臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：教學策略與兒童美語程度之相關性研究
書刊名：康大學報
作者：柳伊玲／朱紹俊
作者(外文)：Liou, Yi-ling／Chu, Siu-chun
出版日期：2018
卷期：8
頁次：頁35-59
主題關鍵詞：兒童美語補習班；教學策略；學生程度；英語教學；Children English cram school；Instructional strategies；Language proficiency level；English teaching
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1264
  • 點閱點閱:6
在全球化與少子化的衝擊下，如何制訂有效之教學策略以提升孩童的英文競爭力即是當前炙手可熱的議題。目前相關研究大多以正規學校為例，因此本研究以補習班教學為例，利用其：快速、密集、集中管理及能力分班之優勢，並採質性研究之焦點團體訪談法，探討學生程度與教學策略之關係。研究對象為新北市新莊區某美語補習班之低中高成就合共18位學生。教學策略是以教師為中心、學生為中心及雙主體作為本研究重點。根據學習動機、滿意度、氣氛與成效四種面向來分析，並以三種教學策略及三種學生程度來交叉探討訪談內容。本研究結果顯示：1.低成就學生相對適用於教師中心之教學策略。2.中成就學生相對適用於雙主體之教學策略3.高成就學生相對適用於學生中心之教學策略。最後將歸納結論並提出實務上的建議，以供教師及未來研究者參考。
How to formulate effective instructional strategies to enhance children's English competitiveness under the impact of globalization and low birthrate is recently the most concerned issue in Taiwan. Recent studies mainly focused on formal schools, and thus the qualitative study adopted Focus Group Interview with special reference to an English cram school in Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City which has advantages of its fast, intensive, centralized management and competence-based class grouping in order to explore the relationship between instructional strategies and English proficiency level. The eighteen participants consist of students from low to high level, and instructional strategies are teacher-centered, learner-centered and dual subject. On the basis of learning motivation, satisfaction, climate and effectiveness, the main findings are as follows: 1. Low-level students are relatively applicable to the teacher-centered strategy. 2. Medium-level students are relatively suitable for dual subject strategy. 3. High-level students are relatively applicable to the learner-centered strategy. Finally, this study provides some practical recommendations for English teachers and future researchers as a reference.
期刊論文
1.Kose, Sacit、Sahin, Abdurrahman、Aysegul, Ergun、Gezer, Kutret(2010)。The effects of cooperative learning experience on eighth grade students' achievement and attitude toward science。Education，131(1)，169-180。  new window
2.Martin, S. D.(2004)。Finding balance: impact of classroom management conceptions on developing teacher practice。Teaching and Teacher Education，20，405-422。  new window
3.Loriz, L. M.、Foster, P. H.(2001)。Focus groups: Powerful adjuncts for program evaluation。Nursing Form--New Jersey Then Philadelphia，36(3)，31-36。  new window
4.周中天(19931200)。外語學習中的動機因素。人文及社會學科教學通訊，4(4)=22，15-25。  延伸查詢new window
5.Merton, R. K.(1987)。The Focused Interview and Focus Groups: Continuities and Discontinuities。Public Opinion Quarterly，51(4)，550-566。  new window
6.Ely, Christopher M.(1986)。Language learning motivation: A descriptive and causal analysis。The Modern Language Journal，70(1)，28-35。  new window
7.Parsons, S. A.、Vaughn, M.(2013)。A multiple case study of two teachers' instructional adaptations。Alberta Journal of Educational Research，59(2)，299-318。  new window
8.Martin, Charles L.(1988)。Enhancing children's satisfaction and participation using a predictive regression model of bowling performance norms。The Physical Educator，45(4)，196-209。  new window
9.Kitzinger, J.(1995)。Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups。British medical journal，311(7000)，299-302。  new window
10.張瑞村、陳怡君(20000900)。從班級經營策略談營造積極的班級氣氛。教育實習輔導，6(2)=23，1-5。  延伸查詢new window
11.李雅婷(20140500)。少子化下的積極性差別待遇--談差異化課程與教學。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(5)，81-86。  延伸查詢new window
12.顧華詳(2005)。論師生關係的雙主體性。南寧職業技術學院學報，10(4)，29-34。  延伸查詢new window
13.Al-Zu'be, A. F. M.(2013)。The difference between the learner-centred approach and the teacher-centred approach in teaching English as a foreign language。Educational Research International，2(2)，24-31。  new window
14.Barrett, J.、Kirk, S.(2000)。Running focus groups with elderly and disabled elderly participants。Applied ergonomics，31(6)，621-629。  new window
15.Bierman, K. L.(2011)。The promise and potential of studying the "invisible hand" of teacher influence on peer relations and student outcomes: A commentary。Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology，32(5)，297-303。  new window
16.Frith, H.(2000)。Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research。Sexualities，3(3)，275-297。  new window
17.Lee, I. C.(2010)。The effect of learning motivation, total quality teaching and peer-assisted learning on study achievement: Empirical analysis from vocational universities or colleges' students in Taiwan。The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning，6(2)。  new window
18.黃添丁(20150900)。數位學習融入課程之學習動機及學習行為對學習成效的影響。慈濟科技大學學報，1=25，35-52。  延伸查詢new window
19.王梅玲(20020200)。焦點團體研究法的理論與應用。圖書與資訊學刊，40，29-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Wilhelmsson, Susan、Foldevi, Mats(2003)。Exploring Views on Swedish District Nurses Prescribing: a Focus Group Study in Primary Health Care。Journal of Clinical Nursing，12(5)，643-650。  new window
21.Skehan, Peter(1989)。Language testing, part 2: State of the art。Language Teaching，22(1)，1-13。  new window
學位論文
1.勾孝倫(2007)。英語資優班與普通班課程實踐之對照研究：一位高中英語教師之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃明玉(2004)。成人學習者自我導向學習傾向、班級學習氣氛與學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃朝凱(2003)。國民小學學童知覺班級氣氛、學習態度與創造傾向之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳秋麗(2005)。國中生英語學習動機、學習滿意度與學習成就之相關研究--以雲林縣為例(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學，雲林縣。  延伸查詢new window
5.林曉玲(2015)。任務型教法對國小三年級學生英語學習成就與學習動機影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.洪宜君(2014)。高職美容科學生學習動機、學習行為與丙級技術士技能檢定成效之相關性研究--以臺北地區為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭祖運(2013)。高雄市十二年國教免試生與參與基測學生數學科學習動機與學習態度之比較(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉芸婷(2015)。資訊多媒體對於學習動機、學習成就與學習成果之研究--以國文教學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bogdan, R. C.、Biklen, S. K.(1982)。Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and practice。Allyn and Bacon, Inc。  new window
2.Glesne, C.、Peshkin, A.(1992)。Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction。White Plains, New York：Longman Publishing Group。  new window
3.David, Matthew、Sutton, Carole D.(2004)。Social research: the basics。Sage Publications。  new window
4.Kirkpatrick, D. L.、Kirkpatrick, J. D.(2007)。Implementing the four levels: A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs。San Francisco, CA：Berrett-Koehler。  new window
5.Stewart, D. W.、Shamdasani, P. N.(2014)。Focus groups: Theory and practice。Sage。  new window
6.Harmer, J.(2001)。The practice of English language teaching。Pearson Education Ltd。  new window
7.Anderson, L. W.、Krathwohl, D. R.、Bloom, B. S.(2001)。A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
8.袁方(2002)。社會研究方法。臺北市：五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.沈翠蓮(2001)。教學原理與設計。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.新北市新莊區公所(2016)。新北市新莊區人口結構。新北市：新莊區公所會計室。  延伸查詢new window
11.Bubin, A.、趙碧華、朱美珍(1995)。研究方法--社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用。臺北市：學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
12.鐘倫納(1993)。應用社會科學研究法。臺北市：臺灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
13.Ambrose, S. A.、Bridges, M. W.、DiPietro, M.、Lovett, M. C.、Norman, M. K.(2010)。How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching。New Jersey：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
14.Gabriel, D.(2004)。Teacher-centred Professional Development。London：ASCD。  new window
15.Goldstein, I. L.(1986)。Training in organizations: Needs assessment, design, and evaluation。Monterrey, California：Brooks-Cole。  new window
16.Kamberelis, G.、Dimitriadis, G.(2013)。Focus groups: From structured interviews to collective conversations。London：Routledge。  new window
17.Maki, P. L.(2012)。Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution。Virginia：Stylus Publishing, LLC.。  new window
18.Reeve, J.(2014)。Understanding motivation and emotion。New Jersey：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
19.Shaw, M. E.(1981)。Group dynamics: The dynamics of small group behavior。New York：McGraw-Hil。  new window
20.席汝楫(1997)。社會與行為科學研究方法。五南。  延伸查詢new window
21.陳向明(20020000)。社會科學質的研究。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Gardner, Robert C.(1985)。Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation。Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.。  new window
23.Minichiello, Victor、Aroni, Rosalie、Timewell, Eric、Alexander, Loris(1995)。In-depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis。Longman。  new window
24.亞瑟．伯格、黃光玉、劉念夏、陳清文(2004)。媒介與傳播研究方法：質化與量化研究途徑。臺北：風雲論壇。  延伸查詢new window
25.賴志峰(2010)。學校領導新議題：理論與實踐。臺北：高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.吳清山(20120415)。差異化教學與學生學習，https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=38。  延伸查詢new window
2.Aidman, A.(1995)。Advertising in the schools，Urbana, IL：ERIC Clearinghouse。，(ED389473)。 。  new window
3.Gentry, R.，Sallie, A. P.，Sanders, C. A.(2013)。Differentiated Instructional Strategies to Accommodate Students with Varying Needs and Learning Styles(ED 545458)。  new window
4.Wong, R.(1985)。THE COMMUNICATIVE SYLLABUS: EVOLUTION, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, Janice Yalden. Oxford: Pergamen Press, 1983. Pp. xiii + 198。  new window
圖書論文
1.Larsen-Freeman, D.(1991)。Teaching grammar。Teaching English as a second or foreign language。Heinle & Heinle Publishers。  new window
2.游家政(2003)。創新教學方案的設計與評鑑--以統整主題單元為例。創新教學理論與實務。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡幼慧(1996)。焦點團體法。質性研究：理論、方法本土女性研究實例。臺北市：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：727（臺灣：726，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67798682
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上