:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從「初稅畝」看周代土地問題--並論「稅畝」的實質意義
書刊名:中山人文學報
作者:黃秀燕 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Show-yen
出版日期:1997
卷期:5
頁次:頁19-44
主題關鍵詞:春秋土地稅賦經濟封建制度The spring and autumn perlodLandTaxEconomyThe feudal system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:185
  • 點閱點閱:36
     本文從魯宣公十五年「初稅畝」一事切入,探討周代土地問題,追溯周代封建制度下經濟體系的特殊性,結合經濟、政治、社會與軍事編制,扼要呈現土地問題與稅收真相。 從周朝政治體系的歷史背景考察,本文針對封建制度下,政治層層分潤關係的事實,兩套稅、賦、役的標準,與鄉遂制的差異,推估「稅畝」的徵收對象,可能稅率、此制的意義,以及稅畝的承啟。 從當時魯國的政治環境與國際現勢考察,本文對齊國、晉國的經濟政策改革作概要敘述,以呈現兩國對魯國產生影響的可能性。根據上述兩層探索,試圖討論《春秋左氏傳》、《公羊傳》、《穀梁傳》對此事注解的異同以及注疏的焦點。 本文首先把歷來對「稅畝」的相關說法,扼要臚列,其次本著對周代土地問題的關鍵性理解,說明: (1)封建制度下經濟體系的特殊性。 (2)「稅畝」的徵收對象。 (3)魯國政治環境與國際間政策交流的可能性。 (4)傳注的焦點範圍。 最後,以時代下變革的態勢以及魯公單純的需求等等可能制法的因素作結。祈盼方家指正。
     "Levy by Acre" (初稅畝) and the Land Polic of the Chou Dyn. It is basically an attempt to look at the fact of "levy by acre" carried out in 594 B.C. during the mid spring and Autumn period in Lu Kuao. The fact was not only connected with the land policy, but also with the political, economic, and military system. The evidence from documentary and archaeological sources proves that there were different requirements of taxation and labor service to make the social administration distinctively between the citizen clans and the slave clans. Benifits from the land policy depended on the relation of noble or base blood as known. Citizens were free and owned some estate, yet, slaves hardly had anything. The situation remained until those discriminations got blurred gradually due to the reformation prevailing in every feudal state. Then, the head of the feudal provinces especially felt it imperative to increase his whealth and to consolidate his strength by asking for changeing. That became an irrepressible tendency and occured just at the mid Spring and Autumn period. It is obvious that a new law of "tax by acre" announced by Lu Shyuan Kuong (魯宜公) in 594 B.C.merely for the reason to show his authority of governing or to do the needful. As a result, the tax rate was even of secondary importance. The research proves that "levy by acre" did not spoil the "Well-Field" system (井田制度) temporarily. Although the feudal order with a hierarchy of feudal classes, the structure of fiefs and clans declined latterly owing to more other complex factors, but not such small change in Lu kuao.
期刊論文
1.劉文強(19910800)。爰田與州兵。大陸雜誌,83(2),32-40。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.杜正勝(1983)。古代聚落的傳統與變遷。第二屆中國社會經濟史研討會。臺北:漢學研究資料及服務中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳瑞庚(1974)。井田問題重探(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.韋昭(1974)。國語。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭玄、賈公彥。周禮。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.何休、徐彥。春秋公羊傳。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.范甯、楊士勛。春秋縠梁傳。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.杜預、賈公彥。春秋左氏傳。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.惠棟。春秋左傳補注。  延伸查詢new window
7.顧奎光。春秋隨筆。  延伸查詢new window
8.顧楝高(1982)。讀春秋偶筆。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.班固、顏師古(1967)。漢書。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬持盈(1980)。中國經濟學史。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳伯瀛(1985)。中國田制叢考。台北:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.竹添光鴻。左傳會箋。台北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.孫貽讓。周禮正義。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.王夫之。春秋稗疏。  延伸查詢new window
15.趙岡、陳鍾毅(1982)。中國土地制度史。台北:聯經出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.楊寬(1964)。古史新探。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.金春峰(1992)。周官之成書及其反映的文化與時代新考。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃仁宇(1989)。赫遜河畔談歷史。台北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.(1985)。中國上古史特定稿。中央研究院史語所。  延伸查詢new window
20.田昌五(1991)。中國古代社會發展史論。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
21.許倬雲(1984)。西周史。臺北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.杜正勝(1990)。編戶齊民。臺北:聯經出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.侯家駒(1985)。先秦法家統制經濟思想。台北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.尹知章、戴望(1981)。管子校正。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.王貴民(1989)。商周制度考信。臺北:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.楊伯峻(1993)。春秋左傳注。台北:洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
27.呂文郁(1988)。周代采邑制度研究。台北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.趙世超(19930000)。周代國野關係研究。臺北:文津出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.杜正勝(19790000)。周代城邦。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE