:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地方層級社會抗議之解析(1992~2008):一個政治機會結構的觀點
書刊名:臺灣政治學刊
作者:蘇彥斌吳親恩
作者(外文):Su, Yen-pinWu, Chin-en
出版日期:2017
卷期:21:2
頁次:頁57-106
主題關鍵詞:社會運動地方抗議政治機會結構民主進步黨選舉周期Social movementsLocal protestsPolitical opportunity structureDemocratic Progressive PartyElectoral cycle
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:180
  • 點閱點閱:32
期刊論文
1.何明修(20100300)。誰的家園、哪一種願景?--發展主義陰影下的社區運動。臺灣民主季刊,7(1),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Snyder, David、Tilly, Charles(1972)。Hardship and Collective Violence in France, 1830 to 1960。American Sociological Review,37(5),520-532。  new window
3.Jenkins, J. Craig(1983)。Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements。Annual Review of Sociology,9,527-553。  new window
4.Meyer, David S.、Minkoff, Debra C.(2004)。Conceptualizing Political Opportunity。Social Forces,82(4),1457-1492。  new window
5.King, Gary、Tomz, Michael、Wittenberg, Jason(2000)。Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation。American Journal of Political Science,44(2),341-355。  new window
6.Arce, Moisés(2010)。Parties and Social Protest in Latin America's Neoliberal Era。Party Politics,16(5),669-686。  new window
7.Ho, Ming-sho(2003)。The Politics of Anti-Nuclear Protest in Taiwan: A Case of Party-Dependent Movement (1980-2000)。Modern Asian Studies,37(3),683-708。  new window
8.朱偉誠(20090600)。性別主流化之後的臺灣性/別與同志運動。臺灣社會研究,74,419-424。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Goodwin, Jeff、Jasper, James M.(1999)。Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory。Sociological Forum,14(1),27-55。  new window
10.吳介民(20021200)。解除克勞塞維茲的魔咒:分析當前社會改革運動的困境。臺灣社會學,4,159-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林澤民、蘇彥斌(20150600)。臺灣快閃政治--新媒體、政黨與社會運動。臺灣民主季刊,12(2),123-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Eisinger, Peter K.(1973)。The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities。American Political Science Review,67(1),11-28。  new window
13.何明修(20041200)。政治機會結構與社會運動研究。國立政治大學社會學報,37,33-80。  延伸查詢new window
14.McCarthy, John D.、Zald, Mayer N.(1977)。Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory。American Journal of Sociology,82(6),1212-1241。  new window
15.Ho, Ming-sho(2015)。Occupy Congress in Taiwan: Political Opportunity, Threat, and the Sunflower Movement。Journal of East Asian Studies,15(1),69-97。  new window
16.Goldstone, Jack A.(2004)。More Social Movements or Fewer? Beyond Political Opportunity Structures to Relational Fields。Theory and Society,33(3/4),333-365。  new window
17.Herrera, Antonio、Markoff, John(2011)。Rural Movements and the Transition to Democracy in Spain。Mobilization,16(4),455-474。  new window
18.Ho, Ming-sho(2014)。The Fukushima Effect: Explaining the Recent Resurgence of the Anti-nuclear Movement in Taiwan。Environmental Politics,23(6),965-983。  new window
19.Ho, Ming-sho(2005)。Taiwan's State and Social Movements under the DPP Government, 2000-2004。Journal of East Asian Studies,5(3),401-425。  new window
20.Jenkins, J. Craig、Jacobs, David、Agnone, Jon(2003)。Political Opportunities and African-American Protest, 1948-1997。Mobilization,109(2),277-303。  new window
21.Inclán, María(2012)。Zapatista and Counter-Zapatista Protests: A Test of Movement-Countermovement Dynamics。Journal of Peace Research,49(3),459-472。  new window
22.Huang, Chang-ling(2003)。The Politics of Reregulation: Globalization, Democratization, and the Taiwanese Labor Movement。Developing Economics,40(3),305-326。  new window
23.Jung, Jai Kwan(2010)。Disentangling Protest Cycles: An Event-History Analysis of New Social Movements in Western Europe。Mobilization,15(1),25-44。  new window
24.Meyer, David S.(2004)。Protest and Political Opportunity。Annual Review of Sociology,30(1),125-145。  new window
25.Percival, Val、Homer-Dixon, Thomas(1998)。Environmental Scarcity and Violent Conflict: The Case of South Africa。Journal of Peace Research,35(3),279-298。  new window
26.Oliver, Pamela E.、Myers, Daniel J.(1999)。How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events。American Journal of Sociology,105(1),38-87。  new window
27.Nam, Taehyun(2007)。Rough Days in Democracies: Comparing Protests in Democracies。European Journal of Political Research,46(1),97-120。  new window
28.Myers, Daniel J.、Caniglia, Beth Schaefer(2004)。All the Rioting That's Fit to Print: Selection Effects in National Newspaper Coverage of Civil Disorders, 1968-1969。American Sociological Review,69(4),519-543。  new window
29.Schatzman, Christina(2005)。Political Challenge in Latin America: Rebellion and Collective Protest in an Era of Democratization。Journal of Peace Research,42(3),291-310。  new window
30.Roberts, Kenneth M.(2008)。The Mobilization of Opposition to Economic Liberalization。Annual Review of Political Science,11(1),327-349。  new window
31.Quaranta, Mario(2016)。Protesting in 'Hard Times': Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of Europe, 2000-2014。Current Sociology,64(5),736-756。  new window
32.Pickvance, Christopher G.(1999)。Democratisation and the Decline of Social Movements: The Effects of Regime Change on Collective Action in Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Latin America。Sociology,33(2),353-372。  new window
33.蕭遠(20110900)。網際網路如何影響社會運動中的動員結構與組織型態?--以臺北野草莓學運為個案研究。臺灣民主季刊,8(3),45-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.賴鈺麟(20030500)。臺灣同志運動的機構化:以同志諮詢熱線為例。女學學誌,15,79-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.林秀幸(19970900)。重建鄉村社群:新港文教基金會的成立背景與組織探討。思與言,35(3),87-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.何明修(20030600)。自主與依賴:比較反核四運動與反美濃水庫運動中的政治交換模式。臺灣社會學刊,30,1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Wu, Chin-en、Chu, Yun-han(2010)。The Dynamics of Social Protests During Taiwan's Democratic Consolidation。Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,(會議日期: 20100902-20100905)。Washington, DC。  new window
2.吳根明、陳奎旭(2009)。公民社會下的環境運動:林園反三輕運動初探。2009年南台灣社會發展學術研討會。屏東:國立屏東教育大學。311-337。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃德福(1988)。自力救濟之回應:分析與評估。「自力救濟與公權力行使」研討會。台北:財團法人明德基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Álvarez-Rivadulla, María José(2011)。The Evolution and Dynamics of Land Squatting in Montevideo, Uruguay。International RC21 Conference。Amsterdam, NL。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計總處(2014)。台灣地區家庭收支調查:可支配所得平均數。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣省政府主計處(1997)。臺灣省各縣市重要統計指標。南投縣:臺灣省政府主計處。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺灣省政府主計處(1992)。臺灣省各縣市重要統計指標。南投縣:臺灣省政府主計處。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺灣省政府主計處(1993)。臺灣省各縣市重要統計指標。南投縣:臺灣省政府主計處。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺灣省政府主計處(1994)。臺灣省各縣市重要統計指標。南投縣:臺灣省政府主計處。  延伸查詢new window
6.臺灣省政府主計處(1995)。臺灣省各縣市重要統計指標。南投縣:臺灣省政府主計處。  延伸查詢new window
7.臺灣省政府主計處(1996)。臺灣省各縣市重要統計指標。南投縣:臺灣省政府主計處。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許仁碩(2015)。臺灣「警察處理抗爭」之法制的考察及省思--以政黨輪替時代的警察策略及其反制為核心(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Powell, G. Bingham(1982)。Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.何明修(2006)。綠色民主:台灣環境運動的研究。台北:群學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃鈴華(2005)。台灣原住民族運動的國會路線。台北:國家展望文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bruhn, Kathleen(2008)。Urban Protest in Mexico and Brazil。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Hsieh, Jolan(2006)。Collective Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Identity-Based Movement of Plain Indigenous in Taiwan。Routledge。  new window
6.Markoff, John(1996)。Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change。Pine Forge Press。  new window
7.Silver, B. J.(2003)。Forces of labor: workers' movements and globalization since 1870。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.(2014)。譴責流血鎮壓綠縣市召回警力,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/paper/764947。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2014)。數位落差調查報告,http://www.ndc.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0028380。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2002)。五結籌建新垃圾場蘇澳人抗議,udndata.com。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2000)。搶救柴山團體昨陳情,udndata.com。  延伸查詢new window
5.(2006)。二崙建養豬場上百人抗爭,udndata.com。  延伸查詢new window
6.Marshall, Monty G.,Gurr, Ted R.,Jaggers, Keith(2014)。Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2013,http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html。  new window
7.Tomz, Michael,Wittenberg, Jason,King, Gary(2003)。Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University,http://gking.harvard.edu/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gamson, William A.、Meyer, David S.(1996)。Framing Political Opportunity。Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.何明修(2008)。體制化及其不滿:二十年來的台灣勞工運動。跨戒:流動與堅持的臺灣社會。群學。  延伸查詢new window
3.范雲(2010)。靜默中耕耘細節的婦運革命。秩序繽紛的年代:走向下一輪民主盛世1990-2010。台北:左岸文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃長玲(2008)。民主深化與婦運歷程。跨戒:流動與堅持的臺灣社會。台北:群學。  延伸查詢new window
5.夏曉鵑(2000)。美濃反水庫的社區抗爭。發現政治社會:現代性、國家暴力與後殖民民主。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hsiao, Hsin-huang Michael(2001)。Sociocultural Transformation in Taiwan since the 1980s。Taiwan's Economic Success since 1980。Northampton, MA:Edward Elgar。  new window
7.Ho, Ming-sho(2011)。Environmental Movement in Democratizing Taiwan (1980-2004): A Political Opportunity Structure Perspective。East Asian Social Movements: Power, Protest, and Change in a Dynamic Region。New York, NY:Springer。  new window
8.Koopmans, Ruud、Statham, Paul(1999)。Ethnic and Civic Conceptions of Nationhood and the Differential Success of the Extreme Right in Germany and Italy。How Social Movements Matter。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
9.Kriesi, Hanspeter(2004)。Political Context and Opportunity。The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements。Malden, MA:The Blackwell Publishing。  new window
10.McAdam, Doug、Tarrow, Sidney、Tilly, Charles(1997)。Toward an Integrated Perspective on Social Movements and Revolution。Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.McAdam, Doug(1996)。Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions。Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Van Dyke, Nella(2003)。Protest Cycles and Party Politics: The Effects of Elite Allies and Antagonists on Student Protest in the United States, 1930-1990。States, Parties and Social Movements。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Tarrow, Sidney(1996)。States and Opportunities。Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framing。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE