臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：自主與依賴：比較反核四運動與反美濃水庫運動中的政治交換模式
書刊名：臺灣社會學刊
作者：何明修 引用關係
作者(外文)：Ho, Ming-sho
出版日期：2003
卷期：30
頁次：頁1-49
主題關鍵詞：社會運動；政治交換；政黨；運動資源；自主性；Social movement；Political exchange；Political party；Movement resource；Autonomy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:269
  • 點閱點閱:147
社運組織的重要任務之一，即是將累積的社會力轉化成為政治力。要達成這個目的，社會運動需要在既有的政治勢力中尋找聯盟者，以建立一套政治交換關係。本文分析美濃反水庫運動與貢寮反核四運動之個案，試圖建立政治交換關係的自主與依賴的理念類型。在自主的情境之下，社運組織較有能力獨立設定自己的策略，而不受到l聯盟政黨的限制。相對地，依賴的社會運動則是處於一種不對等的情境中，沒有具有自行擴張與實現目標的能力。本研究試圖提出一套因果解釋的架構，分析自主與依賴的形成過程。(1)社會運動的起源，(2)社運組織所掌獲的資源，此兩項因素是具有關鍵性的。另一方面，不同政治交換關係也表現在動員框架的差異。最後，本文將要重新思考社會運動自主性的意義。
Among the tasks of social movement organizations, to transform the accumulated social support into political force is critical. To reach this goal, social movement has to find an established political ally and to build a workable relation of political exchange. This essay analyzes Meinung anti­dam movement and Kongliao anti-nuclear movement in order to construct two ideal types in political exchange, i.e., autonomy and dependency. A social movement is autonomous insofar it can independently decide its strategy with little constraint from the allied party. A dependent movement, on the contrary, faces an unequal relation and does not possess the capacity to expand and realize the goal by its own strength. This essay tries to present a causal explanation for the different political exchange types. Two factors, the origin of social movement and the resources of social movement organization, turn out to be explanatory. Different types of political exchange are also manifest in mobilization frames. In the end, this essay further reflects on the significance of movement autonomy.
期刊論文
1.Jenkins, Craig J.、Perrow, Charles(1977)。Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946-1972)。American Sociological Review，42(2)，249-268。  new window
2.吳介民(19890910)。反對運動與社會抗議的互動。中國論壇，28(11)=335，29-40。  延伸查詢new window
3.周克任(1999)。南方水學--打開南臺灣水庫戰爭史。新觀念，128，110-112。  延伸查詢new window
4.Emerson, Richard M.(1964)。Power-Dependence Relations: Two Experiments。Sociometry，27，282-298。  new window
5.Homans, George C.(1964)。Bringing Men Back In。American Sociological Review，29(6)，809-818。  new window
6.Marx, Gary T.、Wood, James L.(1975)。Strands of Theory and Research in Collective Behavior。Annual Review of Sociology，1，363-428。  new window
7.Meyer, David S.、Whittier, Nancy(1994)。Social Movement Spillover。Social Problems，41(2)，277-298。  new window
8.Minkoff, Debra C.(1994)。From Service Provision to Institutional Advocacy: The Shifting Legitimacy of Organizational Forms。Social Forces，72，943-969。  new window
9.Shin, Gi-wook(1994)。The Historical Making of Collective Action: The Korean Peasant Uprising of 1946。American Journal of Sociology，99，1596-1624。  new window
10.Ho, Ming-sho(2003)。The Politics of Anti-Nuclear Protest in Taiwan: A Case of Party-Dependent Movement (1980-2000)。Modern Asian Studies，37(3)，683-708。  new window
11.何明修(20021200)。為何民進黨政府的廢核政策失敗？社會動員、改革機會與政治策略的分析。臺灣政治學刊，6，86-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.吳介民(20021200)。解除克勞塞維茲的魔咒：分析當前社會改革運動的困境。臺灣社會學，4，159-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.何明修(20011200)。臺灣環境運動的開端：專家學者、黨外、草根(1980-1986)。臺灣社會學，2，97-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Kitschelt, Herbert P.(1986)。Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies。British Journal of Political Science，16(1)，57-85。  new window
15.何明修(20030600)。政治民主化與環境運動的制度化(1993-1999)。臺灣社會研究季刊，50，217-275。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.McAdam, Doug(1983)。Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency。American Sociological Review，48(6)，735-754。  new window
17.Emerson, Richard M.(1962)。Power-dependence relations。American Sociological Review，27(1)，31-41。  new window
18.Cohen, Jean Louise(1985)。Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements。Social Research，52(4)，663-716。  new window
19.Homans, George Casper(1958)。Social Behavior as Exchange。American Journal of Sociology，63(6)，597-606。  new window
20.Lipsky, Michael(1968)。Protest as a Political Resource。The American Political Science Review，62(4)，1144-1158。  new window
21.Snow, David A.、Rochford, Edmund Burke Jr.、Worden, Steven K. Jr.、Benford, Robert D.(1986)。Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation。American Sociological Review，51(4)，464-481。  new window
22.陳淑華(1998)。遠離惡水－捍衛南臺灣的水資源。經典雜誌，3，56-75。  延伸查詢new window
23.Arato, A.、Cohen, J.(1984)。Social Movements, Civil Society, and the Problem of Sovereignty。Praxis International，4(3)，266-283。  new window
會議論文
1.張高傑(2001)。美濃反水庫運動的社會力分析。第一屆客家研究研究生論文發表會。桃園中壢：國立中央大學客家研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.梁鴻彬(1999)。政治變遷的地方模式--民進黨在宜蘭執政的個案研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.何明修(2000)。民主轉型過程中的國家與民間社會：以台灣的環境運動為例（1986-1998）(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳介民(1990)。政體轉型期的社會抗議--台灣1980年代(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林美挪(1989)。臺灣的綠色災難-臺灣環保運動啓蒙記實。臺北：前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.林義雄(1995)。希望有一天：充滿喜樂的台灣。台北：玉山社。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊憲宏(1987)。受傷的土地。臺北：圓神出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Koopmans, Ruud(1995)。Democracy from Below: New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
5.Jasper, James M.(1997)。The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social Movements。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.高雄市綠色協會(1996)。南臺灣綠色革命。晨星。  延伸查詢new window
7.Tarrow, Sidney(1989)。Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965-1975。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
8.李允斐、鍾榮富、鍾永豐、鍾秀梅(1997)。高雄縣客家社會與文化。高雄：高雄縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
9.McCarthy, John D.、Zald, Mayer N.(1987)。Social Movement in an Organizational Society。New Brunswick, NJ：Transaction Books。  new window
10.胡湘玲(1995)。核工專家VS.反核專家。台北：前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.林俊義(1984)。科技文明的反省。臺北：帕米爾書店。  延伸查詢new window
12.Tilly, Charles(1978)。From Mobilization to Revolution。Michigan：Addison-Wesley。  new window
13.Olson, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。New York：Mcgraw-Hill College。  new window
14.李筱峰(1987)。台灣民主運動四十年。台北：自立晚報社。  延伸查詢new window
15.張茂桂、朱聖漢、黃德福、許宗力(1992)。民國七十年代臺灣地區「自力救濟」事件之研究。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
16.Cohen, Jean L.、Arato, Andrew(1992)。Civil Society and Political Theory。MIT Press。  new window
17.張茂桂、吳介民、楊靜文、陳維新(1989)。社會運動與政治轉化。臺北市：國家政策研究資料中心 (政研中心)。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Dalton, Russell J.(1994)。The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe。New Haven：Yale University Press。  new window
19.Tarrow, Sidney、吳慶宏(2005)。運動中的力量：社會運動與鬥爭政治。北京：譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.McAdam, Doug(1982)。Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970。University of Chicago Press。  new window
21.McAdam, Doug、Tarrow, Sidney G.、Tilly, Charles(2001)。Dynamics of Contention。Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.(1994)。天火備忘錄。天火備忘錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.Kriesi, H.、Koopmans, R.、Duyvendak, J. W.、Giugni, M. G.(1995)。New Social Movement in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis。New Social Movement in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
24.Maguire, D.(1995)。Opposition Movements and Opposition Parties: Equal Partners Or Dependent Relations in the Struggle For Power and Reform。Politics of Social Protest。London, UK。  new window
25.Tarrow, S.(1989)。Struggles, Politics and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Cycles of Protest。Struggles, Politics and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Cycles of Protest。沒有紀錄。  new window
其他
1.美濃愛鄉協進會(1998)。工作成果報告書(1996.07-1998.10)。  延伸查詢new window
2.美濃愛鄉協進會(1999)。反對美濃水庫說帖。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Klandermans, B. P.(1990)。Linking the ‘Old’ and the ‘New’： Movement networks in the Netherlands。Challenging political order: New social and political movements Western democracies。Oxford：Polity Press。  new window
2.Rochon, T. R.(1990)。The west European peace movement and the theory of new social movements。Challenging political order: New social and political movements in western democracies。Oxford：Polity Press。  new window
3.林俊義(1995)。民主自由是解決生態危機的必要條件。台灣生命的心聲。台北：前衛。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dalton, Russell J.(1995)。Strategies of Partisan Influence: West European Environmental Groups。The Politics of Social Movements: Comparative Perspectives on State and Social Movements。London：UCL Press。  new window
5.Freeman, Jo(1979)。Resource Mobilization and Strategy: A Model for Analyzing Social Movement Organization Actions。The Dynamics of Social Movement: Resource Mobilization, Social Control, and Tactics。Cambridge, MA：Winthrop。  new window
6.Kitschelt, Herbert(1991)。Resource Mobilization Theory: A Critique。Research on Social Movements: The State of the Art in Western Europe and the USA。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
7.Martin, Andrew、Ross, George(2001)。Trade Union Organizing at the European Level: The Dilemma of Borrowed Resources。Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity。New York：Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
8.Pizzorno, Alessandro(1978)。Political Exchange and Collective Identity in Industrial Conflict。The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe Since 1968。New York：Holmes & Meier。  new window
9.Rootes, Chris(1997)。Shaping Collective Action: Structure, Contingency and Knowledge。The Political Context of Collective Action: Power, Argumentation and Democracy。London：Routledge。  new window
10.Gamson, William A.(1992)。The Social Psychology of Collective Action。Frontiers in Social Movement Theory。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
11.Kitschelt, Herbert P.(1990)。New Social Movements and the Decline of Party Organization。Challenging the Political Order :New and Political Movements in Western Democracies。Oxford：Polity Press。  new window
12.林碧堯(1994)。台灣的反核運動。核四決策與輻射傷害。台北：前衛。  延伸查詢new window
13.夏曉鵑(2000)。美濃反水庫運動的社區抗爭。發現政治社會：現代性、國家暴力與後殖民民主。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
14.蕭新煌(1997)。都市居民運動。台灣的都市社會。台北市：巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳豐偉(1994)。落日原鄉。重返美濃--台灣第一部反水庫運動紀實。台中：晨星。  延伸查詢new window
16.曾文忠(1994)。我與第七小組工作站。重返美濃--台灣第一部反水庫運動紀實。台中：晨星。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：366（臺灣：360，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1473665 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67278714
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上