:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:比較不同背景的研究生如何設計PO+E實驗與微型教學
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:盧秀琴谷冰
作者(外文):Lu, Chow-chinKu, Ping
出版日期:2019
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁1-27
主題關鍵詞:PO+E教學法在職教師科學解釋能力設計實驗微型教學PO+E teaching methodIn-service teacherScientific explanation abilityDesign experimentMicro-teaching
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:114
  • 點閱點閱:34
本研究因應12年國教的新課程綱要,加強設計PO+E實驗與探究教學的師資培育,並比較不同背景的研究生要如何進行師資培育才能達到效果。本研究以某教育大學自然科學教育學系修習「昆蟲生理學特論」的研究生,包含7位在職教師及7 位非在職教師,做為研究對象;採用「預測─觀察─科學解釋能力(PO+E)」教學法培育。課程內容包含:昆蟲生理學概論、PO+E理論與示範教學、模仿設計實驗與微型教學、自行設計實驗與微型教學等。研究工具包含:PO+E設計實驗評量表(APD)、PO+E微型教學評量表(MTAP)、科學解釋能力評量表(ASE)等。研究結果發現:一、兩組研究生皆能使用PO+E教學法設計實驗與學習單,從自行設計PO+E實驗的選擇教材發現,非在職教師組比較能符合PO+E的實驗精神。二、在職教師在模仿設計實驗與自行設計實驗的微型教學MTAP得分,均優於非在職教師組。三、兩組研究生在科學解釋能力的ASE得分差不多,在職教師得分略高;兩組研究生在第二階段的科學解釋能力有明顯進步。四、PO+E教學法的師資培育,在職教師組應加強PO+E的教材選擇,非在職教師組應加強微型教學的教學能力。五、建議培育在職教師組著重於尋找PO+E實驗教材,培訓非在職教師組著重於微型教學與師生互動的技巧。
In response to the Curriculum Guidelines of the 12-year Basic Education, this study strengthens the cultivation of teachers in designing PO+E (Prediction - Observation - more Explanation) experiments and inquiry teaching and compares how graduate students from different backgrounds achieve the effect of teacher education. This study included graduate students in the Department of Natural Science Education at a University of Education, including 7 in-service teachers and 7 non-in-service teachers. This study adopted the "predictive-observation-more explanation (PO+E)" teaching method, with course content that included Introduction to insect physiology, PO+E theory and teaching demonstration, Imitation of experiment design and micro-teaching, and Self-designed experiment and micro-teaching. Research tools include: Assessment of PO+E Design Experiment (APD), Micro Teaching Assessment of PO+E (MTAP), and Assessment of Scientific Explanation Ability (ASE), etc. The results are as follows. 1) Both groups of graduate students could use the PO+E teaching method to design experiments and learning sheets. The non-in-service teachers group was better at selection of teaching material for self-designed PO+E experiments. 2) The in-service teachers group was better than the non-in- service teachers group in terms of MTAP scores for both imitation and self-designed microteaching. 3) The ASE scores were similar between the two groups of graduate students, but the in-service teachers group was slightly better. The two groups of graduate students made significant progress on scientific explanation ability in the second stage. 4) For the cultivation of the PO+E teaching method, the in-service teachers group should strengthen the selection of PO+E teaching materials, while the non-in-service teachers group should enhance the teaching ability of micro-teaching. 5) It is suggested that training in-service teachers group should focus on finding PO+E experimental materials, and training non-in-service teachers group should focus on micro-teaching and interaction skills.
期刊論文
1.Geddis, A. N.、Onslow, B.、Beynon, C.、Oesch, J.(1993)。Transforming Content Knowledge: Learning to Teach about Isotopes。Science Education,77(6),575-591。  new window
2.楊凱悌、邱美虹、王子華(20091000)。應用數位影音融入POE教學改善國小高年級學童脊椎動物分類另有概念之效益研究。科學教育學刊,17(5),387-407。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(10),994-1020。  new window
4.McNeill, K. L.、Lizotte, D. J.、Krajcik, J.、Marx, R. W.(2006)。Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials。Journal of the Learning Sciences,15(2),153-191。  new window
5.吳麗珍、鄭碧雲、段曉林、郭重吉(20111200)。全國國中小數理教師背景現況分析。科學教育研究與發展季刊,63,69-98。  延伸查詢new window
6.邱美虹(20000300)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.施惠(20001200)。STS教學模組對國小教師教學專業知能成長的探究。科學教育學刊,8(4),335-355。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.盧秀琴、李怡嫻(20161200)。「昆蟲學」師培課程培育國小師資生開發「昆蟲桌遊」教具與設計測驗卷。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(3),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張世忠、李俊毅、謝幸芬(20130300)。一個同儕教練為基礎之發展模式對國中科學教師PCK之影響:以〈熱與溫度〉單元為例。科學教育學刊,21(1),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.楊桂瓊、林煥祥、洪瑞兒(20120400)。以論證活動探討國小學童論證能力和科學本質之表現。科學教育學刊,20(2),145-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.董又愷、林樹聲(20141200)。以結構式探究教學促進國小學生了解證據和從事論證之行動研究。科學教育月刊,375,2-19。  延伸查詢new window
12.林靜雯(2015)。由資深教師與師資生之比較探討科學教師內容知識與教學內容知識之培力。T&D飛訊,208,1-21。  延伸查詢new window
13.許良榮、羅佩娟(20090900)。以序列性POE探究學生的科學解釋能力:以「大氣壓力與表面張力」為例。屏東教大科學教育,30,42-55。  延伸查詢new window
14.靳知勤(19941100)。職前與在職國中教師對環境課程及教學方法之認知與運用。教育研究資訊,2(6),111-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.盧秀琴、徐于婷(20160400)。國小師資生在自然領域的專業成長--以探究式教學為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(1),115-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Breslyn, W.、McGinnis, J. R.(2012)。A comparison of exemplar y biology, chemistry, earth science, and physics teachers' conceptions and enactment of inquiry。Science Education,96(1),48-77。  new window
17.Fekete, P.、Walker, P.(1997)。Interactive Teaching Resources for thermal physics。UniServe Science News,8。  new window
18.Sandholtz, J. H.(2002)。In-service training or professional development: Contrasting opportunities in a school /university partnership。Teaching and Teacher Education,18,815-830。  new window
19.靳知勤、楊惟程、段曉林(20101000)。引導式Toulmin論證模式對國小學童在科學讀寫表現上的影響。科學教育學刊,18(5),443-467。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.張世忠、蔡孟芳、陳鶴元(20121000)。國中科學教師的學科教學知識與科學教學導向之探討。科學教育學刊,20(5),413-433。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.湯才偉、朱嘉穎(2006)。不同專業支援對不同背景教師專業成長的影響。「學校改進與夥伴協作」兩岸三地研討會,香港中文大學主辦 (會議日期: 2006年6月3日)。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lu, C. C.(2016)。Cultivate elementary school in-service teachers to design experiment course by Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) with the theory of scientific explanation。32rd ASET Annual International Conference,National Science Museum (會議日期: 2016, December, 8-10)。  new window
3.Lu, C. C.、Huang, Y. S.(2017)。Elementary pre-service teachers apply a POAA framework to design science lesson plans and teach in the elementary school。9th International Conference on Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education,University Malaysia Sabah (會議日期: 2017, November, 7-10)。Sabah。  new window
4.Lu, C. C.(2018)。Strengthen scientific explanation ability: Nurturing the pre-service teachers to design innovative PO+E teaching plan and teaching。International Symposium on Education and Social Sciences,Okinawa Convention Center (會議日期: 2018, June, 27-29)。Okinawa island。  new window
學位論文
1.巫少岑(2007)。以序列性POE探究國小科學教師之科學解釋的研究--以「大氣壓力與表面張力」為例(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳勇昌(2008)。以POE策略探究國小職前科學教師色光概念及概念改變歷程(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hoban, G. F.(2002)。Teacher learning for educational change: A systems thinking approach。Open University Press。  new window
2.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
3.White, R. T.、Gunstone, R. F.(1992)。Probing understanding。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
4.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE