:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民中小學學生社會心理環境變因與其數學信念及數學焦慮關係之研究
書刊名:教育學刊
作者:吳明隆 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Ming-lung
出版日期:1996
卷期:12
頁次:頁287-327
主題關鍵詞:國民中小學學生社會心理環境變因數學
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:95
     本研究從學生社會化觀點,探討國民中小學生社會心理環境與其數學信念及數學 焦慮的關係。本研究先採用分層隨機取樣法;次則採用叢集抽樣法。發出問卷1600份,回收問卷1402份,有效問卷1364份。研究工具包括「數學信念量表」、「數學焦慮量表」、「父母影響歷程量表」、「教師行為量表」及「人際關係量表」等五種;統計方法採用皮爾森積差相關、單因子多變項變異數分析、、雙因子變異數分析、單因子單變項變異數分析、區別分析、逐步多元迴歸及典型相關等方法。研究結果綜合歸納為下列十一點: 一、國民中小學生性別、年級對其數學信念、數學焦慮無顯著交互作用。 二、女學生、國小六年級、低數學成就學生其數學焦慮較高。 三、國小學生、單親家庭及低數學成就學生有較負向的數學信念。 四、教師對學生行為表現愈積極、正向者,學生的數學信念較正向、數學焦慮較低。 五、父母影響歷程行為對學生數學信念、數學焦慮有顯著影響作用。 六、同儕人際關係對學生數學信念、數學焦慮高低有顯著影響作用。 七、數學信念較正向學生,其數學焦慮較低。 八、父母心理支持、學生數學成就為有效預測數學信念之指標;而數學成就更為預測數學焦慮最主要變項。 九、個人變項、家庭變項及學校變項等十個控制變項可透過三個「典型因素」有效解釋整體數學信念總變異量的30.0%。而此三個典型因素又可以直接解釋數學信念總變量的31.5%。 十、個人變項、家庭變項及學校變項等十個控制變項可透過四個「典型因素」有效解釋學生整體數學焦慮總變異量的26.8%。而此四個典型因素又可以直接解釋數學焦慮總變量的53.7%。 十一、父母影響歷程、教師行為及人際關係等社會心理變因可以有效區別高低數學信念(或高低數學焦慮)之國中小學生。
     This study is to investigate the relationship between the socio-psycho environments of primary and junior high school students and their belief and anxiety in Math through the viewpoint of the socialization of students. This study adopt the method of stratified random sampling as well as cluster sampling. We issued 1600 questionnaires. Among the returned ones, 1364 are valid. "Questionnaire of Student's living experiment" was administered. Basic statistics, t-test, two-way ANOVA, Pearson's product-moment correlation, MANOVA, stepwise multiple regression, canonical analysis and discriminant analysis were employed to analyse the data collected. Major findings and conclusion were described as follows: 1. Sex and grade differences appear no significant interaction in the belief and anxiety in Math. 2. Female students, six grades in primary schools and students having low achievement in Math have higher anxiety in Math. 3. Elementary students, students from single-parent family and low achievers in Math have negative Math Belief. 4. The more positive tend to be the teacher's behaviors towards the students' performance, the more positive the students; belief and the less the students' anxiety of Math will be. 5. Behavioral influences from parents are significant on students' belief and anxiety of Math. 6. Parallel interpersonal relationship has great influences on students' belief and anxiety in Math. 7. Students having more positive belief in Math have less anxiety in Math. 8. Parental psychological back-up and students' achievement in Math are valid indicators in predicting students' belief in Math. Students' achievement in Math is a major variable in predicting students' anxiety in Math. 9. All ten controlled variables in personal variables, family variables and school variables can accout for 30% of total variance of math belief by was of three "canonical factors". Then, these three "canonical factors" can directly explain 31.5% of variance of Math belief. 10. The above ten controlled variables can effectly account for 26.9% of total variance of students' anxiety in Math by way of four "canonical factors". Then, they can also directly explain 53.7% of variance major anxiety in Math. 11. The socio-psychological variables such as the process of parental influences, teachers' behavior and students' interpersonal relationship can effectly discriminate the students of high-low belief/anxiety in Math. According to the results of this study and the inductive conclusion, 5 concrete suggestions is proposed.
期刊論文
1.Campbell, J. R.(1994)。Educational productivity and differential socialization。International Journal of Educational Research,21(7),669-674。  new window
2.Whang, P. A.、Hancock, G. R.(1994)。Motivation and mathematics achievement: Comparisons between Asian-American and non-Asian students。Contemporary Educational Psychology,19(3),302-322。  new window
3.Parsons, J. E.、Kaczala, C. M.、Adler, T. F.(1982)。Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: parental influence。Child Development,53(2),310-321。  new window
4.Campbell, J. R.、Wu, R.(1994)。Gifted Chinese girls get the best mix of family processes to bolster their math achievement。International Journal of Educational Research,21,685-695。  new window
5.Frank, M. L.(1988)。Problem solving and mathematical beliefs。Arithmetic Teacher,35(5),32-34。  new window
6.Jacobs, Janis E.(1991)。Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Parent and Child Mathematics Attitudes。Journal of Educational Psychology,83(4),518-527。  new window
7.Hess, R. D.、McDevitt, T. M.、Chang, Chih-Mei(1987)。Cultural variations in family beliefs about children's performance in mathematics: Comparisons among People's Republic of China, Chinese-American, and Caucasian-American families。Journal of Educational Psychology,79(2),179-188。  new window
8.楊延光、葉宗烈、駱重鳴、徐澄清(19930300)。與數學成就有因素之十年追蹤研究。中華精神醫學,7(1),18-28。  延伸查詢new window
9.鍾思嘉、林青青、蔣治邦(19910800)。國小學童數學焦慮之形成與原因。教育與心理研究,14,99-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.魏麗敏(19910600)。國民中小學生一般焦慮、數學焦慮及數學態度之比較研究。臺中師院學報,5,129-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Becher, R. M.(1980)。Teacher behaviors related to the mathematical achievement of young children。The Journal of Educational Research,73(6),336-340。  new window
12.Campbell, J. R.、Uto, Y.(1994)。Educated fathers and mothers have differential effects on overseas Japanese boys and girls' math achievement。International Journal of Education Research,21,697-704。  new window
13.Marjoribanks, K.(1994)。Social-arithmetics environmental research。International Journal of Education Research,21,441-454。  new window
14.Schommer, M.、Crouse, A.、Rhodes, N.(1992)。Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so。Journal of Educational Psychology,55(3),406-411。  new window
15.Tocci, C. M.、Engelhard, G.(1991)。Achievement, parental support, and gender differences in attitudes toward mathematics。Journal of Educational Research,84(5),280-286。  new window
16.Walberg, H. J.、Fraser, B. J.、Welch, W.(1986)。A test of a model of educational productivity among senior high school students。Journal of Educational Research,79(3),133-139。  new window
17.黃幸美(19950400)。數理與科學教育的性別差異之探討。婦女與兩性學刊,6,95-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Richardson, F. C.、Suinn, R. M.(1972)。The mathematics anxiety rating scale: psychometric data。Journal of Counseling Psychology,19(6),551-554。  new window
19.Schommer-Aikins, M.(1993)。Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students。Journal of Educational Psychology,85(3),406-411。  new window
20.Dweck, Carol S.、Leggett, Ellen L.(1988)。A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality。Psychological Review,95(2),256-273。  new window
圖書
1.林清江(1994)。教育社會學新論--我國社會與教育關係之研究。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kellaghan, T.、Sloane, K.、Alvarez, B.、Bloom, B. S.(1993)。The home environment and school learning: Providing parental involvement in the education of children。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Stevenson, H. W.、Lee, S. Y.(1990)。Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese and Japanese children。  new window
其他
1.Lofland, V. J.(1993)。Mathematics and gender: an analysis of student attitudes toward mathematics at the university of Hawaii, Manoa Campus。  new window
2.Sachs, L.(1995)。Math anxiety elementary education students in a mathematics methods course。  new window
3.Vann, B. D. N.(1993)。Mathematics anxiety: parental anxiety as it relates to anxiety in children。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chipman, S. F.、Wilson, D.(1985)。Understanding mathematics course enrollment and mathematics achievement: A synthesis of the search。Women and Mathematics。New Jersey:Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE