, S., Martin, J. E., Miller, R. J., Ward, M., &; Wehmeyer, M.L. (1998). A practical guide for teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power and strategies. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 134-145). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Gartin, B. C., &; Murdick, N. L. (2005). IDEA 2004: The IEP. Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 327-331.
German, S. L., Martin, J. E., Marshal, L. H., &; Sale, R. P. (2000). Promoting self-determination: Using take action to teach goal attainment. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 23, 27-38.
Glaser, B. G., &; Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Goldenberg, C. (2004). Successful school change: Creating settings to improve teaching and learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Grundy, S. (1982). Three models of action research. Curriculum Perspective,2(3), 23-34.
Hoffman, A., Field, S., &; Sawilowsky, S. (1996). Self-Determination Assessment Battery user’s guide. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
Hughes, L. (1996). Beginnings &; beyond: A guide for personal growth &; adjustment. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
Johnson, D. R., &; Emanuel, E. J. (Eds.) (2000). Issues influencing the future of transition programs and services in the United States. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Jonsz, L., Le Belanc, M., Boulerice, B., &; Tremblay, R. E. (2000). Disentangling the weight of school dropout predictors: A test of two longitudinal samples. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 733-762.
Keith, T. Z., &; Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(3), 207-226.
Kim, K. H., &; Turnbull, A. (2004). Transition to adulthood for students with severe intellectual disabilities: Shifting toward person-family interdependent planning. Research &; Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29(1), 53-57.
Kochhar- Bryant, C. &; Greene, G. (2009). Pathways to successful transition for youth with disabilities: A developmental perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill Prentice Hall.
Kohler, P. D. (1998). Implementing a transitionperspective of education. In F. Rusch &; J. Chadsey (Eds.), Beyond high school: transitionfrom school to work (pp. 179-205). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Konrad, M., &; Test, D. W. (2004). Teaching middle school students with disabilities to use and IEP template. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 27, 101-124.
Konrad, M. (2008). Involve students in the IEP process. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(3), 236-239.
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation, and control (10th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ladd, G. W. &; Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risk and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment? Child Development, 72(5), 1579-1601.
Levitz, R., &; Noel, L. (1989). Connecting students to institutions: Keys to retention and success. In M. L. Upcraft, J. N. Gardner, &; Associates(Eds.), The freshman year experience: Helping students survive and succeed in college (pp. 65-81). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lohrmann-O’Rourke, S., &; Browder, D. M. (1998). Empirically based methods to assess the preferences ofindividuals with severe disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 146–161.
Loman, S., Vartand, C., Strickland-Cohen, K., Horner, R., &; Walker, H.(2010, June). Promoting self-determination: A practice guide. Kansas City, KS: National Gateway to Self-Determination. Retrieved from http://www.aucd.org/NGSD/template/link.cfm.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York, NY: Harper &; Row.
Mason, C., Field, S., &; Sawilowsky, S. (2004).Implementation of self-determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 441-451.
Mason, C. Y., McGehee-Kovac, M., &; Johnson, L. (2004). How to help students lead their meetings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 18-24.
Martin, J. E., &; Marshall, L. (1997). Choice making: Description of a model project. In M. Agran (Ed.), Student-directed learning: Teaching self-determination skills (pp. 224-248). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.
Martin, J. E., Marshall, L. H., Maxson, L. M., &; Jerman, P. L. (1996). The self-directed IEP. Frederick, CO: Sopris West.Martin, J. E., Marshall, L. H., &; Sale, P. (2004). A 3-year study of middle,junior high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70,285-297.
Martin, J. E., Van-Dycke, J. L., Christensen, W. R., Greene, B. A., Gardner, J. E., &; Lovett, D. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in their transition IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an
evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299-316.
McDonnell, J.M., &; Hardman, M.L. (2010). Secondary and transition programs for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. London, England: Sage.
Mckim, B. J., &; Cowen, E. L. (1987). Multiperspective assessment of young children's school adjustment. School Psychology Review, 16(3), 370-381.
Mithaug, D.E. (1996). The optimal prospects principle: A theoretical basis for rethinking instructional practices for self-determination. In D. J. Sands &; M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), The self-determination of life span for people with disabilities. (pp.147-168). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Mithaug, D. E., Wehmeyer, M. L, Agran, M., Martin, J. E., &; Palmer, S. (1998). The Self determination learning model of instruction: Engaging students to solve their learning problems. In, M. L. Wehmeyer, &; D. J. Sands (Eds.), Making it happen: Student involvement in educational planning, decision making and instruction. (pp. 299-328). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
NICHCY (2002, January). A student’s guide to the IEP (2nd ed.). Retrieved
from http://www.parentcenterhub.org/wp-content/ uploads/ repo_ items/ ta2. pdf.
O’Brien, C.L., &; O’Brien, J. (2002). The origins of person-centered planning: A community of practice perspective. In S. Holburn &; P.M. Vietze (Eds.), Person-centered planning (pp.3-27). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London, England: Macmillan.Rathus, S. A., &; Nevid, J. S. (1995). Adjustment and growth: The challenges of life (6th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace &; Company.
Reddy, R., Rhodes, J. E., &; Mulhall, P. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A latent growth curve study. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 119-138.
Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., &; Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443-471.
Ryan, R. &; Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, school development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Santrock, J. W. (2007). Child development (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Schwartz, A. A., Jacobson, J. W., &; Holburn, S. C. (2000). Defining person-centeredness: results of two consensus methods. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(3), 235-249.
Sitlington, P., Neubert, D. &; Clark, G. (2010). Assessment for transition education and services, in transition education and services for students with disabilities (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Smull, M. W., &; Lakin, K.C. (2002). Public policy and person- centered planning. In S. Holburn &; P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Person-centered planning: Research practice and future directions (pp. 379-397). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Snell, M. E. &; Janney, R. J. (2000). Teachers’ problem solving about young children with moderate and severe disabilities in elementary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 66, 472-490.
Snyder, E. P., &; Shapiro, E. S. (1997). Teaching students with emotional/ behavioral disorders the skills to participate in the development of their own IEPs. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 246-259.
Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 69-74.
Stowitschek, J. J. (1996). Transition choices program: Preparing to participate in life's choices. Retrieved from ERIC Document ED 403695.
Super, D. E. (1990). A life span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown, &; L.Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (2nd ed., pp. 197-261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
Test, D. W., &; Neale, M. (2004). Using the self-advocacy strategy to increase middle graders’ IEP participation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 135-145.
VanReusen, A. K., &; Bos, C. (1994). Facilitating student participation in individualized educational programs through motivational strategies and instruction. Exceptional Children, 22, 30-32.
Ward, M. J. (1988). The many facets of self-determination. NICHCY transition summary. National Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities, 5, 2-3.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., &; Hughes, C. (2000). A national survey of teacher’s promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 58-68.
Whemeyer, M. L., Agran, M., Hughes, C., Martin, J. E., Mithaug, D. E., &; Pallmer, S.B. (2007). Promoting self-detemination in students with developmental disabilities. New York, NY: The Guiford Press.
Wehmeyer, M. L., &; Kelchner, K. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
Wehmeyer, M. L., &; Metzler, C. A. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The national consumer survey. Metal Retardation, 33(2), 111-119.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S., Agran, M., Mithuag, D. E., &; Martin, J.E.(2000). Promoting causal agency: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439-453.
Wehmeyer, M. L., &; Schwartz, M. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245-255.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Shogren, K., Palmer, S., Williams-Diehm, K., Little, T., &; Boulton, A. (2012). The impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on student self- determination. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 135-153.
Wolman, J. M., Campeau, P. L., Dubois, P. A., Mithaug, D. E., &; Stolarski, V. S. (1994). AIR Self-Determination Scale and user guide. Palo Alto,CA: American Institutes for Research.
Wylie, R. C. (1979). Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1022（臺灣：994，外國：28） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67419141
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上